Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU

That represent the main gravity. We can conclude that the temperature bring the superconductivity to report in gravity.

Hi David ! I'm happy to see you. It's really an exellent description. Otherwise from my point of view, the dark matter is the matter without charge. Cordially.

Good evening. I saw that as we talked about several topics. I wish therefore plublier that pattern below. Many thanks. asymmetry monodynamic ; pic link resized http://img4.hostingpics.net/pics/362657ArnaudAntoineANDRIEUasymmetry.jpg I must say that I drew this diagram. Cordially

Hello, but what you do "with the neutrino" ? In which classification we can put ? Only the energy can be faster. Otherwise why we call it energy ? Cordially.

Hello David, yes, i haven't grasped it. But I must first work on the translation before proceeding. I only have two or three links in French until. We keep abreast. Cordially. http://www.sur-la-toile.com/discussion-238257-150-Le-big-bang-peut-il-reculer-...html Dirac Sea : http://www.sur-la-toile.com/discussion-225671-50-E%253Dmc%25B2.html

hello juanrga. I knew you did it. This was to come to : "This mean that the "mass" it really set to work with the only value ² above". And more, I was wrong about that sentence. In fact It is the "distance" which operates ², and no "mass" in my example. Cordially.

suche [math]E= \sqrt{m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2}[/math] or [math]E^2 = {m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2}[/math] gives the linear momentum. I know that you know that, but for a massless particle the real ones are : (pictures below). This mean that the mass it really set to work with the only value ² above. So, for one photon we can say : 1 packet = λ (complete period of it) distance = d (m/s) E = λ d² 1 packet = "mass" or "massless" or "quantum" or "period" or "charge" ... = 1λ = 1 photon _______________________________ x = source E.utile = E - = energy E.effec. = d ¤ = photon packet = λ 1 photon : x----------¤ E = λd² 3 photons : x-------¤¤¤ E = (nλ)d² The following does work as 1λ = 4πω http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70028-the-mass-of-photon/page__st__40__p__714470#entry714470 In conclusion this means that the energy goes faster than the speed of light. Ev=1λc² and Ev=(nλ)c² _______________________________

From my point of view : 4π generate one packet : http://up.sur-la-toile.com/i16M6

That's means that the photon is the first representation of smallest of masses one photon = one packet = one quantum

we can also speak of charge to represent the mass of the energy. Not a charge to mass ratio ; but only the unique one "quantum" of mass. That represent one photon of course. That's mean that the photon is the first representation of smallest possible of mass Why not

Ok

Ok, no worries. Have a Nice Day.

I know that. But we talking about universe, and not How the earth been formed. kind the asteroid belt ...

First answer is Sun. (evident) But the real forces come from the heart of the galaxy. So ?

Of course everything undergoes the expansion kinetics ! it's the same if you do it with the Earth's core. Do you agree ? I know that the Solar system is not the best example ; because in addition to the kinetic, the earth orbit around the sun, and the Solar system around into the Galaxy. The more important is this story of the main expansion we follow.

The matter generate by the big-bang are handled by the following. Simply. Something like God ? I think this is one of the reasons that the neutrino can't catch. But the speed of it will be too high. We can imagine everything. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Albet Einstein.

Not really ; but this is not fake too ! The big-bang can be compared by a permanent supply source ?! But, at this moment the detonation is in a very short "time (for who ?)" .. and the distribution order that provides some galaxies one afer another. (The source can't create two things in the same time !) In the following and concluded : the final management of the galactic comportement (gravitationally bound system), seams guided by a magnetic field after their birth up. Be careful, there's only one point of departure. The big-bang. It's the main center of gravity too.

Good morning, happily ! happily too! Yes. But not in the same "time", or "system" Each Galaxy is an independent system. (time, speed, size, ..). and each own is a Son's big-bang. However, their journeys at present days, from at a old formations as lot's of multidirectional collisions --> after the big-bang --> until yet. And then a main direction was defined, or groups ... like said ACG52 : In terms of glactic groups, a gravitationally bound system is one in which the gravitational force is greater than expansion. The group remains roughly together and moves in a common direction. Cordialy

oups, I'm really sorry for that. These writings are the worst I wort. of course the source of gravity (magneto-field above) works with the entropic forces. That's it. Cordialy

knowing that the photon dose only the visible face "in eyes" .. the rest work as well (invisible frequencies has any level we can imagine ..

This is true. And undeniable, I think that the realy origine provide form an electromagnétic field ; represeting the "field of energy". This electromagnétic field is a hypothetical integrated vector. It will represent the 5th type of element (invisible) and the source mechanic (mathematics). This is purely theoretical ! This "electro-field" above, can simply be the photons by example...

Exactly. In French (again) I call this hypothetical particle "magnéto-particule". It represent the energie. Of course. It represent the effective "charge" moving in the time. In the same way as the fusion of law. Cordialy.

Hi, It's the same théory in France : http://www.sur-la-toile.com/discussion-240551-10-Densite-des-trous-noirs..html With this French Doc Too !! Erik Verlinde : The Gravity doesn't exist http://astronad.voila.net/La_gravite_n_existe_pas.htm (picture : Erik Verlinde) of course this work with the Entropic Force (inside the doc above, we have m1 m2 G r too)

The x-rays/light can create a "piece of matter" with it opposite ? interesting

It can be the same object in the same time. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/69831-could-particles-with-intrinsic-properties-explain-quantum-gravity/page__p__711731#entry711731 ____________________________________________ Literally "nothing" can really mean "nothing". But "nothing" in the subatomic world mean "energie (invisible)". ____________________________________________