-
Posts
12852 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Everything posted by Moontanman
-
Does anyone have any idea why you tube videos play better when I access them through SFN?
-
Tunguska come to mind.... The Earth has natural radioactivity, dinosaur bones, for instance, are often radioactive and this has been used to assert that dinosaurs attained intelligence just before their extinction and a nuclear war was the end game of the dinosaurs. But it can also be shown that groundwater containing uranium concentrates in bones and accounts for the radiation. Now which is more likely, a dinosaur nuclear war or ground water depositing uranium in bones? BTW the reason you can't find a reference to the "glass" in india is because the site is in north Africa not India and the site is indeed covered by yellowish glass and the consensus is that a meteor exploded before impact the melted a section of the desert. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_desert_glass Your discovery channel show is confusing an old Indian myth and the reality of glass caused by meteorite impacts in North Africa... Glass associated with a crater... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_glass
-
You do realize that meteors do not necessarily leave craters don't you? They can detonate above ground and the results are very much like a nuclear explosion...
-
Your link proves nothing, in fact it asserts quite a bit but it supports that with nothing but baseless claims...
-
You are mistaken, this forum is not a PM system...
-
You should show some supporting evidence of your claims...
-
You realize we are talking about neutrinos, by what mechanism could the human brain focus neutrinos? The point is that focusing neutrinos is not the same thing as focusing photons... The human brain does receive external energy, it's called chemical energy ie food... Human thoughts are made by the brain, they do not come from an outside source. I see no reason to suggest human thoughts come from an outside source... No, neutrinos are not just a form of light, light is made of photons, photons interact with matter quite readily, neutrinos do not readily interact with matter, in fact they almost never do... Most researchers think neutrinos do have a tiny amount of mass... I want to ask, Why do you think some sort of outside source is needed for thoughts to begin with?
-
So far everything you have asserted has been horse feathers, I have been respectful and offered you links to evidence of your mistakes. You however insist on simply making baseless claims with no evidence what so ever.
-
I suggest you support those assertions with some real evidence not baseless claims...
-
Are there any health benefits for men who undertake semen therapy?
Moontanman replied to Mr Rayon's topic in Biology
dmaiski! dude, if we are going to get this urban legend going you have to stop pointing out the reality of the situation... -
I never suggested that David, please do not put words in my mouth... Mars does have clouds... Care to try again astrology? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/marscld.htm
-
Actually this is not entirely accurate, there are places on Mars that has air pressure high enough for liquid water to exist for short periods of time, the bottom of deep valleys... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_on_Mars
-
No, not true, gravity holds an atmosphere, ozone has nothing to do with it... Again no.... ozone has nothing to do with this...
-
Don't you think it's more proper to say space/time had a beginning rather than just time?
-
No astrology, the ozone layers is a layer of quite rarefied gas, it "contains" nothing but is nothing but a side effect of having an atmosphere that contains oxygen and a Sun that gives off UV rays, the UV rays make the ozone, the ozone is not capable of containing anything... but it does keep most of the UV out... Gravity is what holds our atmosphere in place, not a layer of rarefied gas.
-
No, gravity contains an atmosphere....
-
I've given this some thought.... ok there... I can't see how anyone can say time had a beginning... space-time yes but time is just a measurement and the ideas behind the Ekpyrotic Universe theory suggest that what we call space time is just a small portion of a greater whole... has to be a joke in there someplace... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekpyrotic_universe
-
Astrology, what we have here is a failure to communicate. I am assuming that English is not your first language but even so it is obvious that you have a mistaken idea of what an atmosphere is. Atmosphere is not synonymous with Earth's atmosphere. You seem to be asserting that if the gases surrounding a planet do not match the ones surrounding the Earth then it has no atmosphere, nothing could be further from reality. I suggest you do a little bit of research on google and find out exactly what an atmosphere is...
-
Mars lost most of it's atmosphere due to it's lack of a magnetic field, when the planet cooled, if it ever had a magnetic field, the field shut down and the solar wind tore away most of it's atmosphere. This process has been confirmed by NASA space probes. There is no need to suppose that Mars is moving away from or closer to the sun to explain it's current conditions...
-
In no way does this answer my question or your assertion about ozone or the atmosphere of Mars...
-
Where all the rest of the water had gone?
Moontanman replied to mr.spaceman's topic in Earth Science
It should be noted that water welling out of thermal vents in the mid atlantic and other mid ocean ridges is not from within the earth but is water than has been recycled by geothermal processes. In other words it just circulates around and around.... -
Exactly how does not having an ozone layer mean there is no atmosphere? Earth would be the only known planet with an ozone layer yet many planets have extensive atmospheres. How does that fit with your assertion that Mars has no atmosphere because it has no ozone layer?
-
Why do so many atheists/non-believers wear cross neclaces?
Moontanman replied to Mr Rayon's topic in Religion
Possibly because they think it's pretty? Trendy? Someone they love gave it to them and they feel obligated to wear it? I wear gay pride T-shirts but I'm not gay, I have a denim jacket with the Harley Davidson emblem on it even though I ride Yamahas because someone gave it to me as a present but they didn't understand brand loyalty... BTW who are you to say who is or is not religious? -
Can you give us a link to that? I've never heard of it...
-
Why do so many atheists/non-believers wear cross neclaces?
Moontanman replied to Mr Rayon's topic in Religion
Care to explain why a picture of Madonna wearing a cross is relevant?