Jump to content

Moontanman

Senior Members
  • Posts

    12843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Everything posted by Moontanman

  1. The religious fundementalists are on the run, they know they are loosing ground and they..... love it! They have a persecution complex, they want to be persecuted, they think it's what they should expect in the evil end times The feeling of the evil atheist humanists and false religions persecuting them is what the bible teaches them to expect (at least in their interpretation of it) and they believe their fight to oppose it is a holy thing demanded by god and that they alone will escape the horrible end when the rapture gathers them up directly into heaven just as the final conflict between god and the devil takes place. The rest of us get to be killed in horrible ways as the atomic Holocaust is orchestrated by the Devil, in fact the reason they are so supportive of the existence of Israel is intimately connected with the belief that the anti Christ will only come into power after Israel destroys the Muslim mosque that sits on the old Jewish Temple which will bring about the reign of the anti Christ and Armageddon... These people are far more dangerous than most other Christians can conceive of and tolerated because they are after all... you guessed it... Christians Manipulative power hungry politicians like Santorum are using this to take advantage of these people for his own political gains. They are all despicable human beings taking advantage of ignorance instead of trying to do something about it, in fact they rely on the ignorance of these people to survive... All of the republican candidates at least pay lip service to this crock of Horse Feathers, either they are lairs, willfully ignorant or stupid...
  2. I agree but in my case that is not what happened, the DuPont company did not go bust and neither did it's Dacron polyester market, until is started up polyester plants in other countries on the cheap under under different names with the help of our government... At Dupont, it was always far too many chiefs and not enough Indians....
  3. I have to admit some understanding at least of what this guy is talking about, I worked for 25 years for the DuPont corporation, I worked closely with engineers to develop new products new technology and new processes. We were always told to never discuss our work with anyone due to industrial espionage and that we needed to keep our technology secret to protect us from foreign competition. Some fo the stuff I helped develop was so secret the areas were walled off by huge curtains so only certain people had access to them. Once we perfected a great many unique technologies and products that had a high sales potential and wide spread uses DuPont immediately turned around and started up polyester sites in India and China, and sold our plant to a Mexican company. Most people lost their jobs and all of us were left with that greasy anus feeling. Now I commonly see the products i helped develop flooding in from other countries where people work for peanuts and most of the people I worked with spent their lives learning to do things that are no longer needed here but emulated everywhere labor is cheap and ten people can be hired to do the job one of us struggled to do. It ruined my health and left me with that greasy feeling for life... Why did they do it? cheap labor and tax breaks offered by our government.... yeah... that greasy feeling never quite goes away.... and yes, the products i see are often very inferior imitations of what we developed...
  4. What part of "things don't expand as they loose energy" didn't you understand?
  5. Not if your hypothesis is shown to be false, even if you don't get that removing energy from the earth would make it shrink not expand it can be absolutely shown the earth is not expanding, we can measure the size of the earth to very small tolerances and there is no sign of expansion. other testable theories can and do explain the way the continents move and plate tectonics is real and happens, your "idea" cannot be supported by any evidence and is easily shown to be false, in fact as i have pointed out you proceed from an absolutely false notion then build up ever higher piles of false notions to support the original false notion, it's an epic fail....
  6. Rich, you are absolutely wrong, taking energy away from anything makes it shrink not expand your analogy fails from the very start, everything that follows is false as well. Watch this video for clarification or don't and remain ignorant... http://www.youtube.com/user/potholer54#p/u/37/epwg6Od49e8
  7. No, in the United States of America we do not have two ceremonies, you can have a civil ceremony if you want but if you wed in a church there is no civil ceremony. Also I would like to point out that some churches do indeed sanction gay marriage, i have been to several and catered two of them, but the state does not recognize them as legal...
  8. This is not true, in fact the USA grow far more food than we need and we export a great deal to other countries, so this statement is false.
  9. Google is your friend... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_exploration_in_the_Arctic
  10. Rich, did you not bother to read the posts people have spent their time posting to answer your questions? Continents are granite, it is lighter than the basalt of the ocean floors, this basalt is not only under the oceans it is under the continents as well. basalt wells up along mid ocean ridges and spread out as this basalt come to a continent is goes under the granite because it is heavier, this tends to move the continents around. What part of this specifically do you not understand? If you look at a map of the ocean floors you can see the mid oceanic rides where the ocean floor spreads out. As was indicated sometimes the ocean floors do subduct under another part of the ocean floor but most subduction occurs at continental margins mostly due to granite floating on the sea of basalt below. It is not a random process, a map of the sea floor shows this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-ocean_ridge see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
  11. I googled it, all i could come up with is some people experience their penis getting smaller or have erectile dysfunction, no evidence of it causing birth defects. If your wife had taken it then it might have been more likely but try google, the top hits didn't mention anything like you said but such things are often complex and difficult to really pin down the cause.... Did you take any other supplements?
