Nobrainer

So if part one of my Ghost wave theory to be true says that there should be evidence of gravitational wave emission and there is indirect evidence of gravitational wave emission and this evidence is inclusive of relativity and alternative theories concerning gravitational wave emission then it is perfectly acceptable to quote it as evidence. So stop the ill thought out attacks and try to pick on an aspect of my theory that has a better chance of a flaw... This part is in total agreement with Einstein. We both agree there should be production of gravitational waves.

You left that one wide open--- that's funny but I don't have to use your own words... Anyhow let's get this straight first, The 1993 Nobel prize in physics did this for me, it showed me that gravitational waves exist, are emitted and have a speed. It indirectly confirms their existence. That is why I can use it because I was asked to show proof of what I am saying and I am saying that Gravitational waves exist, are emitted and have a speed, frequency and wavelength. Here is a quote from the Nobel Prize commitee 1993 "Here a new, revolutionary "space laboratory" has been obtained for testing Einstein's general theory of relativity and alternative theories of gravity." The last four words allow should show you you are wrong. Any theory with emitted gravitational waves is not eliminated. This is indirect proof of gravitational waves. I believe I was answering a question about proof of emitted gravitational waves, this is proof. No one owns the proof and you do not make any sense. Two parts 1). All mass and energy decay creating the action of energy transfer into gravitational waves- I agree. Where I differ is with the concept that gravitational wave emission is the clock of time, and the generated space. The emission of THE GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EMISSION IS SPACE-TIME, created by and the reason behind the big bang.( maybe this part should be in speculation, haha) The big bang created space, mass and energy but I believe space is the monopole gravitational wave created at the big bang and the remaining mass and energy (4%?) still decays as an energy transfer into a wave with a specific speed, frequency and wavelength from the source.

No predictions? - you are ignorant and wrong. Actually read precious posts. You straight out lie, why? Predictions 1). Violations of Kepler's laws- 2nd law most obvious "KARACHI. A team of academicians and their assistants observed Venus in the sky during the 73-second period of total darkness besides witnessing the violation of Kepler’s second law of planetary motion in the form of variation in aerial velocity." -UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI Department of Mathematics Astronomy Program 2). No dark mass with bw found with the actions of dark matter -Independent analyses of data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have found no trace of low-mass dark matter – the mysterious substance thought to make up much of the universe. The results appear to go against recent direct evidence for low-mass dark matter, although some physicists believe there is no conflict.- physicsworld.com 3). Gravitational energy should be lost in an isolated system as the 1993 Nobel Prize in physics shows; "Of particular interest has been the possibility of verifying with great precision the theory's prediction that the system should lose energy by emitting gravitational waves in about the same way that a system of moving electrical charges emits electromagnetic waves." press release - The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

A center piece of my understand is that dark matter and dark energy are actions, which include gravitation, of a process. This means that there is no mass in dark matter, if actual mass is found then I concede I do not know how the universe works. FermiLab has a little contribution to my side of the argument... "Independent analyses of data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have found no trace of low-mass dark matter – the mysterious substance thought to make up much of the universe. The results appear to go against recent direct evidence for low-mass dark matter, although some physicists believe there is no conflict."physicsworld.com

Meanwhile, concerning photons and magnetic fields, "virtual photons ... are constantly being emitted and re-absorbed by the electron" but that isn't really what we mean. Two particles that are interacting electromagnetically are indeed surrounded by a virtual photon cloud. However, in familiar cases (e.g. a hydrogen atom) that cloud is completely unchanging in time. Nothing at all is going on. The words about things fluctuating around are a rough way to convey one of the peculiar properties of quantum fields. The electric and magnetic fields have not only average values but also ranges of possible values around the average. That's what's so different from classical fields. (It's just like the positions of quantum particles, which have ranges around the average position, unlike classical particles.) You can convey an image of that range by pretending that the fields are jumping around between the different possible values, just like you can pretend that a particle is jumping around among the different positions in its cloud. However, the fields (including their spread of values) no more need to be jumping around than do the particles in space. In a nice stable atomic state, for example, nothing changes in time. The static range of possibilities turns into an actual range of outcomes only when the system interacts in particular ways with the bigger world outside. Mike W. (published on 04/28/11)" That quote saves me time, but what I can say and soon youknow too, the concept of "virtual photon"s is a man-made way to picture something on the quantum level of fields that attempt to explain why magnetic fields do not show a particle as electromagnetic fields. Imagine the particle exists, but can not be dissassociated from the photon's cloud. It has a spin vibratatonal frequency which adds energy as it is contained. You are trying to save Einstein's ass because he did not predict dark energy. The reason Einstein put in his cosmological constant was because all of physics thought that the universe was static and Einstein needed a cosmological constant to correct general relativity. Einstein died having no idea that the universe was increasing in acceleration. The best you cab say is he put it on the wrong side of the equation. My math teacher would fail me for that one wrong is wrong. People try to give Einstein credit where none is deserved which clouds the achievements he did do. So quit BS-ing me with made up BS that Einstein Knew the universe was increasing in acceleration, he did not and anyone who says he did is giving Einstein credit that is a flat out lie. Which is worse. Lying directly or spreading falsehoods because you can't think for yourself? Einstein did not know about or predict the actions of the universe expanding at an accelerated rate- that is a lie that is being forwarded by people that can not think for themselves. He constant was for a completely different reason and on the wrong side of the equation. SDA As for proton or photon decay, I have not given you the answer yet, just clues. Pay attention SDA I can not believe you can not get it- Planets on the outermost orbits will revolve around their stars exactly as the inner most planets as if they are sitting on a record player going around a turntable. Put two coins on a paper plate one by the center, slightly off centered and one on the outer edge and slowly rotate the paper plate and you will see what I mean. U can play with the details- boring. Now review that understanding with the second law.And you will see it violates that law and then you can figure out the rest. I don't have a virtual protector - sorry

