illuusio

I'm not looking for abstract theory. I know that quantum theories works fine where applied. THE problem is, that those theories are limited. If we try to overcome limitations, we must know the mechanism behind force carriers. For example my own theory works just fine with same force carrier mechanism. But at the moment I want to know how you guys think how forces are carried, mechanism behind quantum fields.

Sure there was a few other thing but the idea was good. Adding my own ideas to Bohr model -> complete and functional model.

Well, that's all current belief. Bohr model was discarded because consensus was that there can't be faster than light movement. That was wrong hypothesis for physics.

Well, photon ain't massless. It's just too small to measure. Actually electron orbiting around Hydrogen nucleus has velocity over speed of light.

Eh, really? Pure virtual particle hand waving won't do it. Virtual particles... how you can believe that ****? Same thing if I believe that all forces are carried out by tiny elves. Ball is in your court. I need more detailed mechanism.

Ok, that's your theory. I respect that you have your own ideas! What is the explanation of the main stream science? Anyone?

And the mechanism with these gauge Bosons is?

How attractive force is carried with force carriers? Well, virtual particle sounds like a hand waving to me http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1orMXD_Ijbs

dipole to dipole alignment through constructive wave alignment, what that means? What is wavelength of this magnetic field force carrier photons? This part I agree totally.

Force carriers? How do they function? Magnetism is mediated with photons? How that is possible? Well, gravitation effect doesn't act faster than light if object is moving. Actually it effects app. speed of light.

If we think gravitation, strong interaction and electromagnetism how you would describe delivery mechanism? What is the essence of different fields? What makes fields? I think there must be some kind of medium matter (ether?).

Well, hard to say, I have no experience on that one

This is easy one! If you have invested many years of your life to current truth you won't accept new knowledge too easily. Scientists get funding more easily with main stream research areas, so research is biased. It's hard for scientists who are swimming against the current

Every orbiting electron creates magnetic field. Only when orbits are lined up in material crystal (magnetized), effect is useful. Current is electron's movement from atom to atom.

I have made new experiments and refined my theory a lot. For Mellinia, you where right, two masses hanging side by side, they gonna contact. But why? Ether does the trick! My theory can explain for example flyby anomaly, Bruce DePalma's experiments and many many more anomalies.

I can totally understand that zero thing. If there is no motion there won't be any force. And because there is universe, zero is impossible

Could that be because of photon rotates and travels through something? ether? Without ether, It could travel straight, right?

I'm totally pro ether with you! Waves are too much for my taste, but ether kicks ass in this Universe. I have studied ether paradigm couple of months now. Every day ether makes more and more sense. Keep on rocking!

I made more serious thinking about speed of light. Certainly gravitation effects lights wave length, that's common knowledge. When it's said that even light can't escape from black hole, I don't think that's a whole truth. Maybe wave lenght is lost but photon particle itself keeps on moving at speed of light. Wave length can be imagened as photons rotation energy. Without that energy, photon impact on electron does practicly nothing because of too small kinetic energy. Speed of light certainly is dependant on matter travelled through. But measured speed of light on Earth in vacuum is same as in "empty" space.

Well, how about speed of light in strong gravitation field, like in black hole. Speed of light can be stopped.

Any comment on this one? -> http://www.sea3000.net/zhuyonghuan/20081009181348.php

Sure it is! But you must understand what you are measuring and factors involved. I just wonder why you haven't watch my video. Could you give me some kind of reason?

LOL I like you!

mm.. that statement is interesting. Did you or did you not watch the video of mine? Did you or did you not read the link I posted? And your opinion about them?

What ever, I add you to ignore list. Air flow is very strong. With smoother object there is smaller problem with air flow as you saw in my video. Why you are ignoring facts? I also posted a link where relative slow rotation frequence created pulling force. You can even google what rotation does for objects near each other.