Jump to content

LaurieAG

Senior Members
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About LaurieAG

  • Birthday 11/09/1959

Profile Information

  • College Major/Degree
    Applied Science
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Applications

Recent Profile Visitors

11852 profile views

LaurieAG's Achievements

Atom

Atom (5/13)

15

Reputation

  1. Just for those who are a bit slow. So the big question is, if Cuba launched Russian missiles at US mainland targets, HOW MANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS WOULD THE US LAUNCH AT CUBA?
  2. For all of those who missed this word in the title. Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more hypothetical /hʌɪpəˈθɛtɪk(ə)l/ adjective adjective: hypothetical based on or serving as a hypothesis. "let us take a hypothetical case" supposed but not necessarily real or true. "the hypothetical tenth planet" Logic denoting or containing a proposition of the logical form if p then q. noun noun: hypothetical; plural noun: hypotheticals a hypothetical proposition or statement. "officials refuse to discuss military policy except in coy hypotheticals"
  3. But remember the US is the only country who has used nuclear weapons on a country without nuclear weapon(s), it set the precedent.
  4. So the big question is, if Cuba launched Russian missiles at US mainland targets, HOW MANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS WOULD THE US LAUNCH AT CUBA?
  5. Raphaelh42, some Australian states like Queensland have voluntary assisted dying (euthanasia) legislation for people who meet the eligibility criteria. You may find some answers to your philosophical questions in the structure of the following link. Eligibility criteria for voluntary assisted dying
  6. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    You've never worked in the public service have you? Obviously the American people didn't choose to restrict the new administration by only allowing it to control one of the two houses.
  7. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    LOL, That's really funny, before the election you were being racist if you called someone lazy because that is supposed to be a racist trope. But you are just showing how 'rule by law' operates, you have one set of rules for 'us' and another for 'them'.
  8. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    In Australia no Federal government has had control of the House of Reps and the Senate at the same time for over 20 years.
  9. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    What they usually do is to not give them total power in one or the other houses. I'd have to say that the current situation occurs when people notice lawyer politicians doing a thing called 'rule by law', especially when it is obviously not applied universally, as opposed to 'rule of law' where all are equal under the law.
  10. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

  11. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    Well they do have Harris on 188 and Trump on 266 ATM. Fox and Sky have already called it for Trump (226 to 280) while PBS and the Australian ABC has it 214 to 248.
  12. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    They were under reporting her results compared to many of the other channels at the time. Their results aren't as extremely different now.
  13. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    Why does CNN have only 1/4 of the votes for Harris allocated when compared with most of the other cable stations? is it for a late surge or what?
  14. LaurieAG

    Harris vs Trump;

    LOL, it's a bit different down under. Around 20 years ago in my state we had a politician who was supposed to be far right who won a safe seat (poorest area in the state) that had been left wing for over 50 years, partly because the previous left wing politician was a convicted child molester. The left wing government fixed her up big time and locked her up in jail several years later but unfortunately they had to release her after 11 weeks because the state Supreme court said the charges and conviction were contrived political BS. But the left wingers weren't satisfied with just locking up a so called right wing politician so they also locked up the states Chief Magistrate and it took 12 weeks before the state Supreme court said the charge was contrived political BS. Funny thing is the state paid the Chief Magistrate a million dollars compensation but wouldn't pay the politician a cent. This was all going on just after the states left wing lawyer Premier introduced clause 8 if the Imperial Bill of Rights 1688 into our state Constitution so that no sitting politician could be impeached outside of parliament and also introduced laws so that they couldn't be impeached inside state parliament either. This was all to protect one crooked left wing politician who, after he lost his seat, was later charged and convicted for receiving 300,000 dollars in corrupt payments. Gee did the left wing politicians really look after their corrupt mate. While he was supposed to lose his multi million dollar politician payout when he finished his sentence a later left wing government forgot to do the paperwork so he got the full multi million payout minus the $300,000 he received in corrupt payments. We used to be 10 years behind the US but now we're 10 years ahead.
  15. It still performs all of its functions without a hitch, the only noticeable thing is the LCD display is a bit fainter.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.