Ironic Steel

So, a thoughts been lodged in my head for awhile that I'd like to discuss, to see if it's taken as common knowledge or as a revolutionary point of view. From my perspective, the speculations of a "Gravitron" somewhere in matter isn't right, mainly because light has no room to cary it with it as it's doing loops in spacetime. So, Einsteins theory of relativity shows that spacetime bends around matter; isn't that gravity right there? What if spacetime is a fabric, a three dimensional fabric laced by strings, and matter is an obstruction to this fabric, a sort of cosmic tumor? (not going for a nilhist perspective on this one, trust me) lets say that, theoretically, this fabric IS the ultimate form of the space that permeates the entire universe. Now lets say that, out of nowhere, two sphereical objects pop into existence, inside the fabric. Since the fabric was probably (thought, still speculative) Completely still before this disruption, how would the strings affect these two objects? Completely still, the strings (I'm also speculating on how fast time would travel at "0" speed, since we're all constantly moving whether we like it or not.) would have to make way for these objects (make way for the infinitesimial specks of matter that cannot allow a string simply to "pass through it" I like to think of matter in this respect as a peg maze, and the fabric of space time as a 3-d grid of metal balls flowing at a constant rate (chinese scientists say the speed of G is the speed of light, I wonder why <.< I know what they're [not a conspiracy here F.Y.I.] attempting to formulate and I want to get my 2 cents in before they do) this grid of metal balls finds the matter as a peg maze, and from all directions it flows through easily (these metal balls can go through each other) though, not as easily as the strings flowing around it. This phenomena would be unobservable if there were not two objects, as my speculation is that the strings running through object one reach object 2 slightly different that the balls from other directions. So, Gravitation is not a force, but a lack of a force, as the "pressure" so to speak of the entire universal fabric is disturbed only between these two objects. Now, the trampoline effect so to speak all around a 3-d object is an illusion that can take your eyes off the prize in this case; that would only happen if there was matter all around another peice of matter, as whats present in our universe. So, take for example the earth. it isn't a force that keeps the moon magnetically attracted to us, but a normal, constant force coming from all directions except ours that keeps it in it's place. This would signify that spacetime is not an empty graph to be filled, but a graph whose lines move with it's contents. Now, onto black holes. Say that the peg maze and balls concept is not too far fetched to be a theoretical model. Now, a supermassive star, with a very detailed pegmaze, collapses. These pegs rapidly move together, becoming more dense, and the spacetime fabric of balls flowing through it (the balls are representations of the tips of the fabrics strings) gains, seemingly, more friction, less balls pass through (not lost, just "late") and an even greater disturbance occurs, until the pegs form an impassable 3-d sphere. Now, the Pressure of the entire spacetime fabric is on this sphere, as it was never fully aimed at the tiny pegs themselves. Now you have a conundrum, where the pegs can't break (at all) and the force can't stop; the unstoppable force of the entire universe put against the immovable object of the basic building blocks of the former star. Now, what exactly happens is something that i can't guess at with the non-existant (literately) funding that I get involved with black hole research, but if the very center of this phenomena was completely cut off from the fabric of space time, then YES, the gravity would approach the speed of light, the disturbance would be a missing piece of the entire fabric! Either existing as a rip in the space time, or a column on which its weight is supported, This could be the connection between "0" force (what i like to refer to as the state of an object completely at rest) and "c" fore (an object at the speed of light) The connection between all time in a single event, and no time in an infinite amount of spacetime. I guess I'll stop the speculations now, cause I'm not looking to be bashed on my intelligence, but only bashed on how this theory (speculation, whatever) cannot hold up in the law of the universe.