univeral theory

I apologise in advance if I appear like over using or miss using your comments and some of the quotations you use in reinforcing your point of view. In fact, am a fun of relativity theory as am a fun of the way you demonstrate your point of view. The underlying principles of your quotation have fertilized my work both in relative and absolute terms. Some where some how, you used a brilliant quotation from alvin toffler that “the illitrates of the 21st century will not be those who can not read and write,but those who can not learn, unlearn and the relearn”. The gentle man un knowingly analyzed the process of knowledge acquiring cycle through establishing its reciprocal unity as based on the equilibrium framework of opposite variability (symmetrical). The concepts were quite simple to experiment –“learn, unlearn, then relearn and then observe what the ignorance of 21st century is”- excellent. In respect of the argument with in; though only confined on the 21st century, but has been the cycle of processing knowledge since the down of human civilization. we learn new ideas as a positive dimensional framework of acquiring knowledge and unlearn some as a negative dimensional framework of learning. But we can only know whether the knowledge we acquire through this cycle is ignorance or civilization if the regulation and coordination of its equilibrium framework is reciprocal- and this has been the core of research and discoveries. Such that; If; (knowledge/1/learn . unlearn(√knowledge) )=1 than; ∂(knowledge/1/learn . unlearn(√knowledge) ) Else; add, knowledge (learn) Or; subtract knowledge (unlearn) End if (relearn). We learn, un learn and then relearn (which is equivalent to 1+ or – 1) of our knowledge and establishes a reciprocal unity of it through the equilibrium framework of its opposite cycling -and this is the foundation of everything (univaso science) Plato’s universe though had a lot of short comings solved many problems of the time and this was the civilization of the time; but basing on it to solve problems in Newtonian age - it is ignorance and in Einstein age, Newtonian civilization; was, and its significances depends on the mercy of relativity theory. This is what the relativity of the reference frame of a given variable does on its absolutism. But in absolute terms; they are just different aspects of conserving knowledge as a function of their applicability due to the speed of consciousness which is equivalent to what Andy, calls the MQ2(hopping you know how knowledge is conserved through quantum units of mass in human brain and how its responsiveness depends on Planck constancy). In chaotic universe era or specifically in computer age, it is not logical at all to think of time as a variable of material impact as the synchronization of the clock in computer science does not at all depend on the differentiation of material data in question but only on the pre programmed procedures (algorithms) of processing that material data. Even still, the regulation and coordination of chaotic data depends on the responsiveness of the universal variable in question as a function of initial conditions verses final conditions or in particular symmetry coordination and regulation(since the initial conditions and final conditions are just two opposite frames(symmetry )in chaotic group). Thus; ” The cause of every thing is smoothly and recursively reciprocal and opposite (symmetrical) in nature, this symmetry breaking is circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to their regulation and inversely proportional to their coordination; and when the equilibrium framework of the conflicting symmetry pairs is established, reciprocal prevails and unity is realized” zaid.

Absolutely; everything “IS”. But due to the reference frame of different procedural step of its quantum being; “EVERYTHING WAS AND IT WILL BE”. And this “IS” relativity from univaso science point of view of res extensa verses res cogitan. For example; thunder and lightening are caused at the same time, but the difference in the procedural quantum steps of accessing there being as a function of the reference frame of the consciousness, subjects them to different times of effect, and this is E=MQ2. Let me re-use the ordinary example illustrated from my previous work that can establish the equilibrium frame work between relativism, absolutism and E=MQ2 as a function of their reciprocal unity through oppositely conflicting variables (symmetry breaking) of univaso science. From your life experience, you have been encountering a plenty of physical objects; say people, buildings, trees, rocks, water bodies etc. suppose you are asked to identify what you have seen say a tree, the fact is that you would have seen a mass of living plant called a tree, in luganda we call it omuti and in Arabic it is called shajarat, in Chinese prof. A pibernick can help or else I will tell you soon. But regardless of the name you would all have called what you saw, the fact is that you have all seen the same thing absolutely which is a mass of a living plant. That is true. But suppose an expert in physics, chemistry or biology was the one to identify what he saw concerning the very same tree and he says that, I see energy as a function of different recurring square fields call them gravitational fields, velocity fields, magnetic fields, kinetic fields, bra…bra…..bra…..conserved smoothly and recursively into different quantum units of organs and then cells and then molecules and then atoms and then particles and then and then. ..! Would he be wrong? No, he would be true, especially depending on the accuracy of his presentation. But what makes these two people of seemingly different answers to be both true, here is the core of the quantum steps of consciousness as a function of reference frame (relativity). The first person sees a mass of a living plant even with out recognizing how many procedural quantum steps by steps through which his consciousness or mind has undergone to establish an equilibrium framework between different forms of conserved energies (colors, light, substances, dimensions etc) at less than a blink of an eye up on which there reciprocal unity is the recognition of a mass of a living plant. The reference frame of this person is deductive and its consciousness speed is equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium unity of E=MQ2. Further still, the approach of the second person does not mean that the speed of his consciousness is not equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium framework of E=MQ2, but it is rather an inductive reference frame capable of identifying the quantum step by step procedures followed by his consciousness when it was establishing the reciprocal equilibrium unity of the framework that he perceived as a mass of a living plant. The effect of the reciprocal unity and its equilibrium framework as a function of opposite(symmetrical) reference frames is at the centre of Einstein’s simultaneity hypothesis from the relativity theory point of view provided that time is just a numerical measure of change as a function of material existence through its units of procedural quantum steps. Relativity is just a victim of time and symmetry breaking ignorance as a function of natural phenomenology through its procedural quantum steps of establishing the reciprocal framework of the oppositely conflicting variables of natural unity (simultaneity). This is established smoothly and recursively by univaso science as formulated by zaid sserubogo. After all, even the commutability of E=MC2 lies at the blessing of equilibrium unity framework of symmetry breaking from the oppositely two reference frames. Think of a Turing machine as a model of predicting the reaction of consciousness based on procedural steps. A Turing machine is a model of predicting the reaction of a given machine (call it a computer) based on predetermined steps (call them programs) of data manipulation (call it data accessibility, data regulation, and data coordination). Binary system is a form of data that can be represented and manipulated by a Turing machine and in computer programming it is conventionally known as machine codes or raw data system or the basic language system. Although the reaction of a Turing machine is based on manipulation of data through binary system, but the prediction of this reaction is based on the predetermined step by step procedures of the algorithm used to program it. So, while predicting the reaction of a Turing machine is the central point in its programming, but the algorithm used in such a program is the central requirement of determining the predictability of a Turing machine. There are two requirements of determining the predictability of a Turing machine; Resource requirements Procedural requirements. There are only two known resources that are required to complete a given pre - programmed prediction of Turing machine. 1a- Time resource 1b- Space resource Procedural requirements are the central point in computer complexity. And it is a measure of the complexity degree of completing the processing cycles required to solve a given problem by a Turing machine and it is measured in time. There are two types of such complexities; The one which when given the algorithmic step by step procedures of a given program; the Turing machine reaches a certain point and automatically halts. The algorithm used in such a program is called decidable (by decidability we mean proving the answer by true/yes or false/no). And the other one which when given the algorithm step by step procedures of a given program, the machine will never halt automatically. The algorithm used in such a program is called un decidable. In computer complexity; the requirements of deciding a given problem falls into two categories of procedural complexity; one is call polynomial time procedure or specifically polynomial time, and another one is called exponential time time procedure or specifically polynomial time(but this is not so strict because though there is a strong argument to believe that sub exponential time is just the extra mile of polynomial time, but researchers have not concluded on this, so it still stands as another time dimension In computer complexity). In the context of the opposite reference frame, we are dealing with solving as well as proving our solution in a given polynomial time procedure (hoping that you know the advantages of polynomial time procedures and why it is of such great importance to the complexity of existence or computer science community. We need to reconcile the process of our solution to the process of our verification such that there equilibrium framework is based on a polynomial reciprocal unity of 1/yes/true or 0/no/false. The mechanism of establishing this is through commutative parametrization and combinatorial optimality of opposite pairs. Such that; If; (s/1/+ .-(√s) )=1, Then; ∂(s/1/+ .-(√s) )=1, Else; add 1 Or; subtract 1 End if As we can see from the above illustration it only takes a procedural polynomial time of 1+ or -1 to administer the changes and reactions of texts made to and from our S variable framework, If this framework has been optimized with in an equilibrium framework of oppositely conflicting pairs (symmetry breaking) with in a reciprocal unity of 1. Such that 1, +or-1 = ∂(1, 0). As a Turing machine, the mechanism of physical data manipulation by a given consciousness or mind and the predictability of physical data reaction by the mind is regulated and coordinated in the same way as that of a Turing machine, though the methods of accessing this data differs. .'' The cause of every thing is smoothly and recursively reciprocal and opposite (symmetrical) in nature, this symmetry breaking is circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to their regulation and inversely proportional to their coordination; and when the equilibrium framework of the conflicting symmetry pairs is established, reciprocal prevails and unity is realized.''

