dapifo

Last studies says that decisions are taked before we realize. them Does it mean that they ar only the result of physical laws? So scientists, led by neuroscientist John-Dylan Haynes, located with precision concrete signs of brain activity up to 10 seconds before participants were aware of their own choice. According to what Haynes said to the magazine NewSientist , this study has shown that "our decisions are predetermined unconsciously a long time before our own conscience the launch." As early as 1983, the American neuroscientist Benjamin Libet proposed that "decisions taken by any subject are first carried out in the unconscious and subsequently transferred to the conscious, and that the subject's belief that its decision depends on your will is due only to the retrospective view of the process. "

I agree with you ythat I´m not an Phisics Expert (like you?), and that is possible why my mind is open to learn and understand. I am Industrial Engineer with a large experience in making multidisciplinary projects, and I am not an expert in academic knowledge of basic and theoretical phisics science. But possibly, that is why I'm not a slave of the bonds of conventional science. Some times "trees will not let you see the forest" Also closed ideas from an Expert (??) science officer like you are wellcome !!...This makes the discussions that we have most interesting...and we can contrast with the state of the art of science. All I ask is some education and, above all, learn to listen to ideas and knowing how to refute them with sound arguments and not insults (typical of the Inquisition).

When JustinW says: "a form of free energy energy Could Be The vacuum of space", I thought it was a joke ... I did not know about the Casimir effect. You see that strange energy! ... How many different types of energy such as this one can find in the universe? ... And out of our Universe or System? When I speak of Our System I refer to the system we know and that we have modeled (with laws and theories that work within). But for me, this is our open system, and sometimes distortions may appear that will be unexplained by current models. "Our System" is different hat "Our Universe": "Our Universe" is all the Universe (space) that we know nowadays (from 10 exp -35 to 10 exp +27). But inside this Universe, we don´t know every thing nowadays, we only know the part that we have modeled (about 20% of total). This 20% is "Our Sytem".

quote name='D H' timestamp='1340303599' post='685582'] In other words, an over unity device. Sorry. It doesn't exist. Learn some physics. Please, open your mind !!! and read all I am saying ....by transforming "unknown energy" into a "known energy".....!!!! You know that most (80 %) of the energy existing in Our Universe ... we don´t know were it is ... it is unknow (dark) energy. Possibly this knowledge is too high for you?

When I talk about free energy, I mean what is commonly known: to obtain A energy from a system that spends only B (where A> B). Windmill or solarpanel IS NOT free energy...but possible the problem is that the extra energy is coming from any where we don´t know (!!!!?)... The questios are two: - It is known for certain of the existence of a machine like that?...your answer is clearly NO - If there ... where is coming this extra energy? The problem is to know when really a system is closed (!!!) It is possible that exist any other energy (dark energy,...) that you don´t know and realize, but that it exist (in this system)...and it is possible that, some of these machines ,what they do is transforming this "unknown energy" into a "known energy"

I see that you are very pragmatic and clear. When I am talking about the possibility of getting this extra energy from the electromagnetic wave that could be in the space, I reffers to the possibility that a big motor coil rotating at high speed (3-10.000 rpm), could generate electricity from waves of the magnetic field that may exist in space (possibly generated by several electromagnetic waves : phone, TV, radio, ...). And what about dark energy? it is the 80% of the energy of the universe and we don´t know any thing about it: what it is and where it is. That "energy is neither created nor destroyed. it is only transformed"...could be valid into our system we know...but there is a (little?) possibility that other hidden systems (dimensions) exist (??), but we still don´t know them....and this extra "free" energy comes from there.... I read about "black holes" could transfer energy and mass to other dimensions or universes (??)...and also that "force of gravity" is possible that leaks to other dimensions or universes. If these theories could be true ... why not other...(?) I agree that this would be a very small possibility, and that most (or all) of the studies about "free energy" could be false, erroneous or scams...but possible not all of them !!!

It is clear (or not?) that "energy is neither created nor destroyed. it is only transformed" But I like always leave the door partly open and not deny exhaustively without checking. That is why I think taht possible could happen something that we don´t know (?): - It is possible that it get the new energy from the electromagnetic wave there are in the space? - Getting energy from other unknow systems (universes): smaller or larger ?...neutrinos, ... What yes it seams clear now is that there are not any scientific and oficial evidence that any machine like this is working now in the world..

OK...It is clear that you have a very good position in the Google search (2nd if you looking for "science forum")...go on with your job...and congratulations for it !! I only hope to be able to have interesting discussions and coversations about science topics...with you and with your members and users. Usually, It is something difficult to have them in the regular sociial life outside the university and research centers. I hope this forum (..and others) could be a window for me to the intellectual and scientific discussions, in a a pleasant and amusing way, but also in a educated and serious way.