Oh I forgot about an earlier question; proton decay. photon decay, it doesn't matter. First any estimate is total BS. Let me tell you why first with an example in the real world. I have a light on in my house, in the man cave, which is my kids play room and my wife's storage room anything but a man cave, and after I walk in knowing the light has been on for weeks. The illumination has not changed. Could I say the illumination has not aged because there is no change? Isn't that what we think of photons traveling at the speed of light? Another example; I have a swimming pool and the water level never changes, it is constantly at one level whether it rains all day or it is 90 and sunny without rain for two weeks, why? Because I have an automatic filler and a hole to drain excess water above a certain level. The water level is ageless, so it appears... Now apply that information to protons in a protective atom and to a photon with magnetic fields...

All of Kepler's big three should be violated. Imagine this scenario; All mass and energy in the universe decay into the least potential form of work energy, space, the once emitted, never to be reabsorbed gravitational wave. All mass and energy decay into the baseline wave which synchronizes, increases in amplitude with all other waves. Example 1 Extreme synchronization - hypothetical In a galaxy with a black hole in the center this rotating massive black hole loses energy through this process and spins faster if there is no energy to replace the lost energy due to emission of gravitational waves, if the black hole is in an equaliibrium wirh mass gain vs energy loss at the center of a galaxy then the black hole's mass is constant and it's spin stays constant. In this situation with a constant spin velocity of the black hole and given enough time for all the gravitational waves in this galaxy which is continually emitting gravitational wave from each piece of mass and energy then the overall wave synchronization will create a process which initially catches the outer planets, spirals in the black holes rotation in older galaxies and eventually catches all the galaxy in a synchronizating rotation with the black holes rotation. This effect should be extremely common in varying degrees dependent upon the black holes spin, energy consumption verses energy loss and the total energy of the system. The system itself, combining onto the continued emission of a large wavefront will also align, synchronize with the wavefronts from all of space creating a constant force, with a decreasing overall total energy (mass) and every galaxy will be increasing in acceleration in the direction of their original motion following Newton's laws of motion, F=MxA. This one process of mass and energy decay, creating the aether of space, which inflation explains exists, for the wrong reason I might add, remember there has never been an experiment devised to check if the aether was generated from within and therefore controls the laws form local sources outward. Now if this idea is correct it is an example of wave amplitude increase or space density increase through a feedback of a contact force with actions and reactions to wave amplitude increase. In otherwords, only one wave can occupy the waves area without changing the amplitude, thickness of the area the wave controls. If wave could stack without change in amplitude then the current laws are correct, but they can not interfere without interfering... It is just common sense which is oddly very uncommon. Because there is an increase in amplitude when two waves combine constructively, there is change. Because there is change, the waves cannot occupy the smallest pinpoint area of a single wave with multiple waves or there would be no change. Why is that so hard for all of physics to see? That right there is the essence of the problem with physics, wave alignment changes waves and is by defination a contact force. A contact force requires for every action a equal and Collinear reaction. I think it was MigL who sarcastically said, and I am paraphrasing; so you are right and everyone else is wrong... In this case the answer is definitely yes. Everyone else is wrong and blew it big and is stuck on stupid. It is so obvious yet no one uses their brain here. The amplitude is increased, that is fact.. This is a change, that is fact. It is somehow a contact or there could not be a change, this is fact. Once you understand that continuously emitted in-phase waves collide and rearrange to fit and it is a contact force, the rest is easy because it follows classic laws of motion and the entire universe clearly works this way by all the evidence which can not be examined on one understanding any other way. This violation of Kepler's laws through future observation is just one example of why this Ghost Wave Theory is correct. "God does not play dice with the universe" Einstein said, and Bohr's responded, " Do not tell God what to do." Einstein's point, which Bohr could have capitalized on instead of taking offense was that something does not feel right, there has to be something missing. Well Einstein was correct, "God does not play dice, He plays pool"-CMT If either Bohr or Einstein understood that wave interference was a contact sport with no one playing nice but everyone playing for position and dragging mass and energy along with it, general relativity would have incorporated dark matter and dark energy as aspects of field interactions and Bohrs could have combined general relativity with quantum theory and we could use this new way to understand the universe to communicate instaneously independent of distance without any violation of the laws of nature but I am getting a little ahead of myself. Suppose I am correct, and that does mean everyone else is wrong, many people use that to try to say I have an ego but I do not, what they are saying to me is that they are ignorant and jealous and can not phathom that something as wave collision could be a contact force and they tote all the stupid lines like - I used to be like you but I woke up and so should you. Or personal attacks or you are not talking the language of physics, you should go back to school... F- that . I am so sick and tired of the whole world being brainwashed. If I am wrong- show me or STFU. Talk only physics not trash... You can jot show me because I did not discover this to be right, I discovered it because it is right. Show me I am wrong or don't say non-sense and BS. But if you are going to take a shot anyhow, remember the Heisenberg principle keeps the reaction to the action of wave amplitude increase a hidden variable until the grand scale where the prediction of unknown phenomenon gives raise to oddities resulting from this process such as violations of Kepler's laws, (dark matter) wave synchronization with planets and galaxies and dark energy- ( F=MxA)

