Humblemun

I've made a qualitative prediction for the Juno flyby anomaly expected on Oct 9th 2013. That's not long to wait. Here's a recent article which is potentially on the same lines as my own ideas: MOND predicts dwarf galaxy feature prior to observations - Also indicates gravity fields vary where dark matter presumes uniformity

Yes, this is the way forward imv.

ok

I doubt whether it was the same as my own worldview. More likely your rash judgement of an apparent similarity was enough for the comment "with exactly the same mechanism as yours".

I've probably said too much on the matter already.

The testing of relativity given in the OP relies on atomic clocks which rely on atomic theory, which is the modelling of the atom in isolation.

I don't think it was me. Can you direct me to it please?

It might happen if science moves on in a new and unexpected direction.

That was the Wikipedia engineering example of the discipline. My Professor of Simulation Modelling used to solve problems of big multi-national companies. One story involved the problem a company was having with oil tankers worldwide, trying to make them as profitable as possible. Eventually after much research and modelling the problem was found to be the harbour masters taking "back handers" for a quicker entry into port. There's certain problems which are better suited to simulation modelling and some better suited to mathematical modelling.

I prefer the acetone production hypothesis by Brian J Ford Professor's breakthrough on human combustion theory but with the trigger being an intermittent force from exotic fluid matter at the Earth's core. There was an interesting Daily Mail article on the subject just recently Can a baby just burst into flames? This child is claimed to have spontaneously combusted FOUR times. Crazy? A new theory offers a tantalising explanation.

Shouldn't you two be on the bickering site?

Fluid exotic matter which intermittently emits force particles which interact with fluids to create an anomaly with an acceleration towards the surface with a lateral deviation to the left. It's my solution for the 777 crash at San Franscisco Airport just recently: Autothrottle Function Probed in Asiana 777 Crash

Wow, you're making approximations about myself. I've said elsewhere that I'm very respectful of the need for mathematics and that it is complementary to simulation modelling.

Most people on here seem more than sure that Newton's and Einstein's continued works are the real deal. Newton assumed that the Earth is composed of entirely the same kind of matter found on the surface. I've deduced that fluid exotic matter exists around the central core. The foundations of the modern mainstream theory of gravity is way to simplistic for me to take seriously. "Time" is a factor within these potentially very flawed equations.

They certainly don't have one for the nucleus that I've seen which makes me think they have a full understanding of the inner most workings of structure. As my Professor of Simulation Modelling used to say, when you're 90% sure of something is when you are at your most dangerous.