Absolutely; everything “IS”. But due to the reference frame of different procedural step of its quantum being; “EVERYTHING WAS AND IT WILL BE”. And this “IS” relativity from univaso science point of view of res extensa verses res cogitan. For example; thunder and lightening are caused at the same time, but the difference in the procedural quantum steps of accessing there being as a function of the reference frame of the consciousness, subjects them to different times of effect, and this is E=MQ2. Let me re-use the ordinary example illustrated from my previous work that can establish the equilibrium frame work between relativism, absolutism and E=MQ2 as a function of their reciprocal unity through oppositely conflicting variables (symmetry breaking) of univaso science. From your life experience, you have been encountering a plenty of physical objects; say people, buildings, trees, rocks, water bodies etc. suppose you are asked to identify what you have seen say a tree, the fact is that you would have seen a mass of living plant called a tree, in luganda we call it omuti and in Arabic it is called shajarat, in Chinese prof. A pibernick can help or else I will tell you soon. But regardless of the name you would all have called what you saw, the fact is that you have all seen the same thing absolutely which is a mass of a living plant. That is true. But suppose an expert in physics, chemistry or biology was the one to identify what he saw concerning the very same tree and he says that, I see energy as a function of different recurring square fields call them gravitational fields, velocity fields, magnetic fields, kinetic fields, bra…bra…..bra…..conserved smoothly and recursively into different quantum units of organs and then cells and then molecules and then atoms and then particles and then and then. ..! Would he be wrong? No, he would be true, especially depending on the accuracy of his presentation. But what makes these two people of seemingly different answers to be both true, here is the core of the quantum steps of consciousness as a function of reference frame (relativity). The first person sees a mass of a living plant even with out recognizing how many procedural quantum steps by steps through which his consciousness or mind has undergone to establish an equilibrium framework between different forms of conserved energies (colors, light, substances, dimensions etc) at less than a blink of an eye up on which there reciprocal unity is the recognition of a mass of a living plant. The reference frame of this person is deductive and its consciousness speed is equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium unity of E=MQ2. Further still, the approach of the second person does not mean that the speed of his consciousness is not equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium framework of E=MQ2, but it is rather an inductive reference frame capable of identifying the quantum step by step procedures followed by his consciousness when it was establishing the reciprocal equilibrium unity of the framework that he perceived as a mass of a living plant. The effect of the reciprocal unity and its equilibrium framework as a function of opposite(symmetrical) reference frames is at the centre of Einstein’s simultaneity hypothesis from the relativity theory point of view provided that time is just a numerical measure of change as a function of material existence through its units of procedural quantum steps. Relativity is just a victim of time and symmetry breaking ignorance as a function of natural phenomenology through its procedural quantum steps of establishing the reciprocal framework of the oppositely conflicting variables of natural unity (simultaneity). This is established smoothly and recursively by univaso science as formulated by zaid sserubogo. After all, even the commutability of E=MC2 lies at the blessing of equilibrium unity framework of symmetry breaking from the oppositely two reference frames. Think of a Turing machine as a model of predicting the reaction of consciousness based on procedural steps. A Turing machine is a model of predicting the reaction of a given machine (call it a computer) based on predetermined steps (call them programs) of data manipulation (call it data accessibility, data regulation, and data coordination). Binary system is a form of data that can be represented and manipulated by a Turing machine and in computer programming it is conventionally known as machine codes or raw data system or the basic language system. Although the reaction of a Turing machine is based on manipulation of data through binary system, but the prediction of this reaction is based on the predetermined step by step procedures of the algorithm used to program it. So, while predicting the reaction of a Turing machine is the central point in its programming, but the algorithm used in such a program is the central requirement of determining the predictability of a Turing machine. There are two requirements of determining the predictability of a Turing machine; Resource requirements Procedural requirements. There are only two known resources that are required to complete a given pre - programmed prediction of Turing machine. 1a- Time resource 1b- Space resource Procedural requirements are the central point in computer complexity. And it is a measure of the complexity degree of completing the processing cycles required to solve a given problem by a Turing machine and it is measured in time. There are two types of such complexities; The one which when given the algorithmic step by step procedures of a given program; the Turing machine reaches a certain point and automatically halts. The algorithm used in such a program is called decidable (by decidability we mean proving the answer by true/yes or false/no). And the other one which when given the algorithm step by step procedures of a given program, the machine will never halt automatically. The algorithm used in such a program is called un decidable. In computer complexity; the requirements of deciding a given problem falls into two categories of procedural complexity; one is call polynomial time procedure or specifically polynomial time, and another one is called exponential time time procedure or specifically polynomial time(but this is not so strict because though there is a strong argument to believe that sub exponential time is just the extra mile of polynomial time, but researchers have not concluded on this, so it still stands as another time dimension In computer complexity). In the context of the opposite reference frame, we are dealing with solving as well as proving our solution in a given polynomial time procedure (hoping that you know the advantages of polynomial time procedures and why it is of such great importance to the complexity of existence or computer science community. We need to reconcile the process of our solution to the process of our verification such that there equilibrium framework is based on a polynomial reciprocal unity of 1/yes/true or 0/no/false. The mechanism of establishing this is through commutative parametrization and combinatorial optimality of opposite pairs. Such that; If; (s/1/+ .-(√s) )=1, Then; ∂(s/1/+ .-(√s) )=1, Else; add 1 Or; subtract 1 End if As we can see from the above illustration it only takes a procedural polynomial time of 1+ or -1 to administer the changes and reactions of texts made to and from our S variable framework, If this framework has been optimized with in an equilibrium framework of oppositely conflicting pairs (symmetry breaking) with in a reciprocal unity of 1. Such that 1, +or-1 = ∂(1, 0). As a Turing machine, the mechanism of physical data manipulation by a given consciousness or mind and the predictability of physical data reaction by the mind is regulated and coordinated in the same way as that of a Turing machine, though the methods of accessing this data differs. .'' The cause of every thing is smoothly and recursively reciprocal and opposite (symmetrical) in nature, this symmetry breaking is circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to their regulation and inversely proportional to their coordination; and when the equilibrium framework of the conflicting symmetry pairs is established, reciprocal prevails and unity is realized.''

