FrostySnow

Yes that is my point, there are no oceans on either of these planets so where is the "tide" to lock these moons, and with so many how can this theory hold up? What I is see is superconductor pinning effect, and it would point to the cores of planets being superconductive and this is what is holding them in place. The earth is a very special case as we have "life". I would like to say that the collision with the earth by the moon was the beginning of life. By this I say that the moon struck the earth under attraction and then its velocity carried it until gravitational forces took over leaving these two planets coupled. This collision accelerated the outer core of the earth to a high rate of speed over the core, both cores being attracted, locked on to each others field and into the dance we still have today. Without this spin life on earth would not have occurred.(and the proximity to a sun) http://www.history.com/news/moon-created-by-giant-collision-studies-confirm?cmpid=Social_Twitter_HITH_10182012_1 Thoughts?

Tidal locking is said to be the reason that the moon always has the same face towards earth. Jupiter and Saturn have 62 - 63 moons most of which are also in synchronous orbit. In the absence of a liquid ocean and the crustal structure of the earth how do they still pull this off?

If "tidal locking" is holding our moon in place, then what is causing synchronus orbit of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn, and it would appear that these moons follow the core. Where are the extrateresstrial oceans doing the same thing! Can some one answer that?

I was also of that understanding, but there are many things that do not make sense..but when i read this one and some others... http://www.history.com/news/moon-created-by-giant-collision-studies-confirm?cmpid=Social_Twitter_HITH_10182012_1 and you put it through "simulation" and i use my own brain for this, flawed maybe but tides locking the moon through tidal friction doesn't work.. the face would have to change out of subtle differences and either rock back and forth or small jutters one way or another.. However if you imagine the forces involved in a collision such as this would have to have been, spin would have been delivered to an earth that had just developed a new core, setting the outer core on a much higher speed and by attraction to the inner core was glanced off and then "reigned" into the orbit we now share! http://sn136w.snt136.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=657400239!n=238075073&fid=1&mid=77c94625-198c-11e2-86b5-00215ad965ac&fv=1 The reason the measurements are innaccurate is the core has a superconductive outer layer, making it invisible and all seismic measurements would possibly render it undetectable.? not enough known about these effects. you know what you know and what you don't know, but you don't know what you don't know.. so once the earth was flat. Just saying that something in this does not make sense under the current knowledge. Thanks for your reply, and reading my ponderings.. all in the search of the unknown. Brian http://www.history.com/news/moon-created-by-giant-collision-studies-confirm?cmpid=Social_Twitter_HITH_10182012_1 tp://sn136w.snt136.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=647684456!n=278533322&fid=1&fav=1&mid=77c94625-198c-11e2-86b5-00215ad965ac&fv=1The reason the /quote] don't know why these cut off?!

The outer core is the shock absorber of the system, it is the inner core that is locked to the moon, so from its outer surface to the outcore/mantle boundary is the "transition zone. A proof for this would be to place a large (1200 km dia) conductor in the polar region. 78 degrees is the prefered aurora position, as well as the "magic angle" of 54.7 deg. (look up magic angle!). An easy test would be a few circles of 2.9 km diameter overlapping by 1/4 of circumference. I think it will not only produce electricity, but will also exhibit some super-conductive levitation! There is a record of an approx. 11 km drift per year of "pole position" (which on its own should cause induction. cheers in short NO, the atmoshere is trivial to the earths mass and the upper atmosphere has nothing to push upon. The power comes from the core and all above are controlled by its mass and magnetic moment. The outer core is the shock absorber of the system, it is the inner core that is locked to the moon, so from its outer surface to the outcore/mantle boundary is the "transition zone. A proof for this would be to place a large (1200 km dia) conductor in the polar region. 78 degrees is the prefered aurora position, as well as the "magic angle" of 54.7 deg. (look up magic angle!). An easy test would be a few circles of 2.9 km diameter overlapping by 1/4 of circumference. I think it will not only produce electricity, but will also exhibit some super-conductive levitation! There is a record of an approx. 11 km drift per year of "pole position" (which on its own should cause induction.<br style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; background-color: rgb(248, 250, 252); "> in short NO, the atmosphere is trivial to the earths mass and the upper atmosphere has nothing to push upon. The power comes from the core and all above are controlled by its mass and magnetic moment. The symmetries of rotation with the sun are also impressionable

Facts... the Queen alone owns 6,600 million acres.. http://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/ shall i check the others?

Quantum entanglement is as close as it gets for not at least. I recently read an article that the chinese research has done this over 125 miles apart.. http://www.zdnet.com/quantum-teleportation-over-143km-smashes-distance-record-7000003883/ definitely maybe!

I think it is the other way around. Look at any planet and you will see a vast difference of surface speed to inner core. The moons also provide a hint about this in that most are in synchronous orbit one side is always facing the planet. The exceptions to this have either a hot core or interact with other moons. The force and power of our ocean currents also provide hints that say the outer crust is rotating around the core. The strength and westward flow of polar currents is another clue. Their are also undersea horizontal vortex's in certain locations, it would be difficult to explain this by any other means. The Suns emissions are captured by the earths magnetic attraction, and these super sub atomic particles are ripped off of protons at the auroral ring. After being stipped the proton becomes an electron, and is then repelled towards the south pole. The movement of the crust over the core with this fusion injection drive the dynamo. A spinning magnet in a superconductive space forces the magnetic field outward by reflection to create the Van Allen belts, protecting us from direct radiation. Thats what i think anyway.. Here are the figures, Speed of earths crustat 3400 internal boundary. 10681km/24hrs = 445 km per hour Speed of the earthscore locked to face moon ~1500km (outer boundary inner core) 4712 km/672hrs = 7 km/h So the earth’s difference in core to crust speed is ~ 437 kmper hour, does that make your generator work?! I think you can calculate withthis in mind.

Why doesn't the moon revolve (dark side away)? I believe that the earths core also "holds its position" in lock step with the moon. That is the core revolves once every 28 days and continually faces its same face toward the moon. The earths crust, is in motion over it. There are “magma currents” much like the ocean currents and jet streams, yet inner core. This explains more the lay of mountains in their relative lines. When in the "right" position the lava can burst through weak spots as the rivers of lava flow under-crustal plates in very organized and constant flow. The temperature changes can be noted by the varying intensities.. and are cause by solar emissions flowing into the earth. So if you relate the solar influx with the heat increase, and know the under locations of these flows/rivers in relation to the crust, predictions can come a week in advance or more.. Here is a proof of this theory! The core of the earth is in lock step with the moon, both constantly facing the same face to each other. It is the reason ocean currents have the power and force and directions they do. Both north and south circumpolar currents flow to the west, it better explains the coriolis effects. The ocean floor has horizontal vortex currents, this would explain them. REally think .. If it were the moons influence without this concept, the polar currents would be flowing in the opposite direction. Think of the dynamics of it.. The sun rotates about 28 days.. I think there are other better proofs that can confirm this. your thoughts...?