Moontanman

No, it is your responsibility to back up your assertions. I would suggest you read the rules of the forum.. Do you really think that link backs up your baseless assertions? I would suggest you list the passages that support your assertions..

I disagree you keep on making all sorts of assertions but so far all the evidence you have presented is nil. I looked up the word and my usage is correct.

That is quite an assertion, I think it needs to be backed up with some evidence...

Eons and Eons? Really? In science an Eon is a billion years so you start your premise out by claiming something that is not true..

Yes but the conditions in Antarctica are far better than the conditions on the Moon or Mars. Yet no one is really interested in homesteading at the south pole... If we do colonise space it makes far more sense to build colonies orbiting the sun in and around the asteroid belt or even in the Kuiper belt. Rotation of cylinders and torus type structures to generate a feeling of gravity. They can be made quite large and cab be moved around the solar system as you wish on very slow time scales. Great video discussing the topic:

A few people being rotated in and out on a regular basis is not a colony...

It would easier to colonise Antarctica than the Moon or Mars...

So you buy into the super being paradigm?

Even if they are extra careful it doesn't answer the question. I would assume a trash dump orbiting in the asteroid belt would be evidence. I would look out in space to find the junk they leave behind. Considering how much energy it takes to move "stuff" from star to star I would imagine lots of things would be left behind. Of course they could drop them into the Sun or Jupiter but just balling them up and leaving them in orbit would be the easiest route. Leaving the stuff in the asteroid belt would be easy and make it difficult to find as well...

Call it Neon Wind...

Hey Jimmy look! Pownies!

At this point I think we need pics...

I am asking you please to do some research someplace besides religion. Your answers and assertions are completely without merit. This doesn't mean there is no god or that your god is not real. It just means that your god cannot be detected by any empirical means. I ask you please to at least watch this short video about genetic information... Science prohibits faith based assertions about reality, you really need to read your homework...

When I was in the hospital I noticed their toilets were much longer than standard...

I ran across this wild idea last night. It reminded me of a post on here about the universe being one huge galaxy shaped at extreme distances...

I don't understand your assertion, in my experience other living creatures have some part of the extraneous stuff you talk about. Humans might have more of it but it is just a matter of degree and not one of type. I would expect a self aware robot to have them as well...

Not to mention deep...

I am going to assume for the moment that you are not simply being disingenuous and really are as ignorant of evolutionary theory as you are of geology, paleontology, and quite evidently reality in general and suggest you go to talkorigins.org at the very least to see just how uninformed you really are. It's bad enough that you dismiss with wave of the hand hundreds of years of peer reviewed scientific inquiry but to suggest the supernatural is on equal or on even higher level of evidentiary support is down right dishonest in the extreme. The supernatural has no empirical evidence of it's existence what so ever. How ever science has a huge advantage over the supernatural... It Works!!! Nothing has ever come from the supernatural, no supernatural claim has ever been shown to be true, at no time has the supernatural ever shown us anything about reality and never has the supernatural shown science to be wrong. If indeed you really care about what is true and your posts so far haven't been nothing but troll drivel I suggest you do some research out side those who think magically and truly believe in faith and touch reality for what it is and not what you want it to be! Nothing but word salad...

Don't forget the water is usually cold too...

I love this woman! Oh hell yeah!

I would propose using air pumps to bring cold nutrient rich deep sea water to the surface, it could be tested at a small scale in a limited area to see what effects it might have...

I understand what you are saying except for the neanderthals brains, they were bigger.

Yes but the man would replace him things the world is 6,000 years old and noah's flood really happened and that the apocalypse is a good thing he just can't wait to happen...

I do not believe because of the total lack of evidence of any gods or goddesses. The Abrahamic god, which is the most popular god concept today, is by the writings supposedly attributed to him a jealous, immoral, and unjust monster. No religion I am aware of has any evidence of the existence of gods or gods...