LittleBoPeep

It is a different equation... It won't work because the equation is broken into 4 parts; all parts are independent of themselves... AVERAGING CIRCUMFERENCE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM TIME Answer Decoder.... --------------------------- Pythagorean Theorem: needs [math]A^2 + B^2 = C^2[/math] Or [math]Latitude^2 + Longitude^2[/math] ........................................................................................................... Circumference equation is needed too figure Altitude of a sphere figured at both LATITUDE + LONGITUDE with [math] Circumference = \frac{\ 3.14(AX)cos(CZ)}{\ 360} [/math] ........................................................................................................... Averages for each (LATITUDE + LONGITUDE)@ Altitude by averaging each Idea separately then creating a common connection for LATITUDE + LONGITUDE work in the circumference step appropriately by adding both averages then multiplying by each side of the equation of Latitude and Longitude averages... ............................................................................................................ Latitudinal answers are easy simple Pythagorean Theorem but Longitude is throwing me around will get it cracked but will take a little longer than expected... But I think it has to do with 90 or the limitations of latitude... LONGITUDE is still escaping my grasp but I believe it to be an angle problem that I must be prepared to take from Either end of the 180 degrees which has 2 signs... This gives me 3 variations of the equation... ............................................................................................................ I think that I need another equation to figure longitude... Do you see I have to be prepared to take it from both ENDS!!!!! ANSWERED SQUARED = 3 VARIATIONS OF EQUATIONS * 2 VARIATIONS OF SIGNS = ??????? Logic tells me that it is the other variation of the equation.... But REMEMBER THE LIFE LESSON given at both ends of the speed of speed equation... ........................................................................................................... WE TOO MUST FIND OUR TRUTH TOO CHANGE OUR ERRORS.... With everyone translating others observations manually understanding space time frankly is nobodies destiny, observered universal restrictions transcend: Reality Understanding Trust Happiness; AGAIN translating others observations + communicating how all notions grow exponentially observed universal restrictions erase reality received of respected sanity AND when we see errors, ERASE everything and start with a clean slate, REVIEW what we already have but REVISE the OBSERVATION that RESTRICTS our SIMPLE progression... .......................................................................................................... SIMPLY PUT I know as much as you only I respect your reality choice and request you respect mine....

MY point exactly, DISTANCE = TIME x SPEED Multiplications = Addition SPEED of 12 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 3 x 4 = 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 of SPEED Even if I say that I found a speed equation the holy trinity of DISTANCE, TIME, SPEED still is interchangeable. WE CHANGE OUR ERRORS.... With everybody communicating how all notions grow exponentially observed universal restrictions erase reality received of respected sanity + when we see errors, ERASE everything and start with a clean slate, REVIEW what we already have but REVISE the OBSERVATION that RESTRICTS our SIMPLE progression...

... I also listed my words in a functional sentence... The Items you listed vertically work in a normal sentence... YOU BE THE JUDGE.... (Pancakes Or Sushi Tastes Imbittered Now Guy Looking Into Krystal Elephants Thoughts, However Integrate Songs Igloos Sit Nocturnally Turbid Everyone Voices Indignation, Damnation, Exclamation Northward Causing Explosions...) Do you think the prior sentence conveys a solid point or Idea? OR Do you think???? With everyone translating others observations manually understanding space time frankly is nobodies destiny, observered universal restrictions transcend: Reality Understanding Trust Happiness... WE TOO MUST FIND OUR TRUTH...

