Nobrainer

Let's say you are in denial and can not accept that you are wrong. You do not have a clue as to the real basis of the force of gravitation so you have to create multiple ideas to explain away the expansion of the universe and the fact that the expansion is speeding up. Light element distribution has nothing to do with this it is hogwash. Dark energy is just F=MxA Constant force = decreasing measured mass x increasing acceleration. A Newton law. Again see the 1993 Nobel prize in physics for loss of energy in an isolated system. I see no reason to believe you... You lose with false evidence that is not correct. You also do not understand the root cause of time dilation ... "Lost I am afraid you are"- Yoda It is interesting that you use the concept of radiation but never once mention any wave properties of constructive of destructive interference or wave amplitude. I see you never had a course in understanding radiation, and my second clue .... Here is a question that puts it all to rest . What is the mechanism which allows this ALL RADIATION HAS THE PROPERTY TO TRAVEL AT A CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT INDEPENDENT OF THE SPEED OF THE SOURCE? Describe the conceptual mechanism... What is the mechanism that creates the inverse square law that makes gravity a function of distance? What is the mechanism that makes gravity so much weaker than the other forces? Why are the laws of physics local laws? Why is gravity absent from aspects of the quantum world? You can make stuff but there really is no answer with in your reasons as to why the universe might not be expanding. You have made your mind up and now you want to convience others but too many flaws... American's talent is missing here.

Jane you ignorant slut- Dan Akaroid SNL Let's change the name of the second universe to invisible pink bunny. Pretend examples mean nothing. There are no other universes. You are playing with invisible pink bunnies again... Have you heard of the 1600's and the Huygens Principle, or Maxwell's equations in which the Hiygwns principle can be derived. Sorry but you are talking about waves other than monopole, again radiation by definition radiates from a source. I can not help that you think the grass is any greener in the 1930's it just has more BS to confuse and bait and switch .. There is only one proven universe thus the "uni". I can explain everything in one universe that contains three dimensions because I understand the mechanism of time and space and gravity and how it all fits in with the smallest thing, the largest thing and everything in between. And it is simple. The universe was a singularity then became mass and energy and space but the remaining mass and energy still decay into space, via generating a monopole wave fas a by-product of mass and energy naturally decaying creating generated local laws.

Radiation radiates by definition and therefore is antigravity You are ignoring facts to shape a failing argument. There is only denial which traditionally is a trait of the weak minded. I could not tell a flat earth person that the earth is round any more than I could tell a "gravity always pulls" person that gravity is the reaction to a radiating wave interaction. This is where you are 100%, no way out, wrong..... I speculate you are too entrenched in your theory to appreciate your mistakes, or are you stronger minded than I think? Or another way to say it is that there is no perpetual motion machine and any Theoritical Physicists that thinks there is can never prove it, only live in pretend land where you can get something from nothing..

Hey Bjrne, Both sides are ignorant because in order to be correct, the mechanism has to be understood. I have reviewed everything and found two missing pieces. Here is the summary. 1). All mass and energy decay into gravitational waves. Proof is the 1983 Nobel prize in physics. 2). When waves of equal energy generated from different sources collide the form a wavefront as the primary action, this is proven fact. What is not yet known is that the reaction to wavefront formation is Gravity, and I have proved that one myself. All your other stuff is hogwash and baloney

There is a simple explanation to explain gravity that works in three dimensions. If the forces other than gravity are dipole alignment forces where constructive wave interference is strong because the wave alignment is between two dipole bound fields and gravity is a momopole wave alignment between fields that are generated by the decay of electromagnetic fields into monopole gravitational waves which form wavefronts. Everything can be explained this way by understanding that gravity is a generated wave alignment.

Here is your misconception. Gravity is NOT a directly pulling effect it is an emitted wave synchronizing effect. This means that as waves are realease and going through a constructive wave interference there are two actions, 1). The waves pull the sources with them and since the big bang started their journey the waves aligning are creating a constant force and a decreasing mass. This is dark energy. 2). As wave synchronization happens and since the waves are aligning, they also align the masses that generate the waves, this is gravity. Time and space are generated actions of this particle to wave conversion. This is the correct way to understand how gravity and an expanding universe work that makes sense with the current laws of physics. So in conclusion, if the nature of Gravity is a wave aligning action from wave generating sources, then gravity will not pull the universe together but it will align masses along Rhe path of least resistance and the universe will become more and more aligned or flattered NOT collapse. Your misconception is tha you think Gravity is a direct pulling force. It is a wave aligning force.

