Edward Wechner

the Right to Vote, I am aware that the majority of people do not agree with me on this subject, but I do get some quite encouraging support and would not mind if you people from the SCIENCEFORUM.NET would offer your comments, if you feel like it. Please refer to my blog: link removed as per rule 7

The acceleration force on a gravitational free fall is a function of the mass so there is ten times more force on the 10 kg mass than on the 1 kg mass. On your horizontal acceleration you assume a constant force, that is a spring with the same tension, so the acceleration obviously is different a = F/m.

I am sure what you are saying is correct, but without notations I do not understand it.

Many thanks for this, I am absolutely delighted by this. The r should be squared.

I do not question what you are saying, but I do not understand it. Would you be able to give me some hint where I could read more about it?

I do understand the equivalence of acceleration and gravity under the General Relativity, but this equivalence did not exist in the Newtonian physics, there must be another reason why light bends under Newton's law.

We know that light does bend around a mass under the General Theory of Relativity, but why does light also bend under Newton's Law? and how is it calculated?