SIMPLE LOGIC TEST: TIME = 3 LENGTH=4 Combine both using all manners possible ( / * - + ) using whatever calculation is at your mathematics disposal... Some answers may include: 7, 1, -1, 12, 1.3333 or .75 None of which are the original numbers but are products of combining 3 and 4 OR TIME with SPACE(Length) and every product of the answer is classified as SPEED. While I have explained Space-Time in its simplest form it is rejected because we have built our math around SPEED an accurate procedure for science, but in order to gain precision then WE TOO MUST FIND OUR TRUTH. With Everyone Translating Others Observations Manually Understanding Space Time Frankly Is Nobodies Destiny Observered Universal Restrictions Transcend Reality Understanding Trust Happiness (With everyone translating others observations manually understanding space time frankly is nobodies destiny, observered universal restrictions transcend: Reality Understanding Trust Happiness..) Other Ideas should fit in/on this base unit; if something else is found to be better then WE CHANGE OUR ERRORS.... With Everyone Communicating How All Notions Grow Exponentially Observered Universal Restrictions Erase Reality Received Of Respected Sanity (With everybody communicating how all notions grow exponentially observed universal restrictions erase reality received of respected sanity.....) OR Erase Review Revise Observed Restriction Simple when we see errors, ERASE everything and start with a clean slate, REVIEW what we already have but REVISE the OBSERVATION that RESTRICTS our SIMPLE progression... If something else is right so be it... I am a mere stepping stones of simple progression... TIME is my Idea but SPACE is Universal... I MUST SAY THANK YOU>>> SHARE THE WORDS AND THE WORKING EQUATION!!! because you have allowed me the time and energy needed to find the letter to write to the physics community... Thank you to all... please keep the posts coming because I still need your help...

I am trying to convey in it simplest form what is happening in the equation... I have stated from the very beginning everything is distance... how far is the market from here -700 cubic feet on foot... this will give you time it takes the latitude and longitude whether or not it is with the gravitational rotation or not. Everything will be simplified... to its ultimate terms... [Horizontal distance(Time) + vertical distance variation(Time)]Horizontal*Vertical This gets an average of the two parts.... Horizontal distance(Time) is known as our current form of speed. the second half is the average distance traveled when vertical change occurs... THIS IS NOT THE ACTUAL EQUATION IN THE GOOGLE DOC!!!! The doc is actually: [Horizontal distance(Time) + vertical distance variation(Time) + TIME]Horizontal*Vertical And even that is not the most accurate answer because it goes through three steps... The reason for the distance(time) Is to convey speed in its current form only and the percentage of change happening when vertical climb happens... Units of measurement are the thing of the past, one agreed unit for every idea until the idea is updated... I am sure about this I can not say why... LITERALLY...

The issue lies int the altitude you are talking about XYZ which is not altitude longitude and latitude. Your point 000 has no circumfirence. my equation placed one as the circumfirence making a diameter of 1. causing further change from the [math]\sqrt(3)[/math] additionally it takes into account gravitational spin when where tried and true just do points system... We are talking about two different systems that function under different conditions... I am still correct in my statement a 3 is a 3 and a 4 is a 4 different combined variations does not make their product a 3 or a 4 but a sum of or a factor of... If they have a common denominator then you can combine terms to make a new term, but that is not what I am saying... (Distance(Time) + Altitude(Time))*Altitude(Distance) I stated the above because speed is indicated by a blend of distance and time miles per hour or kilometers per hour.... That is outdated and needs to be removed with a standard distance rate. What you are not seeing is the altitude from the second part is reintroduced into both sides of the equation at the end multiplication part and the distance from the first part is the determinate of the multiplication of the second part... This is a simple percentage problem of multiplication solves the time error in math by creating the perfect environment to be combined... In stead of using percentage we are using time as the percentage which is really a percentage of 360 full rotation which is what I have been trying to say not so well but trying... hope that bridged the gap... The fact is I do not know how to explain what I have I only know that I am right in this matter... So as long as science forum allows us to go back and fourth then I would be willing to twiddle away to the most consist answer that explains everything to it truest form... I am not conceated I just new where we need to move next... and am doing everything in my power to get this moving toward... science... Try this one same idea different words [math] \frac{\ Horizontal Distance + Altitude}{\ TIME} *Horizontal Distance*Altitude [/math] So really it is a verticle speed plus a horizontal speed connected by time averaged by distances... That is the concept in a nutshell... I do not know if this is already in use or a big thing. Time is never be zero so this will always be correct....

The theory gives consistent results it is the requested disproved action of other theories to that would give inconsistent results.... The fact u said that proves my point... Length per unit of time. It is not a time or a length the combination makes it neither. The Idea we hold true is that it is interchangeable and this is the falsity I am faced with lets say time is the number three and then length is the number 4 when combined they are either seven, one, -1, 12, 1.3333 or .75 all of which have the properties of 3 or 4 but are not three or four it is a new item altogether... The answer was presented in the video it was 35.207 feet... As for the time travel backwards time travel is irrelevant we all know that but how would you navigate an atmosphere where nothing moved or only moved slightly you would need to remove time from the equation what I have been saying from the beginning... New time equation which turned out to become a distance equation instead... My equation handles motion as well as non motion as well as time and altitudes.... if parties of interest would stop trying to disprove the notion that I could develop something new of importance maybe we can move forward in changing the world...

