Nobrainer

I answered it already just ask... Nicely Here we go again, so pay attention, "Robert Hooke speculated in 1671 that gravitation is the result of all bodies emitting waves in all directions through the aether. Other bodies, which interchange with these waves, move in the direction of the source of the waves. Hooke saw an analogy to the fact that small objects on a disturbed surface of water move to the center of the disturbance.[17] A similar theory was worked out mathematically by James Challis from 1859 to 1876. He calculated that the case of attraction occurs if the wavelength is large in comparison with the distance between the gravitating bodies. If the wavelength is small, the bodies repel each other. By a combination of these effects, he also tried to explain all other forces.[18]" Reference- http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_explanations_of_gravitation#section_5 Thus since gravitational waves are the least potential form of energy, an endpoint and the wavelengths are large then destructive interference does not play a role, not by my just saying so but by experimental fact of wave interaction when a wave is emitted from a body. A non- binding wave emitted from mass or energy is defined as a "monopole wave" not to be confused with a monopole itself if that is your next question.- my words "Criticism: Maxwell objected that this theory requires a steady production of waves, which must be accompanied by an infinite consumption of energy.[16] Challis himself admitted, that he hadn't reached a definite result due to the complexity of the processes.[17]" Reference- http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_explanations_of_gravitation#section_5 With Maxwell's objection, Maxwell was under the impression that the universe was static and existed forever with no beginning and no end. Now that it is understood that the universe has a beginning then the objection for the requirement of infinite energy is no longer valid because a finite beginning does not require an infinite amount of energy, only infinite time of existsnce requires infinite energy to continue infinitely.- my words So at the lowest of energies- destructive wave interferences disappear and only constructive waves create interference and process has been experimentally proven and known for over 100 years.- my words

So to repeat, My Ghost wave theory stands or falls on two fundemental principles; 1). That all mass and energy decay into the least potential form of energy, the gravitational wave, a wave that once given off can not bind to anything else as other waves do. 2). And now a new law- KNOWN- when wave of the same energy collide, they form wavefronts but New Law- when they collide, this is a contact force in which there is a reaction to the action of wavefront formation, an increase in amplitude is therefore a contact force. As a contact force there is a reaction, equal, opposite and collinear. Three dimensionally this reaction to wavefront formation causes the sources to spatially move together and align by touching as a result of three dimensional wave alignment. So waves are emitted and combines which creates a reaction of mass clumping. Concluding; This simple process of waves given off and colliding (action) creating the clumping of mass (reaction) runs the framework of every known observation/ action with in the universe. Everything is easy to explain, from inflation to the accelerating rate of expansion of mass and energy, from a constant speed of light in all reference frames independent of the speed of the source to common violations of Kepler's laws and dark matter . The quest to create a real conceptual picture of the universe is over, just not even close to accepted yet and this and this alone is responsible for the man made concept of forward time which describes the actions of the universe proceeding in one direction also interpreted as increasing entropy. An alternative explanation for inflation; If time is the measure of a process and the big bang created an energy transfer from potential to kinetic energy and then mass and energy formed into their most stable states do to this reaction process then it is possible that we measure time as a function of wave emission, not from the big bang but from the stable form of mass and energy ( formation of the three forces of mass) which since then, decay into the gravitational wave from each quanta of mass and or energy. In layman's terms, in deciding to bake a cake we do not start the timer when we get the ingredients, we start the timer when everything is mixed and put into the oven. In this respect, the timer of the universe started when mass and energy stabilized and continued to slowly decay continuing the process of potential to kinetic energy transfer. To conceptualize another way, a nuclear explosion creates an initial energy exchange from potential to kinetic energy yet the unconverted energy still decays creating via unconverted radioactive uranium, continuing the process of potential to kinetic energy transfer. We unknowingly measure time by the left over, still converting mass and energy. The big bang created mass and energy and space too but we measure time as a process of mass and energy decay creating more space. This explanation keeps space staying conformed to the rules and laws that apply to everything else with out having space be outside the laws of physics. In searching for an explanation to understanding the observations of the universe all I want to know is the truth. It is not about winning or losing, it is about discovery and testing, but it takes imagination hardwork and playing devil!s advocate along with knowledge and questioning everyrhing. I accept your apology but it us not about winning, it's about understanding. I have an unshakable belief in God, I believe an intelligence built the universe because I believe in the laws of physics and with out a belief in God, the universe has to be a perpetual motion machine and the laws of physics rule that out. It is easy to get upset, and with that, I apologize too.

