Yuri Danoyan

Billion stars around us, but only one among the most nearest.This is our Sun № 1. 8-9 planets revolve around our Sun but only one № 3, most need for Sun. This is our planet Earth. Again, the ratio of 3:1. Please accept this post as the autumn joke

Wonder of beta -decay that "death" the 1 nontstable particles gives "life" to 3 stable particles: A neutron (udd) decays to a proton (uud), an electron, and an antineutrino. Another example of ratio 3:1. Only 4% corresponds to the visible baryonic matter which constitutes stars, planets and living beings. Hydrogen is the most abundant of the chemical elements, constituting roughly 75% of the universe's elemental mass. Helium is the second lightest element and is the second most abundant in the observable Universe. Hydrogen and helium are estimated to make up roughly 74% and 24% of all baryonic matter in the universe respectively. Almost 3:1 ratio...

New edition: If the space and time non-equivalent substances, it is prevents to understand c,G,h, changed in time or not? Their dimensions contain both...

O.K. Thank you for correction. Shortage of experience in this field....

As noted in my thread http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34145 about metasymmetry and its numerical measure 3:1 we can see other approximate cofirmation in content of universe. WMAP data reveals that its contents include 4.6% atoms, the building blocks of stars and planets(NM-NATURAL MATTER). Dark matter(DM) (comprises 23% of the universe. This matter, different from atoms, does not emit or absorb light. It has only been detected indirectly by its gravity. 72% of the universe, is composed of "dark energy"(DE) that acts as a sort of an anti-gravity. This energy, distinct from dark matter, is responsible for the present-day acceleration of the universal expansion. WMAP data is accurate to two digits, so the total of these numbers is not 100%. This reflects the current limits of WMAP's ability to define Dark Matter and Dark Energy NM=4.6%; DM=23%; DE=72%;NM+DM=27.6; If DE error+3% If(NM+DM) error-2.6% then DE/NM+DM=3:1 My be accidental coincidence?

Who should be, he will certainly understand ..

I try used google translator

If the space and time non-equivalent substances, it is not prevents confirm or deny whether the change in time c, G, h? Their dimensions contain both...

I must think about this...

Something like to get a splinter in my brain.I don't like 4-D space-time. I will try to explain .... Why are you went to bed, a night for all spatial scales changed in ten time.You are notice anything? Absolutely sure that no, but now the usual time period when you sleep, increase or decrease by 10 times. Did you notice this?

I guess 4 kinds pseudoscalar mesons pi,K,D,B play roles of Higgs....

1)No signs of supersymmetry. 2)We will see signs metasymmetry, ratio 3:1.

More LHC Predictions http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/

"Still, the general direction is always toward the reductionist—understanding complexity in terms of an underlying simplicity."(Burton Richter) http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc...s_10/8_1.shtml

I knew until now that .... What do you mean?

535 views is not a small number.

I think you fail the Turing Test What mean the Turing test?

Reminding about "It from bit".....

Reminding about chasm between discrete and continue.... Foundations of Set Theory (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics) (Hardcover) by A.A. Fraenkel (Author), Y. Bar-Hillel (Author), A. Levy (Author) Quotation from Chapter IV,p.211.The abyss between discretenes and continuity

So far, you've only introduced a method of calculating discrete symmetries About chasm between the discrete and the continuous. Neither the continuous-within-discrete nor the discrete-within-continuous are fully satisfying."Of two evils choose the least."i waste 40 years my life to make the right choice and focused on last version. This choice has opened me eyes and i have seen "Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it - in a decade, a century, or a millennium - we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid?"(John Wheeler)

In the book "Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics: The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures" in lecture Stewen Weinberg "Towards the final laws of physics" we can read next sentence: "Gradually comes understanding that the symmetry group is most important that we today can learn about nature.I like now to say something that, until the end of what is not sure, but that could well become a reality, namely: all that we need apart from quantum mechanics to describe the physical picture of the world, is determine the group symmetry of nature." Metasymmetry idea just fit to Weinber's thought about universal symmetry of nature and could lead to the realization of his dream of a Final theory.

Just in case: http://books.google.com/books?id=cU3HQFek7L0C&dq=vilenkin+infinity&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0

Eventually we must do choice between discrete approximation of continue,or vice versa,continue approximation of discrete.Computer- Internet discrete epoch dictates to as first version.

Can you help me establish contact with Professor Hovik Khudaverdian?My be we can used him as a translator,because he speaking russian and armenian.My mail to him always returning.His adres blocked.

Could you help me establish contact with Professor Hovik Khudaverdian? When i explain him my research (i speaking armenian and russian),then i can used him as a translator. We are natives the same city Yerevan,e-mail to him always returning.