-
Posts
318 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Semjase
-
The pole shift is based on sound science watch this video
-
Here's the video from where the prediction comes from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqT6QOxaxbQ
-
Adam and Eve was a story in the bible, where they were created by God as specified by the date in the bible, According to the Plejaren they were not created by God but Eve was a native earth women who birth to Adam with the union of Eve and their scientist Semjasa 13000 years ago. The crediblity of the Plejaren hinges on the fact they can see probalistic possibilities in the future. They have predicted plate shiftting in the pacific ocean which will lead to a horseshoe shaped tsunami from northern California to northern Washington. They have mentioned December 21 2012 as the problem date and further research on the subject which has lead to one factor that could account for that prediction which is the pole shift that will potentially occur on that date.
-
All these images didn't come out of thin air, The contact reports have a lot of scientifically verifiable information, for example they mentioned that universes are created by the creation in matter and antimatter pairs. I know of no other way to make charged particles except by pair creation, why is there no antimatter in this universe. Is there an example of science creating charged particles by anything other means than by pair creation?
-
True, but their working on it
-
You missed the point mainstream physics is interested in time travel. http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=252
-
Observed faster than light speeds. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm Time travel research. http://phys.org/news63371210.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html
-
Without faster than light travel how would any space travellers be able leave thier world and traverse great distances in space and return to their own world near the date they left instead of in a different century. Faster than light speeds have already been observed experimentally. And time travel is a new field of research.
-
Since their home planet Erra is 500 light years away their ships have the technology to break the light barrier where matter becomes tachyon particles, in reality matter dematerializes and becomes imaginary matter as predicted by the Gamma equation if light barrier is broken, matter then rematerializes when you slow down below light speed. This same effect makes time travel to the future and the past possible which they are capable of safely.
-
A smoking gun. I like to add that Plejaren scientist named Sejasa took a native earth women Eve and fathered the caucasian race as refered to in the bible 13000 years ago and as mentioned in the contact reports by Semjase. To further complicate the story Jesus was fathered by a man from their star system who actually was Jmmanuel who later became known as Jesus, his life was recorded 2000 years ago, and the scrolls were found and translated into English and be viewed here. talmud.pdf
-
-
If you read the contact reports carefully you will find the body of evidence overwhelming. Here are some further images Asket is the women who is a related race to the Plejaren, notice her lower forward placed ear lobes Plejaren man in space suits A ship at close range
-
This is the most important alien contact with the human race, it is with the Plejaren people who Semjase is a member, They are a peace loving race who have had peace on their planet which is in the Pleiades star system, for 50,000 years, the caucasian race on our planet has it's roots from their star system. 1800 pages of contact reports, of recorded conversations with them is available on a pdf download at the following web page. http://www.helirods.net/apps/documents/ Here are some images related to them The Plejaren alphabet A laser gun Semjase by her ship Semjase doing a flight demonstration in her ship The Plejaren peace symbol
-
Why should proponents of alternative theories learn accepted science first?
Semjase replied to rah's topic in Speculations
Something else of interest a mathematical model that accurately predicts the behaviour of the physical reality may not be accurately describing what is actually what is physically going on. -
Why should proponents of alternative theories learn accepted science first?
Semjase replied to rah's topic in Speculations
Thats true but if you want closest to 100% accuracy then you have to go with the theory that most accurately models the physical reality. -
Why should proponents of alternative theories learn accepted science first?
Semjase replied to rah's topic in Speculations
Let's start with math that is proven if proven correctly it remains valid forever regardless of the degree of intelligence that scrutinizes it. Scientific data that is proven accurate to the same degree is the only basis that sound theories can built, new data discovered that contradicts old theories,require new theories, as the case with the speed limit of light and relativistic effects on gravity shown to be incorrect by this experimental data listed below http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060325232140.htm -
Why should proponents of alternative theories learn accepted science first?
Semjase replied to rah's topic in Speculations
In this universe which we live in if you know all the properties of everything that is here, then you can predict, the behavoir of anything that is here and the virtually unlimited theoretical possiblities that could be here. If you know nothing you can predict nothing. If its here it had to be theoretically possible. In the dual slit experiment the quantum properties of particles are not fully understood, and electrons passing through a small enough hole produces an interference pattern one electron at a time. Due to relativity the position of a particle that is unique to every other particle relative to the motion of the other particle, in a narrow dual slit the moving electrons of the slit material makes makes it theoretically possible for the charged particle travelling through narrow dual slit to be in many different theoretical positions with respect to every moving electron of the slit material that interact with the electron passing through the dual slit. In an observer created reality it is the act of the observer that determines which theoretical possibility is made real, which works backwards through time to determine the past. supporting evidence the Wang experiment http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
I guess this video is fake as well.- 24 replies
-
-1
-
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
No I'm just interested in bringing to the attention of mainstream science. -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
I finally have proof of conservation of energy being violated, experimental proof. If anyone says that energy is conserved in this video demonstration is not entirely rational. -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
This experiment can be conducted in a gravitational environment except when your moving the ring upward and inward your doing work against gravity, then when slow the rings motion to a stop at the top of the cone extracting net energy out of the ring, you have to drop the stationary ring to the bottom of the cone recovering the work done against gravity. -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
This will make an interesting experiment. -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase replied to Semjase's topic in Speculations
I already have it doesn't work, but this example does you take cone in a gravity free environment stand it up right then you have a metal ring in contact with with the cone revolving like a wheel rolling around the circumference of cone parallel to its base. The ring is set in motion around the cone at 1 m/s at a radius of 2 m the ring is allowed to freely change speed angularly as the ring is moved upward and inward to a radius of 1 m. The key to this is that rolling ring does not produce any centrifugal force when moving circularly around the cone. This is proven by the fact that a rolling ring is always accelerating and decelerating each part of the ring from 0 m/s to 0 m/s so therefore the net force exerted by the ring is zero. Therefore you can move the ring inward with no force, since the law of conservation of angular momentum applies the cone will act as a stator causing the ring to speed up as it's moved inward. This proven by the fact the stator effect is caused by the a segment of the ring is accelerated from a larger radius of the cone to decelerated with the same force to a smaller radius of the cone, therefore producing a net accelerating effect on the ring. Hence you an increase of energy with virtually no input energy. Any feedback? -
The law of conservation of energy proven invalid in this test
Semjase posted a topic in Speculations
Einstien was wrong energy can be created or destroyed. This is a simple apparatus that will prove this. You set the apparatus on the x y z axis. An input shaft, connected perpendicularly a 1 meter straight collapsable arm that has a negligible diameter frictionless wheel on the end, is placed parallel to the z axis. The arm where it is connected the shaft is at .707 meters on the +x axis and the y axis acts as a wall where the wheel rests at .707 meters on the + y axis and the arm is at a 45 degree angle with respect to the x axis. 1 n meter torque is applied to the input shaft that is rotated 15 degrees and the arm is now at 30 degrees and the arm has also collapsed to .8165 meters in length and the wheel resting on the +y axis wall is located at .4082 meters on the + y axis and the position of the shaft remains constant at .707 on the x axis. A simple vector analysis will show the work done collasping the arm .1835 meters is greater than the work put into the 15 degrees of rotation of the input shaft. A most simple elementary analysis will prove that minimum force collapsing the arm will be a minimum of 2 newtons the minimum output work will be 2*.1835 = .367 J. The minimum input work is 1* pi/12 = .2618 J. Energy was created here anyone care to prove otherwise? -
What would be proof of a God or gods running the universe?
Semjase replied to Moontanman's topic in Religion
Here's a little something on the goldilocks factor. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/6035233.stm