CPL.Luke

couple of things: (in order of when I thought of them) 1. are you familiar with the copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics or the path integral that richard feynman proposed? these solve the problem of what consciousness is and observation, by showing that the mathmatical model they have can predict the actions of subatomic particles ie. "shut up and calculate"- richard feynmann 2. You are thinking of a very old and out of date big bang model. the modern inflation theory of the big bang proposes that the universe sprung out of a false vaccuum

thankyou for the latex

those clouds are actually probability waves of where the particle could be.

alright so I have a textbook on quantum mechanics that I'm going through and it comes to the schrodinger equation and tells me to use a wavefunction equal to [math]f(x)exp(-iEt/hbar)[/math] I insert that into the schrodinger equation wich is i* hbar *(partial derivative of the wavefunction with respect to t) = -hbar^2 /2m *(the second partial derivative of the wave function with respect to x) it said that this simplified to P.S. sorry about latex Ill play with it and see if I can figure out how to work it d^2 f(x)/dx^2 + (k^2)f(x)=0 this simplification shouldn't work this way because the wave function is of the form X(x)Y(y) right?

or they all have factors that are between 1 and 10

did you check for primes

In 2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. -from survive 2012.com the only way the earth could start rotating in the other direction within the course of a year is if some massive torque was applied to the earth. (this is not going to happen)

but just out of curiosity are the two fields directly analougous? as gravity does not have a sign

you could expand on the impedance bit though...

does anybody know what it is? or how to derive it? or where to start? and would this be right closed surface integral of (g da) =m encompassed the trick would be to know what constant to put under m my guess for that would be 1/(G4pi)=C as that would create a constant that could be plugged back in and get the law of universal gravitation so the final equation would be closed surface integral of (g da) =mass enc/ C

how active is the field of quantum physics

anywbody care for a detailed explanation of what that means. I am not fully able to wrap my head around an imaginary number in a real world situation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_law

closed surface integral of E differential a =charge encompassed / epsilon not (leaving it to someone who can do latex to re-write that) it has to do with electromagnetism in its native form it is the basic natural law that governs electrostatics. It can be redone for magnetism but its equal to zero (just tells you that there is no basic charge of magnetism. it can also be re-written to epsilon not (flux e)= q encompassed

yes

how do you deal with an object that has imaginary energy (a particle moving faster than light) in the theoretical context of course

is there a gauss's law for gravity? I mean that as an equivalent law that deals with gravity

or just put probes between the earth and moon, there are places where the gravity of the earth and the moon cancel eachother out but that is simple classical mechanics

just because quantum field theory used a different kind of mathmatics to define space and time than GR did, you can't call it the future.

isn't it true that there's nothing that can shield gravity thus a two slit experiment could not be carried out. furthermore how would you detect where the gravitons are hitting (in order to see the iterference pattern)

actually GR predicts that any region of space with negative pressure would possess gravity that pushes rather than pulls. (that is the inflationary model of the big bang)

Christ slave are you familiar with occams razor? if not it is the idea that the explanation with the fewest assumptions is almost always right (paraphrased) in your idea of a hollow earth you havn't provided any mechanism for the formation of a hollow earth, nor any reason why it could exist. nor any evidence that any of this is needed. you are currently assuming a huge portion of your idea. according to occams razor the previous standing theories about planet formation and gravity and whatnot would be considered correct. by the way have you read Journey To The Center Of The Earth by Jules Vearne(sp) its a good book, that talks about very similar things.

yeah read some of the stuff done by one Allen Guth specifically relating to his work on false vaccuums. Fasle vacuums are supposed regions of negative pressure and thus negative gravity. supposedly these are what created the universe

magnetic monopoles don't exist (to all experimental evidence) now according to special relativity neither does magnetism. it is charge in motion or electrodynamics. to pieces of wire with a current running through them attract because either wire sees the other as being positively charged (lorentz contraction of protons)

how is this relevant?