There you go, you have a little theory, how nice. You see, you have not shown one problem with what I propose but since you have your own theory I can not be right. How child-like sweet. Don't make me babysit you. Answer the question, why is time a forward process ? What is the mechanism that increases overall entropy over time? Stop the cop out answers... If you do not know, that is okay..

As an organism exists it learns and as it learns messenger RNA is produced in response to it's enviorment. It is the genetic transfer of MRNA that can improve a species from generation to generation, change a species to an eventual new species. Botton line; we do not fully have all the facts but it does look like we all came from dust, just like God said Adam did. So any organism can enhance it's survival chances by transferring learned responses generationally, even to the point of becoming unrecognizable over time. You are critizing with inadequate knowledge.

Are you proud of your behavior? Imagine one of us is a crank but the other correct? How does that reflect on you? Better yet? What theory can incorporate every action in the universe? From forward time to dark energy to inflation to relative time to gravity to dark matter. I can explain each one, can you? It's that simple.... Let's include Rhe strength diffemce between the forces too? Before I explain let's hear your reasoning behind just one ... Forward time.. So since we are in speculation, speculate a better reason for forward time, I bet you can not... Remember time only moves in one direction but at varying rates abs remember the factors involved in those rates, density of mass. Relative speed, etc... I am waiting mr. Smart one. can you put up? I already know you can't, just want to see how you squirm.... Prove me wrong.. Another easy question; "How does matter ``distort'' (render non-Euclidean) space-time?" give the exact mechanism...

The math and predictions have been done and you are dripping with insults, no reason to play with you. Insults show lack of ability to hold a respectful discussion.

Show me proof of debunking this: 1. The universe is run by a process of mass and energy decay into gravitational waves. 2). New law- when in-phase waves collide they form the action of changing into a single amplitude which creates the reaction of this contact force, gravity.

The fresnel stuff of a stationary theory... I read what you wrote about it and really, you have not said one concrete piece of evidence that convinces me that you know what you are talking about. And if you could have debunked my theory, it would havenonly taken one post as I have done with yours.

Anyone can explain one piece of a pie with an imaginary constant but that does not explain the fundamental process nor does it explain all the other problems concerned with our observations; such as gravitational lensing of dark matter, then requires a different constant and inflation requires a different constant and dark energy a different constant. I know let's invent a variable constant!!! Funny but that is where you are heading. A variable constant is a funny contradiction in terms... You can't beat me in this- you will have to try something else just like I showed you the stationary aether does not compute with observations therefore it is eliminated.

Constrictive interference is when two waves form a larger wave. The two waves are large waves and when the two sources are large waves they automatically form constructive wave interferences and the sources come together. Remember that as you go down the energy scale of different frequencies the energy of waves decreases the size of the wavelength increases.... "Lord Kelvin (1871) and Carl Anton Bjerknes (1871) assumed that all bodies pulsate in the aether. This was in analogy to the fact that, if the pulsation of two spheres in a fluid is in phase, they will attract each other; and if the pulsation of two spheres is not in phase, they will repel each other. This mechanism was also used for explaining the nature of electric charges. Among others, this hypothesis has also been examined by George Gabriel Stokes and Woldemar Voigt.[19] Criticism : To explain universal gravitation, one is forced to assume that all pulsations in the universe are in phase—which appears very implausible. In addition, the aether should be incompressible to ensure that attraction also arises at greater distances.[19] And Maxwell argued that this process must be accompanied by a permanent new production and destruction of aether.[16]" Concerning waves, "Robert Hooke speculated in 1671 that gravitation is the result of all bodies emitting waves in all directions through the aether. Other bodies, which interchange with these waves, move in the direction of the source of the waves. Hooke saw an analogy to the fact that small objects on a disturbed surface of water move to the center of the disturbance.[17] A similar theory was worked out mathematically by James Challis from 1859 to 1876. He calculated that the case of attraction occurs if the wavelength is large in comparison with the distance between the gravitating bodies. If the wavelength is small, the bodies repel each other. By a combination of these effects, he also tried to explain all other forces.[18]" So by postulating that the universe is expanding into wavefronts with a finite beginning and an eventual end Maxwell's objections are erased. You are wrong about everything. The mechanism is that mass and energy decay permanently into gravitational waves that can not decay anymore, they could be made up of magnetrons or gravitons, it doesn't matter at this junction because once bound into the wave, they can not change themselves. By a wave leaving mass or energy and not returning or be able to be absorbed, this is a monopole. Imagine that at the dipoles of electromagnetic fields there is this process in which the poles decay into gravitational waves forming wavefronts. This explains all Acrions of the universe as a function of wave emission into an enviorment that has wave densities with wavefronts forming in direct relation to the size of the mass. So Rhe dipole is a dipole with the magnetic field but a monopole as the result of decay of the magnetic field into a gravitational wave at the dipole. It has a dual purpose. Since this gravitational wave is a monopole wave, the actions of the wave are weaker than the actions of a. Magnetic dipole wave. References; http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_explanations_of_gravitation#section_10 ^ Taylor (1876), Peck (1903), secondary sources ^ Poincaré (1908), Secondary sources ^ Maxwell (1875, Atom), Secondary sources ^ Descartes, R. (1824–1826), "Les principes de la philosophie (1644)", Oeuvres de Descartes (Paris: F.-G. Levrault) 3 ^ Descartes, 1644; Zehe, 1980, pp. 65–70; Van Lunteren, p. 47 ^ a b c Zehe (1980), Secondary sources ^ Huygens, C. (1944), "Discours de la Cause de la Pesanteur (1690)", Oeuvres complètes de Christiaan Huygens (Den Haag) 21: 443–488 ^ a b Van Lunteren (2002), Secondary sources ^ a b Newton, I. (1846), Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of natural philosophy (1687), New York: Daniel Adee"

