David Levy

Sorry Your message is the best supporting data for my theory!!! So let's read your message: "The Earth is drifting from the Sun, and by an anomalously large amount. The predicted rate based on all known phenomenon yield a recession rate of 1.5 cm/year." The outcome is that 4.5 Billion years ago the Earth was closer to the sun. The Earth is one of the Sun' planets. Unfortunately, there is no measured data about the drifting of the other planets. Hence, why do you claim that all the other planets must drift inwards while the Earth is drifting outwards??? Why do you think that the other planets work on a different mechanism from Earth???

Dear Arevalo If we will stay at a spot which is 13 billions light years away from us we will surly see a similar view which we see from Earth. The BB Theory is THE mainstream of the modern science. The science try badly to explain how the universe had been created based on this theory – so far, without a real success. We all must believe in it. We shouldn't criticize it. If you want to be part of the science community, you must show your faith in this new god. One bad word on this lovely god and you will get a red ticket!!! Never the less, I do believe that one day the science will have to open their eyes and see that the universe is based on a very simple mechanism. They just need to read the message from Sir Fred Hoyle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hoyle about the steady state theory. " The theory tried to explain how the universe could be eternal and essentially unchanging while still having the galaxies we observe moving away from each other." With some minor adaptation – this is the ultimate theory of what we see:

Hello D M That's great news!!! I was expecting that the Earth is drifting away from the Sun. Never the less, at the time that I have set my theory, most of the science claimed that the Earth is drifting inwards. I had a severe argument with some people about this issue. If I remember correctly, one of them was AGC52… Therefore, I will mostly appreciate your help by giving me the Web address for this measurement. This is a pure fantasy story!!! Please read again the following statement by Wiki: " The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the 5-kpc ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." Now let's think about this critical message. If that ring contains a large fraction of the Hydrogen present in the galaxy, then we must assume that galactic Center is the place where it had been created!!! The chance that it had been collected from outside the center is almost zero. (As the Hydrogen fraction in whole galaxy outside this ring is quite low) Therefore, it must come from inside of the ring. From this aria it drifts outwards. Therefore, we can also understand how the The hydrogen "bridge" between Andromeda Galaxy and the Triangulum Galaxy" had been set!!!