I buy it !!!!...how much ???...we see and talk...out of the web !!! OK..OK...Thanks...I see this web belogs to three private persons with nonprofit objective (Unless that appears a good opportunity), and with some volumteers collaborators. That´s all !!!!...I only wanted to know it. Because I thought that it belonged (as other science webs) to Universities or Other kind of Science organization. I don´t ask it to all the webs, only to that I use to use...because normally it didn´t appear in any place of the web. And the other 4 web I ask it (1 USA, 1 English, and 2 Spanish) ... they belong to particular persons like this one (!!!). I think it could be interesting to tell it in the Principal Page.

I know a person that assure to me he has developed a "free energy" machine, and now he is pomoting it in several trade fairs. He will show it to me soon. Which experiment I have to do to prove and certificate if really it is getting free energy? As I know it is a "rotative endless motion machine", with a big motor coil in the middle....And it is Initialy moved by an electrical (car) battery that never is being spend...and also it generates extra electricity to keep working light bulbs It is possible that it get the new energy from the electromagnetic wave there are in the space? It is clear (or not?) that "energy is neither created nor destroyed. it is only transformed" but possible could happen something we didn´nt know: - Getting energy from other systems (universes): smaller or larger ?...neutrinos, ...

It is only a normal question...to understand better the funccioning of it...and also the objective of it. It is the first time that any moderator is aswering....(???)...the question was for them...but possible at this hours they are resting. Will see the answers tomorrow.

There are a lot of articles and doccuments talking about the "Free Energy" machines, but there is any real demonstration of its operation? There is any physical explanation to accept or to refute it?

I wonder if this website belongs to a University, Centre or Company (Public or Private?). Thanks

This thread is trying to answer the question about why current state of the art of the science says that there is no center of the universe. But I think there is a overlooked issue that is above this one, and that can clarify the purpose of the initial thread subject: "Is the observable universe (Our Oniverse) the only one?" If Our Universe could be only a bubble more of the Global Universe, then the question about the center of the universe (Our Universe or Global Universe ?) has another dimension. If Our Universe is expanding isotropically, could mean that there are not center, but if it is a bubble more within a Global Universe, then must be a center. But if as universe you refers to the Global Universe ... then that is a question currently beyond our knowledge.

I really do not understand why you are so offended. I Only referred you this link to show current studies on the multiverse ... that they are still in study. It is clear that some people do not have enough level to create and imagine, and that the only thing they can do is to read the studies of others and to look through a telescope looking for supernovae.

Yes, but partly. I propose that ,either outside or outside of us, there are infinite scales bands, spectra, areas,.... (positives or negatives) in which each one can exist different universes, .... with different laws, entities, ....at different scale....uizás quisiste decir: ya sea fuera o dentro de nosotros, existen infinitas escalas , en la que en cada una pueden existir diferentes universos, .... con diferentes Alpha

Here I am....with some evidences...have a look to the following forum: Stephen Feeney at University College London and colleagues say they've found tentative evidence of four collisions with other universes in the form of circular patterns in the cosmic microwave background. In their model of the universe, called "eternal inflation," the universe we see is merely a bubble in a much larger cosmos. This cosmos is filled with other bubbles, all of which are other universes where the laws of physics may be dramatically different from ours. http://www.kurzweilai.net/astronomers-find-evidence-of-other-universes-in-cosmic-microwave-background http://www.universetoday.com/87927/testing-the-multiverse-observationally/

Take a look to the following forum: Stephen Feeney at University College London and colleagues say they’ve found tentative evidence of four collisions with other universes in the form of circular patterns in the cosmic microwave background. In their model of the universe, called “eternal inflation,” the universe we see is merely a bubble in a much larger cosmos. This cosmos is filled with other bubbles, all of which are other universes where the laws of physics may be dramatically different from ours. http://www.kurzweilai.net/astronomers-find-evidence-of-other-universes-in-cosmic-microwave-background

It´s not clear for me your opinion... - First you say: that iif "the universe was infinite in space/time How could this be understood in the antropy princeable,or laws of thermodynamics"....then I understand that you think the universe is finite. - But then you say: would it be improbable for this advent or creation to have accured maybe millions or billions of times leaving untold number of universes perhaps from other demensions?...then I understand that you thik theu niverse is infinite. I think that it is like the live: I don´t think we are the only live beings in the universe, as I don´t think our universe is the only one ("and the best!!"). If something happened once...the normal and logical is that happen more times (!!?)...And the experience give us a lot of examples for it.

So what is the HUDF? I understud that HUDF is the place of the universe that we can see the youngest galaxies...as they were 13.000 millions of years...and that in this direction will br the CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE. so difficult is to understand that Our Universe (Universe 1) is just one bubble among thousands of millions of bubbles that exist in a universe (Universe 2) a larger scale? In this case, Our Universe itself to be a center, which is the singularity that created the big bang, and will be expanding into the Universe 2.

I´m sorry I´m new here...but I don´t thik I heve done an wrong answer...just my opinion.

No one, but I think is the most logical hypotesis... and explain better the whole universe. Some time is better to give ab hypotesis...and then to try to prove or observe if it seems logical and possible .

The big bang is only a explotion inside a bigger universe.