Absolutely; everything “IS”. But due to the reference frame of different procedural step of its quantum being; “EVERYTHING WAS AND IT WILL BE”. And this “IS” relativity from univaso science point of view of res extensa verses res cogitan. For example; thunder and lightening are caused at the same time, but the difference in the procedural quantum steps of accessing there being as a function of the reference frame of the consciousness, subjects them to different times of effect, and this is E=MQ2. Let me re-use the ordinary example illustrated from my previous work that can establish the equilibrium frame work between relativism, absolutism and E=MQ2 as a function of their reciprocal unity through oppositely conflicting variables (symmetry breaking) of univaso science. From your life experience, you have been encountering a plenty of physical objects; say people, buildings, trees, rocks, water bodies etc. suppose you are asked to identify what you have seen say a tree, the fact is that you would have seen a mass of living plant called a tree, in luganda we call it omuti and in Arabic it is called shajarat, in Chinese prof. A pibernick can help or else I will tell you soon. But regardless of the name you would all have called what you saw, the fact is that you have all seen the same thing absolutely which is a mass of a living plant. That is true. But suppose an expert in physics, chemistry or biology was the one to identify what he saw concerning the very same tree and he says that, I see energy as a function of different recurring square fields call them gravitational fields, velocity fields, magnetic fields, kinetic fields, bra…bra…..bra…..conserved smoothly and recursively into different quantum units of organs and then cells and then molecules and then atoms and then particles and then and then. ..! Would he be wrong? No, he would be true, especially depending on the accuracy of his presentation. But what makes these two people of seemingly different answers to be both true, here is the core of the quantum steps of consciousness as a function of reference frame (relativity). The first person sees a mass of a living plant even with out recognizing how many procedural quantum steps by steps through which his consciousness or mind has undergone to establish an equilibrium framework between different forms of conserved energies (colors, light, substances, dimensions etc) at less than a blink of an eye up on which there reciprocal unity is the recognition of a mass of a living plant. The reference frame of this person is deductive and its consciousness speed is equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium unity of E=MQ2. Further still, the approach of the second person does not mean that the speed of his consciousness is not equivalent to the reciprocal equilibrium framework of E=MQ2, but it is rather an inductive reference frame capable of identifying the quantum step by step procedures followed by his consciousness when it was establishing the reciprocal equilibrium unity of the framework that he perceived as a mass of a living plant. The effect of the reciprocal unity and its equilibrium framework as a function of opposite(symmetrical) reference frames is at the centre of Einstein’s simultaneity hypothesis from the relativity theory point of view provided that time is just a numerical measure of change as a function of material existence through its units of procedural quantum steps. Relativity is just a victim of time and symmetry breaking ignorance as a function of natural phenomenology through its procedural quantum steps of establishing the reciprocal framework of the oppositely conflicting variables of natural unity (simultaneity). This is established smoothly and recursively by univaso science as formulated by zaid sserubogo. After all, even the commutability of E=MC2 lies at the blessing of equilibrium unity framework of symmetry breaking from the oppositely two reference frames. Think of a Turing machine as a model of predicting the reaction of consciousness based on procedural steps. A Turing machine is a model of predicting the reaction of a given machine (call it a computer) based on predetermined steps (call them programs) of data manipulation (call it data accessibility, data regulation, and data coordination). Binary system is a form of data that can be represented and manipulated by a Turing machine and in computer programming it is conventionally known as machine codes or raw data system or the basic language system. Although the reaction of a Turing machine is based on manipulation of data through binary system, but the prediction of this reaction is based on the predetermined step by step procedures of the algorithm used to program it. So, while predicting the reaction of a Turing machine is the central point in its programming, but the algorithm used in such a program is the central requirement of determining the predictability of a Turing machine. There are two requirements of determining the predictability of a Turing machine; Resource requirements Procedural requirements. There are only two known resources that are required to complete a given pre - programmed prediction of Turing machine. 1a- Time resource 1b- Space resource Procedural requirements are the central point in computer complexity. And it is a measure of the complexity degree of completing the processing cycles required to solve a given problem by a Turing machine and it is measured in time. There are two types of such complexities; The one which when given the algorithmic step by step procedures of a given program; the Turing machine reaches a certain point and automatically halts. The algorithm used in such a program is called decidable (by decidability we mean proving the answer by true/yes or false/no). And the other one which when given the algorithm step by step procedures of a given program, the machine will never halt automatically. The algorithm used in such a program is called un decidable. In computer complexity; the requirements of deciding a given problem falls into two categories of procedural complexity; one is call polynomial time procedure or specifically polynomial time, and another one is called exponential time time procedure or specifically polynomial time(but this is not so strict because though there is a strong argument to believe that sub exponential time is just the extra mile of polynomial time, but researchers have not concluded on this, so it still stands as another time dimension In computer complexity). In the context of the opposite reference frame, we are dealing with solving as well as proving our solution in a given polynomial time procedure (hoping that you know the advantages of polynomial time procedures and why it is of such great importance to the complexity of existence or computer science community. We need to reconcile the process of our solution to the process of our verification such that there equilibrium framework is based on a polynomial reciprocal unity of 1/yes/true or 0/no/false. The mechanism of establishing this is through commutative parametrization and combinatorial optimality of opposite pairs. Such that; If; ((s/1)/(+ .-(√s) ))=1, Then; ∂((s/1)/(+ .-(√s) ))=1, Else; add 1 Or; subtract 1 End if As we can see from the above illustration it only takes a procedural polynomial time of 1+ or -1 to administer the changes and reactions of texts made to and from our S variable framework, If this framework has been optimized with in an equilibrium framework of oppositely conflicting pairs (symmetry breaking) with in a reciprocal unity of 1. Such that 1, +or-1 = ∂(1, 0). As a Turing machine, the mechanism of physical data manipulation by a given consciousness or mind and the predictability of physical data reaction by the mind is regulated and coordinated in the same way as that of a Turing machine, though the methods of accessing this data differs. .'' The cause of every thing is smoothly and recursively reciprocal and opposite (symmetrical) in nature, this symmetry breaking is circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to their regulation and inversely proportional to their coordination; and when the equilibrium framework of the conflicting symmetry pairs is established, reciprocal prevails and unity is realized.'' Einstein never steal relativity from the Quran. The genius was ignorant of the claims made in Quran regarding the reciprocal equilibrium unity of oppositely conflicting variables as the foundation of natural phenomenology. In fact he was creative enough to demonstrate it through his simultaneity hypothesis as he had observed it and predicted it based on the opposite reference frames of his relativity theory point of view.

I thank you and I thank all those who made to me some private linking about the new calculations of pendulum made by zeeper base on un disputable observational truth. I believe that the main purpose of this effort was to help out my mathematical calculations to demonstrate some sounding and testable predictions of natural deity based on physics but not just numerology. Let me just paraphrase one of the comments made, that; though there is un disputable evidence to prove that the calculations made provide a sounding predictions of P=NP for a token of research based on the singularity of symmetry breaking, but the way it was used to describe mass-energy equivalence contradicted with some of the fundamental concepts used to establish the evidence that claims the proof of P=NP. After revising the contents from the links provided (about the true calculations of the pendulum) it washed out my ignorance about gravitational commutative parametrization up on which I was basing the dispute of E=MQ2 (as discussed in my previous papers about M=EX2 verses E=MQ2 and E=MC2) . I realized that there was un disputable proof of gravitation commutative parameterization as calculated by zeeper’s pendulum based on E=MQ2. With this commutation, the inverse square equilibrium framework of symmetry coordination and its reciprocal differentiation unity (regulation) as can be predicted by symmetry breaking entropy and singularity of univaso calculations is quite consistent with zeepers pendulum calculation proof. Observing this from the pendulum point of view was tricky and a bit hectic since the previous pendulum theory(up on which I my knowledge was based could not establish a mathematically consistent reconciliation between E=MQ 2 and the reciprocal unity of univaso calculations. But after zeeper's pendulum, the concept of E=MQ2 verses univaso calculations can be reconciled. The concept is quite simple and amazing; As noted earlier (through the paper of univaso science and another one of univaso science and the proof of P=NP), that the foundation and the formation of everything is opposite (symmetrical) in nature; and this symmetry is smoothly and recursively circulated through conflicting patterns. But when the equilibrium framework of this conflicting symmetry is established, reciprocal prevails and unity is realized. This implies that For P=NP to prevail, the equilibrium framework of conflicting symmetry pairs must establish a polynomial reciprocal unity of (1), such that; ∂1= (1, +or – 1) = (1, 0). a). Remember that, this reciprocal unity is directly proportional to the regulation of symmetry breaking frame work of variables in question. This implies that there must be an optimally polynomial combinatory framework of variables in question. Such that; (∂ (variableA))/(∂ (variable B)) =1. b). and remember that, this reciprocal unity is inversely proportional to the coordination of symmetry breaking frame work of variables in question. This implies that there must be a commutative parameterization framework of variables in question. Such that; if, (variable A) = (variable B . variable C), then; A/(B.C) = (B.C)/A =1 or if, A =B.C2 then; 〖B.C〗^2/A = (A/1)/((√A)B.C) =1 If we borrow the legacy of the above mentioned scenario to explain the mathematical accuracy of E=MQ2; It would be that; (∂ ( E))/(∂ (mQ^2)) =1, And E = mQ^2 = (mQ^2)/E = (E/1)/((√E)M.Q) =1. This scenario is quite consistent with the reciprocal equilibrium unity of gravitation from the univaso symmetry breaking point of view and zeepers pendulum that is directly proportion to the regulation of gravitational effect( as a pressure of electrical mass from its magnetic fields) and inversely proportional to its coordination. this can as well be proved by both the reinman hypothesis and the birch and swinnerton dyer conjecture since the real part of energy is the potential energy (mass or specifically electrical mass) and the numerical (or what reinman called the imaginary part or illusion part) is the kinetic energy (quantum steps of conserving the potential energy) which is the velocity field as a function of gravitation. In fact there are two types of symmetry breaking; Explicit symmetry breaking. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. The e explicit symmetry breaking is a Hamiltonian path and is solved by the clique problem solution (as discussed from the paper of univaso science and the proof of P=NP). This provides a good framework of velocity field as a token of proof of E=MQ2 based on the nervier -stokes hypothesis And the spontaneous symmetry breaking is a birch and swinnerton-dyer path and is solved by barch and swinnerton-dyer hypothesis proof (as also discussed from the paper of univaso science and the proof of P=NP). Congratulations E=MQ2 – and thanks to UNIVASO science. Wishing you a happy new year.