Last time I spent this much time with someone as I have with you today I married her. I will answer, I am out of time for now. Physical labor calls. You are asking me to feed you a fish and I would rather first, discuss the mechanism by which the laws are violated, dark matter mechanism and you will see"why" the laws are violated and which ones and then we can fish together. But later thanks for getting to a fun question. And still monologuing.... I can not learn and memorize easily until I know why something works and it drives me obsessively crazy until I figure it out. By trying to understand a simple child-like question, " When I drop something why does it fall?" I came across parameters that modified the possibilities such as the variables of forward relative time, space shrinking or expanding, mass increasing or decreasing depending upon other parameters such as distance and speed. You see, it's always the why... Whether you are a physicists or a philosopher. It's mankind's only never ending question.... Why?

Verification throughtout prediction will confirm there math, other peers have given their Math a positive preliminary look. But I don't know until they predict unknown phenomenon. For example I predict that as the universe is mapped you will see Kepler's Laws violated more often in older galaxies. I read the link - no it doesnt fit. Evidence and predictions an overview of the process and the concept fits all observation and gives reasons for deductions being correct. Every law now has reasons behind it. And I created a new one, wave interaction is a contact force!

These two tiny bits of evidense is all I need to spring an original idea. And obviously I am having fun with you because it is like one plus one to me and your mindblock ignores the evidence that currently exists which I have stated previously. You ask for the math I say Read the paper by Ma and Wang, you say no evidence and I supply evidence. Yet not one word. Obviously I have step on your crap theory and you don't like it and funny thing you are one in the crowd, not original. Not one question yet that I haven't answered logically you are boring me. And yes I have provided all you stated; 1). Light evidence above 2). Read Ma and Wang paper for math, bone up on Rhe Huygens principle for math- I am not your personal teacher. 3). I have stated some predictions previously either here of forward time. One would be there is no matter in dark matter. Another is mass and energy decrease as space increases. The predictions are so obvious- Kepler's laws will be violated.. duh...

The whole reason that I confirmed that I was right was in part to discovering that physicists ignored their own mathematical equations, their own language. And I confirmed this thru experimentation just to be sure. They made a big mistake by throwing out 1/2 of the equation. Almost like the mistake Einstein made when he added his constant to correct for a false belief in a static universe. But they were one step away from understanding their own math and they through out the other half of the Huygens principle. They could not grasp that they only needed one more step. You see, when a wavefront forms Huygen's principle dictates a wavelet in every direction forming and they only see the wavefront going out and no back wave but here is the step they missed. When you have a wave colliding continually forming larger waves the opposite reaction has a wave aligning continually by smaller and stronger waves because it it traveling back to the sources and since the inward motion of energy transfer in a medium is compressing into smaller generated waves as it gets closer to the sources, a stress/tension builds between the sources and the sources decrease in distance apart to reduce the stress/ tension. This is the basic building block of gravity and the math was ignored until now. Together Einstein, Ma and Wang have corrected this flaw in the understanding of Huygens principle and now it can be the Huygens law. Try it. Take two ping pong balls and drop them is still water varying the distances apart. It is Newton's gravity formulas. It is the correction of understanding because the MATH IS DONE, it is your understanding of the math that is the problem, not mine. Well that math which I agree with because they created the missing field needs to be tested. We will see. In the meantime, it is the underlying math that you ignored. It was also done with out me but I agree with it and you have ignored it. It is the math behind the Huygens principle derived from Maxwells equations. And the concept shows that there is a reaction to wavefront formation, the entire principle has been ignored because it did not make sense because they did not see a back action wave they ignored the math. The math should not have been ignored. The mistake I found was physicists ignoring their own math so they decided it was negligible and discarded it. So as the French say- Touché Now go pick on a string theorist and make then show you another dimension in space. They can't because if they could we would be already in it and not living in 3. So they have to pretend it curls up so we will never see it. Or we live in only 3 dimensions and time and space and gravity are actions of wave emission and in-phase collisions. I chose my way because I proved it to myself. Funny, mathmatically we have competing universes we live in string theory has how many dimensions? So does that make it true? No. Math is just a tool but you can be sold useless tools in math also. The reason math is important to Theoritical Physicists is for predictions and to link the four forces of nature together ( or are they saying six forces with dark energy and matter?). Anyhow it reminds me of a man who is driving around lost without a gps and refusing to ask for directions. Once everyone catches on to the concept that mass and energy decade into their lowest form then and gravity is a by product of this decay not directly related to the other forces except it monopole action then everything is easier to understand. Oh yea. The decay of protons... In my house my piano sits 1/2 in the sunlight and there is a distinct difference between the wood which is protected and the wood not protected. Protons protected are kept abay from decay until eventually everything becomes space.

