Moontanman

Ok, I'm not trying to be obtuse here, i am really trying to understand. I understand that from the stand point of both twins their own clocks are running at the normal rate. Both see the other as having a distorted time frame. Both see the other as foreshortened, more massive and time slowed. Why is reality the of the twin who is moving the only reality that turns out to be real? it's all relative, neither twin can say who is moving until one of them stops. Why is one reality real the other not?

"Don't Fear the Reaper" is probably their most famous song, lots of good stuff.

Massive Attack is cool, my son turned me on to them. Blue Oyster Cult is good for long slowly changing tracks that keep you drifting.

Well it wouldn't be proper to say on this forum but yes, there is something better than music but it can be enjoyed while listening to music, of any kind even Blues or Jazz...... But I enjoy as I said Heart the best.

If I had to guess I would say chlorine did it. Over time chlorine will erode most white or clear plastics.

The Music of Heart always does it for me, something about Ann Wilson's voice sooths the beast in me !

It would seem there is a real difference in the way chimp muscles and human muscles actually work. http://www.slate.com/id/2212232/

From the point of view of the space ship twin wouldn't it be the earth twin who's time was slowed down? Since from his point of view it would be the rest of the universe that was time dilated?

I have a struggle to understand how relativistic mass is real if the observer that is traveling close to the speed of light sees the rest of the universe as massive and time dilated but the at rest observer sees only the speeding object as time dilated and massive. How can both be correct? also when the fast observer is slowed down only his time dilation proves to be real, the rest of the universe has aged at the same rate it always has. Only the time dilation of the fast observer is real when he slows down.

I think it needs to be said that the wind on Mars contains very little energy when compared to wind on the earth. a 100mph wind on Mars it's a gentle breeze on the earth in terms of energy content. Add that to the losses incurred while beaming this energy to the Earth and you get a strong radio signal but almost no net energy increase.

Every time a thunderstorm blows through I hear his thunder, how could you doubt such a display

Um, why couldn't a Great Dane bitch have puppies by a chihuahua sire?

No, absolutely not. Again no it would not work, you cannot get more energy out of system than you put in, you cannot even break even. Friction will always keep you from even coming close.

First I have to say I think it's possible that aliens are already here, not on the Earth but inside our solar system. If you give any credence to UFO reports (I'm not saying I do but lets assume that reports are real, at least some of them) then you have three basic choices. #1. They have a practical FTL drive for their space craft. In which case all bets are off, we are not playing with a full deck when it come to physics and they can be up to almost anything. #2. They are here but it's a one hit wonder, an exploration craft is here, it was a slow trip and they intended to either colonize or explore. #3. They have been here for millennia, they are part of a colonization effort that is based in space instead of planets. Like artificial colonies and they are only interested in the the resources of the asteroids and comets. They have been spreading from stat to star for tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of years at least. There interest in us is only along the lines of our impact on their operations here.

A more practical use for such technology would be creating plants than have real meat as fruit. Possibly a pod the size of a coconut that contains beef, shrimp, or fish or what ever meat you want.

Lets mix humans and horses and make centaurs!

So one rock that was in space for 16 million years is a deal breaker for you? Bacteria in salt formations many millions of years old have been revived, other bacteria live and grow at temps above 200c a rock could very likely take much less than 16 million years to ride out the trip from mars to the Earth or back. i can think of many life forms that could conceivably survive such a trip. spores of bacteria, spores of ferns, moss, lichens, tardigrades can survive very high temps and dessication for very long periods of time. Even Brine shrimp eggs can with stand vacuum and long periods of dessication. I don't think such a transfer can be ignored, it's likely hood is based on lots of variables many of which are in favor of such a transfer.

Did we read the same link? It's very likely to happen, rocks stay cold inside through the entire ordeal both being launched and reentry, and being inside a rock protects the bacteria or spore or maybe even tardigrades. Most of the objections to life trveling from the Earth to say Mars or vice versa was due to UV radiation but inside a rock UV is no problem.

Can you elaborate on this? I see no reason that finding life on mars would interfere with plans to colonize mars (admittedly I don't thin colonizing planets will ever be a big thing due to it being easier to build free artificial colonies) Life on mars would probably make it more likely we would want to put a base there to study it and a permanent base could be the beginning of a colony.

Are you a student or a parent (think of this as child or adult)? Parent Age:54 How long have you been driving?: 38 years Gender:Male Race: Native American TYPE OF CAR YOU DRIVE:Jeep Year: 1991 Model: Cherokee Make: Laredo Do you text while driving (or waiting at the traffic light)?: If so, how often? (all the time, most of the time, sometimes, rarely) Never Do you talk on the phone while driving (or waiting at the traffic light)?: No If so, how often? (all the time, most of the time, sometimes, rarely) Never Do you listen to music while driving (or waiting at the traffic light)?:Yes If so, how often? (all the time, most of the time, sometimes, rarely) Always Do you eat while driving (or waiting at the traffic light)?: If so, how often? (all the time, most of the time, sometimes, rarely) Sometimes Have you been involved in any accidents while you were driving? Yes If so, how many total (in all the years you have been driving)? 1 While you are driving, how often do you talk to the other passenger in the car? (all the time, most of the time, sometimes, rarely) Always

Actually there is reason to think life could be transfered from one planet to anther through impacts, see this link. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080916-st-space-life.html

I think it needs to be said that until about 40 to 50 thousand years ago humans didn't excel much beyond simple tool making. During the preceding 150,000 years human made the same tools with very little advancement. 50,000 years ago and quite suddenly humans began to make things better, art, tools became more complex in design. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity after this "Great Leap Forward" progress was at a ever faster rate. Until this time progress was much slower. exactly what occurred then is open to debate.

There is fungus that us melanin to convert gamma rays to fuel their metablolism. http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/8564/title/Dark_Power_Pigment_seems_to_put_radiation_to_good_use http://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/major-biological-discoveryinside-the-chernobyl-reactor/

Am impact of the size he is talking about would have been an order of magnitude worse than the impact that contributed to the demise of the Dinosaurs. Such an impact would have devastated the surface of the entire planet, possibly been an extinction event on a scale never before seen.