sunshaker

Out in my garden yesterday (cloudy), There was one little gap at about 10.30, I could only see one bright star in this gap which I had my binoculars focused on hoping to catch a shooting star, When all of a sudden something flew through this gap it was not a shooting star but the ISS, which I was just as pleased about (first fleeting thought was ufo) but checked online and ISS was in that area of space(UK) at 10.30. I then thought of the dangers for the ISS when we have these meteor showers with dust and rocks travelling at 140,000mph, we have a fair few showers each year and I am surprised there have been no incidents that I know of, Surly these meteor showers must be a major threat to satellites and space station plus all the space junk up there. Perseid meteor shower viewed from ISS Courtesy of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center: https://www.flickr.com/photos/28634332@N05/6045926830/

No, Like I said I have read a lot recently about how we measure distances, I have read a few saying we are in the slowing down phase, where others are saying we are in the accelerating phase. I also think we are in the accelerating phase. But myself I like this part, This seven times fits with my "pet theory".

We all make spelling mistakes sometimes, thank you for pointing mine out, I have been spending a lot of time looking at periodic table and have been concentrating on the "noble gases", So "Noble" stuck in my head instead of "Nobel"

The thread is called "is noble prize suffocating science", I am not ranting only replying to thread, The "Higgs" is still under debate, Then I've noticed a lot of talk recently about the universe is slowing down and talk of noble prizes, when within the last few years a noble prize was awarded for the accelerating universe. There is no emotional anti-science rant going on, I love science, why I frequent science forums, and spend all free time looking at many areas in science, it just made me smile thinking a noble was awarded for proving the universe was expanding,, and within a few years another noble may be awarded for proving universe is really slowing down. It makes you realize some theories/facts are how we interpret data, the data may be right but sometimes the interpretation is wrong.

The "Higgs" is still under debate,. There are plenty of other theories that explain this 125GeV BUMP. Cern needed to find something, so pushed the Higgs INTO LIMELIGHT. All I am trying to say is once the Noble prize has been given(rightly or wrongly) it becomes hard to challenge said theory. why neg1? because scientists get NOBLES for proving universe is accelerating? or SCIENTISTS will get more NOBLES for proving universe is slowing? Yes WIN WIN for scientists, lose lose for anyone you don't believe everything they tell us, or have their own ideas.

I believe "Noble's" are given out to quickly, perhaps after a discovery there should be a minimum of 10 years. In 2011 noble given (for accelerating expansion) 2015, now we are being told the universe is slowing down or it as slowed and speeded up at least 7 times. noble prize 2011 http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2015/06/-since-the-big-bang-the-universe-has-slowed-down-and-speeded-up-7-times.html http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/universe-expansion-is-slowing-down/ 2016, are we NOW going to give "another noble" for proving a (slowing down universe)? but if anyone said a word against the accelerating universe since 2011 noble they where fools or quacks. " win win for scientists".

Why so negative dimreepr makes a valid point, Most of us are addicted to sugar without even realising (until you try to diet). Most of us have cannot go a day without our sugar fix, My friend/companion has chronic fatigue syndrome she only weighs just over 6stone but she drinks gallons of coke, spoons full of sugar over everything, well beyond my sweetness levels, I cannot get her to stop drinking coke or cut down on sugar, which I believe is at least partly responsible for her illness. Edit: I have tried sugar and cocaine(MANY YEARS AGO) but sugar is the one that I now "CRAVE"

@s1eep, Thought you may also find this interesting http://theg6group.com/schizo.html(schizophrenia & Mysticism) I have always wondered whether these "mystical experiences" could be classed as "schizophrenia episodes". I must also point out the "lack of sleep" leading up to some of these "episodes" can cause hallucinations or at least put the brain into a different mode on how it interprets information. After these episodes I believe you never lose this new way of "seeing the world" but you do learn to find a more calm balance which you can live with.

