illuusio

Join the club I'll answer you now... I don't think that todo-list is a problem, quite contrary, it's an opportunity for physics to develop. Current foundation in physics will create limits for understanding of nature. Good example is galaxy arms anomaly. Traditional gravitation constant forces us to come up with things like dark matter. Good luck with that one You ain't gonna find it, cos there isn't one. But if you accept that G is not constant (as stated in my theory) you can simulate galaxy arms "anomaly" nicely and say goodbye to "dark matter".

Yep, it would impossible to explain those phenomenon you mentioned with 'known laws of physics'. But by changing the point of view you can explain those all.

Not really. I was saved by the bell (iodine) You'll get the proof later. My theory works as you already know. There is very simple test do that, for example modified Cavendish experiment.

No I'm not. I just pointed out the right way

I have a theory which explains all known anomalies in physics, that's why

I didn't say that they are problems. But what I mean is that we should make some re-thinking in order to resolve them. I 100% agree edit: Wow, my rep is getting bigger! You kids stop clicking that minus sign

You can't deny fringe movement with seen two extended MME, can you? What your eyes see? What you think other people see?

If you look at this list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics What do you think of it? Another day in the office? More handwaving? More dimensions? More everything? Or is it time to stop and do some re-thinking? Or do we even care? Everyday life consumes us very effectively so why bother? I get my money constantly and things are pretty much in equilibrium why rock the boat? We can even give some blind eye to minor cosmetic errors in science.

Ok, so it seems that there won't be any fruits left for this conversations with you. You are ignoring evidence.

mmm... that's original Keep on rocking!

You don't believe your own eyes? Well, I can't beat that If we speak of my theory, it surely does give predictions. I think that you haven't read the latest version.

Well, can you reveal your definition of a theory? I think that I do have a theory, but that's not the point. The point is MME measured horizontal ether wind and didn't find one. How in Earth it took that long before somebody tried it vertically?

And another one Could you at least try to stick with the topic?

LOL You ran out valid scientific arguments, nice. You can now roll on your back on the floor

We are not talking about my experiment here and I can't reveal it because of the patent issues. My theory doesn't have any exact predictions (at the moment) related to the extended MME so it's interesting to see how stable apparatus can be made and what is the fringe movements with it There will be movement, I put my money on that. So what experiments you do mean? Any links?

If that extrapolate is your (scientific) method then I hope you think that through again I don't know if they are right and I don't have to. I have done my own experiment but that's not in focus now. But is MME measuring unmeasurable? This is interesting graph! https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=theory%20of%20everything&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q I wonder why...?

I don't read bible so I don't know story of the mote and the beam. You have no need to be concerned for my health I'm respected member of Finnish society and living balanced life. Just because there is ether which effects extended MME (as we have seen now). So now you attack person behind the test? Well, I don't know anything about this person so I can't comment person per se. Fringes shifted in that video of yours too. I think that there is more accurate tests available from the German guy.

Mmm.. there was very clear shifting of interference pattern during rotation. Magnitude differs due to equipment, chears!

I'm busy at the moment but you can check this out. I found it with fast googling http://blog.hasslberger.com/2009/09/extended_michelsonmorley_inter.html#more It's party time! for me, literally!

Beats me! I haven't done any calculations. And no MME done either.

I'll leave these issue for you to resolve. I don't have any answers to your questions, none, zero, ... You WIN

Lock in is for my knowledge somewhat open issue. Main factor is scattering but the rest is up in the air (literally) I discuss about the matter of "error" with MME Topic of this thread. Other people do the tests sooner or later.

Lock in needs measures taken that's my point! They don't function properly otherwise. Ether flow might be one factor in case of lock in, other is scattering. We must remember that ether effects very very little to photons in small lenght used in RLGs. MME would give some nice results if apparatus isn't horizontally set up

Time is man made concept and from my opinion, not so important one. Exact mechanism of how matter distorts "space-time" is described in my theory, you can read it from there. Current way of measuring time with atomic clocks is problematic (explained in the doc).

I mean ether's effect on photon's path in general.