subhumn

“Free World” is a Cold War–era term often used by the U.S. and its allies to describe those countries that were not in the sphere of influence of, or allied with communist states, particularly the Soviet Union or the People’s Republic of China, but which showed a strong commitment to ideologies of liberalism and capitalism. It is often used interchangeably with “First World”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_World The term usually refers to countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, France, West Germany, and organizations such as the European Union and NATO. In addition, the “Free World” includes the Commonwealth realms, Japan, Israel, and India. The “Leader of the Free World” is a colloquialism, first used during the Cold War, to describe either the United States or the President of the United States. The term, when used in this context, suggests that the United States is the principal democratic superpower, and the U.S. President is, by extension, the leader of the world’s democratic states, i.e. the “Free World”. Why exactly do we have a leader of the free world? This makes the word “free” redundant. Shouldn’t we have a democratic free world system? Every country in the free world is democratic, why is the free world system not democratic? The free world is a dictatorship. Why cant other countries have a say in the decisions of the free world? I am an Australian Christian and this means I am part of the free world and led by the United States of America. I like the United States but unfortunately they are mixing religions in their government. The USA in 1999 is under the same degree of Jewish domination that Weimar Germany was under in 1929 and now its 2013. http://rense.com/general59/sdom.htm Almost every country in the free world is Christian and there is a reason for this and for not mixing religions in government. Religions have very different agendas, their own agendas and they fight with each other on issues that are written in stone. Its well known that the Jewish leaders crucified Jesus and unfortunately they will be persecuted forever because of this. As a result they cannot lead against Christians because they cannot be a respected enemy against Christians and there is much tension between them. The Jewish choose not to convert to Christianity because of their pride and they continue to be persecuted. At present it appears that the Christians and the Jewish get along in the United States but they have now set precedent. It is a well known fact that the United States is enemy with Islamic countries through their war on terrorism. Are Islamics now allowed to take positions in government in the United States? It doesn’t seem so, but the Jewish are? Have the Christians now taken side with the Jewish in the United States? It seems that the United States government does not understand the permanent tensions between religious groups and they are starting to lose their Christian image. You cant be a Jewish-Christian government, it doesn’t make sense. The Jewish believe Jesus never happened and the Christians believe that the Jewish leaders crucified Jesus. Christians hate Muslims and Jews, Muslims hate Christians and Jews, Jews hate Christians and Muslims. Mixing religions is a recipe for disaster. The Jewish in the United States secretly lead the Christian free world. We need a democratic free world system. The United States of America has 8,500 nuclear weapons and Russia has 10,000 nuclear weapons. What exactly do they propose to do with that many nuclear weapons? I cant understand why anyone would require that many nuclear weapons. Why is it that Australia has no nuclear weapons? Does the leader of the free world acknowledge Australia as an ally? Australia has aided the United States in several wars. World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, First Gulf War, Iraq War and Afghanistan War. It would be nice to at least have a few nukes. Israel has a Jewish based government, 80 nuclear weapons and the Jewish now secretly lead the free world. Is there co-operation between the United States and Israel on nuclear weapons? Israel is part of free world. Where does Israel sit in the free world hierarchy in comparison to Australia? Pre-1948, Israel was called Palestine and was shared. In 1948 the Jewish were given Palestine and they changed its name to Israel. Those that were not Jewish to the south of the country were boxed into the Gaza Strip. Those that were boxed in were called Palestinians. This is not how I would classify a free country because they are placing a minority group in a closed area and in effect taking away their freedoms. Should we tell Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad to isolate and box in the people his government is fighting so that they could join the free world also? The free world is labeled “free” but the free world has certain issues with freedom. Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was “nearly obsessed” with obtaining nuclear weapons to prevent the Holocaust from recurring and wanted Einstein, Oppenheimer and Teller to help him obtain nuclear weapons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel I wonder why David was so obsessed? Is it because of the endless cycle that the whole world and the innocent Jews need to be put through time and time again? Its simple David, you don’t need nukes, you don’t need Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, you just convert to Christianity, put Jesus on the end of your faith and it wont happen again. You cant exist as a religion if your religion is responsible for crucifying a respected prophet, or in this case with Jesus, the Son of God. Israel is considered the “Holy Land”, the birth place and burial site for many religious prophets. Jesus was both in Bethlehem, lived in Nazareth and was crucified in Jerusalem. Israel has quite a lot of religious significance to Christians, Muslims and Jews. If you look through the history books there has been countless wars over this land, so it is inevitable that there will be war there once again. This time though, it may be nuclear. The Jewish-Israelis now have 80 nukes and the United States is now a Jewish-Christian government. I predict an utter catastrophe. Richard Dunn <link removed by staff>

The ENMOD treaty is specifically intended to prevent use of the environment as a means of warfare by prohibiting the deliberate manipulation of natural processes in order to protect the environment because these modifications could produce phenomena such as hurricanes, tidal waves or changes in climate. Unfortunately environmental modification can be used outside of conflict without any knowledge its occurrence. Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Techniques – United Nations Treaty (Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977) http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/treaty.pdf The treaty created a list of phenomena that could result from the use of environmental modification techniques (this list is sourced from the United Nations Treaty above): “earthquakes and tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ozone currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer and changes in the state of the ionosphere.” I have found a document which was written by NASA. The document is labeled “The Importance of Understanding Clouds” (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/understandingclouds.pdf The document explains that clouds regulate the planets average temperature and help to spread the suns energy evenly over the earths surface. The article also quotes: “Even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human-produced aerosols, or other factors associated with global change.“ Environmental modification has a great deal more of an effect on climate than carbon. The scientific community has not acknowledged the existence of another defining argument for climate change, weather and environmental modification. The reason for this is that governments hide the existence and developments of their weather modification programs and the media is reluctant to publish anything relating to this topic. Have you ever seen a front page story in your national newspaper on weather modification and its effect on climate? Have you ever seen a prime time segment on any world news network on weather modification and its effect on climate? It is unfortunate that the ENMOD treaty prohibits only the “use” and not the “research” into environmental modification techniques. Since ENMOD it is evident that environmental modification has been researched and at very least tested. To what degree has our climate been effected since ENMOD? The treaty also aims to prohibit the use of any prohibited techniques within a States territory (sourced from the United Nations Treaty): “In particular, each State should enact criminal legislation to outlaw and repress the use of prohibited techniques within its territory and anywhere else under its jurisdiction or control.” The territorial prohibitions are not being adhered to. In the United States there are a number of civilian run weather modification programs and associations which continue to operate, for example “Weather Modification, Inc.” and the “Weather Modification Association”. While in China the “Beijing Weather Modification Office” runs as a unit of the Beijing Meteorological Bureau. The Beijing Weather Modification Office form a part of China’s nationwide weather control effort, believed to be the world’s largest and it employs 37,000 people nationwide. If the ENMOD treaty created a list of phenomena that could result from the use of environmental modification techniques, why are these programs, associations and nationwide weather control efforts continuing to operate? The treaty also states: “Any State with reason to believe that any other State is violating the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations, on the basis of which the Security Council may conduct an inquiry.” Is anyone going to lodge a complaint? If a State was to lodge a complaint, would the Security Council make an inquiry? (Note the wording of the treaty “the Security Council “may” conduct an inquiry”). This treaty was enacted in 1976. Since then, what progress has ENMOD made? Is the United Nations and ENMOD doing the job they are required to do? I think not.

