Mosheh Thezion

everything you said... maybe true... and my view.. my theory.. maybe completely off.. or slightly off... that changes nothing. the universe... is anything but chaotic... or random.. in fact there are beautiful patterns which show clearly... chaos... or what is called chaos theory.. actually describes natural patterns.. patterns... which stem from the point of creation... which many call the big bang... these patterns... are clear... and suggest great order... natural law... law set forth... by the design of the universe.. the result of natural law... then.. leads to life forms.. which follow these patterns... such as right hand twists..... there is no randomness... no chaos... there is beauty and order... patterns.. which are repeated.... this... does not suggest chaos... it suggests design... a design... which lead to creation. To suggest... scripture... written 3000 years ago... MUST BE EXACTLY RIGHT... OTHERWISE ITS ALL WRONG.. IS FOOLISH. SURE.. SCRIPTURE.. CAN BE WRONG... FLAWED... SURE.. I CAN BE WRONG. but.. to suggest that all the order we see in the heavens and in the sciences... is not based on natural design is false. there is a natural design... natural laws... universal constants... I again... cannot tell you anything about god... as there is no evidence... there is only what we observe in this universe. I... say.. and see... that the patterns.. suggest a natural pattern of formation... which Atheists.. like to say is just natural random chaos. But... if it be natural... then it could all be caused... by the application of specific qualitive energy which... caused that formation. Some critisize me for... not providing the equations of creation.. when discussing field theory... but.. The issue... of equations to describe all of creation... would only suggest a god... who wrote the equation... and applied it... by design. I see no conflict between creation and evolution. The entire concept of the universe being 6000 years old... is lame.. I do not support it. I support.. that god.. is so great.. he created all of nature... to develop so that odds are... life will form.. by design.. under evolution standards.. and here we are. The very question of whether there is a creator cannot be avoided.... and the evidence.. suggests.. yeah... could be... much more than it suggest that there is not. Besides if there is not... if life has no purpose or meaning.. or value after we die... then why hold back??? why not rape a kill.. just for fun? truth is... religion.. has always been mankinds greatest asset... as it give people reason to behave and work together. Without religion... we have chaos.. of the mind. The question of god.. cannot ever be answered... but we can discuss the evidence.. and nothing has every suggested that the universe is chaos and random formation.. yet... if you can show chaos... if you can show.. randomness... then I will be happy to consider it. please... show me why I should think that way. -Mosheh Thezion

My belief in a God... as creator... that.. which applied the energy in creation... is found here... > http://empiricalchurch.org/theory/ specifically... here --> http://empiricalchurch.org/createvolutionism/ There is no evidence... about god... as god would exist outside our universe.... but... that one may exist.. seems very likely based on the evidence of this universe. I would say... science supports the god concept.. generally... as the source of the energy of creation, since Big bang is highly flawed... and the universe is anything but chaotic. -Mosheh Thezion

Well.. we can only presume, you mean to insulate a bottle... in which case... yes... wrap in foil, and use as thick layer of foam as possible. However... you should... want to remove all air gaps.... i.e.. make the bottle fit.. as snugly.. perfectly.. into the styofoam as possible,... thick foam... a big block... with a exact hole cut out... probably... cut a cube... as large as the bottle... then cut it in half... and carve out the two halves of the cavity... which you would put the bottle in. test it.. over and over.. as you cut out foam.. to get it to fit as perfectly as possible.. and then... tape it shut when it fits good. I.. would wrap it in aluminum foil... and then make the box of foam... and then.. tape over it.. with say... plastic packing tape... the goal being to prevent any air which is between the foam and the bottom, or foil... from rising out... tape up the top... as that will hold in the air.... as rising air.. will cause loss. (Do not cover the top openning of the bottle.. obviously... just wrap it well... so no air can escape.) also.. do not forget the bottom... and top... both can allow heat loss.... If this... is your project... then.. the thicker the foam.. the better.. but anything more than 3 inches would be a waste probably.... the real thing.. is preventing air.. from escaping... and then cover the top with a foam cap... to keep the cap from leaking heat. I wouldnt use the bristol board... I'd stick with foil or mylar... and thick styro foam. I wish I was in the 7th grade... I would be a much better student than I was then... By the way... you may want to read this... http://mosheh.org/Education.html the study method you use... will have a great effect on how well you do... and how far you can go... -Mosheh Thezion