OK understood... Just sucks to do something that is not going to give a consistent error or result... Working on a formula to show the errors but I think it is going ot be a range not a singe percentage... Ths equation breaks up time because it understands that time is experienced differently from the original speed vs Altitude SPEED.. So it multiplies in the speed of the new average to attain the perfect meld of information.... SPEED was an idea of motion and truly is just two different locations the connection would be called speed. But I change that to distance in the original statement. Except when you calculate the earths spin into the equation and if we ever want to travel the speed of light we must take that into effect...The enviroment of the person can be added retained or resisted depending upon the desired outcome of the observer..... I wanted to create an equation that would be able to navigate space when light and time are removed from the equation... I have done that but people are wanting my to alter the equation to suit their needs... First was GPS not it is disprove distant altitude Squared.... I have given a new incite on life but am told I am wrong.... The equation if for time travel but people are not viewing it as such.... NEW EDIT AND THOUGHT: altitude is can not be built into the current distance equation because of the limiting equation D=S*T it will always remove what was added... because you have to multiply to both sides. I understand you will get a compound answer. At this altitude you will be traveling .... but this will fall short when we start traveling to other planets very fast we will become confused... My system solves the confusion.... When expressed appropriately to the appropriate people... thank you both for being patient with my system and understanding...

ALTITUDE SQUARED is the error.... The understanding is simple speed at altitude one is going to be different than speed at altitude two. This is the same with distance traveled during time at altitude one will be different than altitude two.. Additionally the direction of movement is lost when you square the Items in question this is not a problem if you just want a destination point, but distance is motion or movement from one place to another and should be able to describe that. By separating the time by speed and altitude and adding them back together.... Speed(Time) + Altitude(Time) may be our current idea but what is missing if the key to the whole IS Altitude(Speed) multiplied by both parts... Speed is a compound Idea of motion over time... (Speed(Time) + Altitude(Time))*Altitude(Speed) But it really is: (Distance(Time) + Altitude(Time))*Altitude(Distance) The idea of motion is removed and is a definitive answer not a compounded problem... No more mile per anything... You traveling at a rate of seventy miles... SIMPLE... Accelerate to fifty miles then maintain course on route 66... I understand that this sounds like I am just repeating the same Ideas over and over but I do not understand how else to convey the information....

You keep arguing this point the equation can handle to point 000 for new worlds as well as this one but it is not buiilt into to spreadsheet. I had some and if statement that need to be removed... THE EQUATION CAN HANDLE 000 the spreadsheet is not there yet... the proposed equation describes everything in its appropriate terms... If I get this to work for zero will you move on the the next piece of information? The speed is only attained when a second location is set into the equation time shows the restrictive properties of the earths spin... The problem of altitude^2 when altitude is multiplied in... when researched pointed toward zenith and M which changed the energy equation.... I know that this single statement is making waves so lets work on the spreadsheet to get it to where you will accept it is valid solution for something... OK. ok

Did I answer the question as requested? I said that statement because people keep harping that I am not answering there questions, but when a question is answered it is ignored and criticized about the extra information added... Did you get the information that you requested or not? I answered why you cannot put 000 into the spreadsheet due to the statement in the sheet itself not because it cant be done.... This is not a new system of mathematics just a new system of calculating distance that is not restrictive by speed or time... As far as I can see neither one of the coordinating system are build for real world environments but My real world equation.... If anything It should stand up to current gps equation or distance equations... Not an entire system of calculation from a 000 point... I am not trying to argue or idk talk but seriously I have provided a working equation that can calculation gps location with two point of requested data. I do not know what background you are coming from but mine is not science or math. This has been a hobby for me that lead my down some crazy roads of inspiration. I appreciate you input but if it is not going to be about the concept at hand I must part my ways.... I greatly appreciate all this forum has done and wish it the best....

