ACG52

You don't seem to grasp the implications of time dilation. Time runs slower in a moving frame relative to the stationary frame as measured from the stationary frame. For the moving frame, less time passes, as measured from the stationary frame. But as measured in the moving frame, time is running normally. There is no 'slow motion'.

The last time I expressed my opinion of this 'theory', I was cited by a moderator for rudness. Let me simply say that nothing has changed, other than my opinion intensifying.

Still the questions are not addressed, and we are simply asked to assume that the OP is correct. This is your data source? This thread really belongs in Speculations.

You start by introducing the laymen to the theory of relativity, with particular respect to relative time dilation. Quite well. Your ignorance does not falsify the theory.

You've never answered any questions, just repeated your same assertions. What is the mechanism which would cause star formation in the center of the galaxy to effect stars in the spiral arms. Are you aware that most star formation takes place in the spiral arms? Do you know that the reason the moon has moved away from the earth is due to tidal effects? Do you know that the reason the solar system does not move towards or away from the galactic center is because it is orbiting it? Until these questions are answered, there's no reason to believe that your 'theory' has any validity.

No, those photons are what make up the CMBR.

At this point, I would be tempted to use the descriptive term 'crank'.

Dark energy. Dark matter is something else entirely.

No math, no mas.

You sort of miss the point. You use the equations from that study. It's your nonsense 'work'.

Get a blog.

I read it. That's 10 minutes of my life that I'll never get back. 6 pages of woo.

This is just more nonsense.

More word salad. Do you use a random phrase generator?

Word salad.

What was meaningless was your original statements. Those are meaningless.

No, they don't. No, it doesn't.

alpha2cen is once again hijacking a thread with nonsense.

Actually antimatter has been produced and captured for as long as 16 minutes. It is quite solidly confirmed.

Neither BH would negate the gravity of the other, until the event horizons actually touched, at which time the two holes merge into one.

Totally agree.

What logic? Do you know anything about cosmology, astrophysics or astronomy?

If we're going to discuss Bermuda Triangle woo, this thread should be moved to Speculations.

Again, you make a statement with no basis behind it and refuse, or are unable to provide any explanation. You don't have a message.

David, I've been trying to avoid this phrase, but everything you've posted is illogical nonsense. You have absolutely NOTHING to support anything you've said. This is just woo.