The theory... as proposed... is a description of a dimensional progressive pattern. It is my claim, that all... all.. of what is known as empirical evidence.... fits. It is based on what the abundance of evidence suggests. I have found nothing which cannot be fit... fit... into the progressive dimensional pattern as described. This is very simple people... too simple. Some of you, want an equation to explain it all... and that.. if you understood the theory is harder to produce than you would think. As.. there are numerious variations which can be considered, and those variations would change what we would put forth as equations of everything. here is the problem... So let me be clear... its not complete. ITS A WORK IN PROGRESS. HOWEVER.... the basics are there... as a presentation of a dimensional progressive pattern. The theory... proposes a Dimensional Progressive pattern, in levels of energy manifesting as levels of motion (state) of a spatial ether (space), where in the developmental patterns of energy are pre-destined by the quality of the applied energy... the first and foremost quality of that applied energy being PI.. which sets the scales of what we know of as dimensions.... for if PI.. had a different value then the progressive development would of been different. If I had that equation of everything... and had it all correct, then it would be like holding the keys of the universe, and even if I had it, I would not share it here. The point of all of this... IS THAT IT FITS ALL THE ABUNDANT EVIDENCE. IT CAN... propose many things... sure. But what matters is that it fits with the evidence... that is my claim. It unifies all forms of energy. It unifies all the sciences under one theory. It unifies all of creation as being... one natural pattern of formation, where in we CAN SEE CLEARLY... HOW IT FORMED.. AND HOW THIS THEORY FITS. THAT.. is my claim... that it fits. If you want to crush it... the best way.... is to point to evidence which suggests otherwise. -Mosheh Thezion

My unifying field theory.... in another thread... explains for TIME... very easily.. simply... showing the mechanism... by which it occurs.. and is based. I say this... rather than posting the Jpeg here... Consider it... if you will. -Mosheh Thezion

I should repeat... the links... lead to 30 pages.... with pictures... I did not post 30 pages... as it would eat up band width... but will post them as needed. -Mosheh Thezion I'll start... theory page one... from : http://empiricalchurch.org/theorydetails/ theory page two.... and theory page three... That... is a good start.... That... explains the basics... I will await the attack.... -Mosheh Thezion

umm... and that... is not an argument. I only respect people when they can at least try... try.. to tear it to pieces.... You.. will find that much harder to do than it seems at first. lets start the debate.... shall we... or back away. I did not post this, expecting to be treated nicely.. I expect an attack. I guess I will have to wait for someone else. -Mosheh Thezion

Thank you... as i said... there is more.... much more.

it did... I am the founder. follow the link at the top... but... its a pluralist religious order... where all religions is studied.. and truth... is tempered by science, evidence, and theory.. and when they fit... then they fit. I should point out this... from : http://empiricalchurch.org/createvolutionism/ and.. of course.. there is more.... but thats enough to start with.... Remember... it was not my intention to support Genesis.... it just turned out that way. -Mosheh Thezion

From : http://empiricalchurch.org/theory/ The following image was draw by my own hand, being Mosheh, and represents, as well as I am able, a description of the theory. My proposals are based around the idea of a natural progressive dimensional pattern of formation for our universe as space and time and matter. This image shows a potential pattern for consideration, which suggests 16 dimensions, while in theory we may consider and discuss potentially upto 28 dimensions. Below is illustrated a simple natural progressive rise pattern for dimensional motions and transitions of state on a spatial ether, as a transindental fluid, which condescends to obey certain natural laws set forth by the variable quality of the applied energy, as force, in the development process of universal formation. The texts which follow will be my attempt to make sense of this image to you, so that you may precieve its use and value and how it clearly relates to many religious and spiritual considerations which I have found can only serve to strenghtens ones faith in a God of some kind, and does so with honest theoretical perspectives on real established empirical evidense, in other words, all of modern science. Hence the Reason for an Empirical church.... Because my personal faith is derived through science and made clear with theory, which is based in very real evidense. It is my belief that there is every, every, every good reason to believe in a God of somekind, based on the evidense. I discovered, that the proposed dimensional progressive pattern fits very nicely with the very pattern found in Genesis chapter one, and more than this, theory was developed by examination of the evidense, and it is my belief, because, I have found that the evidense overall tends towards suggesting the application of energy from an outside source, since the idea of internal storage as from a big crunch, is extremely problematic to even consider with any seriousness. This source of applied energy would then be a God of some kind. Hence my faith which is based in evidense and organised into clarity by the highly complex yet simple theory I will now attempt to explain. (Special NOTE : As you read this you will come to the section regarding atoms, and nucleons, and you will notice that I propose simply solid nucleon cores, which is fitting with this here description of a 4 circle rise patterm and 16 dimensions, however, such is not written in stone, and as an abundance of evidence suggests nucleons are piles of Nuetrons and