rwjefferson

Is gravity still considered a state of force? Can you demonstrate any actions of gravity not consistent with force as inertial pressure differential? ron sidereus nuncius.viii

Are stress terms like p and T functions of pressure and tension? newton.001 mass in motion means constant vector and velocity unless forced your nose grows every time you post.viii truth is out of context only under the cloak of dogma Cite the Book and Chapter and Verse that proves curvature is more than a reaction to force. hypervalent_ion: In some forums it is considered polite to answer the OP's questions. Are alphanumeric terms like stress and p and T functions of force? Cite the context of your answer if you so fear universal truth. peace ron a good teacher learns from all students

What might stress terms like p and T really mean? stress tensor.001 Are stress and pressure and tension states of force? Are stress terms like p and T alphanumeric symbols and grads or fields or curvature? Or might stress terms like p and T also mean functions and derivatives of pressure and tension? welcome to my wormhole.007 def: byLaw whereas 'that is the most ridiculous nonsense ever posted' is construed not an ad hominem attack or personal commentary bad dogma.101 My goal is to contribute to science and evolution. That the (un?)intended consequence of your game is to thwart and obfuscate and hijack is not necessarily the simple truth you should so readily reveal. Does the relatively rough surface of topspinning balls accelerate air mass around and under and upwards? Does airmass forced around and over and downwards drag and lift underspinning ballmass back and up? If you so fear to admit basic truth, just turn away and hold your peace and let me speak mine own. peace ron those that fear truth condemn the messenger

its a curse of course.iIi def: r~bvious not from what authority tells you so syn: those that fear truth blame context or messenger Is gravity a state of force or a relatively equivalent mathematical construct? Will maths experts ever admit alphanumeric models and other images sometimes deceive? When will a maths expert calculate the drag of weakly interactive particles gravitating toward mass? Do maths experts know how to put a genie back into the bottle? Is gravity a state of force or an alphanumeric construct? def: dogma what authority tells you so r

standing against trolls~20.13.08.12,08;141 def: pi what's force got to do width it.viii def: current wiki yesterday's best understanding Del, or nabla, is an operator used in mathematics, in particular, in vector calculus, as a vector differential operator, usually represented by the nabla symbol. When applied to a function defined on a one-dimensional domain, it denotes its standard derivative as defined in calculus. When applied to a field (a function defined on a multi-dimensional domain), del may denote the gradient (locally steepest slope) of a scalar field (or sometimes of a vector field, as in the Navier–Stokes equations), the divergence of a vector field, or the curl (rotation) of a vector field, depending on the way it is applied. Is total stress (by any other Name) a function of initial inertial differential or bang~entropy or curvature or something even more magical than existence? thanks ron as horizon lowers pressure declines over time

what you see when you look into the eye of inertial pressure differential ItS peace

Are normal and shear stresses more likely a function of inertial pressure differential or curvature or something different? And what does the state of matter have to do with it? really peace ron

welcome to my wormhole.iii def: topspin the side rolling into the relative headwind! newton.001 def: n a measure of force and mass acceleration syns: i and m and a and g bernoulli.007 fluent flowing faster over a horizon means lower pressure and vice versa Airmass streams downwards behind slippery shiny topspinning bowling balls. Does lower pressure over accelerate fluent airmass downwards? newton.102 fluent airmass departing upwards forces spinning ball mass down Topspinning stitches and dimples drag airmass around and under and upwards. Do satin surfaced underspinning ping~pong balls demonstrate lift? inertial pressure differential.001 newton in~verse bernoulli As inertial and pressure differential are relatively equivalent and streamlines depart straight and level. How much grit must be glued around a slippery shiny topspinning ball before airmass departs straight and level; no matter spin? navier stokes.001 [math]\rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{v} \right) = - \nabla p + \nabla \mathbf{T} + \mathbf{b}[/math] navier stokes.101 The stress terms p and [math]\scriptstyle \boldsymbol{\mathsf{T}}[/math] are yet unknown, so the general form of the equations of motion is not usable to solve problems. Besides the equations of motion—Newton's second law—a force model is needed relating the stresses to the fluid motion. What do the stress terms p and [math]\scriptstyle \boldsymbol{\mathsf{T}}[/math] mean to you? Can you prove it? Really? ItS peace ron when the legend tells better tell the legend

its all so greek to me def: balance equality between opposing or interacting forces def: caveat these definitions are not necessarily found in flatland dictionaries def: differential difference in all forms et. al. that follows syn: ridiculous nonsense according to those that slept through the evolution of science If you still feel the need to convince me that a galaxy is not dam good model of a vortex stoke your navier posts to the speculations forum and prove it to me and beyond a reasonable doubt the force is not inertial pressure differential. ron