IDid I miss something? I don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. If you can not first creatively come ip with the conceptual solution then you can not do the math. I assume 1+1=2 was understood long before it was written down. I understood the concept long before the math but the math is done, I can not take credit for it. It was not done by me. Only the concept is mine, the original thought. The math is done by Ma and Wang. Please explain what the heck I missed in what you are saying.. The concept is simple 1). All mass and energy decay into gravitational waves, continually emitted creating the actions of space-time. 2). Wave interaction is a contact force, in- phase wave interaction creates the force of gravity. So Einstein did not know the mechanism of gravity and also he did not know about the actions of dark energy and dark matter. Taking this to completion, the laws of conservation of energy and momentum are incomplete and need refining to include the decay of mass and energy as a function of an emitted wave.. Well that means that General relativity needs another modification to include this and low and behold Professor Ma and Wang have done it. I copyrighted the entire concept and they have now pit it into the language of physics. To build a car, I need parts, I need to know the order and the understanding of the physics of car building but I do not necessarily have to write out every equation to actually build the car, especially when building and testing something new. The math comes after you have observed, and that is what happened here. I observed and rebuild the universe by explaining the reasons the universe works, mechanically, and Ma and Wang did the math. I just wanted to figure it out, it drove me a little crazy not knowing the mechanism of how it is possible time dialation is possible. Either it was bullcrap or there had to be a concrete understandable explanation. Using only three spactial dimensions I pieced it together. It is kinda like when someone takes something apart to figure out how it works, the math comes last. In this case, the universe put it together, I conceptually took it apart and Ma and Wang wrote the math for future curious people to see how it works mathematically. In other words, I only claim to understand the mechanism and it all makes sense. The math now confirms what I knew. The math was created to correct an error, I understand the mechanism which explains the error and why the math is needed to correct an error no one else saw until recently. If a uncooked fish stinks, I do not need the math to know not to eat the fish, it smells funny. With a similar feeling I knew something was wrong with our perception of the universe so I started over and reviewed all the laws and I found two flaws and it changes everything.

The math was done by prof Ma and Wang in incorporating dark energy and dark matter into GR. In order to do the math correctly the conservation of energy- momentum tensor has to be violated and that is the assumption that they made in there model. Admittedly I have conceptualized the process of the universe and copyrighted it in 2004. It's old to me. Step by step i put all the pieces together and it took a while. If gravity accounts for the actions of dark matter and energy what would the mechanism be like? And the solution was I interesting to find, it changes and clarifies everything. In order for the universe to work in only three dimensions, time, space and gravity have to become measurable actions of a baseline process. As sound has relative qualities because there is a fundamental energy exchange from a source into a wave, it became obvious that Einstein's relativity by definition has this fundamental process. There was no other way in tbree dimensions only that time and space could be variables. They had to be wave functions. That was the biggest hurdle for me. Once I got that then everything fit. And that meant that space itself was included in the laws of conservation. With space as part of the conceptual equation then all the observations which made no sense now made perfect sense. Dark matter and dark energy become wave functions also. Gravity, dark matter became reactions to the reactions of waves forming wavefronts and all sorts of predictions fell into place. one prediction is that this new "dark wave" would always be trying to form wave fronts and galaxies under the right circumstances would violate Kepler's laws and rotate in plate-like uniformity with a black hole In the center. Dark flows could happen, no mass will ever be found to cause dark matter because dark matter is a function of wavefront formation. And on and on. I then traced the initial error in thinking to a principle called the Huygens principle and realized everyone ignored the back action that the principle describes. The reason the ignored it is because they did not see a reverse wave but I realized there should not be a reverse wave forming because the sources are continuously closer than tbe reverse wave and the every is translated to stress- tension or gravitation between the sources generating the waves. I realized we all missed tbe simple fact that wavefront formation is a contact force and Newton's laws of motion apply. And tben I created a simple test. I dropped ping pong balls in water to create ripples and watched the reaction to wavefront formation.... That is a brief overview of how I took the universe apart to look inside and discover the mechanism of operation. Every now and then I will share it with who ever might be u retested but my goal was to understand how the mysteries work that is all. No fame, no glory just no confusion. I just wanted to know. And it is funny to be this far ahead of Theoritical physicists. And the temper tantrums people have, wow! Back in the mid 90!s I though I was wrong because I had Rhe universe increasing in acceleration so I put it down ard wrote a comedy screenplay. Then out of the blue I read about dark energy and ....eventually copyrighted it and published it in a general science journal abd then left it alone for a long while. I get it. If you don't that is okay... There is one mystery left for me to create a working model , my understanding of the universe leads to an interesting proposition. In my opinion,Einstein was wrong about spooky action at a distance and instantaneous communication is possible and does not violate any physics laws. Funny that I can see answers when others can't. I think it is because I sometimes spend a month or two thinking about one thing until I have disected it to death.