Protons, I accept that such may very well be the case, such that, in the 11th dimension, when the nucleon core mass explodes, and forms the solar system, that explosion is likely to of been in the form of a mass nuetron emmision, and as we all know, nuetrons will decay in 12 seconds to form a proton and an electron, and as such, such a 11th dimensional expansion, or explosion, would result in a nuetron cloud, which quickly decays into protons, and in that jumble, these protons and nuetrons, would likely combine and form the various atoms which we know of today. So, while my given proposal of solid nucleons, may be completely wrong, this does not damage or infer that Theory as a whole is wrong, in fact both senarios fit quite nicely, and there is no major conflict. However, this kind of discussion, would be found in a larger discussion of upto 7 circle rises, and 28 dimensions, which would then also suggest various levels of complexity within the realm of photons and magnetic and electrical forces, which are as yet un-seen, and the author, myself, chooses to keep these consideration to myself, as propriortory knowledge to be used in research and development in my own laboratories. Yet for those of you with the skills and knowledge to do so, you should be able to quickly infer exactly what I mean by various levels of complexity in the realm of the sub atomic, meson, and photon realm.) There is more.. much more... such as.... and.... There is more... but ... this... explains all the basics. Arguments please... but before you say it... yes.. it has some spelling errors.. as I wrote this on a primitive machine long ago, without spell check.. so. any real arguments are welcome.. of course. -Mosheh Thezion

Moving my thread topic... is fine... but not my name... THAT IS LAME... Removed personal information. it is my information to give... or not. As to the proposal.... It should be noted... fusion can be done with no more than 10,000 volts... as is done with hand held neutron sources ... which are readily available.. and old technology. The very concept... of needing millions and millions of degrees... is simply not fact... what is needed is only energy levels of activity.... which can easily be done with 50,000 volts... and while the first problem people will see, is that with higher gas density... we would need high voltages.. and that is true, but generating voltage is not difficult science. -Mosheh Thezion

In praise of God, our heavenly father, almighty creator of the universe. To the people of earth, To those in government, who care about fusion and leading the world. From : Mosheh Eesho Muhammad Al-faraj Thezion, Caliph of God, Avatar General of the Empirical Church of Humanity, Concerning : My present proposals for solving the fusion problem. Concerning : If I had a small lab, I could prototype a reactor within a month. I write this unto you, because it is clear, I do not have (and may not likely have) the time, or money, to pursue the avenue of research I am compelled to believe is the right and only direction fusion research should be going in. Namely, I have designed a system for study which is based on all the clear problems which exist with all of the well known methods which are presently wasting millions upon millions of dollars, year after year. I offer this, because it may be so important that it should be shared before and in case I die. (And if you show no interest, I will offer it to the world.) This letter takes the following format. 1) Problems with modern efforts in generating worthwhile fusion power outputs. 2) My proposed parameters. 3) My proposed designs to work from... with. (The specific Avenue of study I would pursue if I had the money and time to build a small lab with the proper tools and equipment, which would cost pennies in comparison to what most are doing.) --------------------- PROBLEMS WITH MODERN EFFORTS a) First and foremost, energy in > (is greater than) energy out... hence no gain. b) Second, is that even though fusion does occur in these many devices, it occurs too slowly and at too low a mass rate of conversion to offset all the losses in the HOT PLASMA SYSTEMS. c) Hot plasma systems, are inherently flawed, as they by their nature, they must use three things, namely, a low pressure ionized gas, a means to heat it, and a wasteful magnetic field to confine it. d) The major losses of energy, are in the magnetic confinement of a HOT PLASMA and the energy put in to heat the plasma, and that which is lost due to the in-efficiency of cooling/ heat exchange systems.(50% for steam systems.) e) In order to work, these devices, ATTEMPT TO DO WHAT SOME BELIEVE STARS ARE DOING USING Gravitational confinement, of which there are many, such as the Tokamak etc, which all must needs reach higher and higher temperatures, with the idea of reaching some plateau where 'over unity' is achieved.. HOWEVER, as each machine is built and we reach greater and greater temperatures, the energy we seek to draw out is not to be found. Magnetic confinement uses a lot of power to maintain its fields at a great loss. Inertial confinement using pulses of energy on pellets again, are attempting to achieve states of gravitational confinement with conditions which are anything but, regardless of temperature. I.e.. what purpose is there to super heat a pellet if it is not confined? Gases will first and foremost use its energy to expand if able. Not to mention other methods along these same lines which all may work to some degree and fusion does occur but always at low levels and below the energy being put in, which is a testament to their inefficiency. f) Other efforts use other temperature based presumptions in their