find the solution for the remainning six problems as solved here http://www.scienceforums.net/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=4364

i regret some of the improper presentation that apeared in my previous work.iam realy sorry and i apologisefor that. this pdf contains some of the corrections of the previous work as well as the proof for the claims made .UNIVASO SCIENCE AND PversesNP PROOF.pdf

please i begg you to read this pdf and find the M= EX2 verses E=MQ2 and E=MC2 http://www.scienceforums.net/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=4329

dear peter. i hope this can make some good smile to phisics of today and tomorrow.tust have a look and have something to say. UNIVERSAL THEORY2.pdf

UNIVERSAL THEORY OF EXISTENCE Perhaps I should begin this discussion by first reflecting on the most popular ontological schools of the theory of existence as I came across them through my research. This necessitates that I make some comparisons and contrasts between them and univaso theory and perhaps confess a unique element of universal theory that make it a contender for the theory of everything. Substance theory has almost been at the centre of ontological theorists that is conciderd in almost all the philosophical schools of existence. Though I can not defy the substance theory completely, I defy its application to some point of ontological consideration; the basic considerations being its relation ship between God, mind and objects and their significance to universal regulation. I consider Descartes' meditations as a modern effort of explaining a given part of Muhammad's concept of opposite dimensionality to some considerable degree of reasoning but not theology or logic. In fact Descartes had done a good job of integrating theology into philosophy because by then, many people had been faced by a number of problems which could not be solved satisfactorily by theology alone with out reason - But Descartes' post modern era was to be based on logic. To my understanding, I believe that the post modern requirement of logic in problem solving was the reason for phenomenologist like Edmund Husserl to disregard Descartes' four of the six meditation. To Edmund and his successors; reasoning with out decidability was insignificant in problem solving of the post modern era. Sure I agree with them to the degree of computer proof. I disregard the monists completely – and I agree with dualists and pluralists to some reasonable degree – but I agree comprehensively with Muhammad's concept of opposite dimensionality due to his logical proof that is mathematically consistent. When applied to God as opposed to nature, this concept implies that God is limitless and dimensionless as opposed to nature which is limited and dimensional; and as such, God is not made up of any other substance but Him. Such that; G (1/ (+.-(√G)) =G (infinity) = G Where, G=God "I know that my nature is weak and limited and that God's is limitless, incomprehensible, and infinite…" Descartes. "He is the beginning, and the end, and the visibility, and the invisibility, and up on everything he is the unlimited knower"57:3 Quran. There is no any other limit of beginning but HIM, there is not any other limit of end but HIM, there is not any other limit of knowledge but HIM, and there is not any other limitless but HIM. God is beyond all comprehension or equal to and does not resemble any of his creations in any way. "..He is God the only one, the self dependent and upon whom others depend, he begeteth not; nor was he begotten, and there is non like unto him"112 Quran. When the concept of opposite dimensionality is applied to every thing, it implies that every thing is a function of both dual pair (symmetry) and twin pair (complementary) upon which their chaotic regulation is based. Such that; every thing is a reflection of a given potion of God's minds in a symmetrical group of dual pairs translated into a piece of real work called nature. And twin pair verses dual pair, it implies that every thing is all but just different aspects of the same thing divided into a hierarchy of complement pairs and symmetry pairs that is inversely proportional to their coordination and directly proportional to their relativity provided that God is not a thing. And among the pluralist, this is a logical proof of substance hierarchy. Such that; 1-(S/(1/(M.N(√N))=1 2-∂(S/ (1/ (M.N (√S)))) =1+or-1 Where; S=everything m=faculty of God's minds responsible for nature N=nature REALITY VERSES FEASIBILITY If I was to make brief definitions of existence to different classes of people, I would say that existence is the being/reality that is feasible and can persist with out this feasibility. To peter J, I would say that existence is a feasible reality/being, and to a mathematician I would say that existence =1, +or-1 or ∂ (1, 0). In the beginning there was God. God made a piece of work. That work is an opposite group of isomorphic omniversal. A thing is any work of feasible reality/being. GOD IS GOD…… God is not a thing because God is not a piece of work done or derived from any other form of existence that can be explained by human reason or mathematical logic. The whole nature is a system of chaotic things; that can only be attached to GOD as its creator, supreme regulator and sole determiner. And GOD can only prove this claim through the feasible testimonies that he confesses to testify and prove that he did this work and that indeed he is the one. ''And of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability'' Quran 51:49…53:45. "Something cannot come from nothing" Descartes. Although it is not my target to discuss nothingness verses somethingness here (as we shall be discussing it in detail through the topic of absolutism verses relativism), but I find it honest to recognize Descartes' effort in which he was trying to prove that the consciousness of GOD creates reality, and so something can not come out of nothing. Consciousness is any type of work made by mind. This work comes in many forms, for example; imagining, observing, determining, sensing and detecting, recognizing, dreaming etc. the consciousness of God creates reality, and the consciousness of nature creates illusions. But when illusions intersect with reality they result into feasibity. Such that; 1- S/M.N (√S) =S=reality 2- S (M .N (√s)) =0= Illusions<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> 3-(A/(1/(R.L(√A))=1 4-∂ (A/ (1/ (R.L (√A)) =1, +or-1 Where; S=everything m=faculty of God's minds responsible for nature N=nature A=feasibility R=reality L=illusions OPPOSITE VARIABILITY AND THE CHAOTIC NATURE Nature is a piece of work divided recursively and smoothly into conflicting pairs (opposite pair's variability) called duality and twinity. Duality is a function of symmetrical pair, while twinity is a function of complement pair. As a piece of work, this means that it was made/ created and the one who made it existed before it. He manipulates this work through miracles and predetermined natural laws that drive it towards a target destiny. Some of these laws are decidable while others are behavial. The decidable laws are aimed at controlling the chaotic physical regulation of this work (for example the universe) with in a mechanism that is inversely proportional to the coordination of its constituents and directly proportional to their relativity. And this is the foundation res extensa and res cogitan. "The cause of anything is dual in nature. Heraclitus the Greek philosopher taught that, the universe was a conflict of opposites controlled by what he called eternal justice and what we call karma. However when the pairs of opposites, the contradictory forces of nature are brought into reciprocal unity, equilibrium is established and unity prevails" sri upiano manglangit. Such that; The universe, over the inverse square of the universe bracket forces intersection energy, times the inverse square of universe bracket, forces intersection energy, intersection the inverse square of universe bracket forces intersection energy over universe equals one. Or mathematically, 1)-((U/1)/((√U)F .E)((U ∩((√U)F .E) )∩(((√U)F .E)/U) ) )=1 2) -change((U/1)/((√U)F.E)((U ∩((√U)E.F) )∩(((√U)F .E)/U) ) )=1,+or-1 Where; U=universe F=force E=energy While, the behavior laws are aimed at controlling the behavial responsiveness of the universe; so as it overcomes the challenges of its existence objectives and to control the chaos of different conflicting interests, challenges, threats and endowments of the constituents of this work. "This is the foundation of right and wrong, truth and false". Some thing is right if it helps us overcome the challenges we face to achieve our living objectives, otherwise it is wrong. The basic interest of all laws made whether natural, divine, constitutional, customary, traditional or international should be to serve the interest mentioned above. Otherwise, any law made; and it does not comply with the above mentioned fundamental objectives, it leads to imbalanced equity, injustice, and abnormal consciousness. Such that; Laws, over the inverse square of laws bracket challenges plus objectives, times the inverse square of laws bracket challenges plus objectives, intersection the inverse square of laws bracket challenges plus objectives over Laws equals one. Or mathematically, 1)-((L/1)/((√L)C .O)((L ∩((√L)C .O) )∩(((√L)C .O)/L) ) )=1 2) -change((L/1)/((√L)C .O)((L ∩((√L)C .O) )∩(((√L)C .O)/L) ) )=1,+or-1 Where; L=Laws C=challenges of life (chaotic challenges) O=objectives of life (chaotic challenges) Else; if the out put of this relativity and coordination is less or greater than one, then there is an abnormal universal relativity and coordination. And in cases of social science, this is abnormal social relativity and coordination. Next: OPPOSITE VARIABILITY AND RES EXTENSA……….

