Xittenn

The principle however interesting is not entirely relevant to the question because it assumes that need is directly proportional to demand. The need for scientists can be far overshadowed by the profitability in these ventures hence no demand. So we could very well need scientists to advance the technology but have a complete unwillingness to venture on account of an nonexistent profit margin. If the SRATC is too great so that the LRATC is far from seeing its return to scale we will see firms never opening to begin with. My personal stance on this now is I will pursue my degree as a Double Major Math and Computer Science and I will work in planning and analysis. As I grow I will open the industry as I see fit under the condition that I can perform such activity. I believe that current markets are competitive under the current market situation, but at the same time I believe that the current market is in its current position because it is underdeveloped and requires a new perspective.

I'm OK with that, until someone informs me of a reason that I should not be! I think the real point of the statement though is that these are observations made with respect to natural phenomena and not conjecture that needs to be disseminated. An appropriate response to this model would be to show through observation that the conclusion made is in fact incorrect as opposed to trying to correct through conjecture. As always correct me if I'm saying something that is wrong.

As long as the participants have a mature understanding of what they are engaging in I don't see why this should ever be an issue. In fact I would be pretty upset if I met the love of my life and it was of extraterrestrial speciation and some other party demanded that I cease and desist.

Sweet . . . I do love to boogy on a Saturday night! Today I feel more like this though:

Astute observation old chap . . . Dubstep and the Trance/Rave genres do employ this very technique in their formal presentation. Often in a live performance the artist will push into these frequencies at a climatic point in their set such that its audience is subjected to a very similar response. The difference here is usually in the coherence of the pattern of which the brain must analyze, where in Dubstep and more so Trance/Rave this tends to be highly coherent and therefore the response tends to in turn be more coherent and often more pleasant. In this case its sort of a pleasurable pain . . .

I believe the reason for this relates to threshold of hearing. The closer a sound comes to the upper limit of frequency range of human hearing the more irritating it becomes. In the case of chalk, a broad spectrum of tones are generated near this threshold which mar the nervous system. The reaction is most likely a neural response in the midbrain and medulla, possibly a nervous response that is generated by a filter in the cortex that says I can't identify this sound please respond!

I think what most of you don't understand is that [math] mc^2 [/math] is the impulse generated by one photon which derives an equivalent amount of work measured in joules (J) the units of energy! That is very poor wording on my part . . . It is an observed . . . Experiments had shown that light exerted pressure i.e. impulse and this related to the energy of the photon by E=pc and hence E=mc^2 . . . .

Vicarious - by ~xittenn Vicarious, I just needed oust of my place Replace, my distaste, with bitter sweet sounds of sentence Relentless, you ripped out pages from the book to hook your message to the masses I'm still choking on your wake, sound quakes boom my ears like you boxed 'em I regret to this day, I slay myself for winning but hey Regretless keeps me busy, Revered steady Reverent in days of decay light years away, It's not over yet 'K, you slay me, funny thing I slay me too Remember sitting in a patio chair, lavishly in a patio chair, sipping lemonade Reality laughing learily about his moor or mood, too much food for thought pro-wrought his digestion No connection to Retirement, Reflection on pension or eternal ascension to becoming Vicarious . . . .

I'm still tripping on that wave daddy-o! My obsequence is remitting me to past performances and redressed mentality . . . . backwards compatibility will only serve to preserve, not conserve, all that I call identity in a formal nature, a manner of self denial . . . . why am I on trial?