I am not a scientist or mathematician restricted by the scientific method. So I have not been trying to prove existing items that have been used by millions just trying to find out why they are the way they are.... Removing the restriction of light and allowing gps positioning to becalculated with only two point of reference and enabling calculations for faster than light travel is not meaningful? Because I do not know how to show you that time is inherently restrictive and no matter what you do you cannot use zero in the equation... Secondly light maximum speed is no longer a constant and I do not know how to show you that.... I can not place imaginary dot point systems in the model... SO you want 000 and 111 as altitude, lat, long.... simple easy doing now... the calculation are going to be different because spreadsheet is not setup that way... so here is without alterations... -36.75 miles.... The negative indicates that you are walking into the gravitational rotation. YOU wanted just literal without the earths circumference built into the equation... = 105.62 ' This is because we were traveling at radius of 1.5 and this is the actual distant traveled between that time.... Future my spreadsheet is not currently setup for different planetary sizes yet... Easily done but just not there yet... if you are wanting additional input from the data then place it into the forum... I was under the impression that you wanted me to find the error n the original system... The spreadsheet is growing and will beable to hand zeros but currently can not do this because of the limitations with the spreadsheet not the equation... The same distance will be traveled if you use 111 to 222 so hope this help bridge the gap in communications...

This is a thank you to to staff and big nose for guiding me down the appropriate venues to effectively answer the question... I apologize if It seems as if I was going of topic will read up and answer your question. How Is the current system errored as well as the percentage of errors found? Is that correct?

I am not sure if you would allow for an equation that could calculate latitude and longitude from an objects height and shadow it produces from the suns rays as enough proof, but that is the next logical steps. I am currently testing and data mining all possible formation. THIS IS VERY EARLY TO BE STATING, but I think I have the two morning equations handled now working on the evening equations... The goal I am doing is if I can get a close approximation at short shadows and long shadows both before and after noon than I will just tear apart the formulas strip it down to the minimalist parts and release a final version... I am only at confirmed morning random data parts.. Next is evening and afternoon then onto exact point data step calculation... AS STATED BEFORE I SHOULD NOT EVEN RETURN A SINGLE POSITIVE if idea is FALSE, let alone multiple random point positives.... I understand videos are frowned here but it explains the course of action and the process I am taking to attain an appropriate solution.

I am lost with the emoticon and what this is trying to say so let me rephrase:\ E = MC ^ 2 is perhaps the most famous equation of all time. It stands for E(negery) = M(ass) times the Speed of Light © squared. But Really the M was making an ass out of us through Longitude at the point of Zenith. (Side,angle,Side equation) The Observer was calculating the angle of the sun by two sides of the equation altitude and latitude BUT these were two systems of calculation for the M of ZENITH... OR WHAT I am thinking is really that is literal instructions again. Where n one leg of n would be the base of the shadow and a splinting extinction at the top of a staff or stick would be use to indicate and create a shadowed triangle... I will work on this to better understand what is going on.....

My point is simple E = M C^2... This we can agree on what I found is that M is not mater but the symbol for ZENITH and the D^2/T^2 was explaining the Latitude shift with the sun of opposing sides of the equator... Energy is a mystery to us because we built equations and science off of navigational tools... That equation was a visual guide to navigate using the sun... Altitude or ALT-itude(state of) is A(Right Angle) from L(Distance protruding from earth) is T(Time{Which may mean Tides???}) LAT-itude L(Distance protruding from earth) transmitting light A(Right Angle) to observers to indicate T(Time{Which may mean Tides???}) LONG-itude L(Distance protruding from earth) transmitting light to O(Observered) N(Zenith) with option to G(right angle shift the light to attain multiple pieces of data) BY NOT UNDERSTANDING THE INFORMATION we are creating redundant future that will not progress beyond the falsities it was built upon.... Gravity, Frequency are still important as for as I can see at this moment.... but using a mathematics system that stops at a certain speed is childish... I am not here to tear into math or science I was asked to justify my equation and have done so... Now it is time for existing science to justify why they did not catch these errors and fix them... Mathematics does expire and will get old that is what I am saying as we progress further than we will ever image science and math must push the bounds of our understanding and restriction we have placed on them in-order to achieve greater successes that they could have never imagined. That is life and change in inevitable... AS FOR THE ZENITH altitude longitude latitude information that is currently being verified by three independent firms who were dumb founded and intrigued by the proposed idea of lost in translation... One has already returned stating everything indicates that I am correct with the proposal of the Zenith issue with energy... I was stating from the very beginning that this equation will allow us to travel faster than light because time is not a restrictive factor...