i apologise for such a posting technical blunder.i was trying to post a chaotic framework curve that failed. but am working on the pdf. please am sorry

thank you so much,dear for such a good push

a simple framework model of universal relativity and cordination curve

You demonstrated that as to your examination the thirteen examples of " ''and of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability'' fail to support our stand point, but in some cases run wholly contrary to it. Here we show you that your claims did not only fail to illustrate your point of view as far as the concern of this theory, but in some cases confirmed the claims you ware disproving. Many of the points you raised were based on misconception of the theory, experimental assumptions, general perceptions and in some cases individual emotions which in general were not backed by any scientific experiment of consistent mathematical proof. Quote 1) the cosmological energy distribution ratio of 2:1 observed in the invisible energy ratio and dark energy ratio and the electromagnetic energy distribution ratio of the universal energy distribution If you divide things into pairs then we imply a ratio 1:1, not 2:1’. ……perhaps you are right on the dual ratio of 1:1.but the concept of this theory is concerned about the opposite variability of this duality, hence the ratio is -1:1.and in the field theory this is equivalent to 2:1.this can best be understood by the SU(3)of the standard model where the young diagram or young tableau multiplicity of SU(3) is 3*3 = 6+3. This is the same as 9/√9(- . +) = 6+3 this implies that the group isomorphic ratio of -3:3 in 9 equals to 2:1. “the mapping of neighborhood of one into the neighborhood of the other is one-to-one and globally homomorphism. In fact, the homomorphism is two-to-one from SU(2) on to R(3)”.while still on the same subject, “The theory of large scale structure, which governs the formation of structures in the universe (stars, quasars, galaxies and galaxy clusters), also suggests that the density of matter in the universe is only 30% of the critical density” using the approximation methods. And with the approximation methods 30% is equivalent to 33.33% .This implies that the rest of cosmological energy density (which is dack enrgy) occupies a field of 66.66%.the ratio of 66.66% : 33.33% of the cosmological energy distribution equals to 2:1 “More recently, the WMAP seven-year analysis gave an estimate of … 22.7% dark matter” –quite a good approximate statistical analysis! And its relevance to universal theory lies in its consistence to its mathematical predictions. such that; 22.7% + x=33.33%.then x=10.63%. So if dark matter is 22.7% approximately then ordinary matter is 10.53% which is consistent to the ratio of 2:1approximetely. Quote 2) the quantum particle opposite variability sets from the negatively charged particles along with the positive ones, the neutrals along with the charged particles, the up quarks along with the down quark, the visible energy along with the invisible energy etc The invisible energy is divisible into infra-re and ultra-violet. Where is the division of the visible energy? That's right - the seven colours of the rainbow. No duality there. ………..as far as the universal theory predictions are concerned, the visible energy is made up of magnetic energy and radiant energy. The magnetic energy is made up of atomic energy and chemical energy. The chemical energy is made up of metals and non metals. The atomic energy is made up of hadrons/nuclear energy and lepton energy. The radiant energy is made up of electrical energy and thermo energy. The electrical energy is made up of neutral energy and chargeable energy. The neutral energy is made up of neutrons and neutrinos. The chargeable energy is made up of positive charge and negative charge. The thermo energy is made up of light energy and colour energy. I think there can be duality there. Indeed the seven colours of rainbow are just the seven generations of colours coordination and relativity as a reflection of solar and sky bifurcation.<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 3) the inverse square law observed in universal objects and force coordination In what way is the inverse square law evidence of "pairs of opposite variability"? ……..the inverse square is an evidence of opposite pair dual coordination of objects as a function of their observation. such that; the inverse square of space-time dilation of two opposite observers is just relative to the observer, and thus it is also opposite. Such that Sb = Sb/√Sb(+.-) Where Sb is the absolute space-time between two observers. Are you aware that not all forces follow the inverse square law? How do you account for that? ………Iam not aware! Please help me with just a single example backed by statistical observational analysis and consistent mathematical proof. While we are on the subject of forces why is there no paired force for gravity? First of all, let me first try and make the gravitation force definition simple as observed by our ordinary experience. This is the force which a given body (A) exalts on another body say (B) as a function of their velocities (i.e. this is the force which the velocity of object A exalts on the velocity of object B). This is the central story behind the expansion of the universe. Gravitation is also subject to opposite pair duality - the concave and convex gravitation. Dark mater is responsible for convex gravitation and ordinary matter is responsible for concave gravitation. and because dark matter is 2:1 of ordinary matter, this explains the continual expansion of the universe. And it is this attraction between the convex gravitation of dark matter and the concave gravitation of ordinary matter that accounts for the motion of solar objects and perhaps the motion of universal objects. Quote 6) the opposite pair variability used in economic computations like; input along output,costs along benefits, productions along consumption,saving along expenditure,demand along supply etc These pairings are more a consequence of the ease with which two variables can be represented on a two dimensional sheet of paper. With the advent of computer analysis three-dimensions and higher are being used for more sophisticated analysis. Indeed, long before computers ternary diagrams were being used to illustrate rock compositions based on three components. ………..Whether three dimension or multidimensional, they all subject to dual group isomorphism and cohomology whose proportional coefficient determinant is modulus 1 Quote 7) the philosophical foundation that is based on two opposite pair variables; that is observation along conceptualization. This is only one of the many artifical ways of dividing up the cognitive process. The alleged match is meaningless. ………..what do you mean by “artificial”? are you trying to mean that because it is artificial no theory is capable of explaining its flow structure and applicability? Quote 8) the ontological dilemma that is solved by the univaso theory of existence based on two opposite pairs; that is coordination along relativity I know English is not your native language, but you please make an effort to write sentences that nake some kind of sense. ……….Thank you for this alert! And please keep it up. But what I mean is the ontological “questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences”. Quote 10)the Turing machine instrument based on 0 and 1 Sure. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. ………….quite a good quotation of binary pedigree. but please try to apply it technically on the quoted details you aim to disprove Quote 11) the psychological regulation instrument based on opposite pairs;that is hedonism and eudymonia Please. Now you are just being silly. There are many instruments of psychological study that are multi-dimensional. ……….dont you think that now you are becoming too emotional rather than demonstrating a higher degree of scientific competence? don’t you think that the many multi-dimensional instruments are either isomorphic or homomophic to hedonism and eudaimonia. Please just list few of those many multidimensional instruments you know. For us we promise to find where your basic problems lie so that we find a good doze of those problems for you. Quote 12) the periodic table universal periodic table that is based on two opposite pair of chemical phases that is metals and non metals.instead of the classical one that is based on three chemical phases. The periodic table is not based upon metals and non-metal,. but upon a periodicity of properties when the elements are arranged according to their atomic weight. The clue is in the name periodic table. If there is any number present here it is eight. ……….“ The periodic table is a tabular display of the chemical elements, organized on the basis of their atomic numbers, electron configurations, and chemical properties” Wikipedia. The fundamental modulus manifold of this organization is based on metals and non metals with 2:1 topological constant ratio of their cohomology. Quote 13) the biological cellular pairs of opposite variability, that is eukaryotes and prokaryotes’ These are not opposites. Eukaryotes contain what were once prokaryotes. Since when did an opposite contain its opposite? ……….well informed! But that is just experimental assumption never backed by any consistent mathematical proof of scientific reasoning. If you have one please provide. but as far as universal theory is concerned, at a given point of their constituents; eukaryotes intersect with prokaryotes’ and this intersection is directly proportional to their relativity and inversely proportional to their coordination This obsession with breaking things down into pairings, yin and yang, life and death, true and false, is a human characteristic, not a characteristic of any deity. …….. I beg that you consider some revision over the group theory, category theory and field theory so that you get a fertile ground to disprove this obsession with breaking things down into pairings…..characteristic of any deity. 0 THE EXTRA MILE OF UNIVASO SCIENCE (universal theory?) 