Semjase

Wolfram Alpha gave the correct result

With the an exact equation for e I've derived an exact equation for pi without e pi=(-2*i)/(log,base(i),((cos(1/2)+i*sin(1/2))^(2/i))) does this also mean that pi and e are both not transcendental numbers? e=(cos(1/2) +i*sin(1/2))^(2/i)

I'm just curious as to why that equation didn't work when plugged into google calculator when x<4?

I've found an exact equation for e without pi e=(cos(1/2)+i*sin(1/2))^(2/i) does this mean that e is not a transcendental number?

I have no proof for it but just wondering if this equation is new? (-1)^(1/x) = i*sin(pi/x) + cos(pi/x) where x>=4 I've tested this equation and Google calculator gives the correct answer for every example.

Does antimatter repulse ordinary matter, that's what Cern's Alpha experiment is trying to find out. If this is the case what would it mean for the theory of gravity under relativity? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22355187

Present videos related to UFO's and discuss their credibility here. These two videos seem to be credible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sktso1dqtk

Consciousness survives death, research seems to support this Quote " A number of scientific studies carried out by independant researchers have demonstrated that 10-20 percent of people who go through cardiac arrest and clinical death report lucid, well structured thought processes, reasoning, memories and sometimes detailed recall of events during their encounter with death." Here's a documented case where essentially the brain wasn't required for the functioning of the consciousness. Quote "in 1980, Roger Lewin published "Is Your Brain Really Necessary ?" in the prestigious journal Science, discussing the work of Dr John Lorber- arguably the world's top expert on a condition called hydrocephaluas, or "water on the brain". "Here's a direct quote from Lewin's paper about this astonishing phenomenon. "There's a young student at this university," asys Lorber, "who has an IQ of 126, has gained a first-class hoors degree in mathematics, and is socially completely normal. And yet the boy has virtually no brain." The student's physician at the university noticed that the youth had a slightly larger than normal head, and so referred him to Lorber, simply out of interest. "When we did a brain scan on him," Lorber recalls, "we saw that instead of the normal 4.5- centimeter thickness of brain tissue between the ventricles and the cortical surface, there was just a thin layer of mantle a millimeter or so.. His cranium is filled mainly with cerebrospinal fluid."

The patch was of the original Apollo 20 mission that was officially cancelled. What would really clear this mystery up is the image of the three astronauts at the 3 minute 32 second mark of the Apollo 20 video could all be positively identified as who Rutledge claims them to be as William Rutlege,Leona Snyder and Alexei Leonov in 1975. William Rutledge who was 76 years old in 2007 couldn't possibly of faked that photograph, it was just lying around for him to use in in 2007 I don't think so. Here's an image of Rutledge's secret Apollo 20 mission patch

I was referring to the photograph of the patch being faked , you could obviously could get a patch made up, why bother? Rutledge alone released this information, it would take a lot of money a number of people to fake that Apollo footage. Who's going to pay for it and why? How could they keep the whole thing quiet? Maybe professional assessment of this footage maybe in order. Remote viewers confirm Rutledge's story Quote "This video comprises footage of the secret joint US/Soviet mission to the backside of the Moon that allegedly took place in 1976 and launched from SLC-6, Vandenberg Air Force base. The video also contains a short video clip of one of several professional Controlled Remote Viewers who had worked the “target” to CRV Stage-6, which includes rendering various aspects of the target in clay. In addition, there is a short video sequence demonstrating a fairly recent discovery that, during later Stages of a remote viewing session, when the aperture in the liminal layer separating the conscious from the subconscious is widened (assuming the remote viewer is “on the signal line”), the subconscious mind will yield up information about the target that is responsive to a “blind” target cue–in reverse–which is hidden from the remote viewer’s conscious awareness. In this case, data consistent with the story related by Apollo 20 commander (CDR) William Rutledge."

Here's something a little more credible a close-up photo of a Apollo 20 patch from the mission which obviously cannot be easily faked, a custom made patch? There's other credible information on this page as well concerning Apollo 20. http://reinep.wordpress.com/2011/06/03/apollo-20-real-or-a-cover-up/ Here's the translation of the Latin encrytion on the patch Quote "Historically, the phrase was likely in popular use at the time, but is most famously quoted in Virgil's Bucolica (“Bucoliche”) IX, 50. Daphnis, why are you gazing at the old constellations rising? See! the star [comet] of Caesar, seed of Dione, has gone forth – the star to make the fields glad with corn, and the grape deepen its hue on the sunny hills. Graft your pears, Daphnis; your children’s children shall gather the fruits you have sown."

Here's an independent in depth analysis of William Rutledge's claims of the secret Apollo 20 mission and he was one of the Astronauts onboard that mission. http://www.angelismarriti.it/ANGELISMARRITI-ENG/REPORTS_ARTICLES/Apollo20-InterviewWithWilliamRutledge.htm

Is this Apollo 20 footage authentic or faked, if faked for what reason and how? Any opinions?

This question actually depends on if God really does exist? First I'll give my best evidence for the existence for a God or Creator. The existence of anything that has come into reality, that is proven to be impossible under all known appliciable scientific properties, outside of an evolutionary process. The discovery of Alien life throughout the universe that's based on DNA that has evolved independly of each other would be strong evidence of a Creator. The fact that this universe is solely matter where is it's antimatter components required under pair creation, that would indicate the creation of the universe is not a naturally occuring event. Why is the world controlled by the law, why does a court of law hold you accountable to God for the truthfulness of your testimony? Evidence for life after death, how is the afterlife a natural thing? It is proven in a scientific reality that you no matter how far you go back in time that will have something or nothing, that gives you two possibilities for God, 1 he is a structure that always has been here and can never be explained that even he could not explain, 2 he evolved out of the properties of nothing and came first. Believing purely in science I will only accept the second explanation since everything here seems to orignate from science. If science allows it and the Creator is not self-destructive and no one is above him who has evolved elsewhere in the vaccuum of nothing, then he will be here forever

This is the most definitive information I've seen on the subject