insults flourish as reason fails Did you fall asleep during the "How to have a kind and well reasoned conversation" class? Again? honestly It might be just a quantum bit more dishonest to deny inertial pressure differential is a better model of force than curvature; even if the empress' new cloak lulled you to sleep during the science revolution. wakey wakey up up up /honestly def: ambivalence equal in verse opposite valence syn: N0 delta vortex works for me What do you call it when the force of attraction is equal to the force that resists change? ron~ oops I dood it again

yes.iii The force IS the differential pressure and what does it take to goad you into admitting vortex is the balance between inertia and differential pressure? Or there IS NO proof the force IS NOT delta pressure. Carry on. as you wish ron

inertial pressure differential.007 I did not ask for the direction of the force. Gases and liquids move in response to differential pressure. Pressure 'pushes' from high pressure to lower pressure, and the resultant spiral direction of tornadoes or toilet bowls, is dependant on northern or southern hemisphere location. may be MigL might be on to something What do you call the force that created heat and wind in the fist place? ron def: bang don't tell empress I still see through cloak

does.ii newton.101 If a relatively efficient (insignificant friction) inertial (centrifugal) pump spins air mass around and under and upwards; is pump mass forced downwards in verse the air mass accelerated up? How is this different from a baseball? bernoulli.101 What if the headwind is relatively thin i.e. inviscid? What if the boundary is relatively shiny i.e. inviscid too? What if you top spin a bowling ball in 0g? What's heat got to do with it? ron

So what do you call the force that spins a vortex? ron

look up inviscid.vii Does the top side of a rolling ball attack the relative headwind faster or slower than the bottom? What does Bernoulli predict under such given conditions? So what about the Magnus effect. peace ron

as you wish I am so sorry; now please cite the first word in phrase that escapes your limited vocabulary. What is the difference between the force and energy and power needed to accelerate and spin fluent matter into a whirlwind and where might flatlanders and you see a tornado twisting and spinning up and away? ron sometime between dreamtime and imagination

What is the size of a monoxide atom relative to carbon? The recent IBM atomic animation clearly shows the two nuclei of carbon monoxide molecules. Which atom is the larger? Why? ron

good What does D'Alembert call the force that energizes a vortex? What do you? ron

Does a vortex demonstrate centripetal or centrifugal force? honest queries deserve kind and honest replies Does a vortex demonstrate centripetal or centrifugal force and why does a twister so twist and spin and tango? memory is the second thing to go Does a vortex exhibit centripetal or centrifugal force? just ask.ing ron sometimes the best answer is yes and yes and no more threats or warnings

geometric models 'For a satellite in orbit around a planet, the centripetal force is supplied by gravity. Some sources, including Newton, refer to the entire force as a centripetal force, even for eccentric orbits, for which gravity is not aligned with the direction to the center of curvature.' Theo Koupelis (2010). In Quest of the Universe (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-7637-6858-4 Centripetal force is model for attraction - like tension and gravity. Centrifugal force is a model for resistance to attraction - like inertia. Science evolves as good geometric models are replaced by better, by more fluent models. ron ode to urban.viii warnings from you are points of honor

And here I thought that force was called gravity. Oh... right. According to relativity dogma, gravity is not really a force. in truth ron

I am brought up old school. Can you prove plate tectonics is not still driven by the impact between theia and gaia once upon a long time ago or can you prove it is? I didn't think so. ron~

What happens when the nuclear core of an imactor sinks deep enough to reach critical mass? ron

the point.007 the more you try not, the more you prove me right def: alphanumeric dogma the dictate that relatively close is close enough syn: strawman response alphanumeric dogma used in a sentence: What we do have are mathematical models that make damn good predictions of what is observed. What if my thread is hijacked by zealots too blinded by dogma to see inertial pressure differential is a better model than curvature? ron maybe dark matter is not really inviscid; maybe dark matter is only relatively weakly viscid

...and? bad dogma Please fore give my language. I wanted to typo too much learning how to misinterpret mathematical models is a dangerous thing and two much alphanumeric dogma do blind weak minds to simple truth and hear you are. Does math prove wings create lift by curvature? Does math prove mass creates gravity by curvature? Do exceptional claims require exceptional proof? current observation Stars wheel faster around galaxies accelerated by fluent weakly interacting massive particles. Interacting means matter is subject to inertia and massive means matter is subject to gravity and fluent means matter flows. trolls don't answer the questions; trolls criticize the writing What is the relative velocity by viscosity of a wimpy matter headwind that slows a 250kg mass by ~8.74±1.33×10^-10 m/s^2 toward the distant sun? What is the relative velocity by viscosity of a wimpy matter wind that accelerates a 1' x 1' x 1' x 1g mass by 1g toward earth? welcome to my wormhole and gotcha again r~ trolls and ACG52 need not reply