marine(uc)

i just thought that mabey since we are mostly water, and life starts in hot water. that mabey lightning may have struck teh water, and the energy lached onto an element. and by doing this, it was able to create a single cell of an orgasnism. mabey it used a few elements

yah, it's foolish to think you need a replicate earth for an alien speices to be created. the only species that would need a replicate earth to live on, is us. well. you can't say thats silly. how can a one cell organim learn to live and expand?? it has 1 cell. nobody knows how the first cells were created. i can't imagine how they did the cross-over from element to organism. BUT i garantee it has to do something with energy, heat and water. energy being the key ingredient. i think that elements with energy make life. because in the end all we are is lifeless elements filled with energy. take us apart atom by atom and we are just elements. I believe we are just an evolution of elements.

okay, i think im in the wrong section... is there one for philosophy?

yes, i know that. i included that in what i wrote. that in the experiment we are basing time as what we currently are seeing. not what the object is currently doing.

ohhh thats really interesting lol. i read the grandfather paradox. thats a neat situation

lol im only 17. whats causality mean? and FTL?

yah, i get it. your supposed to test a theory. but the point of myn wasn't the speed of light. it was the other part. why do you insist on making this so difficult. its like you guys live by the theory of reletivity. you know what. what if using science we broke that rule?? what if we were able to affect time and space itself. heres an idea to help you, there is no known velocity that spacetime can move, as in the spacetime fabric itself. Move that and you're set for time travel. I don't think facts are relevant here, at least in new science, you can use facts to help support your ideas but remember that they exlplain science with a limited perspetive, that is, the present's perspective. this is all philosophical, and you guys are too picky too understand that.

I'm really new at this, i have a crazy theory on evolution okay, i was thinking of this today and we are essentially just elements in a living form. if we were taken apart atom by atom, all it would be is a pile of water and various other elements. Now i was thinking of this, and does that mean we are simply an evolution of elements?? think of it, all we are is a living form. under certain conditions is an evolution of elements to create life and expand it, and try and make it as advanced as possible to extend itself and expand.a is our elemental make-up each of those elements trying to manifest itself for a reason i don't understand. because think about it, life was created from nothing.. from heat, water electricity w.e. ect. it was created from basic elements which expanded into the creature. us humans are mostly water and so was our starting enviornment. does that mean water used cells to evolve and since we were always around water from an early stage, it has made us into mostly water creatures and made it a necessary element of our survival... I don't believe that on every planet you need water to live. i've heard plenty of times, there won't be many planets like earth and they will be extremely hard to find due to correct conditions needed. but i don't believe every planet will need water to sustain life. if i am correct and we are element evolution, life could grow anywhere, and use widely available liquid as its source of life. and evolve from that element

oh. i thought people only thought it was unattainable. i didn't think they thought of what would happen if you acually went faster.

ohh i thought this one was theroetics, not physics. in a theoretics section, you'd think id be able to say theorys without having the means of achieving something torn apart when they weren't what i was proposing in my theory.

wow, im just stating a theory I made. I didn't come to have the means of this theory torn apart. this isn't about the light travel at all. its about the result if it was achieved. don't think about the impossible part, lets just say we magically find a way to go faster.

yes it would have. your just in denial. that guy was ahead of even our time right now.

Okay ive tried a couple drugs like acid once and a few other drugs. When your on these drugs, your perception of time is slowed down. and with other drugs it's sped up. Now this is what happens when your brain reacts to certain drugs. now what if that means, our brain controls our perception of time. if anyone here has ever been in a fight, or had an big accident or fell off a bike. sometimes, time just slows directly down.. like impossibly slow, if time was like that an hour would feel like weeks. that means time is merely a perception. Now our brain is amazingly advanced. what if time was constantly fluxuating, moving back in time forth. constantly moving minutes, weeks even months back in time. or going forward a month, then back 2 weeks. going really fast, then slowing down, then going fast backwards.. then slowing forwards. what if our brain took EVERYTHING in constantly, and layed it out for you in a way you could understand a line, a single line and turned all this backwards forwards movement time does and puts it into a straight line and does this seperately from the rest of the brain which controls memory and is completely subconcious and unconnected with memory or anything like that. mabey certain drugs can slow down time, because it messes with the brains time speed function. mabey the back and forth through time may not be true, but what if the speed was. and the brain leveled out the speed so it was always normal. that would explain how a drug can so widely change our speed because it ruins the brains ability to do it properly and it slows it down. or even things like slowing it down for a accident. what if we could learn how to slow it down permanently or speed it up permanently? and if this is all true, then time could just be a constantly changing and moving thing and our brain just an amazing interpretation that takes it all in and puts it out in the proper order for us too see. this may sound crazy, im only 17 and don't know if this acually sounds reasonable or not.

