sunshaker

Math helps to define an idea, Math is built upon ideas, Just because there is no math yet for an idea does not make that idea any less worthy, Because someone does not know math does not make them "lazy or stupid", there life may have took a different route or they may not have been privileged to carry on schooling due to "money or commitments to feed a family. No one knocks Faraday even though it was James clerk Maxwell, Who a "generation later", cast Faraday’s nebulous field conception in rigorous mathematical form. http://www.aetherczar.com/?p=3044 Most here seem to forget or ignore everything first starts with a thought/idea, then comes the math which is built upon improved and defined over time. "THOUGHTS" on ray vibrations, by Michael Faraday. http://books.google.com/books?id=VoKOnXRXqQAC&lpg=PA345&ots=UM-yVq_foI&dq=faraday%20thoughts%20on%20ray%20vibrations&pg=PA345#v=onepage&q=faraday%20thoughts%20on%20ray%20vibrations&f=false Instead of knocking people who come to these forums with no math but a willingness to learn, Those with math could/should see if they can help to find math with them. Perhaps then we can move past this elitist mentality. Scientists/Mathematicians are not the only ones able/allowed to define our world.

I was referring to "femto ultrafast electron microscope that uses a pulse of electrons instead of a continuous electron beam". http://www.fei.com/tecnai-femto/ I am unsure at this moment, I don't think we will until we can generate a pulse to allow us to freeze frame a photon, Which i do not believe will be far away. Whether it will be done with multiple lasers all pulsing at slightly varying rates or some other breakthrough technology i will wait and see. But when we do freeze frame photons i am sure it will help to answer why the speed of c is what it is.

A few days ago someone posted a video about strobe effects,"which was locked", which showed how we can use strobes to freeze frame speeding objects. I wondered how far we had come using strobe lighting, I did not realize this is basically what a electron microscope is, In 1 attosecond light will travel the length of 3 hydrogen atoms, We have been able to generate a pulse of 67 attoseconds, but I think we are close now to sub 20 attosecond pulses, I was wondering how far we are away from stopping a single photon,"light as already been stopped within a crystal" http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2380028/Scientists-stop-light-completely-record-breaking-MINUTE-trapping-inside-crystal.html I have been looking for the length of a photon, whether this length restricts the speed of c, And whether this will help us understand why the speed of c is what it is, When i "imagine" a beam of light, I see a traffic jam each photon tailgating the next, turning single particles into a wave, each travelling at the same speed unable to overtake, Unsure how to word this but, Could the speed of c, Be the "strobe cycle" of photons, Are we viewing realty/light at sub attosecond cycles, So each photon moves up one space/distance each sub attosecond cycle? cycle/length of photon=speed of light c.

I am not saying i agree with anonymousone, As i have my own ideas, But as you say "observations", Most theories first start with observations" apple's falling", next comes the math. So just because there is yet no math does not make it a story.

It may well be turtles But as "I" believe our universe to be an Electron, I believe we are "falling towards the next electron shell".

I had a thought that our universe was in free fall, Similar to when we see astronauts practicing zero g in a diving plane, http://science.howstuffworks.com/zero-g1.htm I thought we may then be able to work out how fast the universe is travelling if we could work out the mass of our universe, And what speed would be needed for that amount of mass to produce zero g within its own falling bubble. PLANE=UNIVERSE in a bottle/bubble ASTRONAUTS=MASS OF UNIVERSE. Only an idea.

Our physical form is a projection of our inner balance, We may for a moment be attracted to someone(sexual attraction, youth symmetry), But once you get to know them you realize they have no inner substance, And soon you lose that attraction. It is only when we get to know someone(resonate with them) that we become truly attracted to them or not,

A thread so i can ask a couple of questions? 1. A LONG STICK. If i had a stick that would not bend or compress, A foot shorter than our galaxy, And i was able to push this stick wether it had zero weight or on some kind of roller system, If i pushed it 1 foot 1 inch, Would the other end instantly stick out the galaxy?

Nice find studiot, http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/pp0/plasma2.html , I will nick this for my home page From the Gods of Etherea, Shaft of light(etherean currents)from high heavens, piercing the earths vortex. To Birkeland currents, Stars are born within twisting Birkeland currents that flow around a circuit through the galaxy. It covers a large range of my interests, And fits in with a lot of my ideas on who what and where we are. There seems to be varying sizes of "circuits" within our universe, Makes me wonder if we shrank to the size of an electron and viewed the inside of a computer, what would that universe look like. I am stilling looking for that "switch" it is somewhere.