In my opinion, original thought comes before hypothesis, it's more that a hypothesis, it is a swirling cloud with a sudden clear understanding .... And then maybe ...

Guys, the evidense is very persuasive that the universe is increasing in acceleration. It is also known that gravity is directly related to amount, density, of mass and time slows do to increase in gravitational fields, ie increase in mass.

Isn't this a crazy world we live in... I believe I can explain the universe. First I will claim the mass and energy in the universe are showing the red shift expansion which we found out that current thought indicates that this is the same as an increasingly accelerating universe but there is no sign that the universe itself is increasing in acceleration, just the measured mass and energy. Isn't that the same? No and here is another way to look at the problem. Take two balls of yarn and place them on the floor 10 feet apart and take each string and place them together. The ball of yarn represents mass and the strings attached to the balls represent gravitational waves given off. It is known that two or more in phase waves form wavefronts. So as the strings travel at together like overlaping spokes on wheels, the balls of yarn, representing two masses more toward the yarn, faster and faster , a constant force = a decreasing mass x an increasing acceleration. Could the universe be transitioning from mass and energy to space itself? In this yarn example the ball of yarn not only increases in acceleration moment to moment while the speed of the universe, the strings stay at a constant velocity but also the balls of yarn are not 10 feet away anymore but touching as the reaction to the action of Rhe two strings coming together. This simple ball of yarn demo shows the very fundamental nature of the universe, such as why time has only a grand scale forward movement, the mechanism (constructive wave interference) with a kickback that is gravity. If you do not ask the correct question you can not pretend to know the answer. The correct question is, "By what proposed mechanism does time exist and does that proposed mechainism account for the observations that confirm relative time?

I would like to show you that there is a way that really answers all the missing puzzle pieces of the universe and allows the universe to expand at a constant velocity without going against any evidense. Stating this up front and once, this is my opinion which I have derived through deep thought over a long period of time.. General relativity is incomplete because it does not take into account dark energy, dark matter and quantum entanglment. This Ghost wave theory conceptually does exactly that and yet it also takes away the problem of inflation. The ultimate original idea will simply be a thought that combines all distinct ways things seem to be into one clear picture of reality simply encompassing all things. -CMT History of insight In 1993 a Physics Nobel Prize was given for showing indirect gravitational energy loss in a isolated system. So part one is to postulate that gravitational waves are given off from all mass and energy but it takes looking at an isolated system to detect the loss of energy. Question1. Could gravitational energy loss in an isolated system be a measure of time? I think the answer is obvious, yes, any process can be an arbitrary measure of time. Here is an original thought, could all systems give off wavefronts of monopole gravitational waves creating the foundational action of time, and space? Answer 1. Time and space, according to Einstein, are relative. Is there any examples of a generated wave having properties of relativity? Yes, a vehicle traveling to you and then away from you at a constant velocity continuously generating sounds that hypothetically pass directly through you will cause you to hear the sound frequency to increase and the wavelength to decrease proportionally to the speed of the vehicle plus the speed of the generated wave as the vehicle approaches you and as the vehicle leaves you, you perceive the vehicle's sound frequency decreases and the wavelength to lengthens. One generated sound is precieved differently by the observer in relationship to the origin of the generated sound wave. Sound is relative. The fundamental reason that sound is relative is that there is a generated wave via energy transfer from mass/energy to a wave with a constant speed, frequency and wavelength. Could time and space be connected through actions of a generated wave?

Einstein, if I remember correctly, said that having the ability to be creative is more important than having the ability to memorize, it is different thinking that is needed. What if photons travel as wave clouds, trapped as a wave with a constant speed, frequency relative to it's generated source, and creating interference patterns is a contact force changing the cohesiveness of photons to the wave field and to each other with respect to the source. That action of interference creates a reaction tension which travels toward the source. So interference of a wave collapses a photon clouds to a quantized source point where a new point od source is formes with the two orore clouds created the interference bur also at that point the photon clouds quantizing there is a new reaction because the frequency and wavelength have changed relative to the original source. This concept of a backaction wave change or reaction to wavefront formation is not new but ignored and forgotten. What is new is that it affects the source and it is an instantaneous change because the wave, to itself behaves as a solid with zero elasticity. That is your answer to many questions