Here is five reasons that Fresenal's theory fails, 1). It cannot explain inflation 2). It can not explain time in one forward direction 3) it can not explain the universe expanding at an increasing rate of acceleration. 4). It can not explain the actions holding galaxies together called dark matter 5). It can not explain increasing entropy So it fails by observation and reason

As Isaac Newton's laws have been fine tuned by General relativity, GR falls short of predictions with respect to the effects of gravitation in distant and deep space. By fine tuning Einstein's equations with an aspect of another underlying field, Prof. Ma and Wang believe they have solved this issue. But it still leaves open questions of how inflation came to be, is it correct? And how gravitation can be such a weak force compared to the other three forces. At best, general relativity is incomplete The greatest thing about both men that they share in common, Einstein and Tesla, is that they were able to thing outside the box. If someone came along that could shed light, as Edward Hubble did with Einstein, then they had the ability to change their perspective. Imagine that the bog bang was like a nuclear explosion in the since that there was a rapid release of energy creating three states of matter; mass, energy and space itself. Continuing to think outside the box, after a nuclear explosion, the unused uranium still radioactivly decays slowly transferring more energy. What if mass and energy also continue to decay slowly creating the actions of expanding space itself? References; None-Original idea as part of the ghost wave theory

Excuse me for repeating myself and I apologize in advance but concepts and language from the 1600's and the 1800's have different language than today but in this circumstance mean the same thing. So let's go over terms first; "When the crest of one wave passes through, or is superpositioned upon, the crest of another wave, we say that the waves constructively interfere. Constructive interference also occurs when the trough of one wave is superpositioned upon the trough of another wave. During any wave interference the shape of the medium is determined by the sum of the separate amplitudes of each wave. We often say that when waves interfere, amplitudes add." Let me talk about two magnetic's aligning and being pulled together. A magnet is a dipole and when two dipoles the North pole sends the field in the direction of the south pole. Imagine magnetic field wave alignment as a particle spin alignment = attraction , where the particles within the waves aligning spinning in the same direction as to increase the amplitude (strength) Repulsion as a spin conflict between misaligned dipoles resulting in the fields repulsing each other due to the spins in opposite directions and therefore the waves act, in a way, like flexie solids bouncing off each other. Now let's take that same concept and apply it to a monopole interference and think of that interference as a long distance monopole with gravitons all spinning in the same direction as they leave mass and energy and form space itself as spin wave alignment from all mass and energy decay. This is why the strength of the gravitational field is so weak, a monopole, not a dipole and also the strength is related to the distance from an expanding circle (sphere), why time runs forward, space expands at an accelerating rate, mass and energy are being pulled and synchronized by this process of potential energy working creating space. Angular velocity plus spin synchronization of the gravitational wave given off from the earth and the sun = the orbital relationship. There are no pockets of non gravity because everything is giving off gravitational waves with the same spin, as the north pole of a dipole always gives off magnetic field spin, the only problem is that space has no dipole so the waves pull and align forming increasing amplitudes. Now this is just for fun to review the quotes that Einstein has said; Collected Quotes from Albert Einstein "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." "Imagination is more important than knowledge." "If you can't challenge what physicists think they foundationally know, you will never be able to correct a mistake that physicists can not even recognize exists"-CMT

