Semjase

A little background on this book. A landmark expose firmly grounded in fact. The Day After Roswell ends the decade-old controversy surrounding the mysterious crash of an unidentified aircraft at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. Backed by documents newly declassified through the Freedom of Information Act, Colonel Philip J. Corso a member of President Eisenhower's National Security Council and former head of the Foreign Technology Desk at the U.S. Army's Research & Development department, has come forward to reveal his personal stewardship of alien artifacts from the Roswell Crash. He tells us how he spearheaded the Army's reverse-engineering project that led to today's -integrated circuit cips -fiber optics -lasers -

First point read " The day after Roswell" by Col. Philip J. Corso you might learn something Here's excerpt from the book "The KGB and the CIA weren't really adversaries everybody thought them to be . They spied on each other, but all practical purposes, and also because each agency had thoroughly penetrated the other, they behaved just like the same organization. They were all professional spies in a single extended agency playing the same intelligence game and trafficking in information. Information is power to be used. You don't simply give it away to your governments political leadership, whether it's the Republicans, the Tories,or the Communist, just because they tell you to.You can't trust politicians, the politicians, but you can trust other spies. At least that's what spies believe, so their primary loyalty is to their own group and other spies playing the same game. The CIA, KGB, British Secret Service, and a whole host of other foreign intelligence agencies were loyal to themselves and to the profession first and to their respective governments last. That's why one reasons we in the military knew that KGB leadership, not the communist Party officers who were only inside for political reasons, were keeping as much information from the Soviet government as the CIA was keeping from our government. Professional spy organizations like the CIA and the KGB tend to exist only to preserve themselves, and that's why neither the U.S. military nor the Russian military trusted them If you look at how the great spy wars of the Cold War played out you'll see how the KGB and the CIA acted like one organization: lots of professional courtesy, lots of shared information to make sure nobody got fired, and a few human sacrifices now and then just to keep everybody honest. But came down to loyalty, the CIA was loyal to the KGB and vice versa. I believe they had a rationale for what they did. I know that they thought the rest of us were to stupid to keep the world safe and by sharing information they kept us out of a nuclear war. I believe this because I knew enough KGB agents during my time and got enough bits and pieces of information off the record to give me a picture of the Soviet Union during the 1950's and 1960's that's a very different from what you read on the front page of the New York Times." I don't get fantasy information from the channel that I have.

I stand by the evidence, the problem I have with the reconnaissance photo is that base of the lander is shown containing all white pixels considering the base of the lander isn't white you would expect some grey detail considering the resolution of the rest of the image it shows no detail of the base of the lander at all. The center black pixels are the only details of the base of the lander.

This image obviously looks retouched, get the book Moonfire which has the best images available from any moon landing and judge the evidence for yourself.

According to my references on the Meier contacts with Semjase I have the following excerpt concerning the moon landing - Faked Apollo moon landing on July 20, 1969. The faked moon landing of 1969 was done for political reasons to overtake the Russians who were on the verge of being able to land on the moon, after this up to 1972 there were 5 actual moon landings. My connection to aliens is indirect, I have a channel to the Alien God the creator of structures of the mechanics of our reality out of the properties of nothing, which he has confirmed through advanced time travel capabilities.

The whole moon landings were faked. I've got the book Moonfire by Norman Mailer, there's no blast crater or disturbance of moon dust under the lander no a speck of dust on the lander at all. This is a coffee table sized book with large glossy pictures of the entire Apollo 11 landing. A lot of the shadows were completely impossible with parallel sunlight cast down on the moon surface. Here's some web sites that do a thorough investigation http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm http://batesmotel.8m.com/

I think it's time for our civilization to grow up and face the reality that they may be other advanced civilizations in this universe.You sound you come from the pages of Project Blue Book, the days of UFO hysteria are a thing of the past.

A dinosaur in the garage is a way out hypothetical without evidence you couldn't accept it, if it's theoretical possibility you couldn't rule it out. It's not a fair comparison to UFO phenomena .

I rest my case on these crop circle videos. http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/science/weird-science-sci/uk_cropcircles/

They only seem to choose select people, here's some contact information from one of these people. http://www.semjase.net/semjeng4.html http://www.semjase.net/semjeng5.html http://www.semjase.net/semjeng9.html

When it comes to UFO's this evidence speaks for its self, debunk it! http://www.youtube.c...feature=related

As far as UFO evidence is concerned, there is extensive photographic evidence of unknown flying objects disobeying current physics laws, that have stood up to scientific scrutiny as far as authenticity is concerned and reliable eye witness testimonies from many people confirm this photographic evidence. Science can't just close the door on this phenomena. A ball accelerated 90 degrees in a circular path obeys the law of conservation of linear momentum when the the centrifugal force is offset by a string connecting the ball to the stationary origin and the acceleration of the ball is acted on by a force perpendicular to the string. When the ball is accelerated in the same circular pathway to the same velocity by the flail arrangement the acceleration and centrifugal force is a result of a chord connected to the ball and to the end of the handle of the flail. Due to the geometric arrangement of the chord and the handle, as shown in the illustration, is not linear momentum is not conserved. To understand this you have to realize that the end of the handle where the chord is connected is responsible for accelerating the ball.The length of the pathway of the end of the handle is .707*(the length of the pathway of the ball), and due to conservation of energy the accelerating force at the end of the handle is 1.414*(accelerating force on the ball). Since the accelerating force on the end of the handle acts for the same time as on the ball, the (force time) acting on the the end of the handle in the +x direction is greater than the linear momentum of the ball when it's reached the final velocity in the -x direction.

I'll further explain my example by making a simple analogy, lets imagine a battle flail with a handle that is 1 meter long connected a chain that is also 1 meter long that is connected to a 1 kg ball, lets assume that the chain and handle are massless, the flail is laid horizontally on a frictionless table. The chain is set at 90 degrees with respect to the the handle and is straight. Look at the illustration as looking down on the table. The ball is set into motion by an external force very slightly in the + y direction. A shaft connected to the end of the handle of the flail then accelerates the ball in a perfect 90 degree arc, this is possible by maintaining a tension on the chain while accelerationg the handle that results in a vector force to offsets the centrifugal force by 100%. If the initial velocity ball is zero in the x direction and after 90 degree acceleration has a velocity of q in the x direction and zero in the y direction then is linear momentum is q kg m/s. The key to this whole example is the force acting on the chain at the end of the then handle, due to conservation of energy the force at the end of the handle has to be 1.414 times the force accelerating the ball along the perfect arc. Since the handle it's self is moving in arc from 45 degrees to 135 degrees, the resultant force of the the handle on the shaft in the - x direction will cause a greater increase or loss in linear momentum in the mass supporting the table than the net net linear momentum gained or lost by the ball.

The extensive UFO evidence proves that linear momentum is not conserved, since about all UFO sighting indicate that there is no emitting of radiation or gases that would sustain such lift and discrediting all UFO sighting would be virtually impossible. If the theoretical analysis of the experiment predicts that linear momentum is not conserved then it would be worth while to conduct the experiment. I challenge anyone to prove theoretically that linear momentum is conserved in this experiment. This experiment will also work in a gravitational environment if laid horizontally.

The example shown below clearly shows that linear momentum is not conserved here. Here's something special http://semjase.net/indexsemjase3.html

These two videos prove that perpetual motion does exist. Any thoughts?

The Semjase equation for pi ln(.5-.75^.5)= -a+i*pi Anyone care to prove or disprove?