rwjefferson

clarification def: quarky more than a couple of quarks syn: gotcha again Yes. Truth is gotcha to dogma and mass does not bend space because current mainstream science tells it so and large hadrons hold the property of gravity and you missed the science revolution. The question is not whether large hadrons possess gravity. The question is whether gravity is a state of force i.e. inertial pressure differential. Or relativity speaking does mass bend space by some magic god-like property? I am still waiting for you to offer a reason why I should believe gravity does not force mass acceleration. I am still not convinced you know all that much about either basic inertial pressure differential or god, only what authority tells you so. Energy is stated by attraction and repulsion and mass is stated by inertia and gravity, and matter is stated by e=mc2. And yes these statements all hold true, no matter Holier than thou altitudes or latin strawmen or ignorance. A cyclone with its eye condensed to a singular point up is relatively equivalent to a galaxy and vice versa. Those that stand against trolls smell like troll, especially to trolls and other children. That you find inertial pressure differential forcing mass acceleration and all that follows ridiculous marks you. When does weakly interacting matter become strong? When will you admit your observations of gravity are also consistent with inertial pressure differential? ron Too much learning is a dangerous thing; it blinds weak minds to simple truth r~ Bad criticism does greater harm than bad writing. Alexander Pope

~gotcha again def: baryonic matter family hadron syn: quarky def: dense strong shells resist penetration syn: unable to admit simple truth def: quantum matter leptons and all other matter syn: not quarky like you def: relatively equivalent similar but not quite the same as same as syn: relativity gravity forces mass acceleration and curvature does not basic physics.101 gravity and inertia states mass attraction and repulsion states energy e=mc2 states matter Imagine the eye of a cyclone spun to a singular point up. How is this similar to a galaxy? How does this differ? Do you know how to calculate the differential? What's ridiculous is the image that your massive balls rolling around on a poorly sprung sheet of fabric is the same as gravity. ItS peace r~ apologies' carl

Is quantum matter relatively equivalent to baryonic matter? flash news Scientists observe at least one black hole horizon spinning near the speed of light and create sonic black holes. Is electromagnetic energy relatively equivalent to sonic energy? Is curvature the same as force? just asking ron

one small step Yes. I am making a giant leap from relative vacuum energy around strongly interacting massive particles of baryonic matter toward relatively equivalent vacuum energy around weakly interacting massive particles of quantum matter and can so do forth and back as long you want and welcome to my wormhole and the science revolution. Yes. My best answer is still yes and I am so full of grate I am not already thrown out again like trash and welcome to my wormhole and the science revolution. gotcha again.007 What happens as a free floating spacetime traveler places a sphere of matter upon a plane of elastic fabric fixed at all four corners? What happens as a black hole is opened underneath and through the inner shell? What happens as the momentum of inertial pressure differential exceeds the bonds of electromagnetic fabric and does light flow toward black holes? kind and well reasoned responses are always greatly appreciated at least by me rw truth is not dependent on the dictates of mainstream authority

I ask questions that someday even those marked like you might recognize simple truth. What is nonsensical is that you will not admit that vacuum energy can both attract and repulse or that there is energy inherent in pressure difference and that you have the power to silence kind and well reasoned conversation. Is matter pushed or pulled toward lower pressure? How does air spiraling toward a tornado throw tractor trailer trailers away? peace ron too much mainstream learning is a dangerous thing; it blinds weak minds to simple truth

close and try again Correct answers are "Yes, current observations indicate vacuum energy is inherent space." and "Yes, pressure difference matters more." Is matter pushed or pulled from a far higher pressure toward vacuum energy? peace ron bonus question.007 What might bang~entropy mean to you? Does vortex ring a bell?

Does an underlying background vacuum energy exist in space? Is vacuum pressure a push or a pull? ron simple questions deserve simple answers in kind

Does space exhibit vacuum pressure? Does vacuum pressure push or pull? peace ron

speak for your self.101 You over-complicate self-evident truth with alpha-numeric ba-bel. You'll never know how gravity works if you continue to refuse even try recognize quantum pressure differential and quantum vacuum pressure. What is the point of hubris and hostility and ignorance and power? What is the point of a standard model of physics that fails to predict gravity and evolution and topspin lift? What is the point of propagating dogma in the Name of science? What is the point of another innocent mind blinded by dogma? quantum gravity.007 Force is inertial pressure differential. Attraction is reaction in verse vacuum pressure. Earth's atomsphere is filled with interactive massive baryonic particles and space is filled with weakly interactive massive quantum particles. Matter accelerates toward lower pressure and matter is e=mc2. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Observations indicate Hoover and Higg's and weak nuclear and Van der Waal's and gravity are consistent with state of attraction. Kindly prove beyond a reasonable doubt that gravity and Van der Waal's and weak nuclear and Higg's are not consistent with vacuum pressure or fore ever hold your peace . ItS peace r~ vortex is the tango between newton and bernoulli

welcome to the science revolution.101 def: field area subject to force syn: same as above Around each and every working vacuum cleaner nozzle is an area or field where attraction holds sway. q - What happens as ping pong balls and marbles and ball bearings and other forms of matter are spun past the working end of a vacuum cleaner? a - Attraction signifies and defines vacuum pressure. I already know how states of force like entropy and vacuum pressure and Higg's and weak nuclear and Van der Wall's and gravity and lower pressure differential all share and demonstrate the property of attraction. other than time and distance I just want to know why you seem to think there is a significant difference between states of attraction like Higg's and gravity. ron

technically.101 Fields and couplings and curvatures are reactions to force and I am asking what you know of the force that unifies all states and properties and reactions. r~field Roll a ping pong ball and marble and ball bearing through the inertial pressure differential field near the working nozzle of the most convenient vacuum cleaner. Can you predict the path of matter through an inertial pressure differential field? What property signifies and defines vacuum pressure? just askin ron