1) That; work = force * energy 2) That; energy = mass/area 3) That; force = pressure * velocity 4) That; NP-hard problems are decidable in polynomial time 1) (s/((√s)+ .-)((s∩((√s)+ .-) )∩(((√s)+ .-)/s) ) )=s 2)((s/1)/((√s)+ .-)((s∩((√s)+ .-) )∩(((√s)+ .-)/s) ) )=1 3) change((s/1)/((√s)+ .-)((s∩((√s)+ .-) )∩(((√s)+ .-)/s) ) )=1+or-1 You demonstrated that as to your examination the thirteen examples of " ''and of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability'' fail to support our stand point, but in some cases run wholly contrary to it. Here we show you that your claims did not only fail to illustrate your point of view as far as the concern of this theory, but in some cases confirmed the claims you ware disproving. Many of the points you raised were based on misconception of the theory, experimental assumptions, general perceptions and in some cases individual emotions which in general were not backed by any scientific experiment of consistent mathematical proof. Quote 1) the cosmological energy distribution ratio of 2:1 observed in the invisible energy ratio and dark energy ratio and the electromagnetic energy distribution ratio of the universal energy distribution If you divide things into pairs then we imply a ratio 1:1, not 2:1’. ……perhaps you are right on the dual ratio of 1:1.but the concept of this theory is concerned about the opposite variability of this duality, hence the ratio is -1:1.and in the field theory this is equivalent to 2:1.this can best be understood by the SU(3)of the standard model where the young diagram or young tableau multiplicity of SU(3) is 3*3 = 6+3. This is the same as 9/√9(- . +) = 6+3 this implies that the group isomorphic ratio of -3:3 in 9 equals to 2:1. “the mapping of neighborhood of one into the neighborhood of the other is one-to-one and globally homomorphism. In fact, the homomorphism is two-to-one from SU(2) on to R(3)”.while still on the same subject, “The theory of large scale structure, which governs the formation of structures in the universe (stars, quasars, galaxies and galaxy clusters), also suggests that the density of matter in the universe is only 30% of the critical density” using the approximation methods. And with the approximation methods 30% is equivalent to 33.33% .This implies that the rest of cosmological energy density (which is dack enrgy) occupies a field of 66.66%.the ratio of 66.66% : 33.33% of the cosmological energy distribution equals to 2:1 “More recently, the WMAP seven-year analysis gave an estimate of … 22.7% dark matter” –quite a good approximate statistical analysis! And its relevance to universal theory lies in its consistence to its mathematical predictions. such that; 22.7% + x=33.33%.then x=10.63%. So if dark matter is 22.7% approximately then ordinary matter is 10.53% which is consistent to the ratio of 2:1approximetely. Quote 2) the quantum particle opposite variability sets from the negatively charged particles along with the positive ones, the neutrals along with the charged particles, the up quarks along with the down quark, the visible energy along with the invisible energy etc The invisible energy is divisible into infra-re and ultra-violet. Where is the division of the visible energy? That's right - the seven colours of the rainbow. No duality there. ………..as far as the universal theory predictions are concerned, the visible energy is made up of magnetic energy and radiant energy. The magnetic energy is made up of atomic energy and chemical energy. The chemical energy is made up of metals and non metals. The atomic energy is made up of hadrons/nuclear energy and lepton energy. The radiant energy is made up of electrical energy and thermo energy. The electrical energy is made up of neutral energy and chargeable energy. The neutral energy is made up of neutrons and neutrinos. The chargeable energy is made up of positive charge and negative charge. The thermo energy is made up of light energy and colour energy. I think there can be duality there. Indeed the seven colours of rainbow are just the seven generations of colours coordination and relativity as a reflected on earth from the solar and sky bifurcation. Quote 3) the inverse square law observed in universal objects and force coordination In what way is the inverse square law evidence of "pairs of opposite variability"? ……..the inverse square is an evidence of opposite pair dual coordination of objects as a function of their observation. such that; the inverse square of space-time dilation of two opposite observers is just relative to the observer, and thus it is also opposite. Such that Sb = Sb/√Sb(+.-) Where Sb is the absolute space-time between two observers. Are you aware that not all forces follow the inverse square law? How do you account for that? ………Iam not aware! Please help me with just a single example backed by statistical observational analysis and consistent mathematical proof. While we are on the subject of forces why is there no paired force for gravity? First of all, let me first try and make the gravitation force definition simple as observed by our ordinary experience. This is the force which a given body (A) exalts on another body say (B) as a function of their velocities (i.e. this is the force which the velocity of object A exalts on the velocity of object B). This is the central story behind the expansion of the universe. Gravitation is also subject to opposite pair duality - the concave and convex gravitation. Dark mater is responsible for convex gravitation and ordinary matter is responsible for concave gravitation. and because dark matter is 2:1 of ordinary matter, this explains the continual expansion of the universe. And it is this attraction between the convex gravitation of dark matter and the concave gravitation of ordinary matter that accounts for the motion of solar objects and perhaps the motion of universal objects. Quote 6) the opposite pair variability used in economic computations like; input along output,costs along benefits, productions along consumption,saving along expenditure,demand along supply etc These pairings are more a consequence of the ease with which two variables can be represented on a two dimensional sheet of paper. With the advent of computer analysis three-dimensions and higher are being used for more sophisticated analysis. Indeed, long before computers ternary diagrams were being used to illustrate rock compositions based on three components. ………..Whether three dimension or multidimensional, they all subject to dual group isomorphism and cohomology whose proportional coefficient determinant is modulus 1 Quote 7) the philosophical foundation that is based on two opposite pair variables; that is observation along conceptualization. This is only one of the many artifical ways of dividing up the cognitive process. The alleged match is meaningless. ………..what do you mean by “artificial”? are you trying to mean that because it is artificial no theory is capable of explaining its flow structure and applicability? Quote 8) the ontological dilemma that is solved by the univaso theory of existence based on two opposite pairs; that is coordination along relativity I know English is not your native language, but you please make an effort to write sentences that nake some kind of sense. ……….Thank you for this alert! And please keep it up. But what I mean is the ontological “questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences”. Quote 10)the Turing machine instrument based on 0 and 1 Sure. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. ………….quite a good quotation of binary pedigree. but please try to apply it technically on the quoted details you aim to disprove Quote 11) the psychological regulation instrument based on opposite pairs;that is hedonism and eudymonia Please. Now you are just being silly. There are many instruments of psychological study that are multi-dimensional. ……….dont you think that now you are becoming too emotional rather than demonstrating a higher degree of scientific competence? don’t you think that the many multi-dimensional instruments are either isomorphic or homomophic to hedonism and eudaimonia. Please just list few of those many multidimensional instruments you know. For us we promise to find where your basic problems lie so that we find a good doze of those problems for you. Quote 12) the periodic table universal periodic table that is based on two opposite pair of chemical phases that is metals and non metals.instead of the classical one that is based on three chemical phases. The periodic table is not based upon metals and non-metal,. but upon a periodicity of properties when the elements are arranged according to their atomic weight. The clue is in the name periodic table. If there is any number present here it is eight. ……….“ The periodic table is a tabular display of the chemical elements, organized on the basis of their atomic numbers, electron configurations, and chemical properties” Wikipedia. The fundamental modulus manifold of this organization is based on metals and non metals with 2:1 topological constant ratio of their cohomology. Quote 13) the biological cellular pairs of opposite variability, that is eukaryotes and prokaryotes’ These are not opposites. Eukaryotes contain what were once prokaryotes. Since when did an opposite contain its opposite? ……….well informed! But that is just experimental assumption never backed by any consistent mathematical proof of scientific reasoning. If you have one please provide. but as far as universal theory is concerned, at a given point of their constituents; eukaryotes intersect with prokaryotes’ and this intersection is directly proportional to their relativity and inversely proportional to their coordination This obsession with breaking things down into pairings, yin and yang, life and death, true and false, is a human characteristic, not a characteristic of any deity. …….. I beg that you consider some revision over the group theory, category theory and field theory so that you get a fertile ground to disprove this obsession with breaking things down into pairings…..characteristic of any deity. 0

thank you for such a sounding degree of professional competence and hospitality.

