Moontanman

I didn't read that as extraterrestrial life being a fact, he said where ever we find life food chains will exist, he didn't make the claim that extraterrestrial life exists but it can be inferred that if it does it would be based on food chains of some type... yes what? prove it...

He is not a liar, he would have to exist to be a liar... Humans are the liars in this endeavor. Still a book of fairy tales, how do you explain all the stuff it gets totally wrong? Even a blind pig finds an occasional acorn, full filled prophecy, how about all the unfulfilled prophecies? If most of your book of fairy tales is not true then why believe any of it? I have and could again make quite a list of stuff the bible got totally wrong, I see no reason to believe due to some vague claims of fore knowledge... I could make dozens of predictions and it's likely some of them would come true, would that mean i am speaking gods word? Sorry not evidence... and if you are honest you know it too... To be honest I do not care if you believe or not i thought you had positive evidence, but you don't, you never did tell me why your god is better than any of the others, Krishna has prophecies that have come true as well and so do all the others.

I am been awake most of my life, you need to wake up, do you think an old man embraces atheism on a whim? if you want to believe, feel free to do so, but do not make positive assertions you cannot back up... Umm what people would I be afraid of?

Are you going to tell me I need my biblical glasses next? You made a positive assertion, read the rules of the forum, either admit you have no evidence of the existence of god or go someplace else, i hear many religious forums are into this mental masturbation stuff... I am 57 years old, i have looked into this stuff, very deeply and carefully, I was aware much of it was horse feathers by the time I was 8 years old, don't be insulting, show some proof or admit you don't have it...

Prove it wrong??? You are making a positive assertion, not me, prove it correct! You said you had positive evidence of the existence of god, was that a lie? Oh and btw, i am well aware of the religious apologetics on you-tube.... Are you aware of all the people who kick their butts routinely?

So all you have is your book of fairy tales? Are you suggesting I haven't read your book of fairy tales, are you suggesting that if i read it I would understand and be converted? Reading your book of fairy tales, many times both as bits and pieces given out as prayer study in church and cover to cover in a real effort to understand is what destroyed any realistic idea that god might exist much less any assertion that he does... It's a crazy book about a psychopathic monster...

No they are the exact same topic... No one has suggested stars are gods, you are making a false claim, liar liar pants on fire... Lack of an explanation is not evidence a god did it... Not but a couple hundred years ago the explanation of lightning was the wrath of god, now we can keep it from striking and we know what causes it, a god did it is never an explanation for anything... No i have no belief in a god or gods... Please answer why you do not believe in the gods i listed...

All those other gods have exactly the same amount of evidence for their existence as yours... horse feathers, nothing more...

No... were you? So do those other gods...

Religion is an absolute lie... made up by men for the benefit of men... to control the people... Tell me promise, do you believe in Lord Krishna? Allah? Zeus? Wotan? Adrianna? If not why not?

Yes i did, read my answer again... your story is just a story, no way to show any of it is actually true and some of it is demonstrably false and altered to suit the people who are telling the story.. evidence talks horse feathers walks... This part is nothing but horse feathers...

I am capable of and willing to show my existence, the fact that i am typing on this key board and sending this message for everyone here to see is far more than any god has ever done... Oh and if the only evidence of Freddy is a 2000 your old story, all of it written far after Freddy's death much of it easily shown to have been falsified or at least changed to suit the people who are telling the story it doesn't sound so good any more does it?

Global Brain??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project

I think rigney has a point in this, while it's true that aether theory has been shown not to be accurate other theories do indeed sound very suggestive that space time and empty space is made of something whether it's the fabric of space time or the virtual particle foam of quantum mechanics, it sounds a lot like hair splitting to me...

I write my wife poetry, once I had a poem I wrote for her carved in a rock and gave it to her....

I've never claimed I don't exist....

My evidence of what? Proselytizing means trying to convert others to your religion... I'd like for you to shut up or show your evidence of gods existence, you are making a positive assertion, show your evidence... You keep this up and you'll be done a lot quicker than you think....

thepromise, learn to use the quote function please, and yes broken minds are sad, you make me cry...

thepromise, didn't you promise to show real evidence of god when you first came here? if so put up or shut up... Proselytizing is not allowed on this forum

njaohnt... pot... kettle... black...

prove it... And the bible says lots of things that are easily shown to be false, like Noah's Ark and genesis but there are many more and all the murder, genocide, rape, child molestation, seriously evil if god is real... Seriously, if i were you I'd stick to the fuel cell despite the obvious fallacy of wanting to make and use something that science created, the very science that proves your holy book is bunk...

I agree with you, advanced civilizations probably have no need for planets and massive stars almost certainly do not have life bearing planets, they simply don't live long enough for it to develop if nothing else and the radiation problems are real. My question is more of a ethical question as opposed to would it be possible, if we knew the star system would be destroyed in a couple million years would it be ethical to terra form and colonize those planets? I can see the argument if complex life already exists then we should leave it alone, I am not so sure bacteria should be protected, I'll check out your link to see if I can add anything to it.

It's highly doubtful that any large mobile complex organism could be an autotroph. They just don't have enough surface area to feed an active metabolism. There is a reason why trees don't move around like tree bread in lord of the rings, photosynthesis just can't provide the energy to allow that to happen. Why would they have to be green? why not purple, red, or brown? we have purple, red, brown yellow and bluegreen autotrophs on the earth already...

Homo erectus became extinct but they left descendants, two of which are Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis, Homo sapiens still exists today but Homo neanderthalensis is also extinct...

Now this is what i meant when I asked you about reason.... It's really an odd attitude, looking at reality through the filter of absolute religious faith...