okay, i was thinking of this today and we are essentially just elements in a living form. if we were taken apart atom by atom, all it would be is a pile of water and various other elements. Now i was thinking of this, and does that mean we are simply an evolution of elements?? think of it, all we are is a living form. under certain conditions is an evolution of elements to create life and expand it, and try and make it as advanced as possible to extend itself and expand.a is our elemental make-up each of those elements trying to manifest itself for a reason i don't understand. because think about it, life was created from nothing.. from heat, water electricity w.e. ect. it was created from basic elements which expanded into the creature. us humans are mostly water and so was our starting enviornment. does that mean water used cells to evolve and since we were always around water from an early stage, it has made us into mostly water creatures and made it a necessary element of our survival... I don't believe that on every planet you need water to live. i've heard plenty of times, there won't be many planets like earth and they will be extremely hard to find due to correct conditions needed. but i don't believe every planet will need water to sustain life. if i am correct and we are element evolution, life could grow anywhere, and use widely available liquid as its source of life. and evolve from that element i also think that mabey, elements need energy to create life. All we are is energized elements.. is this what they do when they combine?? non-living material + energy = living material, elements that move and expand. What do you guys think about this?

The travelling faster then light isn't what we're talking about. I'm just saying we can magically go faster then light for the purpose of my theory of what would happen. and in my theory, you basically travel back in time because the light has to catch up with you, and you can look back and watch the past.

Okay there are a couple parts to my theory. first im not talking about a time travel machine, I'm talking about moving faster then light and how doing this would make you travel backward into the past. this is all saying we can theoretically move faster then light through some kind of imaginary dark matter futuristic space ship. I have a scenario where time travel would take place due to the space ship going faster then light. Now in my theory, two space ships are beside eachother talking with a sun shining light on them. One does a faster then light launch to a distance where it would take about 40 seconds to get to at light speed. the space ship then turns around and moves left about 50 feet. Now looking back at the other space ship. the light that was reflecting off the ships is about 20 seconds in the past and the light is catchin up to him, and he would see himself talking to the other ship from the past. thus time travel has occured. because in the end time is really just how long something takes to reach our eyes. if u consider everything you see right now current, then that space ship would be current and you would be looking at the past. this also would work for moving forward in time as if you looked in the other direction you just met the light coming from the other direction faster. This is my theory, i may be missing alot of facts, but im only 17 and don't have alot of depth in science. please give me feedback thanks

okay based on the theory of reletivity light will always go the same speed, even if your going the speed of light and you turn on a light it will move away from you. but from a fixed point of reference it will move the normal speed of light. Now people always talk about needing to find a way to move faster then light to travel to distant stars. BUT it is impossible. because even if we were to be able to go faster then light through some imaginary means, we would just go the speed of light no matter how much faster we were going. BECAUSE, time slows down to equal the speed of light the faster your going. so if you were going faster then light, time would just slow you down so ur acually just going the speed of light.. just like it does to light right now. so basically, even if we go faster time will slow down enough that the speed of light is our maximum speed. otherwise then if u ran and turned on a flashlight, from a fixed point the light would move faster then light. but this is just my theory.

was 3 steps below Nikola Tesla. wasn't even on the same playing field as nikola. search him up on youtube. watch some video's you'll be astonished you don't know his name and einstien isn't the forgotten one. He invented a tower that could give us unlimited energy from the sky's ionized layer in the atmosphere. but the project was destroyed by the government while it was being built because it would give limitless free energy for everyone, and they couldn't charge for it. he also built radio waves, lasers, high energy particles, and he stopped progress on his own project because if used you could open a whole in the earths electromagnetic field and allow all the ion's to rush in. creating a lightning storm with the electricity over 100 times greater then any lighting on earth today, with more energy and force then nuclear bombs it would destroy whole citys.