Jump to content

Moontanman

Senior Members
  • Posts

    12852
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Everything posted by Moontanman

  1. This a classic... god I'm so old... This for Popcornsutton... are you mad? Are you really really mad?
  2. You would actually have to explain the instances of evolution that have been observed both in the lab and in the wild. You would have to explain the genetic evidence that totally follows the fossil evidence as well. You would have to explain any you don't find rabbits in the Cambrian, fossils are not found out of place. Now give me something that supports YEC other than a book... BTW, I would suggest you go to talkorigins.org and see if your "evidence" has already been debunked... On top of all that you have astronomical evidence the universe is 13.7 billion years old, geological evidence the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. YEC doesn't hold water, if you want I can go to the specifics of the bible that are horse feathers as well... So your first post was completely dishonest?
  3. There is no evidence what so ever for young earth creationism, I suggest you go to talkorigins.org most everything has been explained there. If you want to discuss specifics feel free to reply.
  4. The amount of air or oxygen in soils is hugely variable, in swamps it's practically zero, in dry deserts soils are quite porous, being somewhat of an amateur horticulturalist I am intimately acquainted with many different plants from underwater plants to cacti to trees and plants that grow completely with out soil. I can say with some experience that water plants that are provided with oxygenated roots will grow root systems far bigger than their anoxic controls. This is true even with trees...
  5. If you want to see plants that grow with no oxygen around the roots I suggest you visit a swamp, cypress and water tupelo trees to just name two grow in deep mud with so little oxygen they produce hydrogen sulfide, it doesn't keep the trees from growing..
  6. Here is a link to the latest information. http://www.space.com/17628-warp-drive-possible-interstellar-spaceflight.html
  7. I understand NASA is looking into it, I'll try to look up the papers, even if it doesn't work for FTL, which is where the radiation problems come in it would be fantastic to simply explore the solar system, 10% of the speed of light would be quite an improvement..
  8. Yeah I'm a complete nerd...
  9. I'm not sure that electricity is an accurate way to define the exchange of positive ions between neurons.
  10. Of course they can, but that is not really a siphon, it's a pump..
  11. Because siphons do not go "up hill"...
  12. The Q Evolved from lesser beings millions of years ago...
  13. Evidently raw pumpkin is pretty good as well....
  14. Obviously a Demon did this? You do realize you are on a science site... RIGHT.... ? You seem to lack critical thinking, just because you saw something doesn't mean it was real, and when you see something that is impossible it's not necessarily real, your mind can play games on you in many ways. This video attempts to explain critical thinking... I suggest you watch it, the entire series would in fact be a good idea...
  15. There appears to be some disagreement on this, I'm not sure which side to go with... http://www.rense.com/general25/vore.htm
  16. A planet around a dim red star, possibly in orbit of a gas giant around that star might be extraordinarily long lived, orbital resonances might keep the core molten long after the radioactive elements have decayed but while it might be 100,000,000,000 years it would not be forever...
  17. There lots of different hypothesis, the main thing to remember is that bacteria were not the first life, bacteria are advanced life forms, the first life was far more simple that bacteria. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
  18. Still, why would you say they couldn't find enough food, ever been to the tropics? Even where I live in the subtropics vegetation is quite lush. Water is close as the nearest river, just like other large animals they would live near a source of water, lush vegetation is generally near a source of water... As Sam suggested if they are gigantotherms they would eat and drink less than their size would suggest...
  19. I agree, the environment wasn't as different during the time of the dinosaurs as many think. An animal that eats small animals would do so even if the small animals were different than they are used to. I am leaning toward disease being a significant factor as well... It's important to note that many if not all small theropods were covered in feathers, this would seem to indicate they could live in temperate environments as well. Makes the idea of them living in our time a bit more realistic.
  20. I'm not sure what you mean, sources of water? All large animals would need that mammals included, I don't see plants being anymore lush then than now, is there reason to think so?
  21. Coming back from the beach yesterday i saw a statue of a triceratops at a lawn statue place. I want one so bad, about 6' long and 3' tall...

    1. imatfaal

      imatfaal

      Just have it nosing out from some shrubbery so that people don't notice it - at first!

  22. This could be an important development in the UFO phenomena. I can't read the entire article but it looks interesting.. These lights have been both filmed and photographed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.