PogoC7

Where did Clinton get his Money (not mentioning the 900 people who paid to sleep at the White House)? International business with other countries. Along with a company that was Known as Enron. http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/1/11/160933

If we let Saddam (or any terrorist group) make the first move then the concequences would most likely be worse. If Saddam did strike first it would probably be a big strike because he knows that once he makes a move America won't be far behind on theirs. So, Saddam attacks with a Nuclear Weapon or even worst. Two or more Nuclear weapon (and or biological) on U.S. cities. "Then we retaliate", this means we use Nuclear Power ( http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/31/112516.shtml ). Overall, it's years of hash environment condictions leading to many ends (plants, decease, ect...). Just saying what would happen if we let Saddam stirke first. We should never go to Iraq and Shake his hand. Hans Blix won't even do that.

Let just be serious. NASA probably has recordings and they arn't going to give them to the public. It's obvious. It just happened seven hours ago. How can they not have some sort of advanced recording "real time" device on the Space Shuttle.

They say they had no communication with the crew before the accident.

What is a proplem of overpopulation. But I see were you coming from. Restructure programs and find money.

I was just listening to the radio while working out and I hear a reporter ask NASA officals "if the had anytype of Black Box on board". NASA says "no, we do not have any hard disk recording device, we do have the ship wired, but we doubt it is still intact. I don't know if it's because they are entering the atmoshpere, that they can't establish any kind of satellite comunication. I would think the Space Shuttle would have some sort of "Real Time" recording device. They said they are trained to deal with problem in spilt seconds, but how can you do that without some sort of "real time" comunication. They also mentioned about the faom hitting one of the wing of the shuttle at take off. Their responce was; "The whole space community got together and watch the take off right after it happened. And concluded that it did not cause any threat to the shuttle." Understandable, but if they deal with matter like they said during the confreance, then would they have some way to shuttle the ship unmanned? I'm not critizising NASA by any means and what happened today will take weeks to understand, I am just posing some thoughts. I know that NASA is a very close community and they are all very saddened by this event. About the people still on-board the international space station. Well, they are not leaving on schedule because of obvious reason, but people ask about their safey (supplies, ect...) Well, America has a drone ship with supplies takingoff tomorrow, it was scheduled to do so before this morning. So, on the other hand. NASA seems ready to deal with situations and this is a example of how America isn't beaten that easily. NASA will always remember the men and women lost, but the brave will not be grounded for long.

This is a good example of peace not war. If America didn't have to put so much money into national defence, then maybe they would fund the space program better. This suttle which saddly disinigrated today, was built in the 1970's and even then the cost were cut on the program and builders had to find alternative resources. Although, even with cut cost, the space shuttle is a work of art. 98% reuseable; which was it's main purpose. Two Questions? How can we more effecently put people in space? When will the time come to fund space programs correctly? *I guess the two question kindof cancel eachother out*;-)

If America was attacked the way it was on Sept. 11 and Clinton was in office. Diplomacy would see people die (everyone in the middle east). Remember how Clinton tried to do something in Bosnia. He didn't need to fight them. America had the power to show military might and make those two countires see peace. Instead he bombed the shit out of one and in about two months (and many people die) they resovled the proplem. Where was Europe during that whole ordeal. Clinton should have never been involved.

About prolate cycloid - http://www.2dcurves.com/roulette/roulettec.html Planetary gear - http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/gearAndCasing.html or http://www.eng-tips.com/gviewthread.cfm/lev2/16/lev3/58/pid/406/qid/39352

Don't know why people are blind to the fact that Saddam is a threat. I understand why British or German soilders don't want to fight a war, it has nothing to do with the. But the fact is Saddam (no the Iraqi people) is a threat and if you do some research on Saddam you will see that. America is a Great satan, they want to put the world on stings and puppet it for their own gain. Why isn't America threatened by India or Pakastain, where we know they have Nuclear weapons? If America was such a evil, wouldn't we have shown our might against those countries. Gulf War? Saddam was asked to disarm. What did he do? Spend his nations money for rebuilding to buy weapons from Russia and equipt himself with the latest radar technology from China (made by the U.S.). Japan agreed to disarm after WW2 and America help them become the second largest GNP country in the world. America isn't great, but Saddam isn't good.