You demonstrated that as to your examination the thirteen examples of " ''and of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability'' fail to support our stand point, but in some cases run wholly contrary to it. Here we show you that your claims did not only fail to illustrate your point of view as far as the concern of this theory, but in some cases confirmed the claims you ware disproving. Many of the points you raised were based on misconception of the theory, experimental assumptions, general perceptions and in some cases individual emotions which in general were not backed by any scientific experiment of consistent mathematical proof. Quote 1) the cosmological energy distribution ratio of 2:1 observed in the invisible energy ratio and dark energy ratio and the electromagnetic energy distribution ratio of the universal energy distribution ‘<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">If you divide things into pairs then we imply a ratio 1:1, not 2:1’. <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> </b> ……perhaps you are right on the dual ratio of 1:1.but the concept of this theory is concerned about the opposite variability of this duality, hence the ratio is -1:1.and in the field theory this is equivalent to 2:1.this can best be understood by the SU(3)of the standard model where the young diagram or young tableau multiplicity of SU(3) is 3*3 = 6+3. This is the same as 9/√9(- . +) = 6+3 this implies that the group isomorphic ratio of -3:3 in 9 equals to 2:1. “the mapping of neighborhood of one into the neighborhood of the other is one-to-one and globally homomorphism. In fact, the homomorphism is two-to-one from SU(2) on to R(3)”.while still on the same subject, “The theory of large scale structure, which governs the formation of structures in the universe (stars, quasars, galaxies and galaxy clusters), also suggests that the density of matter in the universe is only 30% of the critical density” using the approximation methods. And with the approximation methods 30% is equivalent to 33.33% .This implies that the rest of cosmological energy density (which is dack enrgy) occupies a field of 66.66%.the ratio of 66.66% : 33.33% of the cosmological energy distribution equals to 2:1 “More recently, the WMAP seven-year analysis gave an estimate of … 22.7% dark matter” –quite a good approximate statistical analysis! And its relevance to universal theory lies in its consistence to its mathematical predictions. such that; 22.7% + x=33.33%.then x=10.63%. So if dark matter is 22.7% approximately then ordinary matter is 10.53% which is consistent to the ratio of 2:1approximetely. Quote 2) the quantum particle opposite variability sets from the negatively charged particles along with the positive ones, the neutrals along with the charged particles, the up quarks along with the down quark, the visible energy along with the invisible energy etc The invisible energy is divisible into infra-re and ultra-violet. Where is the division of the visible energy? That's right - the seven colours of the rainbow. No duality there. ………..as far as the universal theory predictions are concerned, the visible energy is made up of magnetic energy and radiant energy. The magnetic energy is made up of atomic energy and chemical energy. The chemical energy is made up of metals and non metals. The atomic energy is made up of hadrons/nuclear energy and lepton energy. The radiant energy is made up of electrical energy and thermo energy. The electrical energy is made up of neutral energy and chargeable energy. The neutral energy is made up of neutrons and neutrinos. The chargeable energy is made up of positive charge and negative charge. The thermo energy is made up of light energy and colour energy. I think there can be duality there. Indeed the seven colours of rainbow are just the seven generations of colours coordination and relativity as a reflection of solar and sky bifurcation.<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 3) the inverse square law observed in universal objects and force coordination In what way is the inverse square law evidence of "pairs of opposite variability"? ……..the inverse square is an evidence of opposite pair dual coordination of objects as a function of their observation. such that; the inverse square of space-time dilation of two opposite observers is just relative to the observer, and thus it is also opposite. Such that Sb = Sb/√Sb(+.-) Where Sb is the absolute space-time between two observers. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Are you aware that not all forces follow the inverse square law? How do you account for that?<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> </b> ………Iam not aware! Please help me with just a single example backed by statistical observational analysis and consistent mathematical proof. While we are on the subject of forces why is there no paired force for gravity? First of all, let me first try and make the gravitation force definition simple as observed by our ordinary experience. This is the force which a given body (A) exalts on another body say (B) as a function of their velocities (i.e. this is the force which the velocity of object A exalts on the velocity of object B). This is the central story behind the expansion of the universe. Gravitation is also subject to opposite pair duality - the concave and convex gravitation. Dark mater is responsible for convex gravitation and ordinary matter is responsible for concave gravitation. and because dark matter is 2:1 of ordinary matter, this explains the continual expansion of the universe. And it is this attraction between the convex gravitation of dark matter and the concave gravitation of ordinary matter that accounts for the motion of solar objects and perhaps the motion of universal objects. Quote 6) the opposite pair variability used in economic computations like; input along output,costs along benefits, productions along consumption,saving along expenditure,demand along supply etc These pairings are more a consequence of the ease with which two variables can be represented on a two dimensional sheet of paper. With the advent of computer analysis three-dimensions and higher are being used for more sophisticated analysis. Indeed, long before computers ternary diagrams were being used to illustrate rock compositions based on three components. ………..Whether three dimension or multidimensional, they all subject to dual group isomorphism and cohomology whose proportional coefficient determinant is modulus 1 Quote 7) the philosophical foundation that is based on two opposite pair variables; that is observation along conceptualization. This is only one of the many artifical ways of dividing up the cognitive process. The alleged match is meaningless. ………..what do you mean by “artificial”? are you trying to mean that because it is artificial no theory is capable of explaining its flow structure and applicability?<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 8) the ontological dilemma that is solved by the univaso theory of existence based on two opposite pairs; that is coordination along relativity <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">I know English is not your native language, but you please make an effort to write sentences that nake some kind of sense.<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> </b> ……….Thank you for this alert! And please keep it up. But what I mean is the ontological “questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences”. <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 10)the Turing machine instrument based on 0 and 1 Sure. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. ………….quite a good quotation of binary pedigree. but please try to apply it technically on the quoted details you aim to disprove<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 11) the psychological regulation instrument based on opposite pairs;that is hedonism and eudymonia Please. Now you are just being silly. There are many instruments of psychological study that are multi-dimensional. ……….dont you think that now you are becoming too emotional rather than demonstrating a higher degree of scientific competence? don’t you think that the many multi-dimensional instruments are either isomorphic or homomophic to hedonism and eudaimonia. Please just list few of those many multidimensional instruments you know. For us we promise to find where your basic problems lie so that we find a good doze of those problems for you.<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 12) the periodic table universal periodic table that is based on two opposite pair of chemical phases that is metals and non metals.instead of the classical one that is based on three chemical phases. The periodic table is not based upon metals and non-metal,. but upon a periodicity of properties when the elements are arranged according to their atomic weight. The clue is in the name periodic table. If there is any number present here it is eight. ……….“ The periodic table is a tabular display of the chemical elements, organized on the basis of their atomic numbers, electron configurations, and chemical properties” Wikipedia. The fundamental modulus manifold of this organization is based on metals and non metals with 2:1 topological constant ratio of their cohomology.<br style="mso-special-character: line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> Quote 13) the biological cellular pairs of opposite variability, that is eukaryotes and prokaryotes’ These are not opposites. Eukaryotes contain what were once prokaryotes. Since when did an opposite contain its opposite?<br style="mso-special-character: line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> ……….well informed! But that is just experimental assumption never backed by any consistent mathematical proof of scientific reasoning. If you have one please provide. but as far as universal theory is concerned, at a given point of their constituents; eukaryotes intersect with prokaryotes’ and this intersection is directly proportional to their relativity and inversely proportional to their coordination This obsession with breaking things down into pairings, yin and yang, life and death, true and false, is a human characteristic, not a characteristic of any deity. …….. I beg that you consider some revision over the group theory, category theory and field theory so that you get a fertile ground to disprove this obsession with breaking things down into pairings…..characteristic of any deity.