efforts, or otherwise do not allow for the considered output as an energy source and in their rush to smash atoms they over kill and build systems of such inefficiency as to require a whole building to store and maintain it at great costs, as if massive power levels will make up for improper designs, and we all know, full well, it does not. g) The inherent losses in these systems is clear, and it is based on two things, the use of low pressure plasma gases and the magnetic confinement which uses up huge amounts of power, and while made part of the heat exchange system, is under these conditions NOT AN EFFECTIVE USE OF POWER, and is likened to using and building a massive super machine to sew thread, And by this I mean these PLASMA systems are inherently un-efficient, because so much is wasted just to reach the temperatures needed to get even a little energy out. And generally the amount of matter to be fused is low, due to being in the form of a low pressure plasma, which cannot be run at high pressures either, hence the entire effort is hindered by fundamental natural design limitations. Limits = limits. --------------------- MY PROPOSED PARAMETERS. a) The gas (DT) to be fused, should come in the form of a gas, at the highest pressure possible to put as much matter in as small a space as possible in any reactor. (By this I mean 1-35psi.. or higher.. etc. inside the fuser based on the limits of the material strengths.) b) The energy to achieve fusion maybe millions of degrees in temperature, but that small energy value is achieved by high voltage states such as 10,000 ev to 100,000 ev or more. (Again should be maximized to suit material strengths.) c) The rates of reaction, for fusion is extremely high.. fast, meaning that in any system we build the fact is, fusion occurs at such small scales and high rates / energy scales, that any pulse or supply of energy we use need be focused on placing as much power onto as much DT and as fast as possible, and or then sustain it for specific periods, to drive fusion in bulk and sustain it over and over. (meaning that if pulses are used then during a long pulse, only the top range of V energy may yield, and a higher frequency in any one device would allow for more pulses to levels needed per input unit of energy and time, and a focus must be made to use all applied energy in as efficient manner as possible. (Resonate systems) d) The use of (effort of) 'magnetic confinement of plasma' is best converted into 'magnetic constriction and compression of plasma', where in we use magnetic energy as a hammer, and pulse high energy field pulses which by natural law can be used to compress and otherwise move ionized gases. e) The use of DT as a fuel in any truly effective efficient reactor, will require a COMPLETELY SEPERATE system of gas removal and separation to recover usable DT as fuel, as well as Tritium and Helium 3. Meaning, even if the device does not produce energy as an output gain, as long as it breaks even, and efficiently converts DT into Tritium and He3, then it would serve a great purpose, and the goal in any design should be to convert as much gas as possible per second, hence high pressures of DT to be used. (He3 is one of the most valuable substances on earth.. and my machine should produce it as waste.) f) Any DT+DT or potential DT+Tritium reaction, will be in the 10 million ev energy range on its neutron flux, and this will require specific levels of shielding to protect the user and society as a whole. Such that under perfect conditions presuming the reactor is a small marble sized object, then 4 inches of lead on each side would work to shield the reactor.. meaning the reactor need not be massive, but its shielding must meet specific limits, and this shows, that the smaller the device, the more efficient and cost effective it would be in its construction, operation and use. (small enough to fit in a truck!) g) Technically, any worthwhile fusion reactor will produce about 100 times the neutron flux per unit of energy produced as a Uranium fission reactor, and the potential for radioactive waste from its operation is very real and high, yet, as a Uranium fission reactor is of 100 million ev range of energy, fusion is only 10 million ev, thereby allowing fusion reactors to use 1/10th the thickness of shielding. h) The ideal parameters to reproduce the conditions in the sun with gravitational confinement, would then clearly be, a high pressure DT gas, which is ionized and charged to such a degree as to provide for considerable energy levels of ionization, and on top of this to expose this high pressure ionized DT gas to an extremely high energy magnetic pulsing field, of such magnitude and design as to provide compression and extreme agitation to all ionized DT nucleons in the reactor. i) Since the rate of Fusion is so fast, during any pulse system, only peek levels are likely to yield gains, and as such designs must serve to meet the need of applying the right levels of each type of energy, with exact and proper timing to maximize results. j) The key parameters being : Small as possible, high pressure DT fuel gas under confinement and extremely ionized, and magnetically compressed to hammer fusion to occur, and using all energy inputs in their most efficient manners. k) Any fusion reactor of any worth, could also be used to create specific isotopes in the shielding and potentially generate fusion induced transmutation which may, result in fission or at least high energy alpha particle emission and great energy gains. (However any attempt to generate secondary nuclear reactions, may exceed the shielding limits and change the exposure and shielding parameters, which would require a