Anyone who is dumb enough to fire Nuclear weapons deserves to die. This is why Iraq and the U.S. are going at it. Iraq would fire a nuclear weapon, you want to country like Isrial dealing with Iraq or you want to country that can isolate a nuclear threat quickly. America is supported by many (almost every) nation, even if the nation don't show it. If America wanted to go to war tomorrow, then countries like Germany, Britian and Russia would so, "Ok. We don't agree, but we will help you". They know what dealing with Iraq is not easy and America has the forces of taking him out very quickly. This war may or may not happen. We will find out in the next two weeks. Proof is to be given by the U.S. After this proof; Saddam may slowy begins to cooperate because he sees that he has no chance against American Forces and he is just milking it all the way to the end. You know how a criminal will holdout until all his wishes are meet. I hope we do not go to war. P.S. *As for N. Korea, they use their weapon capabilities for political gain. They want U.S. forces to leave S. Korea. Unification is eventually the outsome in Korea. What is important to undrstand is that the Asian Culture is very complex and Asians are very good at dealing with eachother (better then American dealing with N. Koreans). I don't know why China or Japan don't get involved in the Korea sistuation. Just another example of the U.S. needing to the the Police of the world.*

Hitler was smart. Saddam has the power to put fear in people's hearts and uses that power to contol his people. Saddam said he would dissarm after the Gulf War (were it wasn't really fare to attack him because kawait did take his oil), but he has had chances to cooperate with the U.S. If he is building weapons of mass destruction just to distroy us. That isn't smart. What about helping his own people. Saddam took over leadership in Iraq by force. He is an aggressive man, hence not to smart in a looking towards the future way. America isn't great, but Saddam isn't good.

Yes, the U.S. is in debt. So is every country in the world.

Sayonara³ WOW LOSER MOVE. PEOPLE DO NOT CLICK THE LINK POSTED BY THE BRIT. DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT ***CLICK 21 year old nude LINK****

http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=546&highlight=Black+holes Good thread about black hole.

Beware. Many numbers inside. http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/notes/rh.html

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030201/ts_nm/iraq_tapes_dc_2 Sorry, I thought I posted a link.

Spy Tapes Show Iraqi Deceit, Magazine Says (Reuters) - Secretary of State Colin Powell will release National Security Agency spy tapes next week that intelligence officials say show Iraq repeatedly lied to weapons inspectors, Newsweek magazine reported on Friday. It quotes U.S. intelligence officials as saying the decision to allow Powell to use such secret tapes was extraordinary -- but the evidence was so damning that their release outweighed any potential harm. More... P.S. - that was funny

In about a week the U.S. is going to expose "proof" they have against Saddam. What kind of proof do you think it will be? Satellite photos Spy Planes Speculation Spies inside the country Defective officials

Clinton tried and tried to do something useful during the end of his term. To save his rep. Remember Araft and Sharon at camp david. Thirty years from now he will be remembered for his pleasure before work policy and his ignorance of not doing anything about Osama who declared holy war on us long before bush took power '98. Clinton did know about Osama because after the bombing of the war ship Cole, he did fire missles into Afganistan, thinking he killed terrorists.

Terrosism is a State of mind. That is what America needs to address and will once they get the Middle East under control (Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia). I do have many opinions about this subject, but I'll wait until I open a thread regarding my thoughs about terrorism and how to resolve that issue.

Clinton saw the economy raise during his term because of the introduction of the Internet. Although, he just rode the internet wave (and Gore clained to invent it) and didn't address issues such as security, laws and other political duties towards the internet. The economy took a hit because people became scared. They stopped spending on the Internet, leading to the drop in the economy. Bush isn't the greatest in my opinion, but atleast he dosen't live in a bubble. Don't forget Bosnia. Was that clinton? Ofcourse

Correction *Mothers out there* Japennesse (kamakazies, Overall Fight to the death people) Nazies (need I say more)

Yea, we fought the craziest mother out there.

WELCOME BACK ADAM