I do realize that it predicts a few false primes also miss a couple of primes, this is just when using one method either x+x=90/x+90, or x+x=210/x+210, I am trying to merge two or more methods to over come this problem, but it is hard to show this merging as it looks confusing in these pictures, below I have multiple tables, I would have posted it in xl where you can see it clearer but am having a problem exporting it. pink shows number 1 in each method.inner shows x+x=x outer show x+30, 60 etc. x+x=30 / x+30 x+x=60 / x+60 x+x=90 / x+90 x+x=120 / x+120 x+x=150 / x+150 x+x=180 / x+180 x+x=210 / x+210 x+x=240 / x+240 I have tried to place them under each another to see where they fail in relation to each another, I was going to show to 360(circle) but thought this is enough for now, Edited tables Below table (30) x+x=30(inner), x+30 (outer). Within tables primes not coloured show failure to predict next prime but can be predicted, these are 103 but you can subtract 30 to give prime 73, also 89 but you can subtract 30 to give prime 59(means you can add 30 to 59 to give prime 89, also 61 which you can subtract 30 to give prime 31, also 47 subtract 30 to give prime 17, On other side you have two which are 79, and 107 these two you add 30 instead of subtracting giving primes 109, 137.

As i have two sets of primes running in opposite directions I called one negative, perhaps I should call one set(a) and the opposite set(b). below I tried to show a,b=90 &\a,b=210 overlapping, here I show all primes to prime 199, mainly using 210, last shown outside line (a)11/(b)199 =(210) To find primes after 199, I go through the (b)primes to210, example (b) next primes 13+210=223 17=210=227 19+210=229 23+210=233 29+210=239 etc follow around each rectangle of prime(a) to prime(b) (a)11/(b)199 =(210)(outside yellow)

There are many ways to predict primes, As I am no mathematician I found this way interesting and worth looking into, Yes I CALLED IT NEGATIVE PRIMES TO PREDICT PRIMES, Because I needed "two sets" of primes running in opposite directions. This allowed me to predict every prime in order into the hundreds just with the first seven primes(overlapping two methods into one system), for me with little math i found interesting and wondered how far I could take it before breaking down, And mistakenly thought I might get some help/pointers, instead of having to argue over the definition of "negative" in this method.

mathematically worthless when I can predict every prime in the hundreds from a starting point of just a few low primes? FORGET THE NEGATIVE SIGN(yawn), it is just a case of using "two sets" of primes to predict higher primes(simple)no having to constantly change set values to fit my beliefs. show me a better/simple way of starting with seven primes and predicting every prime into the hundreds?(without complicated equations/math? If you have nothing more to offer as you do not seem to understand the method used, please reframe from posting to derail thread. Thanks sunshaker.

it is why I thought others here with the math, that understand what I am trying to show using neg primes, may show when and where this fails, and also find an higher set above 90, 210 that can carry these predictions further, I do rely on people being critical to my method, so I can see where i need to go next, I know it is not perfect, but it is something I believe I can build on. I have not yet reached a place it fails on(primes in hundreds), but I know it will but I then hope to build from where it fails.

it is nothing like ulams spiral, the other thread is completely different to this one, with a small amount of primes myself with little math can predict each higher prime in the prime sequence, Plus I DID NOT WANT TO DERAIL OTHER THREAD, LOOKING AT PRIMES USING THIS NEG/MIRROR METHOD, Those who give up are always doomed to failure. I found something "I found interesting" and thought others may be able to help to take it further, I can see you do not really understand what I am showing, but hope others may see something worth taking a bit further. in a earlier post I said about overlapping tables to find missing primes, below to small tables running opposite ways that would fill missing primes (not shown overlapped) but you may get impression of what was meant.

a little snippet showing primes in order above/below, +90 to neg/mirror prime, show in orange primes that do not follow +90, 29, 31 etc but these you still get a prime 29/61=90, 31/59=90 but i also can find these primes using 210, I may not be the best explaining or showing, but i am trying to overlap certaain of these charts to show all primes without any gaps. just hard for me to show as diagrams look confusing to some, And I do not have the math to put to equations, but i have been able to predict every prime in a row using lower neg/mirror primes. W

Correct except where you show 29 + 71 = 90, should be 19+71=90 maybe along those lines but 90 can be the sum of two primes in "many" more than 14 ways, by going into the "neg/mirror primes). I realize I need both 90/210 and possibly another which I am looking into to predict all primes, but it was something "I" Found interesting and worth further exploration.

