ACG52

Yes. Pretty much every known fact.

This is the Giant Rubber Band theory.

Put down the bong, and step away from your keyboard. 1. There are at least three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. If M-theory is correct, there are 10 spatial dimensions. 2. Seems a little self-evident. 3. Makes no sense. Dimensions are not higher or lower, or consective. They are all concurrent. You wouldn't say that the forward-back dimension is higher than the left-right dimension, or the up-down dimension. A dimension is a direction of movement. 4. All physical objects exist in all dimensions. However many there are. The rest doesn't mean much.

Just blobs of light and shadow that your mind interprets as faces. There's nothing there.

The 4th dimension is time, and the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th dimensions are additional degrees of freedom of movement.

do you have any math to show this? Or is it just a feeling you have?

It all depends on how big the film is. On a low-budget, independent film my son was in, there was 6 cast and sixteen crew. This is with none of the support staff that gets credited on real movies, the caterers, the drivers, all the electricians, the sound editors, the continuity person, etc, etc. Of course, a big budget film is a sow with many teats, and feeds an extraordinary number of people. That's why it has a big budget.

You really think there will be any details? This may be the least meaningful combination of english words I've ever read.

On thing I've never heard from a hoax nut is, why? Why fake it? The video was right on. We had the rocket, we had spent ten years developing the equipment, We could get the whole mess up to near earth orbit and keep them there, so why fake it? Once you're in orbit, the hardest part is over.

That figure is meaningless. Ever since you learned how to use paint, we've had one meaningless figure after another.

Sounds like it belongs in Speculations.

Tesla2, you make mistake.

We've seen this all before under a different username.

Vaugeries compounding vaugeries.

Nope. No matter how I squint or let my eyes drift out of focus, all I see are a bunch of triangles.

That's nice. Except it doesn't address the points I made and you quoted.

Relativistic energy does not cause an increase in the gravitational field. (Relativistic mass is an outdated concept which doesn't really exist). So, again, you start off in error and proceed from there.

So the experimental results are wrong because they're based on what we know, whereas the nonsense you spout is correct because you say it is. There's seems to be some serious congnitive dissonance at work here.

Gravity has nothing to do with rotation. Jupiter is not a solid body, it consists of gas. Anything else you'd like to get wrong?

Someone showed alpha how to use paint and we've been suffering the results.

It should also be noted that Quasar jets cannot cause atomic blasts.

It's observed, not calculated.

You should keep your nonsense in the Speculation forum. It doesn't belong in Physics.

So you are making an accusation with no evidence to support it. I assume you adhere to the Napoleonic code of justice? BTW, who's 'them'?

Light will always follow the shortest route between points. This is known as the geodesic. Gravity curves the geodesic. Photons always follow the curve of space.