cytodd

Thia might be closer to what you're looking for: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3321-steam-fires-underwater-jet-engine.html

Randell Mills hydrino theory papers are here: http://www.blacklightpower.com/techpapers.shtml and Andreas Rathke's critique of hydrino theory is here: http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1367-2630/7/1/127 iNOW commented that the posters are not staying on topic. I agree. Have any of you posters actually read any of the above material? The math is pretty simple. So instead of rants about the theology of science and how Mills' theory MUST be wrong since it doesn't use modern QM, how about commenting on Rathke's critique? Has he got any valid points? Then there's the issue of Mills' experimental work. Has there been any published experimental data that rebuts this work? How about a Cold Fusion scenario: that there is a repeatable experimental effect but no theory to explain the data (at least not Mills' hydrino theories)?

You must know Archimedes Plutonium!