larger and larger device as energy levels (millions of eV) go up beyond the 10 million eV level.) --------------------- MY PROPOSED DESIGNS TO WORK FROM... WITH. In the following descriptions I will refer to Figures(Fig) 1,2,3 as numbered images presented to make clear the design parameters as I see them operating... and the first steps to be taken, and how I WOULD pursue the study of operation and improvements. Fig. 1 shows the most basic design principle. Fig. 2 shows what might be an improvement from Fig. 1. Fig. 3 shows considerations on inputs and how they may be varied to a large degree in pursuit of the most efficient methods of input to generate an output. Figure 1 : As shown, there is a central chamber (much smaller than shown) with two flat polished terminals with highly insulated edges and backing, designed to fit the diameter of the central tube like chamber, in which is placed high pressure DT gas. At the outside edges of the central fusor core tube, there are high magnetic permeability high frequency core material, which must itself be highly non-conductive and insulated to high voltage, even at high temperatures and heavy neutron flux. This material is likely needed to fill the space above and bellow the fusor core, and provide the needed shielding to both shield and absorb thermal energy as per its exposure based on size. The entire core then, is the core of a magnetic field coil, and Figure one shows a cross section of said LOW OHM coil, being made of thick copper tubing, which then maybe filled with Lead, or usable transmutable isotopes, or otherwise the coil wire may itself be 1/4 or 1/2 inch diameter lead wire which I propose to use as cheapest and allowing us to avoid any isotopes which may retard shielding value in the long term. The ACTUAL DIAMETER... OF SAID COIL.. and so.. the limits of its INDUCTANCE.. ARE SET BY THE MATERIAL NEEDS OF SHEILDING. Meaning, that since we can most easily use thick lead wire, 1/4 inch diameter to build the coil, what we must do, is layer it, to such a degree as to be equal to 4 inches of lead surrounding the core, over all. This thereby sets the theoretical minimum size of said reactor, which will end up being slightly more than 8 inches in diameter, with 8 inches being the minimum with fusion at the center. And as we imagine a core which is perhaps one inch thick with insulation, meaning the device may possibly fit into a space of one to two feet wide. Clearly, coil design matters as thicker wire, and less turns will provide less inductance and so a higher frequency of operation in the coil, as the coils are best energized by the disruptive discharge of a high voltage capacitor, under resonate condition to generate maximum heavy amp pulses through the field coil. However, as field intensity is desired to be high, I choose to start with a lower diameter lead wire, and more coil turns, and so a greater inductance, but a lower resonate frequency, and I would offset this rise in inductance by using the highest voltage possible in the capacitors which are to feed the coil by disruptive discharge. In operation the goal then, is to provide across the gap inside the core, a high voltage spark discharge, which has the power, in amps, to create a ionization of the majority of the core chamber, and that during the full amp discharge across the tube, the field coil, is also pulsed, with maximum power, to then compress the core ions into the tightest path possible, which then, would raise the pressure level to extremes, allowing for fusion. The effort then, is to blast the specific needed power to ionize the whole core, and to provide massive magnetic hammer compression. The entire coil, and core, is by this design, meant to sit in a bath of high temperature oil which not only insulates the core and coil to high voltages, but also acts as a heat exchanger, which naturally easily transfers heat from the coil lead metal of the shield into heated oil which rises up threw the coil, and creates a natural cycling tendency of oil as it is heated. The research then, is finding the limits of voltage and power input, coil design and so frequency of operation of hammer field coil, as well as the frequency of spark discharge in the core, and its timing patterns in relation to the hammer field coil timing and frequency, not to mention... what I call offsets... meaning high voltage polarity biasing of the entire core during operation and so increasing ion potentials and concentrations. Figure 2 : Fig 2 shows an alternative, possibly higher energy fusion core design, which is as shown at the bottom, meaning a two terminal array, with one terminal in the form of a TUNGSTON rod shaft in the center, and the other terminal in the form of a ring, equally distances around the center rod. This configuration is unique in that it would cause the high voltage ionizing discharge in the core, to occur at 90 degree angles to what would occur in Figure one, as previously described. Meaning, in Figure one, the arc energy, the high voltage discharge which slams through the core does so... in a direction which... is parallel to the field lines of the compressing magnetic field of the coil. Meaning in Figure one, the ion flow and field motion, would effect the ion flow in a specific manner, causing a major squeeze of heavily ionized gas at very high pressure and temperature. In figure two, we see that with a 90 degree shift caused by the ring format, that several differences are had.... Namely.. the amount of effective power which can be blasted across said core, by high voltage high amp discharges is much larger than can occur with a straight tube format, as the effective volume of gas which can handle the load