Ive created another post regarding ENMOD. This is a excerpt of the post. The ENMOD Convention is specifically intended to prevent use of the environment as a means of warfare by prohibiting the deliberate manipulation of natural processes in order to protect the environment because these modifications could produce phenomena such as hurricanes, tidal waves or changes in climate. Unfortunately environmental modification can be used outside of conflict without any knowledge its occurrence. Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques – United Nations Treaty (Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977) http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/treaty.pdf The treaty created a list of phenomena that could result from the use of environmental modification techniques (this list is sourced from the United Nations Treaty above): “earthquakes and tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ozone currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer and changes in the state of the ionosphere.” On February 7th 2013, three months after Hurricane Sandy devastated the New York State area, “Colossal Blizzard Nemo” ripped through the same area of the United States. This resulted in heavy snowfall and hurricane force winds. If Sandy was manufactured, could this phenomena be the result of Hurricane Sandy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_2013 As stated in an earlier post, it is unfortunate that the ENMOD treaty prohibits only the “use” and not the “research” into environmental modification techniques. Since ENMOD it is evident that environmental modification has been researched and at very least tested. To what degree has our climate been effected since ENMOD? Has the effect of weather and environmental modification been so severe that the world has decided to impatiently geoengineer and create a Carbon Conspiracy? Are tyrants now taking advantage of these past effects with the use of their own environmental modification techniques? (E.g. Sandy, Evan & Oswald?) The treaty also aims to prohibit the use of any prohibited techniques within a States territory (sourced from the United Nations Treaty): “In particular, each State should enact criminal legislation to outlaw and repress the use of prohibited techniques within its territory and anywhere else under its jurisdiction or control.” The territorial prohibitions are not being adhered to. In the United States there are a number of civilian run weather modification programs and associations which continue to operate, for example “Weather Modification, Inc.” and the “Weather Modification Association”. While in China the “Beijing Weather Modification Office” runs as a unit of the Beijing Meteorological Bureau. The Beijing Weather Modification Office form a part of China’s nationwide weather control effort, believed to be the world’s largest and it employs 37,000 people nationwide. If the ENMOD treaty created a list of phenomena that could result from the use of environmental modification techniques, why are these programs, associations and nationwide weather control efforts continuing to operate? ENMOD was enacted because of Operation Popeye, which was a United States military cloud seeding operation. These civilian run programs do exactly the same thing, seed clouds. What is the difference between civilian based cloud seeding and military based cloud seeding? They both have an impact on climate and the use of both civilian and military based cloud seeding could result in the phenomena listed above. The treaty also states: “Any State with reason to believe that any other State is violating the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations, on the basis of which the Security Council may conduct an inquiry.” Is anyone going to lodge a complaint? If a State was to lodge a complaint, would the Security Council make an inquiry? (Note the wording of the treaty “the Security Council “may” conduct an inquiry”). The United Nations need to be reminded that they are the United Nations. Any breach of a treaty as important as ENMOD should be subject to penalty and punishment by any means necessary.

Notice in your graph of Hurricanes, most of the Hurricanes go east and out to sea, Sandy turned west when it reached New Jersey. That is unusual dont you think? Also note that no Hurricane began in the same place as Sandy, below Cuba. They all started a lot further east or a bit further west. It is improbable that Sandy was weather modification at work, but is it impossible? Why doesnt CNN / BBC / ALJAZEERA ever talk about the effect of weather modification on climate? If news does, it might be some small column in the personal section of your newspaper. How about explaining the effect of weather modification on climate? How about they speak about the Environmental Modification treaty which prohibits the "use" and not the "research"? At what level of technology are we at now with weather modification? We need to expose the effect of weather modification on climate and the capability of weather modfication programs to the world before its too late.

The theory relating to Hurricane Sandy is based on unusual occurrences and weather anomalies which are all sourced on the website provided. Due to the sheer number of these, the occurrences together become very coincidental and theory is formed, you can call it a conspiracy theory if you wish. Maybe I am wrong about Sandy and Evan and I am prepared to bear that, and yes it is not enough evidence to prove this completely, but the coincidental and unusual nature of both storms should at least prompt further scientific research. #1 – Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded. (as measured by diameter with winds spanning 1,100 miles (1,800 km)). #2 – If you look at the topography, when the storm reaches North America it continues to stay the around the same distance away from the coastline. (It is very rare that coastline effects the path of a storm. It seems that coastline had a lot to play in the track of this storm. Note the size of the North American coastline and this sheer distance of coastline that effected Super-storm Sandy). #3 – The storm curves with with the coastline of North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. (Once again, it is very rare that coastline effects the path of a storm, let alone curves with the coastline of a continent). #4 – The storm speeds up just as it heads for New Jersey. (From the start, the storm moved at a steady rate and then just before the major catastrophe of the storm, it speeds up, just before it circles New York City). #5 – The storm moves in a circle around New York