The reason that two or more sources generating in-phase waves attract each other in a medium is because it is an undiscovered law that has been overlooked for 400 years that allows the waves to form wavefronts with reactions. It is not hard to understand every action in the universe with this simple process that has been unknown/ ignored until now. Stating that infinite stacking of boson's is yesterday's news and creates confusion and unknown actions such as not having a reason for dark energy or dark matter. By correcting this wrong thinking, wave emission and wave front formations act as if matter exists (dark matter and dark energy). Also Stephen Hawkins even (believes space has a aether-like function as to moving mass and energy during inflation. Again the aether is back on. Semantics become the sticking point. By mistaking the obvious, and thinking there is no aether then you have multiple disconnected explanations that are incomplete like GR and dark energy. I will answer your questions in a question; A swimming pool's water level never changes, whether it rains all day or whether it is hot and sunny and has not rained for a month. To the life of the swimming pool, time stands still, what is the mechanism and why?

It's all about the evidence and the observations, it is not personal. Or as Dan Akaroid used to say, "Jane, you ...."lol 1). 1993 Nobel Prize in physics shows loss of gravitational energy in an isolated system. 2). "Lord Kelvin (1871) and Carl Anton Bjerknes (1871) assumed that all bodies pulsate in the aether. This was in analogy to the fact that, if the pulsation of two spheres in a fluid is in phase, they will attract each other". 3). I have demonstrated an overlooked law, that wave formation is a contact force and that there is a reaction to wave front formation that is exactly the same as Gravitation. Funny, all you can do is say you are wrong but you do not have the ability to discuss the evidence... If predictions of unknown phenomenon are correct or are not correct, that is the test. Does it fit all know phenomenon? What does it predict? This is not new to me nor are your responses. I have known this for 10 years or more and you are waisting both our times. If you want to know why and how everything can be understood in one theory let me. I do not claim this is just a theory, I claim this is "THE THEORY". The math to correct GR was done recently by Professor Ma and Wang if you care to look, Einstein even thought that gravitational waves were generated by acceleration. I am just putting the pieces together in the correct order and all the mechanisms of all the unknown actions in the universe become easy to understand. Here is what I encounter 1). You are correct, there are people that have ipartiallu lthought out theories that upon close look have contradictions. The contradictions are usually easy to point out. 2). There are also people that have their own theories and therefore your theory has to be wrong or they are wrong and they can not be wrong! These are the worst people to deal with because they mount personal attacks and don't let up. I find that these people have very little original thought. Einstein dealt with them a few ways, one was what he said after 100 of the worlds greatest scientists signed a letter all agreeing that Einstein was wrong he said; "if I was wrong, it would have only taken one." Another saying was, " Albert Einstein Quotes. Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." So don't worry it doesn't bother me that people have a different opinion and throw insults and I know it is correct because it fits the observations. That is the point, not what you say or what I say. It fits everything. You are not my wake up call, my wake up call came when I first started to understand and I called Lawerence Krauss when he was at Case Western and he was nice enough to listen as I explained. He stated and this is a direct quote/ " If you are right then the rest of us are wrong and we wastes our lives so therefore you can not be right!" If I can recover from that then I can easily recover from your non- important comments.. Best of luck though... So try to understand before you criticize without merrit

Electromagnetic radiation comes in discrete packages called photons. And No I am not interested in a prize but thank you anyhow, very kind of you. And like I said the Huygen's principle can be derived from tMaxwell's equations. Use the Internet. I do not claim to be a great mathematician but I do claim to be able to understand how the universe operates by understanding the two processes that have been overlooked. One missed process is that all mass and energy decay into the monopole gravitational wave creating the actions of time and space. - 1993 Nobel prize in physics as evidence of gravitational loss in a system- and where do you think that loss came from? Second; a new process - in phase waves colliding create the action of a wavefront and a reaction of gravity. Gravity is not a direct pulling force but a wave aligning force. Dark energy and dark matter are predictions of this process along with black hole evaporation and many others, dark flow etc. But you will never find a particle associated with these actions of gravity, and the Dark's Again, thanks for your questions it's fun. This isn't new to me I copyrighted this years ago. I have played the devils advocate more than you ever could ever. Einstein never predicted dark energy or dark matter because he did not know the process, And as far as the math that does include dark energy and matter, it has now been completed by Prof. Wang and Ma. altering GR to reflect a new field. Seriously, one process of in-phase wave emission with wave synchrinization explains every action in the universe and you ask less than intelligent questions in my opinion. Explain to me how you are able to nominate anyone for a Nobel prize or was that a lie?... It works both ways my friend... Of course it was a lie, so maybe one more question from you if you start behaving nicely otherwise I will not respond anymore to YOU.

