rusek

I 'm very sorry for that I was so short Ignorant E is GOD he is all what we need to live !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! anyway I need reasearch special in radio waves system please support me by Your contacts I want to start THANK YOU AND SORRY Marosz Inventor Tesla 2 PLEASE USE ONLY THIS FORUM TO SPEAK !!! dears moderators sorry for problem I give You my word I not spamer help me reaserch THX again [link removed]

three independent methods give the same fact I'm Idiot but You schould think how to fit Einstein equations to new discover. 1 Geometry of Light beam 2 Luminous Intensity of light beam >url removed 3 Classical mechanic very precission tool >url removed all work easy like my patents > url removed

On this forum I not have good relation with people who love Mr E I 'm sorry but in my experiments I explain 3 not the same method 1 geometry measure 2 Luminous Intensity 3 Foucault pendulums ( classical mechanic tool ) All three show the same resoult MR E repeat GALILEO MISTAKE http://tesla8.blogspot.com/ " Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them). In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions. This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."

Dear Expert John Acceleration is easy to see without brake rules ! below real experiment that can be confirm in LIGO ( 4 km pipe I give You info in pdf what is this ) if You see that exist " X" about 300 mm ( its very hard not see) it men that we can measure this what was / is / impossible for Einstein, Galileusz , Newton and will be if we will not make below experiment 1,4 MB pdf (link or attachments) >>> http://www.pdfhost.n...eec7af9ec23b8b1 LIGOv3.pdf

below I showing link to pdf document (1,4 mb) I explain there what I want to measure and how to measure I also give real data that we are able get (end of pdf translate where we can use data from experiment in real live ) I want to use LIGO INTERFEROMETER or similar tool I wait for people that want to help me by own contacts and are open for experiments I want to start international experiment and finish this what I started alone download pdf on Your HD please use my pdf and help me ( You have my pdf in attachments or use link ) http://www.pdfhost.net/index.php?Action=Do...84393510f666b86 BR MAROSZ POLISH TESLA 2 Ligo Experiment.pdf

Are You Man or Women or ... : Doppler efect def light source and light sensor move with not the same velocity Marosz Discover light source and light sensor move with the same velocity in the past light signal was sent in past before light tuch sensor - sensor change but position not velocity we have: a ) power of signal b) we knew where signal was sent ( our old position ) c ) we measure - distance change - or brightess we use math to give distance ( photography can give You info ) During polish forum I invented InterSpeedmeter Do You Like ? If Michelson Morley experiment is TRUE i kick MR E us If M-M not true I don't know where is good ( I need help )

1 Desk 2 laser lamp 3 20 mirrors Your icon mean that You can make wine can You explain how work 1.2.3 .. elemets mathematical logic A Michelson Morley experiment is TRUE if A = True I have right if A = Not True I make mistake What is Your opinion ?

I wait for support in pdf I show experiment build and new very simply tool a) desk b) laser c) 20 small mirrors ( please read step by step ) Micelson - Morley eperiment is very important point //// if You not accept yellow table in first link not read more You need read about M-M experiment in any book or use my wiki link yellow table end 1 Earth = Rocket 2 back to my link - without this I can't help You (please click file and save pdf - if any problem with open pdf I can sent by e- mail ) Part 1 start https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bwm...kQ1ZE5GUE1MejQ Part 2 applications and brightness https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bwm...W10UEdac2xrWDQ We have two independent methods: 1 Geometry of picture a) by Marosz's Iterspeedmeter b) by photocamera 2 brightness of picture a) by light power sensor b) by photocamera I wait for cooperation offer ( please show my file Your friends ) I wait for support ( I'm able join to any reaserch project ) I please administrators to keep this forum I need proof day of made Marosz's velocity jig.pdf part 2 (next step).pdf

please see 2.jpg quantum of light hit in front of rocket wall ( Time T1) after this start back camera start work in T1 time and open chip only for 1 s quantum of light hit in camera chip ( Time T2) for more simply think please use R distance = 300 000 km What happen with camera and rocket in time between (T1,T2) What You think rocket velocity V can change point where camera and light have collision ( V rocket base on light quantum between time (T1,T2) brightness of picture has strong relation with R distance ( it is square function relation ) What You think rocket velocity V can change brightness of picture ? read 2.pdf can I compare radio/light/sound Waves ? - They all have R distance similar relation ( it is square function relation ) 2.pdf

I want to ask You please help me evaluate my IDEA step 1 1 not true base on the principle of conservation of energy ( please inform me page / and line where I write not true ) 2 not true base on the principle of conservation of momentum ( please inform me page / and line where I write not true ) 3 after You finish and You not find mistake so what is Your opinion what I can do as a next step ? A please read start.pdf B 2.pdf ( all waves has R^2 distance I just compare all waves in the same way I not confirm by experiment graitation but I see similar R^2) C rocket.pdf rocket.pdf I use SIX classical eguations ( plase inform me where is mistake ( each equation has name ) - can I use these equations as a proof ? Proof that I can recognize velocity and use only dynamite and balls and NEWTON without observation outside object ? Thank You for support !!! start.pdf 2.pdf rocket.pdf