of current across it is much larger, as could be the diameter of the core, thus the work potential should be much higher. Also, in Figure two, the effect of the high energy pulsing magnetic hammer field would have a much different effect.. such that timing and polarities would become important to be able to adjust the timing of field and current and voltage levels to meet and cooperate on the gas in the core and smash it, over and over into super excited states and so fusion. In figure two, we can see that during a pulse from the central rod which is (can be) positive, and outer ring is negative, would potentially generate a biased positively charged cloud of ions near the center rod, and that then upon field coil compression, would be driven together into high states of pressure while maintaining the high voltage energy state. In figure two, we may also consider that arcing plasma across the Fig 2 core, would potentially be effected on some other local scale, preventing motion, causing back ups, and pressure waves of ions following and being driven by what might be low frequency field coil wave forms, squeezing ions toward the center or otherwise creating pressure waves to induce higher levels of compression and collision. Ideally with the figure 2 design format, maximum power would likely be found if the core chamber can be found to resonate with ions and fields, and so forth to set up circular patterns of energy which would cooperate and work together to drive a sustained reaction such as a microwave ovens chamber may do when tuned properly, however in this case, our interest is in forming a stable circular ion flow pattern which is large and perfect for magnetic compression during field pulses. Or otherwise, patterns of disruption and disturbance may be induced into the gas to drive various levels of compression fusion. One of the problems with Figure two, is that the terminal connections would need special connections altering the perfect symmetry of the field in the core, and the potential between the outer ring and the field coil would be higher and require more separation, further effecting field quality, and limiting voltage in the core. Another issue is that IF low power is used this Fig 2 core, could be used, if the field coil pulses are tuned and made to effect ions in flow to compress, and that power across the core would be independent of field core power, and so adjustable, from lowest power to highest power. However, if, this Figure 2, flat circular disk design is used, then it may be found that full efficient energy output is only had when the core is stressed with maximum arc spark flow across all gases, and driving full ionization and setting up full pressure waves of ions to maximize collision odds and so reactions. The consideration of odds, based on ionization levels and current flows of voltages, with gas volumes, and magnetic field pulses and energy levels, gives us all the tools to work with, if... if... if... if.. if... if.. if... if.. if.. we wake up to the fact that to do fusion reaction work efficiently, that WE MUST LISTEN TO NATURE AND NATURAL LAWS OF SCIENCE.... and the fact is.. The fundamental mode of proposed operation being based on collisions, and trying to mimic gravitational confinement, by way of high pressure gases being overwhelmed by high voltage ionization, and compressed and confined by perfectly timed waves of magnetic field energy to bring all these forces together in a dense gas of DT, allowing for stressed conditions to be formed which will ... should yield... high efficiencies of reaction.... is the basic goal of all fusion research, and is the foundation of this design. Figure 3 : Fig 3 shows circuit proposals, and wave pattern aspects to begin with, as we seek to study working with and using high pressure DT gas, in fusion cores, in various potential forms of high pressure magnetic compression reactors. The variables in design are.... a) core design, maximize current to gas volume.. (no escape = full ionization of all gas.) b) maximum permeability to ac, at high frequency, of core parts, with coil. c) Field coil inductance and shielding / heat exchange material. d) frequency rates and harmonic quality, of field coil / core spark current and frequency. e) the Capacity size of power sources for both, field coil and core spark. f) The voltage potential of all systems, maxed to strength of parts. g) Voltage Potential biases to offset behavior. h) outside gas processing and recycling sub-system. As shown in Fig 3, a) The core, which may be as described in Figures 1 or 2, is shown upclose, with the circular dots representing the total volume of gas particles in the chamber, with the idea being that to function best, ideally we would apply enough power as voltage and amps, to create an arc of sufficient thickness literally to ionize what can be consider all the gas, or basically as much as we can, and this can be modified and approached in many ways, such as odd shapes for the core gas chamber, thinner cores, special electrodes, and perhaps doping the gas in some way to help conduction if possible which could include radiation sources. If we can push the vast volume of a dense gas of DT into an instantaneous super heated ionized state, then that volume of gas could be considered as ripe for harvesting. b) As shown, as (b) the two magnetic core masses at the ends of the core.. shown above and bellow the core, are technically very important, as they serve several functions, namely they could boost the effective magnetic field and allow more field lines to be driven into the core, than could empty space, or oil, or otherwise. The need for maximum field lines in the core, suggests