  12. I understand there are exceptions but for the most part my model is a good description of reality... Just like sea ice, a huge ice berg can ride up over sea ice and sea ice can ride up over layers of it's self... In the ocean this process is driven by under water currents on the earth it is driven by moving molten basalt deep in the earth.
  13. The thing to remember is that continental plates are like icebergs floating in the sea... granite bergs floating in a sea of basalt... the molten basalt wells up in the middle of oceans along the mid oceanic ridge, this basalt spreads out and then subducts under the lighter granite continents...
  14. The "middle" of most oceans is where the crust is spreading out from magma being extruded under the ocean. The plates that collide are "floating" on the more dense basalt that underlies the oceans and the tectonic plates... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-oceanic_ridge http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
  15. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=tame-theory-did-bonobos&WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20120125
  16. I understand that but in the book the planets were so close together they were egg shaped with the pointed ends always facing each other and they were so close they shared an atmosphere... they orbited each other in hours...
  17. Is it possible for planets to orbit each other over an extended period of time, i am thinking billions of years, as described by Robert L Forward in his book Roche world? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocheworld
  18. This race to be as extreme as possible seems to have started around the time that the religious right embraced the conservative right, (at best an unholy alliance) at least in my mind it did, i do remember being in public school and being made to stand in a corner because I refused accept Noah's Ark as real. Liberals have stopped the teaching of religion in public schools to a great extent and i think that sort of thing might have pushed the fundamentalist theists into the republican camp. I'm not really sure because I was relatively naive when it came to politics until my mid to late 20's. Fundamentalist theists have the agenda of having their beliefs taught as science or truth but it is only the christian fundamentalists take that is being asserted, no other creation myths are allowed only theirs... Many of them think their religious myths are absolute truth and the myths of other religions are of course false and demonic... More moderate theists are marginalized due to propaganda that counts them as being at best mislead and at worst they are lost souls deceived by the devil and no one wants that label, most moderate theists seem to think that as long as it's Christianity that is being asserted it's ok with them...I remember religion being a very big deal for Reagan's election campaign but it might have been an issue before that era...
  19. I watched the entire video, you start out with a totally false assertion, objects do not contract when you add energy, they expand. A cooling earth would contract not expand. your analogy of a star expanding is also false, a star expands because it begins to fuse helium which cases it to expand because more energy is added not taken away. All else you say fails due to this one fact. It is also a good idea to show that even though the processes of plate tectonics it still making the continents move around the earth and heat energy is still being lost it can be shown the Earth not expanding, we can measure the size of the earth down to minuscule amounts no expansion is shown.
  20. In the USA religion and politics are inextricably intertwined, no conservative could be elected to higher office who thought that evolution is the best answer to the biodiversity we see around us. In fact everyone of the current republican candidates are creationist, or at least claim to be. It's very sad that you have to lie or believe a lie to be in political office... but i guess it's always been that way to some extent...
  21. If it was me I'd go for the most challenging project, it is more likely to give you a higher grade and you will learn more...
  22. Open message to the OP, you say you go to bible college, i am going to assume that means you are religious, your use of the word evolutionist, suggests you are not only religious but a fundamentalist. I wonder how you would react if some one went to a religious forum and asked questions about the beliefs of Creatards? Yes, the term Evolutionist is insulting, so is Darwinist, they both suggest that not only is evolution a religion but that to believe evolution is the best explanation for the biodiversity makes you an atheist and that evolutionism is the religion of atheism. It is not, you are being systematically lied to by the people you are trusting to direct your education. Who, i would like to ask you, is the author of all lies?
  23. The term evolutionist is a term coined by Creationists to make people who ascribe to the theory of evolution seem to be worshiping science instead of god. The Creationist camp declares quite enthusiastically that evolutionism is the religion of atheists or scientists which is generally the same thing in their tiny minds... Sometimes they use the term Darwinists in the same way, they cannot conceive of someone not having a religious belief so they hang those terms on anyone who thinks that evolution is a realistic way to explain biological diversity over deep time. Of course they have picked up a few names of their own, creatards is my favorite...
  24. How do you explain altruistic behaviors in animals, a great many animals from elephants to gophers display very altruistic behaviors, some more pronounced than others but real none the less. Wolves are a good example, even better are the dogs that evolved due to the influences of living near and with humans. There are even examples of cross species altruism, the female gorilla that helped a child that fell into her enclosure, wild dolphins helping a human floundering in the water, or even more spectacular are dolphins that help humans fish and actually cooperate with and help humans of their own free will. Altruism is a part of mammalian behavior... it might be most highly developed in humans, although that is debatable, it certainly exists.
  25. Dinosaurs had respiratory systems like birds, they do not draw air in and right back out like mammals and reptiles do. Air is circulated around and out instead of in and out, it means that oxygen better extracted and CO2 is exhausted. http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/birdrespiration.html
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.