Hello D M Thanks for the question! No. The star in any disc system must drift outwards from the Center. I can prove it!!! We know that the moon is drifting away from the Earth. Mars in the past had a liqued water, therefore, it was surly closer to the sun. The Earth is also drifting away from the sun. Just think about the following statement: " The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the 5-kpc ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." Why the bar contains large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy??? How come??? Where this huge molecular hydrogen come from??? Don't you think that it might be an indication for an Atom Creation activity in the spiral galaxy core??? Don't you think that there is a possibility that at least one atom had been created by the huge power of the rotational suppermassive black hole??? Therefore, The Theory is as follow: A. Creation of a new Hydrogen Atom - a new mass is created around the galactic nucleus of spiral galaxy. Nucleus serves as the accelerating (or generator) that creates new material. In the near distance to the nucleus, there are probably tremendous forces and electric fields with huge energy. This creates thin layers of Hydrogen atoms. Those atoms are moving at nearly the speed of light. B. Creation of wide range of Atoms and molecular: at this high speed there is a chance for collision between those new born Hydrogen Atoms. Also, due to the high pressure, temperature and electric/magnetic fields a nuclear fusion activity will set heavier atoms. (Eg, nuclear fusion between two atoms of hydrogen will generate helium). In this way all the atoms which are known have been created. Due to the high electric field, there is a wide range of intermolecular links. Therefore, all the following molecules are formed: water, carbon dioxide, silicates, and more. Over time, those atoms and moleculars crystallize into blocks and gradually migrate outwards from the bar shape. C. Star Birth – by wiki " The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the 5-kpc ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." Hence, Those blocks crystallize and form hot mass balls. Each ball absorbs additional mass and increases its size- similar to a snowball. As long as the ball is in the creation mass zone, it will get more mass and increase its size. Gradually, a hot new star will appear. If it's a high-mass star then it will keep all the light gases (due to gravity) and become a giant gas star. If the mass is significantly larger there is a chance for a nuclear burning activity than it might become a sun star. But when it is relatively small, than the gases might emitted into space and therefore, it becomes a rocky planet like Earth and Mars. D. New star locked by interior side of spiral arm –The newborn star migrates outwards from the galactic nucleus. The Electric fields and forces in the nucleus of the galaxy form the shape of the famous BAR which is visible in most of the spiral galaxy. The star on the edge of the BAR continues with its outwards migration and starts penetrating to the gravitational forces of the interior side of the spiral arms. Therefore, It reduces its velocity and continue to rotate till it finely locked by the gravitational power of one of the spiral arm. It's similar to roulette ball bouncing between the cells numbers until it lost the speed and finally set in one of the cells. E. Spiral arm - Spiral arm acts as a chain of star which is connected to each other by the gravitational power. This maintains the flat & high velocity. In fact, the galactic nucleus of a spiral galaxy like the Milky Way contains a mass of up to billions of suns. This core rotates on its axis and creates a circular motion for all the stars which are relatively close to it. Thus, rotation of a star near the galactic nucleus causes a higher speed to another star which is a little farther from the nucleus. It can be simulated as series of balls which are connected by elastic cord to each other. In one side the cord is connected to a spinning axis. Hence, the velocity of the other end of the cord will be directly affected by the rotation of the axis. The balls in this example are the stars and the elastic cord is the gravitational power. Note that all the stars in the Milky Way galaxy orbit in a uniform direction. All in one direction. Spiral arm is the ultimate answer for the high velocity of a star which is located far away from the galactic nucleus. F. A brief calculation- Most of the 400 Billion stars are located at the spiral arms. Let's say about 70 Billion stars per arm. The length of each arm is about 70,000 years light and its diameter is 1000 light year. So, by average, there are about 1 billion stars in a 1000 x 1000 light year. Hence, 1,000 stars per 1 x 1 light year. That should be good enough to hold the gravitational chain power of the spiral arm!!! G. New Spiral Galaxy - Each spiral galaxy is generated from some sort of a seed (which might be a magnator or quasar). H. Universe expending -Each new spiral galaxy migrates away from the Mother' spiral galaxy. Therefore, at the far end of the universe, the galaxies are moving away at ultra high speed. in the same token, the galaxies are moving in all directions. That gives an answer why the galaxies at the far end of the universe are moving faster away, while the Milky Way and Andromeda are moving to each other. A solid prove for that is the "The hydrogen "bridge" between Andromeda Galaxy and the Triangulum Galaxy". Hence, Andromeda is the mother spiral galaxy (it has over 1000 Billion stars) of Triangulum spiral galaxy (It has only 40 Billion stars)!!!

Yes, the issue is the law of conservation of angular momentum. But, I do not dislike it. I just claim that this angular momentum can't set the orbital velocity which is needed for the spiral galaxy. The science must look for other alternative theory for the creation of the spiral galaxy!!!

Dear Prophet12 Just asking a tough question for the science is a speculation??? Shame!!! This is absolutely wrong!!! Actually this is a pure speculation!!! Why the science can use a speculation, while I'm not allowed even to ask a question??? You have missed the whole point of my message. Please read it again. Regular thought is a speculation by definition!!! Just a brief example – During the Dark Age, there was a regular thought that the Earth is the center of the universe. Any question on this issue could lead to death penalty!!! Lucky for me, I'm not going to get a death penalty for my question. Never the less, based on your reply, we are living today in the dark age of the modern science. There is no tolerance for any thought outside the mainstream black box. Good Luck for you all. ! Moderator Note I have edited this post as all the quote attributions were incorrect. David I don't know how you managed to have JCMac as the author of all above quotes - but you have to be more careful; members do not like having words erroneously put in their mouths. imatfaal

Thanks D M At least we agree on something... You have missed the point. In the angular momentum Theory, the main Idea is that the object might increase dramatically its orbital velocity. In this example I have proved that by dramatically increasing or decreasing an orbital velocity it will surly lose its orbital track. Therefore, the idea that the angular momentum could increase dramatically the orbital velocity of the object while keeping its orbital track is absolutely false. As I have stated, you have missed the point... Shame on you!!! I thought that you are an expert. Now I have found that your knowledge is less than basic!!! You have made a severe mistake. But your following reply is even worst. Why can't you take responsibly on your mistakes??? Shame on you!