I do not believe I am saying the "primary attraction"between planets is electromagnetic in nature, Neither am I yet implying that it is this electromagnetic force keeping the planets in orbits and not gravity. Thanks arc for the links, Which do seem to suggest a funneling effect of the cosmic rays, There is much for me to think on and digest, before I can make a "detailed response". But it brings me to tesla's "Radiant energy", Which he believed was bound up with the "elusive ether", but could be made manifest by the creation of an abrupt disruption in the equilibrium, He believed electricity could be made available anywhere anytime, by merely pushing a rod into the ground and turning on a electrical appliance. http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml Tesla's radiant energy. Could this "possible property" of the sun/planets be the "Free energy" Tesla was trying to tap into? DC or AC, Would this field be AC or DC, Would the 11yr pole shift of the sun and longer shift of planets produce an AC current? Are we surrounded by "free/clean energy" waiting to be tapped into. We may just have to find the "switch" and switch it on, link to simulation of solar system passage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNBj69RvKDY&list=RDMNBj69RvKDY

I haven't thought it all through yet, While watching cosmos Sunday, Michael Faraday inventor of the generator, Was producing electric by passing a magnet through a coil, Which made me think about the passage of our sun through the galaxy The sun the magnet the planets(metal cores) the coil, This would produce/create some kind of effect/field, The field is what we call electricity, We do not create electricity we only borrow it from this "field". simulation showing passage of solar system http://davidwarlick.com/images1/vidaday2-28-13.png

Electricity is produced by passing a magnet through a coil, Our solar system travels through the galaxy similar to has shown below, The planets orbit the sun, planets are made of elements which are mostly metals, The sun can be classed as the magnet passing through the coil of planets, Our universe/battery was created to produce electric currents, (battery) to fuel some super beings mobility scooter.

I did notice that he still had a brain stem, but i thought the brain stem coordinated motor control signals sent from the brain to the body, So without a brain i thought the brain stem would not have any signals process , So done a google,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anencephaly I did not realize that there are so many people born without brains and only brain stems that have survived for quite a few years. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/07/16/girl-born-without-brain-is-now-6-years-old/ I think this brings me back more to the original topic "Regeneration", What can be done to help these children, Can their brain stem "stem cells" be used to generate enough of a brain to give them a resemblance of live. Or is this when there is a case for man joining to machine the rise of the cyborg. ICUB,Perhaps alone this line http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICub Found this interesting, Biomaterial gel helps to regenerate brain tissue, http://www.medica-tradefair.com/cipp/md_medica/custom/pub/content,oid,28781/lang,2/ticket,g_u_e_s_t/mcat_id,7797/local_lang,2

I cannot help but think of "mike" the headless chicken, Who lived for 18-24 months without is head,(which i suppose includes without a brain), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_the_Headless_Chicken Which makes me think how important is a "brain in lower species"? What allows the headless/brainless chicken to move and behave like a normal chicken, Is information stored elsewhere?

172 IS THE MAGIC NUMBER. Cosmic dna. Artificial Dna , http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/09/health/artificial-dna-life/index.html?hpt=hp_c4 Scientists produce artificial DNA, The new technique allows for the creation of "172" amino acids to build proteins. Has a few here know, I believe that the extended periodic table/electrons up to 172 elements hold many of the answers. Has I believe that once nature/creation finds the best way of doing something it will adapt these ways through different levels of creation. Chromosomes 4 base pairs ADENINE (A) TO THYMINE (T) CYTOSINE © TO GUANINE (G) Periodic table 4 main groups halogens (green) to Alkaline earth metals (dark green) Alkali metals (blue) to Nobles (yellow) The "bases" bind 2 dna strands/tables together that run "anti parallel", We have 22 chromosomes plus xy=23, A sperm cell and egg cell each contain 22 autosomes http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2003-06/1056066906.Ge.r.html There are 11 of each of the 4 groups of elements, 22 with opposing elements. It is the joining of "tables" that create the cell. Everything is connected, We just have to find and understand those connections.

Just switched computer back on and saw this "Hello from ************** England, You are not alone." Hello back to you Sunshaker - and good for you posting something nice on the stream Thank you, Its amazing you caught this comment. While watching I was reminded we are all in this together, And wanted to say hello. These kind of "experiments" can only help and bring us all together, Which can only be a good thing.. cheers Acme for link+ helps to know where i am looking. there seems to be a different focus on each, nasa link more zoomed in?

