RDemelo

"Jupiter is an Electron" theory Checkout the video: http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=ucRuZ9lKM0s not my best video, but its the content that matters. Download a tangible document explaining this: http://www.gpofr.com/portal/SharedFilesDownload.aspx?pageid=10&fileid=13&mid=25

Hi Everyone, http://www.gpofr.com This is a link to my theoretical physics paper (ebook) I've been working on for sometime. Hope you enjoy it and please feel free to pass it along to friends who might find it interesting. Its still very much a work in progress and my first attempt at writing an ebook. What is contains I believe it to be very significant. Just to point this out, my new relativistic mass equation presented in the book equates the relativistic mass of Jupiter to the value of an electron charge which is 1.6x10^-19 C (exactly). It was something I did not expect to find but the new equation was the one that gave me insight into this relationship which was the catalyst why I wrote this book. The new relativistic mass equation was derived using the Reality Scale value of S which remarkably related to the speed of light and Euler's mathematical constant and was further derived from a new relativistic mass-density equation. Essentially mass-gravity at the celestial scale is equal to charge at the quantum scale. To understand how this derived, download a copy of the ebook its absolutely free. NOTE: The book is a collection of many theories so heads up. None of these theories negate any of our current physics so this isn't a claim to have discovered or toppled current physics. Some of these theories have yet to be tested. The only discovery that I find extremely hard to disprove is the one mentioned above. It was discovered accidently based on the initial premise (theory) that our solar system is relative to a Beryllium atom and is the reason I wrote the paper. someone wrote to me: I agree, the book is full of many theories and many will disagree. Its a book so I filled it with many of my mature (heavily worked on) and young theories to allow for a more entertaining experience. But the important thing is that the derived calculation above is hard to ignore which I believe helps support my theory of real relative realities where celestial and quantum realms are relative equals. The other theories which I believe also holds considerable merit is my theory on gravity and distortion where there's many experiments that can be conducted to verify its validity. Regarding the number 42: basically I summarized all my theories in the book into many principles hence the title of the book, but many of these principles were inter-related so after grouping them together I ended up with 39. Then I realized was missed a few which finally ended up at the number 42. I'm still currently researching, working and expanding on my theories so 42 principles might end up being more in the end. True, the Beryllium atom relation to our Solar System might arise criticism but the derived values are again very hard to ignore which strengthens my initial premise (theory). I just wanted to share this information. The wrost that can happen is that I'll be dismissed or ignored, but I'd seriously ask everyone to look at the numbers. There's no harm in that. I don't understand what you meant by "Why not let things skip a few scales?" Can you elaborate?

Hi All! My name is Robert from Toronto Canada.