hydrogen2oxygen

==> "Fairy Tale" The point is, scientists and laymen who are interested in science are just human and many of them forget that science is just a method to discover the truth. Despite the evidence found in nature, people claims that something could derive from nothing. How could ever come space out of nothingness? Before the supposed Big Bang there was no space and no time, no spacetime. How could there fluctuate "something", what was this something if there was just nothing? Many now would argue with "we don't know" (what is true) and "it's not our job to know" (what is a lie). So many are not aware of the truth, they play the "relativism game", a political game ... not scientific, because despite the knockout criteria they continue to claim there is no creator. A politician is someone who says "let's define our own reality" and then they build a framework for a new reality and propagate them through massive propaganda campaigns in order to build a consensus reality. For this kind of people the truth simply doesn't count, they want (WANT) their own reality propagated and they would never allow the truth to be propagated. In what does this all differ, this scientism, comparing it to the catholic church during the dark age? Scientists who propose the right questions loose their job, laymen are told to be quit because they are not qualified to make assertions about nature. If a layman says "Nature is full of order, harmonious, united, ... I have never seen evidence of a evolutionary process through pure chance, never seen order come out of chaos, never ever seen something come out of nothing, how can you claim that 'science' is right???" ... then the so called "scientists" (or the so called "experts") tells them to be quit, because they don't know all the scientific details. The same game that was played long time ago with the church. Some people began to doubt in a existence of a hell and questioned it, asking the priests for evidence ... but the church told them to be quit and never put in doubt the doctrine of the church. This is dogmatism, not a genuine search for the truth.

Regret! No I'm joking, just joking. Evidence: ... since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal human beings and birds and animals and reptiles.(Roman 1:20) 1) You're mother told you to clean your room when you was a young kid (or girl). My mother told me this too. No one could ever provide evidence that the room was cleaned up by pure coincidence. Claiming the contrary would be like a "foolish thinking". So order cannot emerge out of chaos. Well, yes, there is the phenomenon of "emergence", but where emergence occurs some order is already existent, just not visible. And then claiming that something can derive from nothing is also foolish, because never ever something like that occurred ... oh yes, quantum fluctuation ... but nothing can fluctuate if nothing exist, and space is not nothing. 2) The law of conservation of energy, the fact that energy itself can never be destroyed, that something eternal exist (don't you dare to write now "define energy" or something similar, because I got your IP now and I know where you live ... joking), is just ignored by a certain kind of human, the materialist. A materialist is a denier. He loves to contradict whatever seems to be created by a superior being, he hates responsibility, he loves reductionism, analyzing everything until there is nothing more left, ignoring the broader picture, ignoring the facts, instead playing the skeptic game, pseudoskepticism, scientism, whatever ... but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 3) Where is the meaning of life for a materialist, a atheist? No God, no love, no meaning. Everything in nature seems to be created with love, everything is united, not isolated. From the huge galaxy clusters till to the smallest particles, unity is observable and a evidence (one of many) that it was not pure change what brought us here in a world full of order (despite your room, it's still in chaos). But the materialist believes in chaos, in Cush the god of confusion, in Nimrod the god of rebellion, in Satan the antagonist, in the Devil the father of the lie. Saying that all, my conclusion, ... no not mine, that of another man wrote long time ago: The wicked one according to his superciliousness makes no search. All his ideas are: “There is no God.” (Psalm 10:4)

no, I'm right, you are wrong.

I refer to God the creator of the heaven and the earth, not a human made god or some image of a beast, mythological figure, egyptian miaaauuu or woof woof, indian mooooo or similar low things

What the Bible says: But will God really dwell on earth? The heavens, even the highest heaven, cannot contain you. How much less this temple I have built! (1 Kings 8:28 - New International Version) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. (Genesis 1:1) Lift your eyes and look to the heavens: Who created all these? He who brings out the starry host one by one, and calls them each by name. Because of his great power and mighty strength, not one of them is missing. (Isaiah 40:26) Is a supposed Super-Organism like God? A super-organism would for sure have a kind of collective consciousness, something bigger than the sum of the individuals. If ... IF humanity would have a well working (or awaken) collective consciousness, than for sure there would be no wars, no wide spread egoism and crime, because a collective consciousness (super-mind) would represent a great obstacle against secrets, crimes, egoism and so on. But the biosphere, the physical framework for a collective consciousness, is not the creator of the universe.

Interesting idea. If the sun would be powered by galactic currents, then the view of the sun as a accumulation of hydrogen which produce energy through fusion would drastically change. Our universe would look more like a living organism than a dead clockwork, where stars has a regenerative power, like biological cells which are powered also through electrical currents through the whole body.

Capsaicin is used in medicine. So yes it is useful. In a certain way it's a kind of stimulant for the metabolic processes and it stimulates also the release of serotonine (neurotransmitter) which makes it helpful for light depressions. But you should not consider capsaicin as isolated substance, but in the context of the whole plant. For example: mmmhhhh

Don't get it: eating a balanced diet of Ramen and cereal ... will it help you to grow strong and understand the hard science???

I'm Peter. Science is for me a way of thinking, not just a interest. Most of all I'm interested in paradigm shifting processes, how a group change it's "mind" on a specific topic or the whole worldview.