Hi D M & ACG52 As you don't agree with the following statement: "Assuming that the moon will slow down – It's quite clear that the gravity will force it to come closer and eventually it will collide with Earth." Let's see the following info By Wiki: "The Moon completes its orbit around the Earth in approximately 27.5 days (a sidereal month)….With a mean orbital velocity of 1,023 m/s." Hence, assuming that the orbital velocity decreases suddenly to 100 m/s, what would be the outcome based on your deep knoladge??? Do you need further help???

Hello ACG52 ACG52: " You explicitly stated that as an orbiting body moves away from it's orbital center it moves faster." Really??? I have never used this kind of nonsense. Where did you find it? You have to apologize! ACG52: "I'll assume you mean orbital velocity, not rotation velocity, which has no effect on orbits." Yes, sure. Thanks. It seems that you have the ability to understand my message if you wish… ACG52: " By which you mean that what you are writing contradicts all actual observation and physics." In my threads I have never contradicted any actual observation or physics. The main issue is that the science is doing whatever it takes to fit those observations into the mainstream black box. Unfortunately for the mainstream concept, it doesn't fit. There are so many problems in this process that the outcome of the science is – "We don't know!!!". Therefore, the science came with so many supportive theories, but it still doesn't fit!!! I try to show you that the answer stays just at the edge of our nose. If you just raise your eyes above the mainstream concept you could see the answer. So clear and easy! I personally appreciate your knowledge is science. It's clear that you are an expert!!! Unfortunately, you are locked by the mainstream concept. Please try to look behind the black box border and you will get to the same conclusions as I did.

Hello D M D M: "Go back to square one, David. What you wrote is completely wrong. You apparently don't even understand the two body problem, let alone galaxies" You just say that I'm wrong. But you can't give even one issue which supports your message. So let me reuse your message: Please go back to square one! Please try to be more specific. After getting your reply, I start to appreciate the message from ACG52. At least he tried to find something… foolish, but something…

Hello ACG52 ACG52: " All that post has accomplished is to demonstrate that you don't know anything about orbital mechanics or gravity. You make assumptions based on your ignorance coupled with your own ideas and proclaim them to be fact. There are stars in stable orbits around the supermassive BH in the Milky Way as close as 15 light hours." Why you do not read carefully my message??? Why your understanding is so limited??? This has nothing with the mainstream concept. It seems that you are still locked in the same black box!!! Why can't you understand the following simple message: " Hence, in order to maintain the orbit cycle, there must be a very critical balance between the gravity force and the rotation velocity." ACG52: " This is the exact opposite of your assumptions." Why??? Try to read it again and let me know which kind of help do you need. With pleasure!!!

Dear Airbrush Thanks for your message. Airbrush: "It seems that spiral galaxies formed very early in the universe." Why??? Why there is no more new spiral galaxy forming process??? Airbrush: " The gas, however, can quickly contract, and as it does so it rotates faster, until the final result is a very thin, very rapidly rotating disk...." In order for understanding how difficult it is to form a spiral galaxy, let's look at a very simple system: The Earth and the moon. As we all know the moon orbits around the Earth. The gravity force is based on the size and distance between those to objects in space. Let's try to verify what could be the outcome of the distance between the Earth and the moon if the moon will change its rotation velocity??? Assuming that the moon will slow down – It's quite clear that the gravity will force it to come closer and eventually it will collide with Earth. If the moon will increase its velocity, it will drift further from the Earth and eventually it will escape to space. Hence, in order to maintain the orbit cycle, there must be a very critical balance between the gravity force and the rotation velocity. Therefore, the Idea that an object can increase it's velocity and keep its orbit track is none realistic!!! Now let's think about any gas or stars which started to spin around the supper massive black hole: In order for setting an orbit track, there must be some sort of gravity force with the supper massive black hole. If its far away - The gravity force between the supermassive black hole and the star which is located at the far end of the spiral galaxy is almost zero. (As the distance is about 50,000 light years). Actually even the solar system is located far away from the black hole (Hence, no real gravity force). Therefore, assuming that it started to spin before setting the spiral arm, it will surly escape into space. If it's close enough to have some sort of gravity force, than, it might collide with the black hole before gaining any spin velocity. Therefore, the current concept of the spiral galaxy forming process must be wrong.

