Ziven

So the need of "yes" or "no" for seaker to confirm what she really means, since the differences between chemtrails and contrails had been clearly make in this thread. I think the paper you provided is very good. This work proofed that the diverse systems can replace the conventional chemical fertilizers and herbicides system. It is very useful for the developing countries, such as Thailand, Vietnam and so on. The N fertilizers and herbicides are widely used in Asian countries. The result is that the crops can grow more faster recently. However, the future of those countries is darkness.

Of cause chemtrails is only speculated by someone. However, I think seaker's mind is very simple. She just wants to find a place without pollution. The pollutions produced by industries are more serious than the trails of the plane. Since the industrialization is globe, we cannot find a place without pollution, even in Antarctic.

The problems caused by chemical pollution in north American is much weak than in north-east Asia. However you shall mention that the lifetime of the Asians are much longer than the Americans. The evidence shows that the chemical pollutions are not too harmful for human beings' lifetime. This is the good news for modern people. However, there is a bad news for us. There are no denying facts that the fertility rate in east Asia are decreasing rapidly these years, especially for Tokyo, Soul, Shanghai and Singapore. It seems that the chemical pollution can take great effect on fertility rate. At present, the decreasing of fertility rate is a good news for those countries. Because there are so many people in East Asian. I hope the pollutions will disappear after the population decline to some extents. Then the fertility rate can re-growth again.

A very good idea. However, I suggest that you can construct a mathematic differential equation to describe the dynamic mechinism of Hollywood. For example, the left of this equation describe the changes of the quality of the movie, while the right of the equation includes some viariables such as producer, director, screenplay, costs, time and so on.

Spyman's interpretation is right. "Shift" is only the feeling of the observer. The essence of redshift is scaling that can be calculated by the redshift formulas.

A very interested finding. It may have something to do with the changes of the time-space structure caused by gravitation.

I think the formulas that you provided are just for comparing the strong interaction and gravitation interaction in conveniently. You formulas still can't explain why gravitation exists. I think that the weak interaction force you provided is wrong. The weak interaction is β=gm2c/h_bar. Where g is fermi constant, m is proton‘s mass.

I think that you are right. The difficulty is that all of the methods that used to understand what an individual thought without relying on self report are only limited in theories. It is just like hidden variable theory in quantum physics: everything seems reasonable, but conclusions lack of evidence.

You are right. If we can measure the chemistry process of the neural pulse accurately, and we can also calculate some suitable parameters of the nonlinear neural network system of an individual’s brain accurately, I think we can “predict” an individual cognitive process at least in theory. However, you shall mention that the research domain will not restrict in cognitive area. We will involve something associated with matters that are different from the cognitive processes. The problems of matters can be solved by Newton’s laws, relativity theory, and quantum theory. The observers of matters are human. The researches of cognitive process of human are different from the studies of matters. The observers of cognitive process are also human. It means that the observers and research objects are the same in cognitive researching. In quantum theory, we know that if the instruments that used to measure the electron’s behavior are photons or electromagnetic wave, the uncertainty principle will take effects. The reason is simple. It is because the interactions between photons and electrons will generate the errors. If we study the human’s cognitive process, we must ask what he is thinking. When we ask what, it will interference with his thinking process.

It is just like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle since the individual cognition is the minimum unit in the group cognition process. If we want to know how an individual person thinks, we may suffer some difficulties in accuracy. The more accuracy we want to reach, the more error we will get. Therefore I think the individual behavior is unpredictable.

Dear Ophiolite, thank you for your kindly reply! I just wanted to establish a model of the personal cognition in the first. However, I found that the behavior of individual was unpredictable since the human cognitive process is very complex. So I decided to study the process of group cognition. I expect that the statistical effect of mass population's cognitive interaction can give some evidences that are consistent with the theory's prediction. The London riots enlighten me that some aspects of the group cognitive interaction are really predictable. However, I suffered some difficulties in applying my equations to the London's youth community that united by Internet. I think that there are something missed in my theory.

Hello, I am Ziven.

Hello, I'm from China. I had constructed four differential equations that can describe the cognitive process. We can obtain the personal development steps from the calculation of these equations that is consistent with the Piaget's children development theory. The most significant of these equations is that we can use it to solve the problems of the group cognitive problems. I think these solutions can give us some answers why London or east India riots happened. However, I don't know how to publish my work in English journal since English is not my mother language, so I decide to post it here to share with somebody who can understand my equations.