At the point of being redundant, I believe I logically told you the mechanism of force between objects. Outside of my understanding there is no straight forward explanation, just alot of "you know" or "look it up". If you use your imagination and knowledge and observation you may come to the same conclusion that I have arrived. In my opinion, an attractive force as in Magnets is a wave aligning (constructive wave interference) where the objects generating the waves come together as a path of least tension. You see current and past Theoritical physicists concentrate on how particles can cause force. It never occured to them that particles may generate stable waves and it is the structure of the wave and how waves align that create attractive and repulsive forces. Gravity is a monopole wave, not a dipole and therefore it is much weaker but still a wave aligning reaction. Imagine the universe is finite, started at the big bang with space included in the singularity and space is the aether that is expanding. (If, on a place on earth humidity is increasing and water is finite that means that water in liquid or solid form is decreasing so that humidity, water in gas form can increase.) Well is mass, energy and space are three forms of the same substance and space is increasing then mass and energy should be decreasing.

You are correct. That is my theory, I look at a mechanism and dissect it, analyze it and reconstruct it in a way that encompasses all observations and experimentation because that is how creative people have original ideas. For example Einstein's general theory of relativity does not take into accountt dark energy or dark matter, it is incomplete. The standard model of physics does not take into account gravity. I take it all in and it fits perfect in my mind. It is just a fun hobby for me that I get a little oh a little obsessive, and FUN is the goal. Normal force carriers create a force according to Physicists by particle exchange. " Physicists think that all forces are caused by the exchange of particles. Imagine two jugglers playing on a frozen lake. When they start throwing their batons at each other, they will be pushed apart. The batons carry momentum and energy from one juggler to the other and as they are caught this momentum pushes each juggler away from the other across the slippery ice." - Internet I disagree, Same result but different mechanism. I believe that ALL OF PHYSICS made a big mistake when they called wave interaction a non- contact force. If you assume that wave interaction, particles aligning in energy patterns, eventually decay into the smallest, least potential form of fundamental matter, indistinguishable from a continuously generated wave of aether. Mass and energy contain the three related forces, constructive and destructive wave patterns, waves aligning or bumping yet interconnected each giving off a by-product, the aether, the gravitational wave, a monopole wave in-phase, forming constructive wave interference wavefronts with reaction feedback through stress and tension th the generating sources. Time, space, gravity are generated locally as a forward coalescing process. Someday if I ever look back at this I think I will have one of two reactions. The first reaction is not flattering but kinda belly laughing funny.. It is What a total BS artist you were and totally waisted your time. Or it is about time everyone else caught on to something so easy we should have known about this 100 years ago. I am no great scientist but because of who I am, sometimes a loaner, always a thinker, problem solver, hard worker, dreamer persistent I pieced together a good model of the governing actions of universe. Did you ever wonder how is it possible that the speed of light can not be influenced by the speed of the source or the observer? Why is light always the same speed? How is it possible that time can change between two objects and it is the smaller object that always slows? Or is it?

How is force carried? I suggest force is a wave alignment with dipole and monopole waves.

"In particle physics forces between particles arise from the exchange of other particles. These force carrier particles are bundles of energy (quanta) of various fields. There is one kind of field for every species of elementary particle. For instance, there is an electron field whose quanta are electrons, and an electromagnetic field whose quanta are photons[1]. The force carrier particles that mediate the electromagnetic, strong, and weak interactions are gauge Bosons."- Wikipedia