QUICK VID on how to download the Spreadsheet....

I fully understand that we have items placed into our mathematics that will adjust for this error but why would we ignore this challenge for creating a better mathematical solution for the future generations.... Our technology requires that we we update our formulas... After finding out why Altitude is squared and energy is light squared it almost seems barbaric not to move forward to the most logical choice a solution that would allow for any type of terrain and does not rely on time...

I honestly can not tell you what percentage of inaccuracy there is.... I can tell yo that their are two that I know of... Altitude squared and the speed of light.... I fully understand that we have items placed into our mathematics that will adjust for this error but why would we ignore this challenge fo creating a better mathematical solution for the future generations.... I am confused as to why I am the one the professional to answer these questions in a manner that tickles you delight... IF this whole process does not confuse you yet try this one for size..... Will be posting some videos that I have not been able to make sense of yet..... I know it will sound crazy.... Your equation seems to be correct but there are many ways to skin a cat would be my answer to you.... Not trying to offend truly big nose you have been the only one give any light to this proposal...

My apologize.... My proposed equation has the potential to be a Concave cone... If the which allowed for a circumference and I found some crazy things what should not have been possible kept smacking me in the face... this will probably be my last post her because I solved everything Will check back... I could not of done it with out big nose help I truly appreciated versus some of the other because they were judging my on my communication style to which I visual and calculate in my head... I can explain the string theory and how it works and well as the boson particle error and what it actually is... ENERGY and which holds the Flux capacitor to the ultimate REALITY... GOt it down pat..... NO JOKE... THe equation was the literal sense of the opposite equation... That is why you guys and the entire science community would have never fount it... Becuase LIGHT WAS MASSES restrictive property and LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE... If you do not beleive me My TRIANGLE conection wast connecting me to time and and space... Which TA and SA or three points that would remove time from the equation... Here is the equation expressed in the terms of SPACE: TIME Hidden in plain sight SPACE is why passing ships in the night capture moments of time like dust in the wind against all odds light removed dust for Many life scenes flash across the sky like .. That is what is happening here this above is the equation now I turned this into the opposite terms of your understanding of mathematics... The passing ships were the two defining characteristic separating use from connecting Ideas...... The reason why we cand picture this

Let me ask where my mistake is without lifting a pen... IF THAT IS TO LONG THEN HERE

HERE IS THE EXPLANATION THAT YOU WANTED>>>> THIS IS THE SISTER THEORY OF EVERYTHING!!!! The question if I am right or wrong based from our current mathematics is not relevant any more I know there is a theory of exponential change it is like log^???? I am needing this to see how it needs to place into the equation.... That equation will be the deciding factor between two points of connection... The deciding rule that will allow us to navigate through the worlds restricts... What I was trying to explain is I found a 3D {EXPLANATION (Pythagoras theorem)} Observer {(THE MISSING EQUATION) Imagined Future Restricted By the past}... I am not being pompous I am just mathematically able to explain everything in the form of Right - ALMOST - Wrong.... I will do another video to hopfully fully convey what is our restricting reality... A*T THIS TIME!!!