Just came across this, Sorry if already posted somewhere, Nasa has placed HD cameras to the outside of international space station. Live streaming 24/7. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/17074538

It seems then to me that it is the higgs field that does not allow "massless" or physical objects to go faster than c, Would this be because of the mass of the higgs or the actual higgs field? I was trying to find a wavelength for the higgs field, but could only find equations that go over my head, I see they have a mass of 125GeV,Which would result in quite a bit of drag getting to speed of c, I was wondering what is the smallest wavelength possible in this universe, whether it could be smaller than the higgs field wavelength, Which could then act as a barrier/bubble against the higgs effect?(hot knife through butter). Perhaps there are massless particles that travel faster than c, but they are to fast to be aware of or to measure. What is the smallest possible wavelength? slightly detouring, but i found interesting While looking i came across old articles about neutrinos larger than thousands of galaxies http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090602-particles-larger-than-galaxies.html Always something to explore, . Science is an open book, It is best not to close chapters. Always something new around the corner.

It seems to me the problem is mass(real objects), But as real objects are 99.99999% (empty space nucleus to electrons) atoms made from protons neutrons also made from quarks gluons, which also contain "empty space", mass being the product of fields, We are now told that the "higgs boson" endows particles with mass, So once we understand the higgs and can shield against the higgs, Surely we can create something that is massless within a higgs free bubble. estimated due date 8/8/10000ad 4.30pm. Mass is a state of mind.

Wether it takes a thousand years or a million years, One day the speed of light will be broken, In a million years we will/should have control over every aspect of our universe, So somewhere beyond our science at this moment is a way to break the speed of light, To believe something is impossible is for defeatists, Most of our great breakthroughs were believed impossible at one time, I have belief in the creativeness of the human race. I do not believe anyone here would not believe we could travel faster than light in a million years, So there must be a way now, But beyond us at this moment. There is to much unknown about our universe and its creation, to say yet we cannot travel faster than c.

2? hex 1, first take pair/s 6's=12, 8+3+1=12, left with 2 hex 2, pair 4's +pair 3's=14, 9+7=16, 16-14=2 hex 3, 6+6=12, 8+5+1=14, 14-12=2 again. so do you first have to add the pairs in each hex, then all other numbers must equal pairs, then what is left is your answer. other than that i have no idea.

Thought i would look at a few vids, there are some interesting ones out there, (an old one) "alien" helps out in china https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZHUzHbFkJs "alien helps out in china buildings on mars, source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZHUzHbFkJs photo http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00595/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_450326956EDR_F0310538NCAM00266M_.JPG robot on mars http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00595/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_450326956EDR_F0310538NCAM00266M_.JPG blood moon ufo caught during eclipse apr 15 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhBdfFjEkFU march 31 2014 westwood california https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVM-R49NsMg

Szqqsq ain't going to like -6 rep when he visits next, He said with all the sock puppets i should be -8 rep by now, There is always a balance -rep to me allows another to have positive rep, Somewhere there is another me getting +rep to balance my -rep, I have always believed in a balance, it is why nothing ever worries me, If something goes wrong i know another me will have something go right, I live in a no lose world, "Well that's what szqqsq says". Sorry Swansont for the positive rep i just gave you, means somewhere you ain't going to be happy, ha ha laughs on me PS the "observers" keep a track of this balance, You are always being watched the game of balance swings both ways. To much of a good thing is bad for you(somewhere).

I do not really notice on this forum so much, But there are a couple i visit, where it is getting so bad i now do not venture there anymore, Its like simon cowell on x factor acting surprised when a good act comes on, when we know nothing gets on the show without him knowing before hand, Next manufactured boy band, few more million in his pocket. You'd never guess i was a Moderator, And enjoy closing my own threads

They are here, They come as energy beings, They play with us when we are ready to hear them, Space ships/travel is "so yesterday", When you are pure energy time and distance holds no barriers, Earth is a place of treasures, A play ground of new experiences, As an energy being, you can become part of anything, Become any character in any film, Enter a dreamer and dream their dream with them, All they want is a shared experience. That is all we have to offer them, That is all they want from us. They are always with us. They make themselves known to those who listen between the lines. This will get me to -5rep, unless my "alien friend, szqqsq" has anything to say about it