Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU

What about the Quantum field theory ? the pic Feynmann_Diagram_Gluon_Radiation below from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory compared directly to electron energies.

Even-if during ?

Why we call the Sun, Sun ?

the same like the "Small signal gain equation" in the stimulated emission (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulated_emission)

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70967-gravity-and-the-higgs/ I think the strings creates quantum gravity. The values works as ² for each vectors. update pattern ; for one photon during emission :

Hi Daedaus. These [math]2\pi[/math] more represent the anti-matter phases. They are twin's fonctions. if you want more info about that system (theoretical), please cick the following link : Thank you. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70967-gravity-and-the-higgs/

Last one in the series. Please feel free to add your comments. Thank you.

The charge(s) setting in the first "half-spin" in advance of the time and in the relative to it twin, Create this principle of causality "of it".

Hi Michel. The question is "how do you interpret divided units?" Divided unit and compartment : a little bit words in french..

Hello. As we are in this speculative field, I wish in the coming days, to complete this thread about this story of asymmetry. I also hope that I'll not be the only one to address the issue. ______________________________________ From my point of view : The asymmetry is already a normal phenomenon. The flatness (perfect planeity) is the evidence of the total inactivity (lack of energy as we know it). This planeity are these strings at rests (string to therory). Based on wikipedia, I begin by giving some references below. If you know of others please feel free to supplement. Dirac sea : however, difficulties arise when effects of the electromagnetic field are considered, because a positive-energy electron would be able to shed energy by continuously emitting photons, a process that could continue without limit as the electron descends into lower and lower energy states. Real electrons clearly do not behave in this way. Dirac's solution to this was to turn to the Pauli exclusion principle. The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously : any number of identical bosons can occupy the same quantum state, as with, for instance, photons produced by a laser and Bose-Einstein condensate. With a single-valued many-particle wavefunction is equivalent to requiring the wavefunction to be antisymmetric. An antisymmetric two-particle state is represented as a sum (Superposition principle) of states in which one particle is in state |x> and the other in state |y> and antisymmetry under exchange means that A(x,y) = −A(y,x). This implies that A(x,x) = 0, which is Pauli exclusion. It is true in any basis, since unitary changes of basis keep antisymmetric matrices antisymmetric, although strictly speaking, the quantity A(x,y) is not a matrix but an antisymmetric rank-two tensor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiparticle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

hi swansont. You're right. I told my story. I assure you I did not mean it at all. just this new was not a surprised to me. I had given the reasons that I should not have detail in this thread. Really sorry. Sincerely

This is the proof of the direct evidence than the energy owing provides that quantum entanglement (mono checkpoint bounds at only one database) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement I had already started to understand the system since a long time now. It's the information that I expected, and expect more in the coming weeks. The entanglement is the constitutional basis I had settled in my writings in French. The problem that the French refuse, is that I include a hypothetical particle up to millions of times the speed of light. Yes this reprensente the "particle's energy". We have let time take Its course. I say that for me ; we are not press. Friendly. Arnaud Ps : however the last time the same story has cost me one "point" here : http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70595-what-generates-gravity/page__st__20__p__714153#entry714153

I think that unexpected phenomenon described further is a normal ranges. In any case I'm really not surprised of this result observed : “Somehow they fly at the same direction even though it's not clear how they can communicate their direction with one another. That has surprised many people, including us,” This means that the energy goes faster than light.

Higgs boson 2 ?

Hi, The thermal radiation from the merger, isn't already proportional to the force of gravity ? (gravitational merger on wiki in Interacting galaxy)

Hi. Yes, the wireless electricity transmission is simply Impossible. Technically speaking.

Hello, wholesale to describe it to quickly, the vector draw the path of the tensor. Cordially.

The 18°x4 or 4pi started me thinking about one constant 3/7 :

it is clear, the laws of the hhh is a true false discovery

Hi, This is a great idea. That works as you say. The tense string that you represent (position) is the line of gravity zero and the perfect planeity. After, a piece of energy (bit), just hit to come the string at rest. It is what you have demonstrated and it's waht I think too. This is the same rules as "energetic intensity" http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/69831-could-particles-with-intrinsic-properties-explain-quantum-gravity/page__view__findpost__p__713748

Hello. but that already works like this (Dirac sea). The perfect planeity of M1 represent the strings to rest. The strings are the centre of gravity, because in first they are stretched. I'll be careful. Thank you.