Well simply put I was using the properties of my equation to test the Cartesian... I stated with speed altitude and time then i thought about my equation and how I was using latitude and longitude and how I restricted altitude to become the rotating plain... Technically speaking I envision what is happening and then look for the closest equation that can define that and then I tested it until it worked or got me closer to a new understanding... The infinite right angle shift is a Pythagorean thereon Cartesian variation that holds to and expresses the next steps answer or terms to progress to the next step... I was near an explanation with Pythagorean theorem with Fell asleep and woke up with the answers I had the answer n the previous of the host AND WILL EXPLAIN THE ERRORA What my first proposed equation was one of the Altitude of the squared altitudes right angle of the equation of the other equation or IF 100% Accurate is required by the proposed Idea. (CONES OF APPOSING SIDES) OR you can picture two different size BOOBS on the same female.... Equations(LINE 100% ACCURETE WHEN Less than EXPRESSED @@ (-) >: ( 100% finite ACCURATE DOT ONLY CURRENT AT A SINGLE POINT) CURRENT EXPRESSED @@ (-): < (LINE 100% ACCURETE WHEN greater than EXPRESSED @ (+) Equations OR Equations(LINE 100% ACCURETE WHEN Less than EXPRESSED @ (+) >: (100% finite ACCURATE DOT ONLY CURRENCT AT A SINGLE POINT) CURRENT EXPRESSED @ (+): < (LINE 100% ACCURETE WHEN greater than EXPRESSED @ (-) Equations IF 100% PRECISION is required by the proposed Idea. (CONES OF PERFECTIONS) OR you can picture two exact sized BOOBIES that GROW and SHINK Depending upon the desired OUTCOME Able to function in @ either - OR + .... (BOOYAH F***ING MONEY SHOT EVERYWHERE!!! SHUT UP AND OPEN YOUR MOUTH AND LOVE IT, ACCEPT IT, SHARE IT!!!) a Equations(LINE 100% PRECISE WHEN Less than EXPRESSED @ (+ OR -) >: (100% finite PRECISION DOT ONLY CURRECT AT A SINGLE POINT) CURRENT EXPRESSED @ (+ OR -) : < (LINE 100% PRECISE WHEN greater than EXPRESSED @ (+ OR -) Equations 3 VARIATIONS OF EQUATIONS * 2 VARIATIONS OF SIGNS = ANSWERED SQUARED (REMEMBER!!! ALWAYS BE PREPARED TO TAKE IT FROM BOTH ENDS!!! This is a LIFE lesson learned!!!) ((S^2)*T*A+(A^2)*S*T > (A^2)*S*T < (A^2)*S*T+(T^2)*S*A ) EXPRESSED @ (+ OR -).... Its Baby Makin Time!!! ____________________________ The Pythagorean theorem NON-RESTRICTIVE solutions are for the answers Right angle: are the averages of the non-restrictive properties EXPRESSED @ EITHER (+ or -) of itself... THE Pythagorean theorem restrictive SOLUTION is for the FINITE answers: are the differences of the restrictive properties SQUARED of itself... -------------------------------------------- My original logic before this point was to find a restrictive property squared of the ANSWER RESTRICTED BY THE SQUARE!!! I literally saw what was happening but could not justify why but her it is not go clean up the next few dimensions that have the same Right angled conundrum with the SISTER THEORY OF EVERYTHING!!!

HERE THE SHORT VERSION:

