ACG52

What's the charge on a neutron? Step in front of a bus and see if it has only the appearence of matter. Shouldn't this be in speculations? It's certainly not physics.

I've got a little desk toy which floats a ball on a stream of air. Anti-gravity? I think not. This is simply flat out wrong. In fact, the entire post runs contrary to what is well known and understood about electromagnetism and how gravity operates. In short, it's just another crank repetition of a long debunked idea.

I'm sorry, but that really doesn't make any sense or have any relevance.

A movie with Ashton Kutcher.

If you want anyone to look at your posts, you should at least supply a short version of whatever it is you think youi've come up with.

If you're talking about quantum entanglement and action at a distance, nothing was transported through space, neither mass nor energy. If you're talking about anything else you'll have to supply the reference. There has been no matter teleported through space, and so no indication that time travel is not impossible.

Yes. It wasn't hard to find. http://ulysses.jpl.n...s/ulss01-02.pdf

A detector works by the photon impacting either the molecules of the film or the electronic sensor. There's no way to detect a photon flying by and not hitting the detector.

He's explaining the physics, which is the only way to explain it. You have yet to demonstrate that.

OK. It's silly meaningless word salad.

Magnetic Reconnection? I'd ask what you're talking about, but you've been asked that since you started.

Would the word 'crank' be inappropriate here?

EmField talks about 'belief'. He doesn't talk about experiment, or observation, or falsification, or verification, he talks about 'belief'. Well, we know he has his 'belief'. Too bad for him that 'belief' is not a part of science.

Just more ungrammatical nonsense.

This sentence makes no sense at all. But then, it's unfair to single out just one nonsensical line, when this thread is composed of such.

Yeah, this is gibberish.

We see the blueshift in the spectrum of the galaxy. Gravity is easily strong enough to overpower dark energy until we reach distances of over 200 million light years between galaxies.

The cranks always seem to feel that Science means looking at everything that comes along. Invoke Sturgeon's Law: "99% of everything is crap".

This thread belongs in speculations, where sense is not required.

No.

Let's take a look at the typical crank/non-expert 'idea'. There is no mathematical rigour to it, indeed, there's generally no math at all. It's usually word salad, with terms being used in ideosynchratic, non-standard ways. It's almost always challenging a hundred years of experimentation and research with no experiments or derivations to support the extravagent claims. It's not that they're reluctant to accept new ideas, it's that they're reluctant to wade through reams of garbage clogging their e-mail inboxes.

They have been. Often. It's just David pays no attention to anything anyone says. It's typical crank behavior.

I think he confuses protons with photons.

Inane

Observationally and experimentally shown to be wrong. Photons interact only with charged particles. Again, wrong. The OPERA experiment at CERN involved the detection of neutrinos. No dark matter needed. And Dark Matter and antimatter are totally different things. It creates gamma rays. Both of the above statements is meaningless babble. Given that all your basic hypothesis are wrong, why look any further.