illuusio

Ignoring is also a form of resistance.

No it wouldn't change anything but that's not my point. The point is, individuals, who ignite the paradigm change will experience high level resistance at the beginning. More fundamental the issue is more resistance there will be. I mean even evidence won't do anything. Bruce DePalma is a quite excellent example of that. I don't refer to his N-machine stuff but only to rotational experiments.

Those examples tell only that paradigms do change, slowly but surely. It would be very interesting to hear the story behind those examples I mean in personal level.

In modern times I don't know (maybe Ning Li?). But for example during Stalin's era and WWII there were scientists killed because of their different thoughts on scientific matters. Before "modern times" killing was convenient way to get rid of people with different thoughts. Milder way was Church's ban. Before that witch hunts were common and before that just giving poison or using sword was normal procedure. Thank XXX we are living in modern times Now we use other means which are not so effective outside the science world.

I don't buy everything you say. Partially you are (to me) right. Waves are essential in many physical phenomena. But to me, they can't create strong enough pulling force, at least in atomic scale. I'm looking for the theory of everything, gravitation is only one part of it. I see also problems with wave aligning in high velocities, for example when light travels near black hole. Light's path do bend because of gravitation. And you say interfered waves do the trick... Those waves can't always be at proper phase to bend speeding light towards black hole. Sum of all paths of emitted light should be "straight" line.

From times of Antique Greek (science) world has been afraid of paradigm changes. Why? Is current paradigm some kind of religion or something? People with different views are seen ridiculous, crazy and so on. Sometimes they are even killed. This is very interesting question and to me very personal

I rest my case I open new topic in Speculations on this one.

I'm referring major paradigm changes. Science world is screaming and kicking all the way into new paradigm, always has.

You think that every wave is going to align? What about destructive outcome of colliding waves?

To OP, it seems that it is custom here that when theory gets to it's limits then defenses kick in. Sad but true. "Respected" physicist won't take any risks with anything beyond the accepted "truth".

How much is the internal pressure inside of a black hole then?

Ok then. So action of dark matter is also here on Earth because gravitation is?

So both gravitation and action of dark energy are from same phenomenon, wave aligning?

Well, on that case those several staff members should take a look at the current version and give me permission to create new topic on it. Have you read the latest version?

That's your opinion. It certainly was more comprehensive and powerful. So your excuse is your subjective opinion on me and my claims? I think my theory is in phase violent opposing

It depends on circumstances. In this case there is no point on restricting conversation on my theory. It's now much more comprehensive and powerful than two months ago. Please explain why it's not possible for a new thread about my theory? Exact reasons if possible.

Right... is there a rule saying that if some topic is ended because of lack of evidence that topic should never ever raise again? Well, in that case speculations area should be ended immediately because of lack of topics

Quite contrary! Math in theories is only an approximation of the nature.

Well, at least not intentionally. I might be sometimes a bit provocative and annoying but this forum needs that. Every innovative group needs mixture of personalities. So give me some air to breath Some words on black holes... If we talk about photons now. When photon approaches a black hole it experiences blueshift if watched from black hole. Next phase is particle pair production (verified with high power lasers). End result of pair production is annihilation of created particles (particle - antiparticle). That residue of annihilation is what black holes are made of. You can call that residue for example ether or just residue which ever you prefer. That annihilation after pair production can be observed because it happens before event horizon. When black hole captures for example star there will be quite big gamma radiation production.

You know that it can be measured

Mmm... can't answer that because of the sensorship

So what's the meaning of time itself? Time is man made not physical object, unless you link it with atom clocks Why do you need dark matter or energy?

Check this out -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift#Gravitational_blueshift Singularity (in black holes) is just very, very, very dense "ether". Photons are compressed (created) near nucleus because of electron's movement.

But what if the "true nature of things" is part of particle physics?

Within that generated plasma there is not enough pressure to create annihilation of quarks (repulsion still exists). When photon approaches the event horizon of black hole it will gain energy (blue shifting).