How do I resolve this with with Maxwell's equations- Are You understanding I am just taking the Huygen's Principle and saying yes it is correct and telling you and everyone it should be the Huygen's law? Once you understand that then you might understand that Maxwell's equations in fact encompass the Huygen's Principle and can be truncated from it. So I hope this clears up your misunderstanding.

Concerning the photon and the glue that holds photons together into a field or generated wave, electeomagnetic radiation; A dipole has stucture and function, a variable range of strength interaction. If the dipole decays into a monopole wave then you could consider it one process decaying or two processes with a comonality. It is just semantics my friend. You don't seem to see it yet but the whole universe is connected through this process. Are there stages, and steps in this process of the singularity becoming all space. The mechanism of decay- What is the cause of action that allows or creates this process of work originating from potential energy to kinetic energy as the universe transitions from mass (particle) and energy( particle/wave duality) to space (wave)? Who knows for sure, comfort maybe, maybe all of existence is more comfortable laying flat than curled up in a ball? A path of least tension, positive pressure, negative energy, push me- pull you, just being silly.. Potential to kinetic energy, created at the big bang, but now a pulling as space expands or what you might call negative evergy. It is a violation of Einstein's conservation of the energy-momentum tensor would be another way to say it. Here is a quote from a current article off the web; ""Many people have come up with different theories for dark energy," Wang said. "Unfortunately, the mystery remains, and in fact, the nature of dark energy is now perhaps the most profound mystery in cosmology and astrophysics. It is considered the most outstanding problem in theoretical physics. "The other great mystery concerning our universe is that it contains much more matter than can be accounted for in our visible stars. The missing mass is termed as dark matter, and despite many attempts at detecting dark matter, the mystery remains and even deepens." The researchers postulate that the energy-momentum tensor of normal matter is no longer conserved and that new gravitational field equations follow from Einstein's principles of equivalence and general relativity, and the principle of Lagrangian dynamics, just as Einstein derived his field equations. Wang said the new equations were the unique outcome of the non-conservation of the energy-momentum tensor of normal matter." - prof. Wang

Think different- Albert Einstein Sarcastically, I am not aware that the actual physicists have figured it all out and are perfect. With great ideas comes different thinking. With respect to using today's terminology, you may be correct. I am historically correcting an error. The error is; the false fact that wave interaction is a non-contact force. Wave interaction is a contact force and it is an historical term that has been long forgotten but makes all the difference. With respect to waves and understanding the process of the universe, I do care and understand it. Like you, I am sure, we both want to seek truth. In thinking for the last 100 years or so wave interaction has been thought of as a "non-contact" force. What this means is that they eliminated Newton's laws of motion with respect to wavefront formation. And yes, the terms I use are hundreds of years old because that is the time period as to when the error happened so out of respect for the field of physics I am correcting the error at the period of understand of that time. It can be much easier for a layman to understand in retrospect. So putting the "word salad" talk away for a moment and addressing the real issue not a side issue, I stand by wave interaction having to follow Newton's laws of motion. Here is a concrete example; There are two vibrating balls in a medium, water, generating waves of an in-phase fixed frequency and wavelength in that medium. The balls generate waves and There is an action when the waves intersect, the waves collide and reform into a new circular wave with a new center. The centers of the waves before they collided was the individual centers of the equal size balls. The center of the new wave is the exact middle between the balls and the reaction to this newly created wave is that the balls come together and touch so that the waves appear to create this new wave with the least amount of field stress and tension. This is the actual reason for gravity explained so that anyone can understand. To me, the word salad of today's Theoritical Physicist has confused everyone to the point of distancing everyone to understand the physical mechanism of how the universe works. This is not word salad here; 1). Mass and energy naturally decay creating space, via continuing release of the gravitational wave. 2). When in-phase waves collide as a contact force, there is a reaction to this new wave formation. These reactions are the reasons behind gravitation and dark matter. Dark energy and dark matter and gravitation are actions grouped together as "Dark Wave" actions. Now anyone who does not understand this process is talking "word salad". - thanks for the idea of word salad.. (I hope the terminology is acceptable so far, if not rewrite it in a way that is acceptable to you and show me. My point is that you are being dismissive over terms and not concepts and YOU are losing out. It is you that is wasting time if you are not getting this because you have a problem with translation and not concept.) Your mostly wrong on both accounts, well I do have problems with the math, yes but I can struggle through it sometimes. The point is not the math, math can be adapted to any process. But I am explaining the actual process which accounts for the actions dark matter, dark energy and gravity. Here is an interesting angle if you are really interested in the math. "ScienceDaily (Sep. 6, 2012) — A pair of mathematicians -- one from Indiana University and the other from Sichuan University in China -- have proposed a unified theory of dark matter and dark energy that alters Einstein's equations describing the fundamentals of gravity." Now you can still complain but you would not be contributing to understanding. So if you need to see the math- I refer you to follow up with their paper. I did not create the math, I just understand the process that the math explains... Thank you for allowing me to clarify. Your mostly wrong on both accounts, well I do have problems with the math, yes but I can struggle through it sometimes. The point is not the math, math can be adapted to any process. But I am explaining the actual process which accounts for the actions dark matter, dark energy and gravity. Here is an interesting angle if you are really interested in the math. "ScienceDaily (Sep. 6, 2012) — A pair of mathematicians -- one from Indiana University and the other from Sichuan University in China -- have proposed a unified theory of dark matter and dark energy that alters Einstein's equations describing the fundamentals of gravity." Now you can still complain but you would not be contributing to understanding. So if you need to see the math- I refer you to follow up with their paper. I did not create the math, I just understand the process that the math explains... Thank you for allowing me to clarify. Forward time, dark matter, dark energy lead to one inescapable conclusion; the conservation of energy and momentum of has to be violated, period. The reason it is violated is because mass and energy decay into space itself causing the expansion of the universe. Dark energy is a constant force on a decreasing mass over time. Simply stated, F = M x A. The mechanism is as follows; The big bang created the force via release of mass and energy and space, but the space continues to decay via release of the gravitational wave expanding space and at the same time constructively wave interfering creating the force to continue constantly in the direction of the mass and energy original movement. This results on a measured mass that is decreasing in mass with this constant force. Einstein created his theories without the knowledge of dark energy and dark matter so he used the conservation laws as fact. But the Energy- Momentum tensor of normal mass and energy is not conserved in this process and the new understand arises.