continue reading please. unless details fail to appear not until you have get an alternative mathematical and scientific proof that can disprove the facts and details we are giving a miracle is any article of absolute reality whose process of existence is absolutely violating the fundamental principles of grand unification of everything and the mathmatical laws of nature and its regulation.but when a new or extra article of reality is proved to exist with in the limits and boundaries of mathmatical laws of nature and the principles of grand unification of everything;in science we call it a discovery or an invention. God shall continue to do miracles in existence to prove that he is there and that he is the sole determiner of everything,man kind will continue to dig deep the mysteries of existence and discover new articles of reality or invent new alternative of existence in form of innovations. are we trying to make these least meaningful combination of English words quite meaningful

UNIVASO THEORY CONCEPTUALIZATION Allah says in the Qur'an that ''and of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability''.51:49…53:45 these verses reveal the following facts about nature and everything in particular as explained below: 1)that every thing is all but just different aspects of the same thing(i.e the universal hierarchy mechanism of opposite pair's variability). 2)that every thing regulates each other with a force that is inversely proportional to their coordination and directly proportional to their relativity. The above mentioned two facts about nature can be combined into a single natural fact that can explain everything within a single statement of natural law of existence and we say that;every thing is a function of a hierarchy of opposite pair's variability,whose reaction is directly proportional to their relativity and inversely proportional to their coordination. these facts can best be explained through their mathematical construction as formulated in the equations below: 1)(s/(1/(+ .-(√s) )=1 2)∂(s/(1/(- .+(√s) )))=1+or-1 3)s/(+ .-√s)=s 4) s(+ .-√s)=0 5) s(1/(+ .-(√s) )=infinity N.B, the dote that resembles the abbellian dot between the negative variable and the positive variable of the above equation is used as a universal operator.such that it allows to be substituted by any other mathematical operator so as long as the answer it provides equals to 1+or-1. in this case let us substitute this universal dot with addition and we substitute for example 25 for our complex s from the equation.this will equal to: 1)(25/(1/(+ .-(√25) =1 2)∂(25/(1/(- .+(√25) )))=1+or-1 3)25/(+ .-√25))=25 if these equations are correct,they bring us to one of the most taunting observations in nature,for examle: 1)the cosmological energy distribution ratio of 2:1 observed in the invisible energy ratio and dark energy ratio and the electromagnetic energy distribution ratio of the universal energy energy distribution 2)the quantum particle opposite variability sets from the negatively charged particles along with the positive ones,the neutrals along with the charged particles, the up quarks along with the down quark, the visible energy along with the invisible energy etc 3) the inverse square law observed in universal objects and force coordination 4) the math mathematical P=NP range that is equivalent to 0 and 1 because our equation out put of 1+or-1 is equivalent to 0 or 1 5)the 2:1 ratio of the square number provides the evidence for the non trivial zeros of the rein man zeta function which are located at the critical line of 1/2 etc

can you bet on this

because it is a scientific and mathematical instrument that can be used to prove the falsehood and truth of religious dogmas/beliefs and philosophical doctrines with in scientific framework.that is why we call it a theory of everything as the name suggests. of course it has a mathematical construction,only that there was a posting technical problem that is why the equation never appeared on the post. but in the mean time this mathematical detail can be useful. use a complex number s and divide it by the inverse square of s times positive plus negative. this will give u s divide by inverse square of negative s and positive s.if you substitute our complex s by for example 9,you will get something like 9 over bracket 1 over negative three plus positive three.this will give you 9 over 6 plus 3 which equals to 1.else 1+or-1=change in 1

Iam proud to inform all the mankind and especially members of the science forum that, the world's long waited most influential and most outstanding theory in the history of human civilization has been discovered.this theory is non other than the most accurate theory of everything or grand unification theory. its principle has been tested and approved to be the underlying principle of the universal gauge field.its underlying law has been tested and approved to be the universal law of energy regulation.and its formula has been tested and approved to be the universal equation. with it , we have managed to solve all the 6 remaining millennium problems. it was first disclosed through the univaso patent request papers filed to Uganda patent office and African regional intellectual property office on 27-9-2012 and upgraded to univaso P=NP patent amendment paper filed on 23-Oct-2012 application no.UG/P/2012/000005 in the names of sserubogo zaid. Iam considering unraveling the mystery of this theory through this forum as well as discussing its relevance and significance to everything.we shall begin by introducing its principle, its law and its equation and the solutions they provide to the remaining 6millenium prize problems i.e. the P verses NP, the Hodge conjecture,the Riemann hypothesis, the young-mills existence and mass gap, the birch and swinnerton dyer conjecture and the the nervier stocks existence and smoothness. I thank Allah who made this revelation in the Qur'an through his prophet Muhammad(SAW).i thank my family(mom,dad,brothers,sisters and relatives),i thank my colleagues at world Islamic research foundation.i thank my teachers, lecturers,ob's,og's and i thank all scientists world over and world to remember most notably Elbert Einstein and sir Isac newton. happy birth day to the world...................happy birth day to everything. N.B: specifically but not exclusive,we shall begin by disclosing the facts embedded within this invention about the millennium prize problems that; 1) P=NP 2)the navier-stocks existence and smoothness hypothesis is true 3)the young-mills existence and mass gap hypothesis is false 4) the rienman hypothesis is true 5) the birch and swinnerton dyer conjecture is true 6)the hogde conjecture is true Below is a sketch of the proof embedded with in the universal theory as far as the above claims are concerned: Allah says in the Qur'an that and of everything have we created pairs…of opposite variability. from the above fact,it has the following implication about nature and its regulation : 1)that ''every thing is all but just different aspects of the same universal hierarchy mechanism of opposite pair's variability'' 2)that every thing regulates each other with a force that is inversely proportional to the universal system coordination and directly proportional to its relativity The above mentioned two facts about nature can be combined into a single natural fact that can explain everything within a single statement of natural law of existence and we say that;every thing exists in a universal hierarchy mechanisms of opposite pair's variability,whose reaction is directly proportional to its relativity and inversely proportional to its coordination. this can best be explained the universal equation formulated from this law. such that; N.B, the dote that resembles the abellian dot between the negative variable and the positive variable of the above equation is used as a universal operator.such that it allows to be substituted by any other mathematical operator so as long as the answer it provides equals to 1+or-1 This equation has the mathematical power of transforming into another opposite equation with the ability of calculating almost everything as we shall be seeing. Details …………

as much as it has proved that P=NP, it is a fact that shows that it involves religion and philosophy.

iam proud to inform all the mankind and especially members of the science forum that, the world's long waited most influential and most outstanding theory in the history of human civilization has been discovered.this theory is non other than the most accurate theory of everything or grand unification theory. its principle has been tested and approved to be the underlying principle of the universal gauge field.its underlying law has been tested and approved to be the universal law of energy regulation.and its formula has been tested and approved to be the universal equation. with it , we have managed to solve all the 6 remaining millennium problems. it was first disclosed through the patent request papers made to uganda patent office and African regional intellectual property office in the names of sserubogo zaid. am considering unraveling the mystery of this theory through this forum as well as discussing its relevance and significance to everything.we shall begin by introducing its principle, its law and its equation and the solutions they provide to the remaining 6millenium prize problems i.e. the P verses NP, the Hodge conjecture,the Riemann hypothesis, the young-mills hypothesis, the birch and swinnerton dier conjecture and the wait for details please