two magnetic pole pieces as shown, which then, must have several qualities, namely NON-CONDUCTIVE, as it must hold the high voltage inputs and insulate them, it must be able to withstand the neutron flux as well as the lead shielding or those areas above and bellow the core, would literally be neutron leak zones... where the hot neutron flux is able to pass considerable distances in oil and air.. which can be bad.... VERY BAD. And, this material should and must be able to add, and increase the field line passage and flow and change, such that it must also have low hysteresis losses at the frequency used, which is problematic, so in truth, these core end pieces are unfortunately a needed and yet difficult to construct or even imagine material. However, we could use Iron for example, but this then requires that we add, about 3 inches of lead bellow and above the reactor when sitting in the pool of oil. The need for extra 4 inch pieces of lead at a distance from the core, requires MORE LEAD, and so having to add these outside lead shields, would ADD CONSIDERABLE WEIGHT to the reactor which is not needed. NOT NEEDED IF WE CAN USE SOME FORM OF LEAD OR SUCH BASED magnetic end pieces. But again this requires research and development of designer materials. And at this time my intention was to use a mix of Lead Oxide and iron filings soaked in oil, with a thick glass or ceramic tube down the middle to carry the high voltage lines. c) As shown we see a cross section of the reactor, with the core in the middle, the two end pieces above and bellow, with high voltage input lines to the core, and the field coil, which is as proposed made entirely of lead wire, wrapped to form the inductance we desire. there by serving all purposes, of conductor for the field coil, with thick wire for low resistance, capable of handling the heavy neutron flux and shielding it and absorbing the neutrons, and converting the energy into heat, which then perfectly is able to transfer it to the oil bath which not only serves as the heat transfer system, but also serves as the electrical insulation for the field coil turns, and the core, and end pieces, and allows everything to be cooled by that same oil bath, while also insulated for high voltages. It is possible to use copper wire, etc.. and use separate outside around the side lead shielding, however, as we expand out from the core area, the amount of lead needed goes up and up, as we will need the 4 inches around an 8 inch diameter sphere, or 4 inches around a 24 inch diameter sphere, and clearly we want to be as close to the small sphere as possible. I had also considered using a high temperature alloy of copper lets say, as thick 1/2 inch tubing, and inside the tubing I place a form of low melting temp metal, made of Lead and Bismuth etc, such as 'Woods metal, and then use the liquid metal as the heat transfer material and shielding and set up a pump system to pump the warm liquid metal through the tubes, and so easily pump the heated liquid metal coming out of the hot reactor directly into a boiler of simple design... however, there would be numerous complications with this such as being LEAKY OF RADIATION.. and boiler exposure to stray neutrons in the liquid metal, but, this method could possible operate a much higher temperatures than can be achieved with Lead wire and hot oil... i.e.. Lead can melt.. at about 700 degrees f, and oils have similar limits, and so with a ceramic encased field coil / shield coil, with liquid shield metal pumped through the tubes of the field coil.. would allow the Lead to melt, and as long as the materials of the Core and end pieces and field coil tubes and ceramic encasing can handle the temperatures, then it might be possible to run the reactor at 1000 degrees f, or 2000 f, the limit being only a question of how much can the materials stand, and for how long? Again, this liquid metal direction would have its benefits, however the need for extra shielding and complications with radiation in the boiler would make this approach very difficult to imagine for any application other than large industrial size installations where shielding size and weight is NOT a problem, because its not meant to ever be moved after it has been installed. d) This shows the simple idea that the timing by which we blast an arc across the core, and when we blast power through the field coil is obviously very important. And here is where we will need to do abundant research using the full range of variations, and attempting to tune everything in to some form of resonance or if nothing else, harmonic conditions where applied forces like waves, combine and create zones of energy and pressure within the core to yield the desired result efficiently. And, one can see that if there was a large difference between the frequencies of the field coil and core, then effects which are similar to microwave oven magnetron circular patterns can be set up in core designs as discussed in figure 2. And this all suggests, that perhaps the core, should be charged BY A DC high voltage, instead of AC, and that the field coil, should be pulsed with massive DC pulses, and that in this way, the core as from figure 2, can be made into a magnetron like core, with the standing field, causing the arcing power flow to set up rotational aspects which if tuned properly could set the core into a resonate condition, of flowing ions, but as this is a dense gas, the power must be way up and its function will be next to impossible, yet, with large power application, and biasing of polarity we should be able to get a good ion cloud near the positive terminal and when the field coil pulses we can imagine compression. Yet, I do not choose