If you understand constructive or destructive wave interference, imagine the waves are attached, point A to point B. Science considers wave forces non-contact forces so the rules of Newton's laws of motion do not apply, or so they think... Imagine that waves that connect dipole to dipole act as solids to each other and either stack, magnetic attraction or bounce off, magnetic repulsion. Although photons are considered the force carrier of electromagnetic fields, I think that either photons only carry the electric current of the electromagneitc field or both and they decay into gravitons (gravitational waves forming fields) or the magnetic field are fundamentally gravitons used as the force carrier. I think that photons decay in a way that is hard to detect. As long as photons are connected to a continuously generated source, they do not seem to decay becuse the magnetic field is always being filled in by continuous generation from the source . If on the other hand, you could isolate a photon and observe it without changing it, I believe it would show decay into gravitational waves. I think of a gravitational wave as gravitons interconnecting as the least potential form of energy, binding into an "irreversible wave". Essentially, I believe the universe's actions are based on constructive wave interference as a contact force, emitted from all mass and energy creating the actions of time, expanding space, dark energy, dark matter, black hole evaporation and gravity--- but that is just me... Haha. My personal rational A magnetic is a dipole and if a field is attached at both ends and two fields combine constructively, the increase in amplitude, or stacking the waves, pulls the magnet's mass together. To me this is how a magnetic works. And the repulsive force is the magnetic's fields not able to align, instead they bounce off each other because positionally the two fields are NOT in sync. Now with continuously generated monopole fields, only one attached end, the waves generated from different sources still constructively align, stack but the actions and reactions are much weaker. As with two magnetic's, the action is wave to wave increase in amplitude, the reaction is that the magnetics come together and touch. With monopole wave alignment from different sources the action is the increase in amplitude but the reaction is also the same, the masses try to come together and touch. This concept of wave interaction as a contact force and the cumulative "wave aspect" of force carriers being the real reason forces exist helped me to understand everything that current theorys have absent. I I traced the mistake to two events, one is the Michelson and Morley experiment, they never took into account that mass and energy could decay into the aether and then that would explain the reason they could not find an external aether. The second problem I traced to the Huygen's principle, wavelets at every point forming wavefronts but a wavelet is 360 degrees and when two waves combine into one larger wave we only see a wave going outward, none inward. Hugyens ignored the back action of wavefront formation. Imagine two waves colliding creating one wavefront, in a way you have created a dipole, both masses that generated the waves are connected via the wavefront creating a dipole, a weak dipole but as the masses with magnetic's come together so to do the masses generating gravitational waves come together and that is gravity. Time, space and gravity are actions of mass and energy decay, creating the expanding universe. So everything is made of one thing, compact space, and time space and gravity are physical ways to quantize a measure the effects of this process. You may disagree, doesn't bother me, I just had to know for myself, and I think I do. To add an assuming thought What if; The universe's singularity was a 100% particle and it transitioned to three aspects of matter; Mass- mostly particle behavior Energy- particle/ wave duality Space- 100% wave created at the big bang as the gravitational wave forming wavefronts and continues to be generated by each piece of mass and energy decay into gravitational waves forming more and more wavefronts with gravity, dark matter, dark energy, etc.

Although I do not disagree with experimentation on Force carriers, I do believe a different mechanism of force. I believe attractive force is a dipole to dipole alignment through constructive wave alignment and repulsive force is a non alignment due to destructive wave interference. This is with strong, weak and electromagnetic fields an the force carriers are as stated, photons for electromagnetic fields, etc. I believe Gravity, dark matter and dark energy, the aether, are related the same way but with a monopole field. Imagine the big bang was like a nuclear explosion creating three types of matter, mass, energy and space, the gravitational wave. The gravitational wave is the fabric of space, the aether. As unused uranium still decays after a nuclear explosion each piece of mass and energy still decay into aether, the gravitational wave, adding to space. See the result of the 1993 Nobel Prize for gravitational energy loss in a closed system. Gravity is then also a constructive wave interference like the other forces, not an energy exchange that sets up the parameters of dipole constructive wave interference but a monopole constructive wave interference with force carriers acting a contact force in all circumstances. Remember, this is my opinion but I believe it to be correct. What this concept means is that Einstein's equations need to be propertly expanded to include F=MxA and the Huygens Principle's reaction to wave front formation. I think it is the best explanation of why Michelson and Morley could not find an aether, they never looked that it might be generated from within mass and energy and thereby creating the laws of physics to be mostly local. -CMT

Einstein was correct, God does not play dice. God plays billiards, and the Big Bang was his break.- C.M.T. The deepest questions can not be answered by science; Where did I come from? What powers existence? You see thee are two and only two answers, either our existence is based on a perpetual motion machine which violates the laws in our universe so there must be something forever bigger or there is a God, a conscious being. So either non-intelligent or intelligent. I like the smart way but that is just me being selfish, living forever in love...who wouldn't want that. I believe that I understand the universe in three dimensions, in which time, space and the process that generates gravitation are point of origin actions of a process of wave generation and alignment. I cold called Lawerence Krauss and he was polite and gave me one minute of his time. I took :77 sec and then there was silence, if felt dead air awkward, and finally he said; " if you're right then the rest of us are wrong and waisted our lives so you can't be right." and then he hung up the phone. Today science, astrophysics and Theoritical Physics is no closer to understanding the universe than they were when they looked up at sky 10,000 years ago. By contemplating the words of God in the bible, we can summize that time is variable, a thousand years is like a day, we are told that the Earth is a circle and that we were told that from the beginning. The most man can live is 120 years, with Eve, God shows that science can take a rib cell and create another being. Maybe he is showing us the cell to use to repair ourselves. Marriage and monogamy help propagate the species disease free. So it boils down to this, did man create God as one hypothesis of many to explain the universe, or did God create man with the free will to discover, to question, to learn that the real answers are not phusocal answers bit are spiritual and they all get answered by helpIng one another out of unselfish love? If God created the universe and the universe glorifies him (psalm 19), and he has shown the world who he is, Father, Son and Holy spirit, then I might think that the universe might have a Trinitarian relationship for life to exist. One universe three dimensions Atoms come in three densities, solid, liquid and gas. Atons come with three structures, protons, nutrons and elections Protons and Netrons can be broken down into three quarks each. Within mass there are three forces, strong, weak and electromagnetic fields. As mass and energy decay into monopole gravitational waves three density dependent actions are generated, time, space and gravity which are direct results of mass and energy decay. Three colors can make all the colors, third planet. On and on. So do you really think we have the mental capacity to put all that together and then create God to match it? If we did?' We could create a universe and then watch as the ones we love question our existence... LOL

