Jump to content

wvbig

Senior Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wvbig

  1. wvbig

    Bigfoot?

    There is a video on the homepage of my website athttp://steventitchenell.tripod.com/wvbig that shows Mr. Chilcutt & Dr. Meldrum talking about their discoveries. There is also info about hair analysis & the Skookum cast on http://www.bigfootencounters.com The 1785 date comes from the documentary "Oregon Bigfoot" There may be more info on that on http://www.oregonbigfoot.com Besides these last two links, there are many other links on my website that contain lots of info. P.S. For more info on Dr. Meldrum's discoveries, you can read his book "Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science" Such as?
  2. wvbig

    Bigfoot?

    I believe Bigfoot exists for the following reasons: 1)There have been sighting reports by European settlers dating back to 1785 & I fail to see why, or even how, someone could come up with such a creature before the discovery of the Gorilla. 2)There have been at least 20 hair samples found that, after much analysis (Years in some cases) & compaeison to hair samples of known animals, have defied identification by Biologist Dr. Henner H. Fahrenbach. These are hairs found in the vicinity of reported sightings & discoveries of alleged Bigfoot tracks. Dr. Fahrenbach has determined these hairs to be primate & always absent of a medulla. 3)There are also scat samples that have, so far, defied identification. 4)There have been casts of alleged Bigfoot tracks found to contain dermal ridges. These were found by a forensic expert in fingerprint analysis with the Conroe, Texas police department named Jimmy Chilcutt. Mr. Chilcutt is also an expert in non-human primate fingerprint analysis who set out to debunk the legend of Bigfoot. 5)After years of intense scrutiny, including a two-ponged analysis in 2006, the Patterson/Gimlin film from 1967 has never been debunked. The first prong of the two-pronged analysis in 2006 concluded that a person couldn't replicate the walk of the subject of the film. The second prong was a frame-by-frame microscopic analysis of the film that failed to find any trace of a costume whatsoever. 6)There are alleged Bigfoot vocalizations recorded in the vicinity of other Bigfoot evidence that have, so far, defied identification. 7)Dr. Jeff Meldrum has studied numerous track casts & has noted such things as a mid-tarsal break & varying gaps between the toes of two or more casts from the same trackway. This of course indicates a flexible, living foot. 8)The Skookum Cast: The Skookum Cast is a plaster cast of an impression made in mud of a Bigfoot lying down to retreive an apple from the middle of the muddy area. Hair found in the impression was determined through microscopic analysis, by Dr. Fahrenbach, to be primate & one part of the impression was determined by the late Dr. Daris Swindler, to be the Achilles tendon of a large primate. What do you all think?
  3. Hi, I just joined this forum in hopes of finding more open minds here than at the last science forum I belonged to:-)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.