I am now more aware of the aluminium around me, and have made small adjustments in my life(to be on the safe side).

when I say - prime I mean the primes going of to left, but you add these "negative" has a whole number to 90/210 to give next prime. Or take away this negative from 90/210 to give next prime. shown below just -7, -7/83=90 giving me first prime 83 then also -7+90=prime 97, I call these negative primes but perhaps could call them mirror primes.

I think if I can find one more set of higher mirrors I can predict any prime by using a lower prime. using 210 I can predict most primes two ways, examples -13 + 210= prime 223 -13 +197=210 gives prime 197 -17 +210=prime 227 -17+ 193= 210 gives prime 193 -19+210=prime 229 -19+ 191=210 gives prime 191 the next negative gives the next positive.

I choose 90 first because primes where mirrored each side of (45)not a prime 43/47 37/53 31/59 29/71 down to 89/1 each adding to 90, once i got to one I wondered what happens if i carried on, using 90 added to negative primes I could predict higher primes, -7+90=97 97 is the next prime, this meant I only needed a few lower primes to predict higher primes -11 (-11+ 90=101) 101 the next prime.. I realized I could not predict all the primes example 139, this would be -49+90=139 but 49 is not a prime, I am begining to understand why i cannot predict every prime, I then decided to look for other mirror primes, One set I found starts at 103/107=210 instead of 90, each prime each side of 103/107 add to 210 has shown below, with this way i was then able to predict missing prime 139 by this mirror of 210 71/139=210. follow any neg prime around rectangle box shows the next prime in sequence, above 90, shown below 210. example -13+210= prime 223, -17+210=227 etc

while reading about iron found in alzheimers brainshttp://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/07/iron-containing-inflammatory-cells-seen-in-alzheimers-brains.html I came across this study showing a direct link to alzheimers and ADHD from aluminium toxicity,http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/03/22/aluminum-toxicity-alzheimers.aspx I no longer warm my milk up in a aluminium saucepan

Are people acting dumb just to derail thread before I start? I have explained this above, yes I have showed 90+-11=79 but also show that using the primes going into the negs and adding 90 you get the next prime 90+-11=101, as shown below. you can see shown the two multiples of -7, -7+90=83 also -7+90=97. 83 & 97 both primes.

if you notice in the above chart, and follow from -7 you will see the yellow line does stop at "83"showing -7+90=83 but also continues to shows -7+90=97 But take the primes going into the negative and just add 90 so -7=90=97, -11+90=101 etc. Each negative prime plus 90 gives the next prime in the positive row. yes I know -11+90=79 which I have again showed if you follow -11 around the blue line stopping under 79 but continue following line and it mirrors 101 -11+90=101. easier view maybe, just add 90 to each neg in order and it gives next positive prime.(yes -7+90=97)

Once I realized primes mirrored each side of (45) adding to 90 43/47 down to 89/1.except for the fibonacci primes 2,3,5,13,89 I was wondering if you could then use "negative primes" to predict future primes, by within this method adding 90 to negative primes(shown below) if you notice below prime -7 you add 90 you get prime 97 -7+90=97 -11+90=101 -13+90=103 -17+90=107 etc. there are a couple of gaps, prime 139 should mirror with -49 which we know is not a prime but is a prime times itself 7x7=49. I was also wondering whether there are sequences higher up in the primes where this mirroring of primes is beyond 90? by knowing the just primes up to -47 using neg +90 you can get the primes up to prime 137, once you have these primes you just continue.

The Chinese seem to be on top of this 3d printing. Cheap sturdy homes, worlds largest potential housing market, perhaps worth a few shares in "zhuoda group" . I just looked at Zhuoda's site, from what I can gather this is on the verge of taking of big time http://www.zhuoda.com/content/details12_6164.html