What evidence?= quotations from previous propositions!
Quotations work to ferterlise the truth or falsity value behind the view point of our arguments.
Ifour point of view is wrong; quotations do nothing to justify it scientifically apart from making our view point religious in nature .
Some times asking oneself if science is a natural intelligent ability or an artificial ability is good though paradoxical! Because if it is a natural ability; then it justifies why science deals with the nature of our existence! But if it is artificial then science becomes another form of natual religion though not a supernatural one. Our minds can tweak or duplicate the nature of existence limitlessly and conserve this information in form of any kind of imagination possible. But when it comes to science; such imaginations must agree with reality as a limit else they collapse to the weight of their own incompleteness and inconsistencies