So why would the universe ONLY be a constructive interference pattern?, why does time only travel forward and at verying rates? Since from the big bang, the gravitational wave emission had not stopped and is continuous, the expansion itself as the initial wavefront formed aligned everything into an a constructive interference pattern and is the driving force of continuing this process via and as evidenced by the reactive force of gravity modifying space to align everything., dark energy and dark matter. I do believe this works and can show predictable behavior of space itself as a constructive wave alignment or wave synchronization as a long distance expanding dipole. One end of space is a wavefront, created at the big bang and the other end is connected to each and every piece of mass and energy.

In conclusion, By thinking out of the box, where others can not precieve to venture and by using the resources available today, the universe can be shown to follow Newton's laws of motion with respect to wave to wave interaction. When Einstein proposed a senerio where matter warps time and space and this warpage creates gravity he admitted he did not know the mechanism. By showing a wave to wave constructive interference is a contact force and by knowing time is a forward action, entropy increases, a new physics law becomes evident and the explanations for unknown phenomenon become evident such as space with out mass can warp radiation, currently known as dark energy. The extra missing mass in the galactic rotation problem can be solved by modifying general relativity as Prof. Ma and Wang have done. Dark energy, inflation, relative time all become actions of mass formation and decay into a wave. Time, space and gravity are treated as wave functions of mass and energy as they decay into the aether, the gravitational wave, creating space and as waves join increasing in amplitude there is a reaction to wavefront formation which locally and in space is gravitation, unmasking the idenity of dark matter and revealing the reason for forward time.

The simple model is this; Constructive wave interference follows Newton's 3rd law of motion as a contact force. A new law in physics. This results in the mechanical reason for gravitation, which modulates as the governing retardant of wave emission. This gravity and time dependen/ mass dependentt decay of an object is directly related to he degree per unit area of the amplitude of the continuously generated gravitational field ( waves forming wavefeonts) over the original density of the emitting field of the relative moving object is the formula for gravitation's relationship to decay rate. - to me- this is word salad. But saying that the essence of time is mass decay and anu decay slows by the dwnsity of the field the mass decays into or time slows by increasing the thickness of the field. One way is to travel faster and faster, another way so to increase the mass that generates a thicker field. As a result of this law the underlying mechanism of gravitation is reveled correcting General Relativity to include the constructive interference of dark matter by showing violations of kepler's second law by the prediction of plate like rotations of planetary star systems along with the prediction of the absence of mass associated with actions of Dark matter. The direct relationship between total energy change(decrease) in the universe and the expansion of space in in the universe Total energy (mass plus energy) in the universe continually decreases, a violation of the conservation of energy. Black holes will lose energy over time and evaporate with no added mass or energy and black holes may appear smaller in older galaxies than younger galaxies as a result of this. There are many wave interference and loss of total energy on system examples once you get the new law and action of generated waves creating space. So if you agree just say non-testicleword salad, haha

