ACG52

At this point, it appears that OP taken the option of abandoning physics completely, in favor of his own imaginings.

Because an object following a curved path through a flat space-time is undergoing acceleration and must have a force applied to it, whereas an object following the geodesic in a curved space-time is an inertial frame. When an object is undergoing acceleration, all parts of it are feeling the same force evenly. An object undergoing tidal gravity feels different force at different parts. Only as viewed from a distant frame. The free-falling object always measures the speed of the light beam at c. The whole 'the object never reaches the even horizon' thing is an illusion, caused by the infinite redshifting of the last photon emitted by the object before crossing the EH. Much of your arguments are based on this illusion. In other words, the only way your ideas could appeal is if the reader is dead ignorant.

There's no theory there.

You don't have a theory. You have delusions.

Nonsensical word salad, created by tossing random terms into the air and reading the entrails of chickens.

The radius of a particle is really dependent on it's mass and it density. Mass alone is no predictor of radius. I don't really get the rest of your post. Wave functions do not combine in that manner.

Oh, completely. Words are slippery things, with meanings and definitions which change over time. They are imprecise, and often increase confusion rather than alleviating it. We've had so many that we can tell when they show up again.

Major nonsense thread.

So where's the theory? All I see is word salad.

Dueling cranks.

Gravity as electromagnetism, the electric universe and Tesla, all wrapped up together.

Gravity follows different laws than electromagnetism. The two really have nothing in common.

It's certainly not a new idea, and it's been debunked too often to keep track of.

From the photon's point of view, yes. It takes zero time IN THE PHOTON'S FRAME OF REFERENCE

From light's frame of reference, yes.

You must also always keep in mind that all velocities (except light) are relative to some other reference frame. You might be in a spaceship traveling at .9c relative to earth, but relative to the ship keeping pace with you, you're not moving at all.

You don't really have a choice. Light travels at the same velocity in all frames of reference, regardless of the relative motion of those frames. In order for this to be so, and it is, both space and time are not absolute, but relative. You keep asking why, and the answer is that's the way the universe works.

Because you are ignoring relativistic time dilation. At the speed of light, time dilates to a stand still (of course, nothing with mass can achieve lightspeed). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

deleted

Only as measured by a observer on earth. You, on the photon, would measure no time at all.

Nonsensical word salad.

I go with the cartoon.

Wow, two whole months? The moderators of this site place a great deal of store in politness, so I'm not sure I can really express my opinion of your 'theories'.

You needn't worry. There is no information in your post. It would seem to be word salad which was assembled by using a random word scientific term generator.

It doesn't matter that it won't work. Illuusio will claim it does, but he'll always be too busy to provide any evidence or results.