An Aether can exist in three dimensions and I believe does exist and can be demonstrated to be the active hidden process that explains everything. Here is how it intuitive could work. In the beginning, the singularity (100% particle) became the big bang transferring energy into what became Mass( mostly particle behavior), energy (particle/wave duality) and space(100%wave) the aether, the monopole gravitational wave. But in order for the Aether to exist and elude Michelson and Morley, each piece of mass and energy still decay into the aether, creating more space and the Lorenz rules. Thus this is another explanation behind relativity except with this explanation, dark matter and energy and gravity and forward time and relative space-time are all accounted for. It requires two new laws 1). All mass and energy decay creating space itself via the release of the gravitational wave creating the measurable actions of forward space-time. 2). When equal energy waves (in-phase) they collide and stack creating a reaction to the action of wavefront formation which is gravity. I call this the Ghost wave theory and have both indirect and direct evidence that supports it.

Dear Ron, Hello and this is copyrighted material by me. Most people do think the Michelson and Morley experiment proves that there is no aether because there experiment shows no change in light energy/speed/time delay with respect to traveling through an Aether but they are all wrong and I will explain rationally why they are wrong. They are wrong because they assume that the Aether is external only. Remember, laws of physics have an overwhelming local component, almost as if they are "generated from within"... Remember the speed of light measured locally ( the object measuring the speed is by definition local) is always constant independent of the speed of the source. I believe that the only way laws can be local is that they are generated locally which means that an Aether is generated from within mass and energy creating space itself as the Aether and continuously modulating the speed of radiation as a density dependent process. So imagine the big bang creating three categories of matter, mass which is mostly a particle behavior, energy which is radiation, a particle/ wave duality and space itself, the monopole gravitational wave, the Aether, 100% wave. The left over mass and energy from the singularity (all particle), continues to decay into the gravitational wave additional creating more space. As space increases, mass and energy decrease- see the 1993 Nobel Prize in physics for gravitational energy loss in an isolated system. Taking into account constructive wave interference with in-phase wave generation the mass and energy continuously generating the gravitational waves also are pulled along in the direction of their initial movement from the big bang by this constant constructive wave interference. A constant force with a decreasing mass results in an increase in acceleration, dark energy. If you assume, ( I believe I can prove) that constructive wave interference is a contact force then when these continuously generated waves increase in Amplitude(density) there is a reaction to the three dimensional change in the wave and that reaction is gravity. The objects that generate the waves come together as a path of least tension. This is how I have solved the aether problem, deductive reasoning, creativity and I have verified it with a little experiment too. It also seems to answer all the questions that have the physicists stumped. Time, space and gravity are actions and reactions to density dependent ( increase in amplitude is an increase in density to a wave in respect to other waves) monopole gravitational wave emission. In Wikipedia under the topic of Mechanical theories of gravitation, under pulsation I believe, you will see that it has been know for over 100 years that when two or more objects pulsate in synchronization they physically move together. This is the same as an object generating waves creating their own medium and constructively adding to the medium all ready there. Ron, I hope I did justice to your question. The people that believe that there is nothing, no aether did not have the ability to be creative enough to grasp the problems with not finding an Aether. Instead of understanding the actions of the universe such as dark matter and dark energy they only dig deeper holes and more questions. They are like stubborn male drivers without a GPS that refuse to ask directions but argue with the people trying to help them.