The list goes on and on. Yet no one else in this forum seems to have a clue how a mathematical model based on geometry will never hold always true. ItS peace r~

What is the force that attracts matter to Higgs Bosons? Place a powerful vacuum inside a porous model of earth. What path is followed as a model moon is spun toward this low pressure earth? What is the difference between gravity and van der waals and weak nuclear and charisma and vacuum pressure? ron

I agree. Standard Models are rather ugly. The current Standard Model fits annoying well with observations; just like the old Standard Model of Epicycles. The hint that they are based on fallacy is that neither accurately predicts gravity or dark matter. I recognize one force that unifies all and everything. How many forces does the Standard Model currently recognize? Is Charisma is the force of the Higg's Boson? Really? One seeking truth expects to find a better theory, but the hints provided by nature are hidden and cloaked by immoderate alphanumeric dogma. Have you or the brains at Cornell ever tried to calculate the drag of weakly interactive massive particles? My estimate predicts a 1kg mass at the surface of earth will be accelerated at 9.78 m/s^2 and weigh 2.20462 lbs no matter density. How do your calculations differ? ron ignorance and power is not the same as intelligence

Is the Standard Model consistent with current observation? If not, how does the Standard Model fail? ron

kind and well reasoned elves and leptons are all ways welcome Do you seek truth or dogma? The Standard Model fails because it is based on fallacy: relatively equivalent is the same as same as and spacetime curvature is the same as gravity and gravitons are massless and black holes are dense and those are other threads and welcome to my wormhole.101 elementary physics.101 force is inertial pressure differential curvature is no more than equal~opposite reaction to inertial pressure differential bang.entropy.et al def: graviton each and every singular quantum particle that carries force as gravity syn: dark matter to the unenlightened Gravity is carried by weakly interactive massive quantum particles. Massive means subject to gravity and inertia. a noble science fair experiment~challenge Bore the working ends of your most powerful free floating vacuum cleaners through your most powerful electromagnets of the same pole. At distance, attraction is greater than repulsion and vacuum cleaner matter accelerates toward matter. As distance decreases, the energy of repulsion increases by a magnitude greater than the energy of attraction. At a specific distance, the powers of attraction and repulsion tango around equilibrium until rest and entropy prevails. in the spirit of peace ron Have you heard the tail of wimpy spacetime monkeys that gravitate toward massive spacetime bananas even as they flee energetic spacetime bananas?

ditto

memory is the second thing to go It is certainly not kind or well reasoned or appropriate. It is mean. Now kindly tell why you still believe the mathematical miscalculation that curvature is force. Show your proof. ron

Lack of kindness and reason is never an appropriate response. How might an innocent child best explain to an elf on the shelf that curvature is nothing more than reaction to force? ItS peace grandfather clause

Force is mass acceleration and curvature is equal and opposite reaction to inertial pressure differential. Mathematical calculations based on curvature are alphanumeric images of force. Images are easily misinterpreted. Is "That might be the most meaningless nonsense I've ever read in a single post." a kind and well reasoned response? peace ron (:I see through the empress` new cloak:)

truth is not a hijack Force is inertial pressure differential. Curvature is not. peace ron

def: hush There is never need to brag about willful ignorance. I can no more make trolls understand basic physics than I can make a creationist understand evolution. Relative equivalence is not quite the same as is. Force is inertial differential. Curvature is not force. Please cite the first word that escapes your limited comprehension of self evident and stop insulting your self. ItS peace r~

just because.101 Force is mass acceleration and curvature is equal and opposite reaction to inertial pressure differential. Mathematical calculations based on curvature are alphanumeric images of force. Images are easily misinterpreted; especially by zealots. Light (energy) bends toward lower quantum pressure the same way sound (energy) bends towards lower baryonic pressure. How do you calculate what happens as sound encounters the event horizon of a supersonic cyclone? Can you imagine the eye of a baryonic vortex condensed to a singular quantum point up? peace ron

science.evolution.102 def: classical physics modern mainstream physics once upon a dream time long ago syn: memory is the second thing to go current wiki Gravitation is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, along with electromagnetism and the nuclear strong force and weak force. Modern physics describes the phenomenon using the general theory of relativity by Einstein, in which it is a consequence of the curvature of spacetime governing the motion of inertial objects. The simpler Newton's law of universal gravitation provides an accurate approximation for most physical situations. The true cause of gravitation is yet unknown to science and different hypotheses accounting for its origin have remained unproven. self evident observation Inertial pressure differential is the fundamental force of nature. Gravitation (attraction) and inertia (resistance to attraction) are the fundamental interactions of nature. Gravitation, weak, nuclear, and electromagnetic are the fundamental states of force. B~E (condensate), earth (solid), water (liquid), wind (gas), fire (plasma), aether (quantum matter) are elemental states of matter. at least by me Kind and well reasoned responses are always greatly appreciated. ItS peace ron

there is no bar to already forgiven at least by me