City (New York City is the business capital of the United States and the world. New York City would be the most likely place for an attack. United States is where the Twin Towers were destroyed on September 11, 2001). More unusual occurrences and coincidences. #6 – Hurricane Sandy is the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded and it hits late in the hurricane season. (You would think that the largest hurricane ever recorded would hit in peak period). #7 – This hurricane is very far north in comparison to other Atlantic hurricanes. (Most Atlantic hurricanes hit Florida and very rarely go any further. If hurricanes do go any further, they usually head from west to east because the prevailing winds blow that direction. What happened with Hurricane Sandy was the complete opposite). #8 – Sandy had the biggest storm surge ever seen. (The storm surge of Sandy has created some of the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time). #9 – Hurricane Sandy is very fast for a hurricane. (So, Hurricane Sandy is the largest in diameter, its very fast for a hurricane, its not at the right time, its very far north for a hurricane and had the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time. Too many coincidences for me to accept that this storm is a natural creation). #10 – Forecasters labeled Hurricane Sandy “Frankenstorm“… If you remember “Frankenstein” was created, he was not born, he was manufactured. #11 – Hurricane Sandy sped up just before New Jersey, just before the major catastrophe of the storm. It is very coincidental that Hurricane Sandy was dubbed Frankenstorm the same day the National Weather Service predicted the storm would make landfall in New Jersey. I will get to the main point I am getting at and I am trying to make in this thread and I will also verge into the scientific and historical aspect of weather modification. NASA states that “Even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human-produced aerosols, or other factors associated with global change.“ http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/understandingclouds.pdf The United States military used weather modification in the Vietnam War to limit the movement of the enemy. Please refer to the Wikipedia link below. Operation Popeye : Wikipedia This cloud seeing operation ran for five years, resulting in targeted areas seeing an extension of the monsoon period an average of 30 to 45 days. The continuous rainfall slowed down the truck traffic and it was considered relatively successful. This military operation was conducted forty years ago and the calculator on my desk is faster than the computers that existed back then. What can they do with weather modification now? How far have governments advanced in this field? The document by NASA that I have added above talks about the fact that even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds can effect climate. Operation Popeye extended monsoon periods for 45 days. That’s more than just an increase in the abundance of clouds to me, that’s a monsoon. Monsoon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In 1976, one year after the Vietnam War, a treaty was signed in Geneva “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques“. The treaty, as the title infers, prohibits the hostile use of environmental modification techniques. As a result, I find it very difficult to find evidence of the use of weather modification after that date. Note that the the convention prohibits the “use” of environmental modification techniques, not the “research” into these techniques. The problem we have is that it is easy to cheat this prohibition. Weather modification has no source. You know someone is responsible when something gets bombed, but how do we know someone is responsible if a city gets flooded? Weather modification was used in Vietnam and it can be used now. The problem is now, we don’t know who has this technology and we don’t know who is using it.

I have a theory that Hurricane Sandy was manufactured and I would like to share my theory and invite people to read the article provided that explains my theory. I have spent quite a lot of time on this article and my goal is to explain this theory so that anyone could understand it. The foundation of my theory is based on several major coincidences and is backed up by further coincidences. Article #1: Why this website was created?.. "Hurricane Sandy" http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/11/hurricanesandy/ I have also found that Cyclone Evan had a weird and peculiar track and believe that Cyclone Evan might be the work of weather modification also. I have written an article regarding Cyclone Evan also. Article #2: Cyclone Evan has a weird and peculiar track http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/12/cyclone-evan-has-a-weird-and-peculiar-track/ I also have another theory that might cop a lot of flak in the climate change community but I think it should be debated and considered. I believe that the climate is changing because of the use of weather modification. Modifying the weather would in some way effect the balance of our climate. How do we know if weather is being manipulated behind our backs? Is this going on a lot? How can we prove its happening? I believe that governments are using and testing weather modification technology and the general public has no idea. As we all know, countries wish to test the effectiveness and power of their weapons. Weather modification can be used as a weapon also. This theory questions whether carbon emissions are the defining arguments of climate change. The thought of weather modification saddens and angers me and I have also posted another article on my website labeled "Why am I so concerned?" which goes into more detail. Article #3: Why am I so concerned? http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/12/why-am-i-so-concerned/ The United States used weather modification in the Vietnam War to limit the movement of enemy vehicles. I wonder at what stage of advancement in this technology the world is at now. Its been over forty years since the Vietnam War and the calculator on my desk is faster than the computers that existed back then. Unfortunately, we are unable to see the progress of top secret research programs relating to weather modification. I've only started to open my eyes to this recently. I would like other people to be open to the idea also. I'm sure that if we can spend millions researching the effect of carbon emissions, we can spend even a fraction of that researching the effect of weather modification. Please read the articles provided before replying to this post.