Completely Right, as stated before not my profession. I just figured our a new logic processing opportunity... But has taken a little bit to get the possibilities out... in two videos... one 45 minutes long that the microphone was muted because of user error... OOOPS the second was a mental release of ideas to progress forward.... Current Understanding states accurate at a single plain and with altitude expression added to this restrictive equation creates Distance * Altitude^2 OR two points of altitude... Sorry about the word jumble that is about to come but the concepts aren't figured out yet. I know that distance = Time x speed this equation can be placed at infinite altitudes independent of each others restriction and be 100% accurate but when we want to define at a different altitude with the original concept of expression would state....... NEW THOUGHT OK, I think the (Distance)Altitude^2 is the expression for a square 3D representation that is not taking Sphere rotation into account... Image each expressed property as a dimension of the whole. the first input (Speed) is a dot... then (Time) is the line growing and (distance) would be the destination (SECOND) point and that technically is the idea of distance. If we add altitude to the equation it takes the line and two point and pulls it 90 degrees from the starting location making a continual path of the two altitudes... Dot - Altitude - Right ANGLE SHIFT - Distance - Right ANGLE SHIFT - Altitude - Dot all 90% degrees of each other or a square U on both starting and ending right angles or 180 of each other... I have not tested whether the distance traveled is correct in a spherical equation yet I will test after this post and video processing.... IF the equation test work then it would state that altitude simple is added to each end, but I know that altitude is right angle of my original line of Distance and Altitude is stretched square from my starting point..... Dot - Altitude - Right ANGLE SHIFT - Distance - Dot.... OR an L... this does not give me the most accurate answer and can be proven with the Pythagorean theorem Interesting note the image provided is a visual representation of the math of the Pythagorean theorem and is expressing what I have just proposed in the past paragraph Dot - Altitude - Distance - Altitude - Dot all 90% degrees of each other or a square U... or the distance line express under the current restricting distance which creates altitude SQUARED or two exact altitudes right angle from the the two points, maintaining the restrictive qualities of the original points resulting in the complete 180 rotation of the right angle for the starting or the image below... YOU ARE COMPLETELY CORRECT in your understanding of the tools... but the error is not found at that points and data because our current equation is accurate at only one plane of reference and is seen in the equation provided.... Simply put any three dimensional Cartesian coordinate system equation will allow distance to be correct when time equals one and we cant reference zero because we already know we will never be able to return a result, because zero divided by zero.... So the distance equation would be figuring speed. [math] \frac{\ \sqrt{27}}{\ 1} = SPEED[/math] THEN [math] 3.46410161513775 = SPEED[/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(3,3,3,) [math] \frac{\ \sqrt{12}}{\ 1} = SPEED[/math] THEN [math] 3.46410161513775 = SPEED[/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(2,2,2,) [math] \frac{\ \sqrt{3}}{\ 1} = SPEED[/math] then [math] 1.73205080756888 = SPEED[/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(1,1,1,) [math] \frac{\ \sqrt{0}}{\ 1} = SPEED[/math] then [math] \sqrt{3} = SPEED[/math] ERRORED at this Time (0,0,0,);(0,0,0,) Because not distance was capable of being produced and we know that we move through time... Can you tell me what the where the two defining positions of the new outcome are because I will be able to do that with a little fix of the current equation formula.... This will take at least a few hours to construct but give me some time and I can show you... What the Cartesian coordinate system equation is doing is quit simple if you understand the restriction of Pythagorean theorem and a cube.... So we need to choose a corner for a starting point resulting in three different distances we will call latitude longitude and altitude or X,Y,Z... and then choose two planes right angle of each other and average the distances . RESULTING in a simple average of 3 Pythagorean theorem solution gained for each plain protruding forward from your stating position... lets use the suggestion points of 000 and 111 creating cube that is same length at all sides or 1 basically visually after the theorems completed move their connecting point to the the the center of each line... Then gab the end of any one of the planes this is going to define the horizontal spin of averages is going to happen for the other planes... or define that as the odd man out and the other are merge together through averages like any normal average equation and since this is correct at the half way point of the odd man out solution then we divide him by to and get..... Lets use 000 and 222 stating point is zero... [math] \frac{\ 18+18}{\ 2} + \frac{\ 18}{\ 2} = 27 [/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(3,3,3,) [math] \frac{\ 8+8}{\ 2} + \frac{\ 8}{\ 2} = 12 [/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(2,2,2,) [math] \frac{\ 1+1}{\ 2} + \frac{\ 1}{\ 2} = 1.5 [/math] ERRORED!