Dear Friends It seems that your logical limits starts and ends at the border of the mainstream concept. There is no logical way for you to look behind this mainstream black box. You claim that you would love to find the answer to the issues which you don't know: ""We don't know" means (1) scientists don't know (so stop asking), and (2) scientists would love to find out. Scientists love those "we don't know" problems. It's their bread and butter." But, in reality, your "bread and butter" main concern is protecting the mainstream concept. Hence, the science can't tolerate any attempt to look behind the mainstream black box borders. My message is very clear and logical. I show you the way for the living water…But you don't even consider it. Unfortunately, the science rejects any message which might negatively effects the mainstream concept. Therefore, the science will continue to look for answers at this mainstream black box, but without any success!!! One day you will have to open your Eyes!!! On that day, you might ask my forgiveness!!! Good Luck!

Hi D M In one hand you claim that there is no logic in my message. But in the other hand you gave some thought to this reply and you didn't even eliminate it. Therefore, I want to thank you… I hope that you are still ready for some more none logical updates…

Hello D H D H: "Astronomers and cosmologists don't know which came first, supermassive black holes, galaxies, or stars." If they don't know which came first, how do they know how a spiral galaxy had been created? D M: "A couple of things are certain. One is that those supermassive black holes were present very shortly after galaxies first started forming, and they might have been present before then." Again, the science has no clue how, why and when the black hole had been created… Please be aware that it's mass is huge. By Wiki: " A supermassive black hole (SMBH) is the largest type of black hole, on the order of hundreds of thousands to billions of solar masses." Therefore, by definition this mass might be much bigger than any expected early global clusters & stars. Hence, there is no logical way that a stellar halo can support the requested mass for the suppermassive black hole as well as all the stars in the spiral galaxy as a milky way and Andromeda. Please also be aware that t is also a rotational black hole. Its high rotational movement creates the famous bar shape as well as the spiral arms. Therefore, all the stars in the spiral arms actually follow the spin power which is generated by the black hole – and not vice versa. Hence, the Idea that angular momentum could generate this kind of momentum in the black hole is not so logical. D M: "The other is that those supermassive black holes played a key role in the formation and evolution of galaxies". Yes, sure. But again it might be an impossible mission to create this kind of object out of the available mass and star in the halo. D M : "4. What are you talking about? What scientists? Citation needed, please." Please see the message from Spyman: " Also even though supermassive black holes holds a impressive amount of mass/energy they are still very small compared to their housing galaxy". http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/77126-how-thick-is-our-spiral-arm/ Two more issues to consider: If it happened in the past, we would expect that it should happen again. There are billions over billions global clusters and staler halo in the space. Unfortunately for this illogical theory… the science couldn't find even one that is in a transient phase of converting to spiral galaxy. Why the "angular momentum" is not working anymore??? Spiral arms: The science still wonders how the spiral arms had been created. " Some recent studies have explored the likelihood that spiral galaxies with a close neighbor (a nearby dwarf galaxy, for example) get their arms as gravity from the satellite galaxy pulls on the disk of its neighbor." Just think what could be the results for a spiral galaxy without at spiral arms. The Angular Momentum can't give any real explanation how the spiral arms had been created. Without the spiral arms – there is no existence for a spiral galaxy. Therefore, currently, the science has no solid theory for spiral galaxy formation. The atom creation Theory is the ultimate answer for what we see in space!!!

Hi EdEarl There is no explanation how a supper massive black hole had been created!!! Just by putting together billion stars would not create a black hole. Without a real supper massive black hole there is no existence for a spiral galaxy! In order to set a spiral galaxy a full Coordination between the size of galaxy, the mass of the black hole and the velocity of the spinning is needed. If a black hole had been created by some sort of magic power while the spinning velocity is too low, then it would probably eliminate all the stars which might be in the aria of its gravity force. if the black hole had been created while the spinning velocity is too high, then the stars would probably drift out of the clusters before setting the spiral galaxy. Therefore, the chance to set spiral galaxy out of clusters of 400 billion stars is virtually zero!!!