In this hypothetical solution the aether is essentially a continuously generated by-product of the other forces and is "attached to ALL mass and energy" because it is generated by all mass and energy. It is the aether combining forming wavefronts with reactions that creates a whole picture of feedback with in the entire universe. The aether is attached through being an in-phase wavefront formation at each stage of interaction. Gravity is a reaction to a monopole wave alignment of generated waves. Since the waves are generated in a circular, spherical form, the reaction tendency is to clump mass in round forms. It is a quite simple mechanism of waves generated and combining as a "contact force" with a reaction of dark matter and gravity Prediction; 1). Dark matter force lessens as gravitation from mass increases. The closer you are to mass the less empty space wavefront formation creates gravitation. 2). All strong, weak, electromagnetic forces are contact forces between the exchange particles and not the exchange themselves but the waves acting as contact forces themselves. Sorry, let me explain what I mean; with the other three forces, they are considered particle exchange forces or dipoles. Particles, in a wave, acting as a wave are given off by one substance and absorbed by another. I am stating that I believe the real action is a wave aligning force created by the wave of particles and not by the exchange itself. So attraction is a wave alignment, increasing the amplitude and repulsion is the waves creating a field that bumps into the other field because they can not align in this spatial arrangement. Now with gravitation it is a generated wave call it gravitons but it is not a dipole, it can not be absorbed into mass or energy, it is the end product of decay. As it is emitted and it collides with other emitted waves, all with the same frequency and wavelength forming a feedback system that adjusts the sources that are emitting the waves to continue to emit the waves with the least amount of distructive interference, or wave friction ( just made that term up for the point). So these monopole waves, emitted waves that can not ab absorbed into mass or energy create the laws of physics both locally and tie the entire universe together. Thanks for being nice about everything and allowing me to try to explain. I am stating that all attractive forces are wave alignment forces but gravity is so much weaker because it is a monopole wave force, one end and not a dipole wave force , two ends. Here is another prediction, given the right circumstances and adequate time, an entire galaxy with a black hole as the center could establish and equilibrium wave synchronization with all the mass and energy in that system and act as one all rotating like a plate rotates, each point on a rotating plate rotates one revolution at the same time.

It was a retro footnote because I grew up with encyclopedias and this may be silly but it was the first time I understood why Einstein could not link gravity to the other forces, I was probably 7 or 8 when I looked that up. It is the one I will never forget. Outdated sure, but still has not changed... That is the point.

