Jump to content

Moontanman

Senior Members
  • Posts

    12834
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Everything posted by Moontanman

  1. There are schools of thought that UFOs deserve to be investigated not because they might be aliens but because we don't know why they are. Humans seem to tend to want there to be things beyond their keen, something more powerful something more than human, we've been seeing these powerful "things" "gods" Aliens" and other supernatural things since ancient times, are they something of substance or something that speaks volumes about the human psyche.
  2. No doubt, all you non tooth fairy crazies are smug...
  3. If that's what it takes for you then I guess it's what you need but does it justify the billions of dollars that go down the black hole of religion very year due to faith?
  4. Why? Does your faith make you be a good person when in fact you would rather not be? I do not share "faith" in anything supernatural and yet i strive to help my fellow man, improve my society and do no harm to anyone, why can you not do that with no supernatural being to make sure you do so?
  5. Why do you have to have faith in a supernatural being to do that? If you cannot show it then you do not know it.... There is no positive evidence of the existence of a god, gods, or goddesses, in the face of lack of positive evidence the default position is "there are no gods"...
  6. Quite the contrary, both would require positive evidence, what is your point?
  7. Ronald Reagan's opinions on religious faith is no better than any other person deluded into believing faith is something to be proud of...
  8. You do realize that blogs are not evidence of anything but the bloggers opinions? peak oil cannot be shown as the end of our civilization any more than peak lumber can be seen as the end of construction... peak uranium assumes no other type of nuclear power can be used when in fact thorium can not only be used to generate power it can also be used to generate power from the reactor waste we now store...
  9. No i did not... I feel rather strongly we have a language problem here, I think you said we are going to run out of oil and our civilization is time limited by the future lack of oil... is this what you are saying? If so you are ignoring a huge amount of scientific progress like solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, Nuclear, not to mention making oil of of other organic materials and algae... running out of oil is a problem but not an insurmountable one... You are going to have to elaborate on this, i don't understand what you are asserting... And yet I pointed out solutions to that problem in the last paragraph... Again i do not understand what you are asserting here... I suggest you show them... Again that assertion needs to be supported...
  10. Lightning striking something and creating life is not part of real science... You said this The difference is not clear... Ummm while i do not think silicon or silicone life is probable, the reactions are energy deficient but any pseudo organic bonds made from silicone are very stable at high temps... I agree, they are very distant also ran's in this discussion I think... Considering no device has landed on Titan that had the capability to look for any sort of life I can't see why you would say that... I have to agree, at this point we have a data set of 1, no curve can be drawn from one data point...
  11. The irony in that is thick enough to choke a T-Rex....
  12. The technology I am talking about was in 1947 Sam, 65 years Sam, if our government has the technology to do the things the UFOs were sighted doing 1947 the Apollo space program was a waste of time and money... Nothing of course, the bomber was american it was over japan on a low level bombing run the foo fighter feel to the ground in a large explosion and is about as well documented as German foo fighters powered by mercury ion drives... And yet many photos that are thought to be inexplicable are not of blurry ovals... It can try but the leaks always come out...
  13. You need to support this assertion with more than speculations... If you cannot show this to be true, the rest falls completely apart... There is no reason to assume our civilization will fall if we run out of oil, in fact renewable energy can and almost certainly will slowly replace oil. In fact i think it's reasonable to assume our civilization will expand out into the solar system at least and the almost unlimited resources there can and will be used to further our civilization... I do how ever agree that the idea that SETI will be able to eavesdrop on the radio leakage from other civilizations is less than supportable at this time...
  14. isn't that what the Gnostics believe?
  15. Sigh... sadly i have to agree with that...
  16. From "another" forum... Any "female scientists" like to chime in on this?
  17. Michel, I am pretty sure I nailed that in post number #90...
  18. Hmmm... I can think of a criminal who needs to be castrated... does that count?
  19. Talk about "carnal" knowledge of your spouse...
  20. that is weird, it would seem to throw causality out the window...
  21. Such technology always makes it into the public eye, stealth technology once the most super secret technology the US had is now well known the air craft are flying at air shows and stealth technology is much newer than 1947... Foo fighters are puzzling, i addressed them an earlier post and btw a foo fighter was shot down at least once, the report stated in was flying close to a low flying bomber over japan and a gunner shot it and it fell to earth and crashes starting a fire... Like I said, photo analysis can show stuff like that to be fake and if the photo has no frame of reference it is always suspect... Your link has nothing to do with radio telescopes or detecting an alien signal... I thought Roswell was horse feathers at first but the governments series of this is the no kidding truth this time explanation kinda makes the gov look guilty...
  22. This is at best out dated clap trap and at worst intentional obfuscation, which is it? Posted Yesterday, 04:28 PM Again, no one is suggesting anything but protein based life in water and lightning striking a rock is horse feathers... How did i contradict myself here? I did, i don't see it... Straw man, I never said you could create life by throwing random elements together... I said your arguments sounded like a creationist, they deride abiogenesis by saying lightning struck a rock and created life... Obviously so... Actually there are other possibilities, some that are not generally considered arr the organometallic molecules, on very hot worlds with molten silicate surfaces aluminium becomes a possible base for life but there are other possibilities boron born nitrogen polymers Phosphorous nitrogen polymers http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/savvy-scientist/invisible-aliens-theyre-not-life-as-we-know-it-8212-yet/425 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/alternative_forms_of_life.html
  23. I don't understand what you mean, please elaborate...
  24. It's late and I'll get to the other things but the foo fighter piece caught my eye, a well written piece of information and fiction woven together the key to this is the This is nonsense, technobabble, it is the result of believe it or not, Indian religious writings that describe Vimanas ships or machines driven by gods used in warfare between gods. they were said to be powered by rotating rings of mercury in a copper bowl. They were said to be able to strike an offending army with "all the power of the universe" often alluded to in the ancient alien crowd as evidence of both aliens and nuclear warfare in the ancient world... Mix that with a little science in the form of the first ion engines used mercury and you have horse feathers... Fell free to elaborate on that...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.