to go in this direction, as with DC there is no dynamic aspect to it, and the ions in the core can be clustered, and polarized, and options become more limited as there are fewer variables to adjust or tune in. While in AC efforts, everything is dynamic, meaning ions in flow in both directions, and the ability to use resonance makes the entire effort easier. Although, I would test DC efforts, just in case. e) These are the high voltage capacitors suggested as the means of empowering the field coil and core, and while I show simple spark gaps, clearly we would need discharge controls as discussed in d) above, to regulate the timing of the two discharges to work together. Ideally the spark gap we use must be such as to have the lowest ohms when discharged, and this is not easy to do, however according to Tesla an Arc in air maybe about 10-20 ohms, and lets say 10 ohms at best, so lets charge the capacitor to 50,000 volts, and as we disruptively discharge the capacitor the instantaneous amps are.. V / R = I 50,000 / 10 = 5000 amps.. so the first wave of discharge across the coil or core could be in the 5000 amp range, and VxI = watts 50,000 x 5000 = 250,000,000 watts, of instantaneous power... meaning.. it would be that.. if it lasted.. but it does not, it lasts only a micro second, 12 oscillations of the capacitor discharge and its over. But clearly, during the first 1 or 2 waves of a high voltage disruptive discharge of a capacitor, we can in this way, apply to the core, massive power levels measured in millions of watts, and literally with 1000's if not 10's of 1000's of amps, applicable to the field coil and core. It is for this reason that I choose AC instead of DC, because applying these kind of power levels with AC is easy, but with DC, it becomes very complicated and BIG... in SIZE AND MONEY. And what must be made clear is that regardless of what is shown in Figure 3, the effort is to get all the amp discharge across the gas core, meaning the spark gap in question, IS THE CORE, OR CAN BE.. SHOULD BE. f) These represent the main power supplies, which can be as neon transformers, 10,000 volts to any source of high voltage, where in, the higher the better, and the maximum we apply is based on the limits of the core and reactor design, using ceramic insulation and oil, It is reasonable to start with 50,000 volts or so, and test conditions. Yet I see no reason why we cannot proceed with 12,000 volts, as using the lower voltage makes it easier to design a smaller core... one inch long, one cm wide... tube.. is about right for 12,000 volts or so. g) These illustrate the potential use of DC offsets, of.. the AC running system, such that for example using diode connected to the core, would potentially bleed out electrons to ground, thus if the core circuit was closed and insulated, then the entire circuit could be charged and polarized to a high voltage positive or negative, with the idea being that in this way the ionized gases, are likely to stay ionized longer, because we create an inherent lack, shortage of electrons. There is also described the use of triboelectric generators such as Vande-graph etc, which could be used to drive major DC offsets, or, COULD BE USED ALONE, IN THE CORE, WITHOUT ANY AC being applied, meaning, if the core had one terminal, and that terminal was charged to one million volts positive, the gas around the core center rod, would for example, be surrounded by an ion cloud, naturally, all positive ions of DT, and then the field coil could manifest compression. It is difficult to say which is the best direction to go in, therefore I show both, and would do both, and test both, and if possible combine both, and always work to slam as much power into the core as possible. h) This is perhaps the most important part of side equipment, as without it, it becomes impossible to use the reactor safely, because one of the waste products of the reactor would be Tritium which is very bad for humans, and must be handled and processed properly, not to mention that Helium 3, is also a product and just so happens to be one of the most valuable element on earth, and therefore should NOT BE WASTED... CANNOT BE WASTED. Also at some point the reactor will have to have its gas changed, or to operate properly an active gas flow may be found needed, and either way, a system of recycling and separation and collection must be had to not only make it all safe, but to recover un-used DT, and allow for the collection of T and He3, both of which could be used as fuel also, but doing so may change some parameters. Yet technically, this type of reactor should allow the DT, to form T and He3, and then use those also, until its all done. Yet since we can sell He3, we might want to change the gas early, or not, depending on markets. The description of how we separate those gases would be complex and there are numerous options but its need is absolute, as without it, one will have to dump the waste gases, which is not only insanely dangerous and unhealthy, but is like throwing money down the drain. ------------------- Considerations to begin with... is simply that the goals of fusion research efforts, should, in my view be based on the full ionization and magnetic compression of a small volume of the highest pressure DT gas possible, and that is it these levels of high pressure, high voltage, and high magnetic constriction which can potentially lead to efficient fusion reactors. Again, I write this, and I present it to the world, as the foundations of what seems like a very good idea, and is worthy of testing, and since I cannot do so, I offer it to the world in hopes that it shall lead to some good for humanity. ---------------------