But now you understand where I am coming and why everything in GR has a rational Newtonian explanation. If wave alignment through constructively interfering has merit, I should be able to show that when two in phase waves interact they create a reaction to wave front formation. Let me point out something that I challenged originally, if more than one wave can occupy the same space then why does the amplitude increase, it is as if they are rearranging and stacking isn't it? If that is the case then that is a contact force by definition isn't it? And if it is a contact force then Newton's laws must be taken into account. III. "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." In the 1600's during Christopher Huygens life he did not have access to a simple way to prove contact forces applies to waves. Take two ping pong balls, place them 1/4 inch apart and hold them six feet above a solid surface and drop them and watch as they drop to the solid floor and bounce staying 1/4 inch apart. Repeat over still water, watch the ping pong balls hit the water (change in acceleration to einstein's credit) and two waves are created which when they cross each others path become one thicker wave. As a contact force this wave formation requires a reaction and the two ping pong balls touch togethe as they bounce off the water. One example here. Reviewing the mechanical aspects of gravitation you will also find this; "Lord Kelvin (1871) and Carl Anton Bjerknes (1871) assumed that all bodies pulsate in the aether. This was in analogy to the fact that, if the pulsation of two spheres in a fluid is in phase, they will attract each other." -echanical reasons for gravitation (pulsation): Wikipedia. Now combining historical knowledge with current observations of dark matter/ dark energy this one process of energy loss in all systems and the mechanism of generated in-phase wave synchronization always aligning with the original force give rise to all current observations and new reasons for such unknown phenomenon such as black hole evaporation, dark energy dark matter. Many other actions not seen yet, violation of Kepler's laws, the flattening of space at the edges of the furthest galaxies, the dimming of galaxies energy after they are no more but before we know they do not exist. Dark matter has no actual matter, it is the wave synchronization of space aligning and acting as if there is a gravitational pull of mass. Loss of gravitation at absolute Zero.

And that comes in part two, which I have not given you yet. As of right now any theory that has gravitational energy loss in a system is still viable under Rhe 1993 Taylor/ Hulse data according to the Nobel Prize press release. Part two, as I will discuss, differentiates my idea from GR. And this is where I differ from Einstein's explanation of General relativity. I believe generality relativity is fundamentally based upon the decay of all mass and energy into the monopole gravitational wave. Monopole in this case means once released there is no return, no second pole ability to exchange any particles, it is a Newtonian type of relationship vs. a Feynman diagram of particle exchange. So then how does gravity work? Continuously emitted waves of the same energy from different sources spatially separated collide and form larger amplitude wavefronts, this is an action, wavefront formation. I state here that this action is a contact force and follows Newtons law, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction to an increase in amplitude, and that equal and opposite reaction is gravity. Since the big bang created a force behind the expansion of space along with sending mass and energy outward i believe this continued process of wave emssion and alignment with the existing generated waves by each poece of mass and energy create a constant force of wave emission and since the wave is figuratively unwinding from mass and energy it is pulling the remaining mass and energy with it- this is dark energy. Can I show a case where there is a new physics law? that in- phase waves are a contact force? Now Maxwell's equations encompass and can derive the Huygens principle and the Huygens principle clearly has a back action to wavefront formation but it has been ignored and because of this problem the Huygens principle has remained a principle. Is the phrase; because we can not find "it" reason to believe "it" doesn't exist? No. That is what Michelson and Morley claimed with space, it doesn't exist because they could not find it and everyone else could not think outside the box... Space is generated from within in my scenario and everything needs a medium to transmit energy because the laws are universal yet generated locally.

What predictions: By treating gravity as a wave synchronization of in-phase wave emission which constructively interferes forming larger wavefronts(amplitudes), gravity and dark energy become one process with two actions. Dark matter is a wavefront formation of generated waves in space itself with no particles causing the action called dark matter, galaxies are held together by this process. So it predicts everything. It accepts GR and the standard model except it states that everything eventually decays and the universe runs out of workable energy when the universe becomes all space. In this scenario the universe started as a singularity and is transitioning to a wave, the gravitational wave, the least potential energy form of matter. If given the right circumstances, this gravitational wave synchronization balance between mass and energy by the hidden variable of the emitted and synchronizing gravitational wave should be evident in a plate like movement of all the planets in a solar system. Given the right conditions each planet will revolve around a star at the same revolution per unit time, violating Kepler's second law.. My theory predicts that space is expanding at a constant velocity but the mass and energy within the universe is expanding at an increasingly accelerated rate. It predicts violations of Kepler's laws, such as odd synchronizations between planets and galaxies and stars and black holes in ways that defy traditional explanations. To a casual observer the swimming pool in my back yard defies the laws of physics because the water level in the pool never changes, it appears to be decay(change) proof. Why? It may rain for two days or it may be 90 degrees and not rain for a month and my pool still contains exactly the same amount of water based on the level. Why? Because it has an overflow and it has an automatic filler. It appears never to decay yet it does. I have two nice cars, one is an 1985 Mercedes Benz 380sl. It looks just like new. My two year old car already looks older than the Mercedes, why ? Because one car is always in the garage and covered, the other is outside of the garage and exposed to the elements. Thinking outside the box, here are just two concepts via real life type examples of how it is possible that something can decay yet go unchanged or decay is slowed by a protected enviorment. Protons have to somehow be stable over a long time and appear indestructible but there are several mechanism that allow a proton to remain unchanged to the observer.