Dark Matter – When the science doesn't have a logical answerת it's the time for DM…

By Wiki: "The Milky Way began as one or several small overdensities in the mass distribution in the Universe shortly after the Big Bang. Some of these overdensities were the seeds of globular clusters in which the oldest remaining stars in what is now the Milky Way formed. These stars and clusters now comprise the stellar halo of the Galaxy. Within a few billion years of the birth of the first stars, the mass of the Milky Way was large enough so that it was spinning relatively quickly. Due to conservation of angular momentum, this led the gaseous interstellar medium to collapse from a roughly spheroidal shape to a disk. Therefore, later generations of stars formed in this spiral disk. Most younger stars, including the Sun, are observed to be in the disk." Questions: Black hole - In this explanation there is not even one word about the supper massive black hole – When and how it had been created? Spinning – In the Milky Way there are about 400 Billion stars. Even if we put them together, it is clear that each one might have a different velocity, phase & direction. How come that the mass of those stars can suddenly triggered them all spinning in one direction and at high velocity??? Escape – Actually, if the stars will start spinning, we would expect that most of them would be thrown out of the stellar halo galaxy. Do you agree? The mass of the black hole – Scientists claim that the mass of the supper massive black hole is too small compared to its housing spiral galaxy. So how it could even start the momentum? Disk shape & spiral arms – There is no glue between the stars, so how the conservation of angular momentum could set the disk shape and the spiral arms without the requested power which is needed to hold them together?

Dear Spyman. Look at those pictures of spiral galaxies; Try to focus and look carefully… What do you see? How come that the center is full of light? How come that the super massive black hole is not black? Why it has a disc shape? Why all the stars are moving in one direction? Why the stars at the far end of the galaxy are moving at ultra speed? Why??? There is only one answer for that! By wiki " The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the 5-kpc ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." The Supper massive black hole has the power to create new Atoms. This creation process generates the ultra lightning that we see in the center. Those new Atoms are the foundation of the new stars forming process. Those new stars are drifting outwards from the center and create the famous shape of the spiral arms. So simple. So clear. No need for dark energy. No need for quantum. No need for expansion. So simple and easy…

O.K. So, now we know that the core of the milky way Galaxy has the capability to generate Hydrogen Atom. This is good, but not enough. We need to verify that this Atom creation is feasible at the core of any Spiral galaxy. Therefore, we need to look at other spiral galaxies and try to find significant presents or creation of Hydrogen Atom. As Andromeda is the closest spiral galaxy, we should start with this one and try to prove this theory.

Hi swansont This article gives highlight about the Magnetic trap for Anti Hydrogen: "We have given a comprehensive description of a magnetic trap for antihydrogen confinement comprising an octupole and mirror coil arrangement, together with a solenoid to facilitate initial antiproton capture" There is no contradiction to the idea that by strong magnetic and gravitational field the Nature might generate Antiatom or a real Atom. It is a feasible process. The nature is not waiting for our technology for trapping Antiatom or Atom at the Galaxy core. Just think about the following statement: " The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the 5-kpc ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." Why the bar contains large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy??? How come??? Where this huge molecular hydrogen comes from??? Don't you think that it might be an indication for an Atom Creation activity in the spiral galaxy core??? Don't you think that there is a possibility that at least one atom had been created by the huge power of the rotational suppermassive black hole??? With regards to your statement: "It was also done in a vacuum, to reduce the chance of collisions with other atoms". Let's assume that there is a chance for Atom collision in the galaxy core. That is perfect. Now, the new created Hydrogen Atom might collide with another Hydrogen Atom. This should create a helium Atom. Hence, there is good possibility that the galaxy core generates Hydrogen atoms, as well as variety of Atoms and moleculars…