Here is the simple overview of my proposed solution to forward time; The big bang created three types of matter; mass, energy and space. Space is the least potential form of matter, the gravitational wave. The big bang was a massive release of space, the monopole gravitational wave, the remaining potential energy that did not convert to space coalesced and stabolized and continues to decay from all mass and energy into the monopole gravitational wave creating adding to/ creating more space. The entire universe has stays connected as it changes from particle to wave. The universe starts out as the singularity and ends as all wave. Time, space and gravity vacre actions of wave emission and alignment ( increase in amplitude) generated from each quanta. So there is an undiscovered law that I incorporate here, I do not know Stephen Hawkins explanation, only mine and it has been cppyrighted for many years, sorry. For mass and energy to be influienced by gravity, for time and space to be relative, dark gravity and gravity, for all this to happen, not only do mass and energy give off continuous in-phase waves since before time as we measure it began, from the big bang but these waves form continuous wavefronts as a "CONTACT FORCE" not a non contact force. This is the new law. When two waves collide creating a new larger wave there is a measurable reaction to wavefront formation and the sources that are continuously generating the waves that collide are effected as a collinear reaction to wavefront formation. This is the mechanism of gravitation and it is a density dependent emission reaction. As far as the math? Well good news, two theoritical physicists have incorporated dark matter and dark energy into GR... All I an doing is proposing a possible Mechanism that is understandable. In the 1961 world book encyclopedia under the G book for Gravitation it says that Einstein dis not know the mechanism of Gravitation bit thought it was related to electromagnetism. This was in 1929, I think. So the way things stay attached is by all things are emitting gravitational waves which form actions of combining wavefront formations with the reactions we call gravity in short distances and defined with mass and dark matter with long range distances with disturbances in space. Dark energy just becomes F = M x A and you can understand that I believe. I have no problem being wrong, I am just looking to try to understand how the universe operates, how things fall, how time slows when you are further away from mass or if you accelerate in space. And this solution fits everything that I can think. So one process with wave emission and wavefront formation.

Hello First, concerning the precession of Mercury GR gets it closer but not totally and more importantly GR does NOT take into account an adequate explanation of dark energy or dark matter. I agree with GR but expand it by showing a different way to understand the process and to look at the math which includes the expanded actions of dark matter, dark energy, etc. Stephen Hawkins has a way for black holes to evaporate. I am suggesting that one process explains everything with a newly proposed mechanism. Also Einstein stated that that acceleration causing the production of gravitational waves was conjecture( guesswork). He also stated later that he thought gravitation was related to electeomagnetism but he admitted he did not know. So it is valid to use an indirect confirmation of gravitational waves as an example of energy loss in an isolated system. The fact that there appears to be energy loss does not state why by itself. Every system that exists creates forces and uniquely it doesnt matter standing by itself. My understanding argues that this energy loss is a constructive wave interference which will lead to interesting effects of matter where there is no detectable mass. Such as the actions of dark matter, dark flow, eddy's of space, dark energy all of these mysterious unexplained actions are part of this one process. It is the overall process that allows gravity, time and space to be forward driven and uniquely flowing irregularities of space itself.

Yes it does and the decay of electromagnetic fields into gravitational waves creating wavefronts iwith reactions to wavefront formation is the continuing process that links electromagnetic fields to gravitational waves as a continuious process of mass and energy decaying into space itself. Expanding the reach of electeomagnetic fields to the entire universe via gravity. It is an action with a reaction because I am stating that wave interaction is a contact force. That means that the gravitational field becomes an extension of the electeomagnetic field. Stop critizing wrongly before you understand correctly. It is a continuous process with gravity as a reaction or all part of the same universe interconnected. This interconnected process, which Einstein believe was connected but could not figure out how it was connected explains so much. A more human example would be fhe process of the human body sweating to cool itself. Increase in surface area to increase heat displacement to cool the body via evaporation evaporation. This example is just to show a communication of processes with a feedback result. Sometimes it takes thinking out of the box to understand the box.. If you actual care which I don't think šo I suggest you try to understand Rhe entire concept before you start making the wrong characterizations and conclusions. I know the holes in my logic better than anyone and I can address them but you have not come close yet.

Very good points but in my opinion and with my view whether the system is accelerating or not there would still be energy loss, this was just a way that measures it. My view does not exclude energy loss in an accelerating system, it includes accelerating systems and is expected. It is only indirect evidence. Remember, I am stating that energy loss is in ALL systems and this data shows one system which should be covered in the ALL systems category. My question is why would you expect only an accelerating system to have energy loss or in reality all systems are always creating acceleration and deacceleration if waves contacting each other is a contact force which I claim it is. a Another point you brought up is the energy loss is not equal to the gravitational potential. I agree because I am only sighting the 1993 Nobel Prize data as an example of the process of forward time, propagation of the aether, origination of the continuously generated aether, not gravitation. Gravitation, in this sense is nit related to wave emission but to constructive wave interference from all gravitational wave interaction. In other words there is a feedback system that translates wavefront formation into a back action tension. In this sense systems are always guided by the path of least stress/ tension and it fits perfectly with GR except the overall process includes dark energy and dark matter too. One process, in-phase wave emission with constructive wave interference creating gravity(local) and dark matter (non-local). Overall Loss of energy = an increase in space and not equal to gravitational potential. As overall mass and energy decrease, overall space increases. Example; take two balls of yarn and place them on the floor 10 feet apart and tie there strings together and walk perpendicular to the center line drawn of the two balls with Rhe two strings together and attached to both balls of yarn.. Two actions happen, the balls, acting as mass, travel towards the actions of the strings (representative as the generated aether, the gravitational wave) increasing in acceleration until they completely unwind matching the speed of the strings (dark energy) and the two balls of string also come closer together until they touch, unwinding together.(gravity). This is a crude and very simple example to explain the difference between the two actions, wave emission and constructive wave interference.