This isn't a simple answer question in any way. If I were to break this down into bullets it would look something like: - amino acids mixed to form chains, RNA evolves - viral like thingies, or subviral agents, float around doing not much of anything but keep organizing into new and more complex structures - the lipid bilayer is formed and thus the cell membrane - asexual reproduction evolves - bacteria evolves, as does sexual reproduction - eukaryote cells known as protists evolve because some bacteria engulf other bacteria and form a symbiotic relationship; these engulfed cells become organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts - slime molds, various species of protists, cover the world - other forms of protists develop into alga - alga take on an organized structure that resembles tissue specialization but is classified as multicellular colonial - alga reproduce by sporangia that produce zoospores by meiosis, gametes that in turn either produce an egg (female gamete) or sperm (male gamete), which when the sperm fertilizes the egg a zygote is formed . . . . - alga in shallow waters adapt to withstand dessication, terrestrial migration occurs - cell specialization results in tissue and organ formation; true multicellular organisms evolve - plants evolve two modes of reproduction, classification angiosperm and classification gymnosperms; angiosperms are flowering plants, where gymnosperms are like pine cones and variants; each has its own sexually reproductive gametes that specialize or adapt to better the survival of the species and so on . . . . - fungi develop from another form of protist and so do animals; these two share a common ancestor . . . I really hope this isn't homework, the mods might have my head . . on a platter . . they might anyway, some of the things I've stated as fact might be debated by many or all or anybody but myself, I'm pretty content with the outline . . .

There is plenty of research into the imaging of neural transmitters and their 'biological emissions' using various forms of Raman Spectroscopy, but most of these are invasive in one way or another. I don't see why you are going on about the secret services and brain imaging scanners as this would be no more effective than taking a picture of the skull cap itself under the current restrictions of medical technologies. Your post is really off on some weird tangent, I think that if you did some proper research into the matter you would find what it is you are hoping to see--quite in contrast to what your last three paragraphs suggest.

Realistically speaking the actions of trees are like God crying backwards--or Zeus whatever meets your budget constraint! I am a pseudorandom noise generator, not quite unlike the arm . . . .

Since when is being cool about being efficient?

The Standard Model for Particle Physics!

Questions Questions Questions Can Working Wings Be Grafted on a Human? [Answered: NO]

much better than Java! +1 all I have is a base64 converter . . . . which is irrelevant, so I won't post it . . .

As you wish, but over GPU and graphically!

I left it fairly open to interpretation, but regardless feel free to not challenge yourself!

It's a non issue! With respect to my outburst I had reasons to assume there was an 'issue' and I was assured that this was in fact not the case, and so I am truly sorry to everyone for being pissy. I don't expect that people know anything I just ask that if they do and there is an issue that it be kept to the bearer. I opened this thread to give whoever a place to discuss their reasonings about such issues and here would be a great place to voice them, as opposed to in reply to threads where the issue is in fact irrelevant. But yes I was buttacup; also PrettyFlower, Ranunculus, Uncia, JolieFleur, Wuz_Here and so on. . .. . . . some of the names were from chat . . .

Nobody read the thread about my surgery issue or the few blurbs I posted about my younger years? I know it was mostly the #SFN crowd that was aware but I had thought for sure the FSH thread and the vein thread had raised some flags. Not that anyone should read these but Kin selection and homosexuality Fat Graphs Exposed Veins FSH effects on hair growth There were others some more specific some less--like I wouldn't expect anyone to make the connection with fat grafts but. My English has improved substantially, no? I think sometimes my posts go unnoticed . . . No one calls me Sir or he or anything male anymore, I think the breast augmentation did the trick. I must say this final step has seen my life normalize and it has been nice to relax a little.

awwwwwww so cute . . . I whistle like that freaks people out they don't know where it's coming from . . . .

I've got one . . . . implement the Riemann [math] \zeta [/math] function over GPU .. . . use any method you wish but the result should be a colour animation of some sort!

It's funny that you all say I'm so brave but it was never something that took me any of my courage. I honestly believed most everyone here had already known, and in terms of me growing up with the issue it was just how I was. If my parents didn't like it well we weren't ever that close to begin with, and in the end they weren't at all affected by it. My mother is a religious nutter, but she is involved with the non-denominational christian church and they tend to be a little more live and let god sort it out--and by this they tend to mean god is forgiving. Actually come to think of it I'm probably so relaxed about it myself because the people I grew up with were very down to earth christian folk quite unlike the stereotype. They did their day to day and attended church on Sundays and enjoyed potluck. I guess what I'm saying is I'm just nobody special and if I ever become someone special I want it to be because I did something special in the sciences, not because I stood up and made a social statement. But again I appreciate the sentiments and I thank you keenidot for seeing things differently and acting accordingly, I'm just a person not a social or economic threat or a threat of any other form for that matter.

I think they were actually horse-men in Alice in Wonderland . . . .