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(1,1,1,) But if I did not divide by The common denomator and simply add the solutions it would remain true.... LATER ON THAT... [math] \frac{\ 0+0}{\ 2}+ \frac{\ 0}{\ 2} = 12 [/math] CORRECT!!! at this Time (0,0,0,);(0,0,0,) If the resulting solution are the exact same... like the 1+1+1 to equal the desired answer 3 then sums are multiplied by three... Which is the resulting or connecting Idea between Pythagaream therom and Cartesian coordinate system that took 3 hrs to get to this point I new their was an error but connection the dots of error is the trick.... not since Pythagorean theorem requires duplicates of the lengths you would have to sub track that out... the question is can we determine the point on the graph from a specific distance which is space and time???? THE CRAZY THING IS YOU JUST DID WAS SHOW ME REASONING TO MY WORKING EQUATION ARE YOU SURE YOUR NOT PULLING MY LEG AND I am just explaining an existing concept??? My equation divided speed up by longitude and latitude and placed time separately.... or a separating concept above so there is a constant a piece that will enable the calculation of center of everything... All calculated with the same common restriction of circumference but the two speeds are corrected by Pythagorean theorem... The variable of the changes of each 2 points of altitude latitude and Longitude almost match the Cartesian coordinate system except my altitude can never be less than zero because of the defining restriction of latitude(Constant at 360) and longitude(Constant at 180) and Time (Told from the axis same as Longitudes(180) but the altitude is defined by the axis). Something is right here and I do not know what! I am processing a video massively long that explains some of the concepts that can be derived from the proposed equation as well as naming this collective brainchild Sisters theory of everything... The video is actually two different sessions gone wrong I accidentally muted one video and the second was not recording my screen so I connected them... I am going to do another commentated video of the visually recorded hopefully to repeat the dialog of the ideas I was trying to express which will result in a choppy video and audio... I am start to think that this is not Flawed but restricted basically distance*Altitude^2 it was flawed at Cartesian coordinate system because reversing the processes will always give us a positive result because of the squares root... My equation says Distance*Altitude = Speed*Atlitude + Time*Altitude and if we want to find the right angle understanding to that we would Pythagorean theorem (Speed*Altitude) + (Time*Altitude) = SPEED^2*Altitude^2 + TIME^2*Altitude^2 DO YOU SEE IT??? Take the Pythagorean distance and create the new problem with that step... using the I have the answer in math but am tired too completely explain so i will attempt in math and may still be errored sorry.... I have the concept but super tired... Altitude (3) Speed (5) Time (4) 5(3) x 4(3) = ORIGINAL 5(3) + 4(3) = Proposed The Answers 5(3) x 4(3) = (180)ORIGINAL 5(3) + 4(3) = (27)Proposed PROPOSED CONNECTION through Pythagorean theorem (5)(4)(3)+(5)(4)(3)+ (5)(4)(3) = (180)PROPOSED ((5)^2+(3)^2) - (4)^2+(3)^2))/2) Sum expressed@Both + - of ((4)^2+(5)^2)/2 = (16,-25) for the Original DO YOU SEE IT NOW??? if not here: (SPEED^2*+ TIME^2)*Altitude^2 Since altitude is entered into each equation at the same level and two Then I need to change what ever it takes to gain SO FOLLOW ME what this equation is actually telling us when squared attained when a singularity is required to be expressed the equation is then defining the requirement of the opposing equation that allows Pythagorean theorem solutions to be attained by the opposing realm (Spherical or Cubical)... I haven't fully understood the process of the what is happening I have found the working equation. listed above... (16,-25) = (SPEED^2*-+ TIME^2)*Altitude^2 The error was in Cartesian coordinate system (Cartesian version of Pythagoras' theorem.) look at sqrt of(16,-25) or (4,-5) which is describing plus or minus of a single element(Time) and the - maintains true because averaged points are interchangeable not restricting variation in positive or negative signs... BASICALLY due to times forward and backward opportunity and the Distance*Altitude^2 we come one step closer to finding the next solution for our errors n math (5)(4)(3)+(5)(4)(3)+ (5)(4)(3) = (180)PROPOSED The error was in Cartesian coordinate system (Cartesian version of Pythagoras' theorem.) Now we have verified and see what the proposed equation did... It fixed the sign error in the equation... If we plug in (4,-5) back into the ORIGINAL formula it would be... -5(3) x 4(3) = (180)ORIGINAL -5(3)(3) = (45) ORIGINAL -(3)(3) = (9) ORIGINAL Altitudes answer expressed correctly In times understanding... Again as stated in the times new equation video series specifically the reason why we do not see this is because speed is actually the average of distance between latitudes circumference and Longitudes circumference. explaining it at a finished outcome removed the need for circumference to be inputted... All I was wanting to do is develop an equation that would allow me to apply speed when time was zero to remain accurate I just thought why not change the sign and it has lead me down this road.... I beleive both are infinite in there restrictive properties... I have been here for 7 hours trying to answer you... and found what you wanted... I HOPE??? I understand this may be jumbled but I have to take a break and start posting the videos I have done and work on developing the google doc that is increasing with every question you ask this is helping me to gain the next step... I am going to take an 2 - 8 hour break and then come back to refine the word jumble... As for the rest of the paragraph at the end... This is not my career nor my passion but I understand I have found some thing that cleans up the errors in math and science and it should be up to the professionals...