Mohammad Shafiq Khan

@ D H The reply to your querry is in the article 'Experimental....' in detail. One Mr. Jeremy Dunning- Davies come up with the smilar objection and he was adequtely replied so much so that the University of Hull (Department of Physics) to which he claimed to be represening disowned him. The same objection of Mr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies has been replied; to which he had no answer . The objections & replies are in the form of articles which are avaiable on www.jsjournal.net & viXra. However following reply should be sufficient to you since you know some pysics & mathematics. The second trickery is exposed in the article „On the Electrodynamics by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries‟ (Open letter to Professors, Teachers, Researchers and Students of Physics) [2] which would require some clarification for easy understanding. I would reproduce the two sentences in section 3 of the article “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” [4] wherein second trick has been played. “If we place x'=x-vt, it is clear that a point at rest in the system k must have a system of values x', y, z, independent of time. We first define (tau) as a function of x', y, z, and t.” In these two sentences the second trickery is hidden. He accepts that point x', y, z is at rest in the moving coordinate system k which implies that point x', y, z is independent of time (tau) in the moving coordinate system. Evidently point x', y, z is always at a fixed distance from the origin of the moving coordinate system k and as such (tau) is not a function x', y, z as this is a fixed point in the moving coordinate system k. In the following sentences he plays the trick of making (tau) a function of x',y,z and t as variables. This is explained partly in the clarification which stands also published by Elixir Online Journal in February issue on page 6809 under the heading comments. The coments reveal that the open chalenge has been taken as a trivial matter. I will like to inform the members of the forum that all the universities are in total knowledge of the open challenge and the open challenge stands circulated to most of the professors of physics of the world. They have absolutely no answer. In so far as the reputed & main-stream journals are corcerned they in no case publish the articles which challenge th main-stream paradigm even if the articles are perfect & correct. Einstein's basic articles have been shown to be mathematically, experimentally and theoretically incorrect andan alternative proposed which is consistent with theory & experiment. The thorough understanding of the articles is the pre-requisite to make any genuine & logical comments.

OPEN CHALLENGE The article ‘On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies’ by Albert Einstein is based on trickeries is proved beyond any doubt whatsoever in the articles (1). ‘Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Conce...pt and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe’ published in the peer-reviewed journal namely Indian Journal of Science & Technology (March 2012 issue) available on www.indjst.org (2) ‘On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies By Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries’ (Open letter to Professors, Teachers, Researchers and Students of Physics) published in peer-reviewed journal Elixir Online Journal (February 2012 issue) available on www.elixirjournal.org. The Voigt transformation was simply a mathematical possibility which was changed by Lorentz by introducing the Lorentz factor but the Lorentz factor is simply a manipulation. Thus nature and forces in nature were trivialized and made subservient to mathematics in the theories of relativity, Big Bang Theory, Space-time concept and in all physical sciences which are directly or indirectly based on the ‘On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies’. It is unfortunate for humanity that exposing these trickeries took more than one hundred years. I openly challenge all the professors, researchers & teachers of physics/philosophy of physics to come forward & show me where I am wrong or else they have to accept that they are teaching incorrect physics based on ‘trickeries’. My challenge may not be treated as a publicity stunt but I sincerely wish that truth should prevail on this planet and am expecting identical response from all truth loving people/intellectuals. I do understand that it is hard for mainstream physicists to reconcile with the alternative philosophy; though actual and factual; as almost all the living physicists and researchers are borne, brought up and taught physics which is fundamentally incorrect. Their livelihood is based on the physics which has been adopted as the result of fraud, but these material interests should never be a stumbling block to acknowledge the reality, which to my understanding is the essence of scientific thinking and honest living for the betterment of entire human society. I have not an iota of doubt that sooner or later the truth will prevail, but it would be in the interest of humanity that ‘truth’ is accepted now so that humanity comes out of clutches of materialism which in itself is naked atheism. Mohammad Shafiq Khan, (M.Sc. Physics)