So far the Science was able to produce anti-matter at CERN: http://press.web.cern.ch/press-releases/2010/11/antimatter-atoms-produced-and-trapped-cern "Antimatter atoms produced and trapped at CERN" "Antimatter– or the lack of it – remains one of the biggest mysteries of science. Matter and its counterpart are identical except for posite charge, and they annihilate when they meet." "Antihydrogen atoms are produced in a vacuum at CERN, but are nevertheless surrounded by normal matter. Because matter and antimatter annihilate when they meet, the antihydrogen atoms have a very short life expectancy. This can be extended, however, by using strong and complex magnetic fields to trap them and thus prevent them from coming into contact with matter." Hence, the Science was able to generate an AntiAtom and keep it for short time based on the magnetic field and acceleration power at CERN. Therefore, we should look at the universe and try to find if there is any possibility for the nature to create Antiatom or even an Atom. I have found two possibilities as follow: Magnetar star and the core of spiral galaxy Magnetar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar A magnetar is a type of neutron star with an extremely powerful magnetic field, Magnetars are characterized by their extremely powerful magnetic fields of 108-1011tesla.[5] These magnetic fields are hundreds of millions of times stronger than any man-made magnet,[6] and quadrillions of times more powerful than the field surrounding Earth. Hence, a magnetar which is stronger hundreds of millions of time than the one at CERN should have the requested power to generate AntiAtom for long live time or even an Atom… Core of spiral galaxy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_Center "The Galactic Center is the rotational center of the Milky Way galaxy… Existence of a supermassive black hole at the Galactic Center, on the order of 4 million solar masses.[18]… The nature of the Galaxy's bar which extends across the Galactic Center is also actively debated…The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the "5-kpc ring" that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity. "Work presented in 2002 by Antony Stark and Chris Martin mapping the gas density in a 400 light-year region around the Galactic Center has revealed an accumulating ring with a mass several million times that of the Sun and near the critical density for star ormation… The bar may be surrounded by a ring called the "5-kpc ring" that contains a large fraction of the molecular hydrogen present in the galaxy, as well as most of the Milky Way's star formation activity." New born stars – "They seem to have all been formed in a single star formation event a few million years ago. The existence of these relatively young (though evolved) stars was a surprise to experts, who expected the tidal forces from the central black hole to prevent their formation." Hence, the Center of the Milky way is a rotational supermassive black hole. Potentially it should have the power to accelerate the Atom as the science did at CERN but with significant higher power. Therefore, it might have the requested power which is needed to generate long live AntiHydrogen Atom or even Hydrogen Atom . A strong evidence for that is the bar which is surrounded by a ring that contains a large fraction of the molecular Hydrogen present in the Milky Way galaxy. Do you agree?

Hello Imatfaal. It's quite clear that the Elite Scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory. They are so good believers (Especially ACG...) that they reject any heretical thoughts that there is even a small chance that the big bang had never happened... Unfortunately, the big bang theory is full of black holes. It can't explain and sustain (by itself) the current shape of the universe. Therefore, so many people (including myself) wonder if this is a correct theory. It was even difficult for the science to explain why we have to trust this theory. Therefore, new supportive theories had been invented to close the gap. Never the less, at this phase let's abandon any new theory and try to focus only on one issue - "Star age Measurements". This is critical element for any theory. This is a key element for confirming or rejecting the Big bang theory. Therefore, I was quite surprise to find that this key measurement is actually based on the Big Bang theory. Based on Wiki it is stated: "The metallicity of an astronomical object may provide an indication of its age. When the universe first formed, according to the Big Bang theory, it consisted almost entirely of hydrogen which, through primordial nucleosynthesis, created a sizeable proportion of helium and only trace amounts of lithium and beryllium and no heavier elements. Therefore, older stars have lower metallicities than younger stars such as our Sun." So, the science is measuring the star age based on the fundamental Idea of the Big bang. With those results of the star age they are coming back and reconfirm the Big bang theory.This is absolutely radicals and contradicts any basic common sense. It is clear that without the big bang theory, the Science could develop some other method for Star age measurements. Why no one try to think out of the BIG BANG box???

That's good enough for me. The Sun must drift outwards from the galactic center. The Sun must drift outwards from the galactic center. This is a task for NASA to take and verify.

So what would we expect to find? Outwards drifting in a disc shape system – Nasa had found that the moon is drifting away. Is there any possibility for them to verify that the Earth is drifting away from the Sun, and the Sun is drifting away from the center of the galaxy? Star age – The science must find a new method for measuring Star age. This is critical for verification the real place for new star forming.