Time Forward= TF= expanding universe

Go to .....TF

I have switched to forward time and stop getting your panties in a bunch. Pay attention SDA

Why is time a forward action? Why does entropy increase? So far I have suggested that there is a guiding overall mechanism that runs forward time. Einstein gave an example of how gravity works by stating that matter warps space-time and the warpage of space-time causes gravity. His equations are very valid for most situations but he did not know about Dark matter and dark energy unknown causes of actions. . I suggest incorporating dark matter and dark energy into general relativity and clarifying the unknown actions of the universe. The picture I present is that mass and energy do not warp space-time as Einstein theorized instead they create space-time as a natural decay process of mass and energy into the monopole gravitational wave. A monopole gravitational wave is a wave that originates from mass and energy but can not be reabsorbed, it is the endpoint of used potential energy. This means that as space increases, mass and energy decrease via an energy transfer into the gravitational wave. I have then used the Taylor/Hulse model as a foundation, "This is considered to prove that gravitational radiation really exists."- Discovery of the Binary Pulsar www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p... So I am in agreement so far with Einstein that gravitational radiation exists. I have then looked at the measurements for dark energy and realized they did not take loss of mass into account when analyzing their data for the universe increasing in acceleration. Newton has given us a formula for that F= M x A. So with a constant force and a decreasing mass the remaining shrinking mass over time will increase I'm acceleration. So what is driving the universe that gives it a constant force? And this is where I have gained a little insight. If the universe, from the big bang of the singularity, created mass, energy and space as an energy transfer as Stephen Hawkins believes and if the singularity was finite then as space increases mass and energy have to decrease. I believe this is what the 1993 Taylor/ Hulse Nobel prize hints toward in conjunction with the discovery of the mass and energy in the universe is increasing in acceleration expanding the universe. Could the same mechanism that causes gravity also cause the universe's mass and energy to increase in acceleration moment to moment? There is an extremely simple mechanism, and here is a simple example. Two balls of string are placed on the ground, they represent mass and energy in this simple example of a possible solution in three dimensions. The connected strings are brought together as an example of in-phase gravitational waves forming wavefronts. Then walk away from the balls of string while holding the connected strings that are attached to the balls of string. Two actions happen, the sting leaving at a constant velocity bring the balls of string following the direction increasing in acceleration until the balls completely unwind, all space, the other interesting fact is that the balls come closer together and touch. These actions are very similar gravity and Dark energy. Could a similar process be shown in nature? Yes more later...

No evasion, read all the posts including the thread Forward time. 1993 Nobel prize established gravitational waves. Anyone can use that as evidence if that is essential to a part if their theory. So establishing gravitation wave emission is the beginning, does the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics not establish that ? It does.. Now for the other evidence go to forward time because that is where I have moved.

No you are missing the point! The reason is, because my understanding encompasses GR and by explaining the mechanism of GR I also need proof of emitted gravitational waves. This is part 1. The proof of gravitational wave emission. Part two is where I completely differ than GR. I assume you are conceding gravitational wave emission. Part one of my theory is all mass and energy create gravitational waves as a natural decay process, this is established as indirect evidence of that and that only. I postulate that this action is the basis for forward time and increased space. I go on further to state that as mass and energy decay into gravitational waves space increases. A total energy decrease = a total space increase. The conservation of total energy/ momentum is violated. Professor Ma and Wang mathematically wrote in the new field that exactly says that, which will be able to be tested. I also explain the mechanism of this new field, which incorporates dark energy as simply F = M(measured over time) x A. Remember you have two observations First is the 1993 Taylor data- gravitational energy loss second is the 1998 data that measured the movement of the furtherest galaxies showing an increase in acceleration- dark energy. Now putting those two together is a very important clue. A decrease in total mass x an increase in acceleration = what? A constant Force. There is a constant force driving the universe apart, what could it be? well the decrease in mass is from mass giving off the gravitational wave. Could that also be responsible for the constant force? I suggest yes. And when I have more time I will review the second part of my theory to show how it all fits together. Part two is that mass and energy, in giving off in phase monopole gravitational waves create the fundamental forces of gravity and dark energy with dark matter force of wave density.